S&P 500   3,901.82
DOW   31,535.51
QQQ   323.59
S&P 500   3,901.82
DOW   31,535.51
QQQ   323.59
S&P 500   3,901.82
DOW   31,535.51
QQQ   323.59
S&P 500   3,901.82
DOW   31,535.51
QQQ   323.59
Log in
NASDAQ:SINO

Sino-Global Shipping America Competitors

$5.95
-0.51 (-7.89 %)
(As of 03/1/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$5.90
Now: $5.95
$6.85
50-Day Range
$2.55
MA: $6.14
$11.00
52-Week Range
$1.37
Now: $5.95
$12.28
Volume4.07 million shs
Average Volume3.65 million shs
Market Capitalization$79.19 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.45

Competitors

Sino-Global Shipping America (NASDAQ:SINO) Vs. SB, PWFL, DSX, GPP, HYRE, and NMCI

Should you be buying SINO stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "transportation" are considered alternatives and competitors to Sino-Global Shipping America, including Safe Bulkers (SB), PowerFleet (PWFL), Diana Shipping (DSX), Green Plains Partners (GPP), HyreCar (HYRE), and Navios Maritime Containers (NMCI).

Safe Bulkers (NYSE:SB) and Sino-Global Shipping America (NASDAQ:SINO) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Safe Bulkers and Sino-Global Shipping America's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Safe Bulkers-8.52%-3.64%-1.49%
Sino-Global Shipping America-186.24%-192.42%-98.63%

Volatility and Risk

Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sino-Global Shipping America has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

13.0% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.0% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Safe Bulkers and Sino-Global Shipping America's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safe Bulkers$197.76 million1.47$16.04 million$0.0556.80
Sino-Global Shipping America$6.54 million12.11$-16,450,000.00N/AN/A

Safe Bulkers has higher revenue and earnings than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Safe Bulkers and Sino-Global Shipping America, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Safe Bulkers11202.25
Sino-Global Shipping America0000N/A

Safe Bulkers presently has a consensus price target of $1.6625, indicating a potential downside of 41.46%. Given Safe Bulkers' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Safe Bulkers is more favorable than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Summary

Safe Bulkers beats Sino-Global Shipping America on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sino-Global Shipping America (NASDAQ:SINO) and PowerFleet (NASDAQ:PWFL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Sino-Global Shipping America and PowerFleet, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sino-Global Shipping America0000N/A
PowerFleet01502.83

PowerFleet has a consensus target price of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.90%. Given PowerFleet's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PowerFleet is more favorable than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Volatility & Risk

Sino-Global Shipping America has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PowerFleet has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sino-Global Shipping America and PowerFleet's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sino-Global Shipping America-186.24%-192.42%-98.63%
PowerFleet-8.99%-4.15%-1.54%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sino-Global Shipping America and PowerFleet's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sino-Global Shipping America$6.54 million12.11$-16,450,000.00N/AN/A
PowerFleet$81.92 million3.22$-10,960,000.00($0.12)-70.75

PowerFleet has higher revenue and earnings than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.3% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of PowerFleet shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.0% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.5% of PowerFleet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PowerFleet beats Sino-Global Shipping America on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Diana Shipping (NYSE:DSX) and Sino-Global Shipping America (NASDAQ:SINO) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Diana Shipping and Sino-Global Shipping America, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Diana Shipping11302.40
Sino-Global Shipping America0000N/A

Diana Shipping currently has a consensus price target of $3.76, suggesting a potential upside of 31.01%. Given Diana Shipping's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Diana Shipping is more favorable than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Diana Shipping and Sino-Global Shipping America's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diana Shipping$220.73 million1.19$-10,530,000.00$0.0647.83
Sino-Global Shipping America$6.54 million12.11$-16,450,000.00N/AN/A

Diana Shipping has higher revenue and earnings than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Profitability

This table compares Diana Shipping and Sino-Global Shipping America's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Diana Shipping-78.81%-5.63%-2.81%
Sino-Global Shipping America-186.24%-192.42%-98.63%

Volatility & Risk

Diana Shipping has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sino-Global Shipping America has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

