Perficient Competitors

Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) and Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Facebook has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Perficient and Facebook's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Facebook has higher revenue and earnings than Perficient. Perficient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facebook, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.9% of Perficient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.0% of Facebook shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Perficient shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.1% of Facebook shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Perficient and Facebook, as reported by MarketBeat.

Perficient presently has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Facebook has a consensus price target of $328.5385, indicating a potential upside of 8.99%. Given Facebook's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Facebook is more favorable than Perficient.

Profitability

This table compares Perficient and Facebook's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Facebook beats Perficient on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) and SEA (NYSE:SE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SEA has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Perficient and SEA's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Perficient has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SEA. SEA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perficient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.9% of Perficient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.4% of SEA shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Perficient shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of SEA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Perficient and SEA, as reported by MarketBeat.

Perficient presently has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. SEA has a consensus price target of $204.9167, indicating a potential downside of 20.03%. Given Perficient's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Perficient is more favorable than SEA.

Profitability

This table compares Perficient and SEA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Perficient beats SEA on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) and Equinix (NASDAQ:EQIX) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equinix has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Perficient and Equinix's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Equinix has higher revenue and earnings than Perficient. Equinix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perficient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.9% of Perficient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Equinix shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Perficient shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Equinix shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Perficient and Equinix, as reported by MarketBeat.

Perficient presently has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Equinix has a consensus price target of $827.8947, indicating a potential upside of 14.75%. Given Equinix's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Equinix is more favorable than Perficient.

Profitability

This table compares Perficient and Equinix's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Equinix beats Perficient on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) and Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Perficient and Twitter, as reported by MarketBeat.

Perficient presently has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Twitter has a consensus price target of $68.8462, indicating a potential upside of 4.25%. Given Twitter's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Twitter is more favorable than Perficient.

Risk and Volatility

Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Twitter has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Perficient and Twitter's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Twitter has higher revenue and earnings than Perficient. Twitter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perficient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.9% of Perficient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Twitter shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Perficient shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Twitter shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Perficient and Twitter's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) and Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for eBay and Perficient, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

eBay currently has a consensus price target of $67.4815, indicating a potential upside of 10.61%. Perficient has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given eBay's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe eBay is more favorable than Perficient.

Volatility and Risk

eBay has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares eBay and Perficient's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

eBay has higher revenue and earnings than Perficient. eBay is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perficient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.1% of eBay shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Perficient shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eBay shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Perficient shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares eBay and Perficient's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

eBay beats Perficient on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CoStar Group (NASDAQ:CSGP) and Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for CoStar Group and Perficient, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

CoStar Group currently has a consensus price target of $925.3636, indicating a potential downside of 0.43%. Perficient has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given Perficient's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Perficient is more favorable than CoStar Group.

Volatility and Risk

CoStar Group has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CoStar Group and Perficient's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CoStar Group has higher revenue and earnings than Perficient. Perficient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CoStar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

95.1% of CoStar Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Perficient shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of CoStar Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Perficient shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares CoStar Group and Perficient's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CoStar Group beats Perficient on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.