NASDAQ:PRFT

Perficient Competitors

$64.60
+1.47 (+2.33 %)
(As of 04/23/2021 12:16 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$63.30
Now: $64.60
$64.68
50-Day Range
$55.03
MA: $60.87
$65.08
52-Week Range
$30.32
Now: $64.60
$66.14
Volume2,912 shs
Average Volume266,903 shs
Market Capitalization$2.14 billion
P/E Ratio63.33
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.49

Competitors

Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) Vs. FB, SE, EQIX, TWTR, EBAY, and CSGP

Should you be buying PRFT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "internet software & services" are considered alternatives and competitors to Perficient, including Facebook (FB), SEA (SE), Equinix (EQIX), Twitter (TWTR), eBay (EBAY), and CoStar Group (CSGP).

Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) and Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Facebook has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Perficient and Facebook's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Perficient$565.53 million3.78$37.13 million$1.6638.92
Facebook$70.70 billion12.13$18.49 billion$6.4346.84

Facebook has higher revenue and earnings than Perficient. Perficient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facebook, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.9% of Perficient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.0% of Facebook shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Perficient shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.1% of Facebook shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Perficient and Facebook, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Perficient01602.86
Facebook153612.86

Perficient presently has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Facebook has a consensus price target of $328.5385, indicating a potential upside of 8.99%. Given Facebook's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Facebook is more favorable than Perficient.

Profitability

This table compares Perficient and Facebook's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Perficient5.64%15.08%8.62%
Facebook32.00%23.27%18.12%

Summary

Facebook beats Perficient on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) and SEA (NYSE:SE) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SEA has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Perficient and SEA's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Perficient$565.53 million3.78$37.13 million$1.6638.92
SEA$2.18 billion38.45$-1,462,800,000.00($2.27)-112.67

Perficient has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SEA. SEA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perficient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.9% of Perficient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.4% of SEA shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Perficient shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of SEA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Perficient and SEA, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Perficient01602.86
SEA02802.80

Perficient presently has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. SEA has a consensus price target of $204.9167, indicating a potential downside of 20.03%. Given Perficient's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Perficient is more favorable than SEA.

Profitability

This table compares Perficient and SEA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Perficient5.64%15.08%8.62%
SEA-38.59%-144.79%-22.93%

Summary

Perficient beats SEA on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) and Equinix (NASDAQ:EQIX) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Equinix has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Perficient and Equinix's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Perficient$565.53 million3.78$37.13 million$1.6638.92
Equinix$5.56 billion11.61$507.45 million$22.8131.61

Equinix has higher revenue and earnings than Perficient. Equinix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perficient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.9% of Perficient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Equinix shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Perficient shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Equinix shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Perficient and Equinix, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Perficient01602.86
Equinix021812.95

Perficient presently has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Equinix has a consensus price target of $827.8947, indicating a potential upside of 14.75%. Given Equinix's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Equinix is more favorable than Perficient.

Profitability

This table compares Perficient and Equinix's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Perficient5.64%15.08%8.62%
Equinix7.58%4.62%1.74%

Summary

Equinix beats Perficient on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) and Twitter (NYSE:TWTR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Perficient and Twitter, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Perficient01602.86
Twitter1201602.41

Perficient presently has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Twitter has a consensus price target of $68.8462, indicating a potential upside of 4.25%. Given Twitter's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Twitter is more favorable than Perficient.

Risk and Volatility

Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Twitter has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Perficient and Twitter's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Perficient$565.53 million3.78$37.13 million$1.6638.92
Twitter$3.46 billion15.21$1.47 billion$1.9933.10

Twitter has higher revenue and earnings than Perficient. Twitter is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perficient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

93.9% of Perficient shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.2% of Twitter shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Perficient shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Twitter shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Perficient and Twitter's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Perficient5.64%15.08%8.62%
Twitter-31.70%-12.42%-7.89%

eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY) and Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for eBay and Perficient, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
eBay0141302.48
Perficient01602.86

eBay currently has a consensus price target of $67.4815, indicating a potential upside of 10.61%. Perficient has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given eBay's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe eBay is more favorable than Perficient.

Volatility and Risk

eBay has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares eBay and Perficient's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
eBay$10.80 billion3.84$1.79 billion$2.3226.28
Perficient$565.53 million3.78$37.13 million$1.6638.92

eBay has higher revenue and earnings than Perficient. eBay is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perficient, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.1% of eBay shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Perficient shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of eBay shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Perficient shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares eBay and Perficient's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
eBay50.42%82.73%11.84%
Perficient5.64%15.08%8.62%

Summary

eBay beats Perficient on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CoStar Group (NASDAQ:CSGP) and Perficient (NASDAQ:PRFT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for CoStar Group and Perficient, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CoStar Group001003.00
Perficient01602.86

CoStar Group currently has a consensus price target of $925.3636, indicating a potential downside of 0.43%. Perficient has a consensus price target of $64.60, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given Perficient's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Perficient is more favorable than CoStar Group.