24.7% of Diana Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.0% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Diana Shipping beats Sino-Global Shipping America on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sino-Global Shipping America (NASDAQ:SINO) and Green Plains Partners (NASDAQ:GPP) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.3% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.5% of Green Plains Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 18.0% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Sino-Global Shipping America has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Green Plains Partners has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Sino-Global Shipping America and Green Plains Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sino-Global Shipping America0000N/A
Green Plains Partners00014.00

Green Plains Partners has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.83%. Given Green Plains Partners' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Green Plains Partners is more favorable than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sino-Global Shipping America and Green Plains Partners' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sino-Global Shipping America$6.54 million12.11$-16,450,000.00N/AN/A
Green Plains Partners$82.39 million2.92$41.48 million$1.765.89

Green Plains Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Profitability

This table compares Sino-Global Shipping America and Green Plains Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sino-Global Shipping America-186.24%-192.42%-98.63%
Green Plains Partners49.83%-57.99%38.97%

Summary

Green Plains Partners beats Sino-Global Shipping America on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sino-Global Shipping America (NASDAQ:SINO) and HyreCar (NASDAQ:HYRE) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sino-Global Shipping America and HyreCar's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sino-Global Shipping America$6.54 million12.11$-16,450,000.00N/AN/A
HyreCar$15.90 million14.83$-12,520,000.00($0.89)-13.03

HyreCar has higher revenue and earnings than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.3% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of HyreCar shares are held by institutional investors. 18.0% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.4% of HyreCar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Sino-Global Shipping America has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, HyreCar has a beta of 2.97, meaning that its share price is 197% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sino-Global Shipping America and HyreCar's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sino-Global Shipping America-186.24%-192.42%-98.63%
HyreCar-63.49%-481.90%-160.41%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Sino-Global Shipping America and HyreCar, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sino-Global Shipping America0000N/A
HyreCar01302.75

HyreCar has a consensus target price of $14.8750, suggesting a potential upside of 28.23%. Given HyreCar's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HyreCar is more favorable than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Summary

HyreCar beats Sino-Global Shipping America on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Navios Maritime Containers (NASDAQ:NMCI) and Sino-Global Shipping America (NASDAQ:SINO) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

18.1% of Navios Maritime Containers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.0% of Sino-Global Shipping America shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Navios Maritime Containers and Sino-Global Shipping America, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Navios Maritime Containers0000N/A
Sino-Global Shipping America0000N/A

Volatility & Risk

Navios Maritime Containers has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sino-Global Shipping America has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Navios Maritime Containers and Sino-Global Shipping America's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Navios Maritime Containers$141.53 million1.62$7.51 millionN/AN/A
Sino-Global Shipping America$6.54 million12.11$-16,450,000.00N/AN/A

Navios Maritime Containers has higher revenue and earnings than Sino-Global Shipping America.

Profitability

This table compares Navios Maritime Containers and Sino-Global Shipping America's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Navios Maritime Containers3.54%4.04%1.72%
Sino-Global Shipping America-186.24%-192.42%-98.63%

Summary

Navios Maritime Containers beats Sino-Global Shipping America on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.