Volatility and Risk

CoStar Group has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Perficient has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CoStar Group and Perficient's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CoStar Group$1.40 billion26.14$314.96 million$9.12101.72
Perficient$565.53 million3.78$37.13 million$1.6638.92

CoStar Group has higher revenue and earnings than Perficient. Perficient is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CoStar Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

95.1% of CoStar Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Perficient shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of CoStar Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Perficient shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares CoStar Group and Perficient's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CoStar Group17.57%7.58%6.05%
Perficient5.64%15.08%8.62%

Summary

CoStar Group beats Perficient on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Perficient Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Facebook logo
FB
Facebook
2.0$301.17+1.5%$844.39 billion$70.70 billion34.30Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
SEA logo
SE
SEA
1.2$255.76+3.6%$80.61 billion$2.18 billion-86.99
Equinix logo
EQIX
Equinix
2.4$721.04+0.4%$64.31 billion$5.56 billion141.38Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Twitter logo
TWTR
Twitter
1.3$65.87+2.4%$51.36 billion$3.46 billion-47.73Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
eBay logo
EBAY
eBay
2.2$60.96+0.4%$41.33 billion$10.80 billion8.48Upcoming Earnings
CoStar Group logo
CSGP
CoStar Group
1.6$927.65+1.6%$36.01 billion$1.40 billion124.52Upcoming Earnings
VeriSign logo
VRSN
VeriSign
1.4$212.18+0.1%$23.95 billion$1.23 billion31.48Earnings Announcement
Insider Selling
News Coverage
Akamai Technologies logo
AKAM
Akamai Technologies
1.6$107.44+1.0%$17.36 billion$2.89 billion31.51News Coverage
Opendoor Technologies logo
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies
1.6$19.15+2.5%$10.79 billionN/A0.00
Angi logo
ANGI
Angi
0.6$16.09+1.5%$7.93 billion$1.33 billion1,610.61
J2 Global logo
JCOM
J2 Global
1.4$121.86+1.3%$5.43 billion$1.37 billion27.51Analyst Downgrade
Envestnet logo
ENV
Envestnet
1.2$73.15+2.1%$3.90 billion$900.13 million-562.69
SPS Commerce logo
SPSC
SPS Commerce
1.5$104.86+0.8%$3.73 billion$279.12 million92.80Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
LivePerson logo
LPSN
LivePerson
1.8$55.07+1.1%$3.69 billion$291.61 million-29.61
Stamps.com logo
STMP
Stamps.com
1.7$202.22+1.4%$3.66 billion$571.85 million25.06Analyst Downgrade
Yelp logo
YELP
Yelp
1.4$40.53+3.1%$2.94 billion$1.01 billion-238.40
Cornerstone OnDemand logo
CSOD
Cornerstone OnDemand
1.9$44.34+1.0%$2.86 billion$576.52 million-86.94Analyst Downgrade
Cimpress logo
CMPR
Cimpress
1.8$95.97+1.5%$2.46 billion$2.48 billion63.14
NIC logo
EGOV
NIC
1.6$34.00+0.0%$2.28 billion$354.20 million37.78Upcoming Earnings
TechTarget logo
TTGT
TechTarget
1.7$75.65+0.8%$2.11 billion$133.96 million120.08Insider Selling
Gap Down
QuinStreet logo
QNST
QuinStreet
2.0$20.32+1.1%$1.07 billion$490.34 million34.44
Brightcove logo
BCOV
Brightcove
1.6$19.42+1.9%$767.13 million$184.46 million-52.49Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
Blucora logo
BCOR
Blucora
2.1$14.81+2.2%$698.98 million$717.95 million-2.57Analyst Downgrade
Unusual Options Activity
Liquidity Services logo
LQDT
Liquidity Services
1.3$18.18+4.0%$609.76 million$205.94 million-165.27
Limelight Networks logo
LLNW
Limelight Networks
1.8$3.54+1.4%$433.23 million$200.63 million-59.00Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
ZIX logo
ZIXI
ZIX
1.9$7.38+1.1%$416.76 million$173.43 million-23.81
Travelzoo logo
TZOO
Travelzoo
1.3$15.27+5.0%$166.74 million$111.41 million-11.75Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gap Down
DHI Group logo
DHX
DHI Group
2.0$3.15+0.3%$165.39 million$149.37 million-5.34
RealNetworks logo
RNWK
RealNetworks
0.8$3.46+5.2%$126.62 million$172.11 million-6.92Gap Down
Marchex logo
MCHX
Marchex
1.8$3.03+4.3%$125.16 million$106.13 million-4.27
Synacor logo
SYNC
Synacor
0.7$2.19+0.0%$87.37 million$121.85 million-7.30
Support.com logo
SPRT
Support.com
0.4$3.65+4.7%$68.41 million$63.33 million121.71Gap Up
This page was last updated on 4/23/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.