Sino-Global Shipping America Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Safe Bulkers logo
SB
Safe Bulkers
0.9$2.84-3.2%$290.03 million$197.76 million-10.52Gap Down
PowerFleet logo
PWFL
PowerFleet
1.3$8.49-7.3%$264.05 million$81.92 million-16.02Earnings Announcement
Gap Down
Diana Shipping logo
DSX
Diana Shipping
1.5$2.87-5.9%$261.72 million$220.73 million-1.70Analyst Report
Green Plains Partners logo
GPP
Green Plains Partners
1.8$10.36-2.2%$240.44 million$82.39 million5.92High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
HyreCar logo
HYRE
HyreCar
1.3$11.60-11.3%$235.85 million$15.90 million-13.18
NMCI
Navios Maritime Containers
0.3$7.05-3.8%$228.74 million$141.53 million54.23Upcoming Earnings
NETI
Scorpio Bulkers
0.0$19.56-1.4%$223.88 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
Scorpio Bulkers logo
SALT
Scorpio Bulkers
1.6$19.56-1.4%$223.88 million$224.58 million-0.79Gap Down
Navios Maritime Partners logo
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners
1.8$18.22-5.6%$209.31 million$219.38 million-2.47Increase in Short Interest
WLFC
Willis Lease Finance
1.2$33.14-2.5%$198.01 million$409.16 million5.72Gap Down
Overseas Shipholding Group logo
OSG
Overseas Shipholding Group
1.0$2.18-0.9%$188.22 million$355.55 million4.74
Seanergy Maritime logo
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime
1.0$1.21-5.8%$185.30 million$86.50 million-0.33Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Capital Product Partners logo
CPLP
Capital Product Partners
1.9$9.72-1.3%$180.07 million$108.37 million6.39Decrease in Short Interest
Tsakos Energy Navigation logo
TNP
Tsakos Energy Navigation
2.2$9.08-1.9%$170.53 million$597.45 million6.88
GasLog Partners logo
GLOP
GasLog Partners
1.5$3.07-1.6%$151.50 million$378.69 million-1.43Gap Down
USD Partners logo
USDP
USD Partners
0.9$5.04-3.8%$137.62 million$113.66 million-5.31Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Pangaea Logistics Solutions logo
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions
1.4$3.04-1.3%$137.00 million$412.20 million38.00
USA Truck logo
USAK
USA Truck
1.3$15.62-11.0%$136.58 million$522.63 million-22.00High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Ardmore Shipping logo
ASC
Ardmore Shipping
2.2$3.80-3.7%$126.26 million$230.04 million8.09News Coverage
PME
Pingtan Marine Enterprise
0.9$1.53-8.5%$121.33 million$89.62 million19.13Increase in Short Interest
Navios Maritime logo
NM
Navios Maritime
0.5$6.65-5.3%$105.60 million$482.45 million-0.39Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
StealthGas logo
GASS
StealthGas
2.1$2.72-2.6%$102.97 million$144.26 million8.00Earnings Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Dynagas LNG Partners logo
DLNG
Dynagas LNG Partners
1.0$2.87-0.3%$102.21 million$130.90 million5.98Increase in Short Interest
SMHI
SEACOR Marine
0.8$4.18-5.3%$97.96 million$201.49 million-1.69Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
TOPS
Top Ships
1.2$2.37-0.8%$94.40 million$66.09 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Martin Midstream Partners logo
MMLP
Martin Midstream Partners
1.2$2.32-3.9%$90.14 million$847.12 million38.67Decrease in Short Interest
Odyssey Marine Exploration logo
OMEX
Odyssey Marine Exploration
0.5$7.32-1.4%$89.36 million$3.10 million-4.95
AIRT
Air T
0.9$26.52-7.4%$76.43 million$236.79 million-21.39Increase in Short Interest
Navios Maritime Acquisition logo
NNA
Navios Maritime Acquisition
1.2$3.83-1.0%$65.50 million$280.12 million1.46Upcoming Earnings
FreightCar America logo
RAIL
FreightCar America
0.9$3.57-4.8%$55.46 million$229.96 million-0.59Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
ANTE
AirNet Technology
0.4$4.22-8.8%$53.03 million$25.95 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
KIQ
Kelso Technologies
0.3$1.09-5.5%$51.42 million$20.55 million18.17Gap Down
Euroseas logo
ESEA
Euroseas
1.6$7.34-2.6%$49.79 million$40.02 million20.97Earnings Announcement
Increase in Short Interest
PATI
Patriot Transportation
0.8$10.37-0.4%$35.01 million$88.71 million148.11Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Pyxis Tankers logo
PXS
Pyxis Tankers
0.7$1.42-12.0%$30.35 million$27.75 million-3.74Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
EDRY
EuroDry
1.3$7.45-1.1%$17.17 million$27.24 million-2.96Increase in Short Interest
CTRM
Castor Maritime
1.2$1.02-2.0%$2.45 million$5.97 million8.50Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
GLBS
Globus Maritime
0.7$5.26-1.1%$337,000.00$15.62 million-0.01Increase in Short Interest
GRIN
Grindrod Shipping
0.7$6.48-5.6%$0.00$331.05 million-5.84Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/2/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.