S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
Log in
NASDAQ:TGA

TransGlobe Energy Competitors

$1.45
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$1.36
Now: $1.45
$1.53
50-Day Range
$1.03
MA: $1.24
$1.58
52-Week Range
$0.30
Now: $1.45
$1.63
Volume371,504 shs
Average Volume560,082 shs
Market Capitalization$105.19 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield4.83%
Beta2.97

Competitors

TransGlobe Energy (NASDAQ:TGA) Vs. BRY, LPI, HESM, TRCH, FLMN, and TTI

Should you be buying TGA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "crude petroleum & natural gas" are considered alternatives and competitors to TransGlobe Energy, including Berry Petroleum (BRY), Laredo Petroleum (LPI), Hess Midstream (HESM), Torchlight Energy Resources (TRCH), Falcon Minerals (FLMN), and TETRA Technologies (TTI).

TransGlobe Energy (NASDAQ:TGA) and Berry Petroleum (NASDAQ:BRY) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares TransGlobe Energy and Berry Petroleum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TransGlobe Energy-47.93%-17.29%-11.53%
Berry Petroleum-35.49%8.20%4.51%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TransGlobe Energy and Berry Petroleum's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TransGlobe Energy$278.93 million0.38$-3,990,000.00N/AN/A
Berry Petroleum$559.41 million0.71$43.54 million$1.353.67

Berry Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than TransGlobe Energy.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

26.2% of TransGlobe Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Berry Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of TransGlobe Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Berry Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for TransGlobe Energy and Berry Petroleum, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TransGlobe Energy00103.00
Berry Petroleum12102.00

Berry Petroleum has a consensus price target of $5.1667, indicating a potential upside of 4.17%. Given Berry Petroleum's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Berry Petroleum is more favorable than TransGlobe Energy.

Volatility & Risk

TransGlobe Energy has a beta of 2.97, meaning that its share price is 197% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Berry Petroleum has a beta of 2.94, meaning that its share price is 194% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Berry Petroleum beats TransGlobe Energy on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Laredo Petroleum (NYSE:LPI) and TransGlobe Energy (NASDAQ:TGA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Laredo Petroleum and TransGlobe Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Laredo Petroleum$837.28 million0.47$-342,460,000.00$14.802.20
TransGlobe Energy$278.93 million0.38$-3,990,000.00N/AN/A

TransGlobe Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Laredo Petroleum.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

59.7% of Laredo Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.2% of TransGlobe Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Laredo Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of TransGlobe Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Laredo Petroleum and TransGlobe Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Laredo Petroleum-111.63%23.92%6.68%
TransGlobe Energy-47.93%-17.29%-11.53%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Laredo Petroleum and TransGlobe Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Laredo Petroleum13402.38
TransGlobe Energy00103.00

Laredo Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $22.50, indicating a potential downside of 30.96%. Given Laredo Petroleum's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Laredo Petroleum is more favorable than TransGlobe Energy.

Volatility and Risk

Laredo Petroleum has a beta of 4.72, meaning that its stock price is 372% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TransGlobe Energy has a beta of 2.97, meaning that its stock price is 197% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Laredo Petroleum beats TransGlobe Energy on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hess Midstream (NYSE:HESM) and TransGlobe Energy (NASDAQ:TGA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Hess Midstream pays an annual dividend of $1.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. TransGlobe Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Hess Midstream pays out 149.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hess Midstream has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Hess Midstream is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Hess Midstream and TransGlobe Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hess Midstream01602.86
TransGlobe Energy00103.00

Hess Midstream presently has a consensus price target of $21.5714, indicating a potential upside of 2.87%. Given Hess Midstream's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hess Midstream is more favorable than TransGlobe Energy.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.2% of Hess Midstream shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.2% of TransGlobe Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of TransGlobe Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Hess Midstream has a beta of 2.33, meaning that its share price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TransGlobe Energy has a beta of 2.97, meaning that its share price is 197% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Hess Midstream and TransGlobe Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hess Midstream3.11%1.65%1.56%
TransGlobe Energy-47.93%-17.29%-11.53%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hess Midstream and TransGlobe Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hess Midstream$848.30 million0.45$70.10 million$1.2017.48
TransGlobe Energy$278.93 million0.38$-3,990,000.00N/AN/A

Hess Midstream has higher revenue and earnings than TransGlobe Energy.

Summary

Hess Midstream beats TransGlobe Energy on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

TransGlobe Energy (NASDAQ:TGA) and Torchlight Energy Resources (NASDAQ:TRCH) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for TransGlobe Energy and Torchlight Energy Resources, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TransGlobe Energy00103.00
Torchlight Energy Resources01002.00

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TransGlobe Energy and Torchlight Energy Resources' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TransGlobe Energy$278.93 million0.38$-3,990,000.00N/AN/A
Torchlight Energy Resources$750,000.00471.56$-9,840,000.00N/AN/A

TransGlobe Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Torchlight Energy Resources.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

26.2% of TransGlobe Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of Torchlight Energy Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of TransGlobe Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Torchlight Energy Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

TransGlobe Energy has a beta of 2.97, suggesting that its share price is 197% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Torchlight Energy Resources has a beta of 2.6, suggesting that its share price is 160% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares TransGlobe Energy and Torchlight Energy Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TransGlobe Energy-47.93%-17.29%-11.53%
Torchlight Energy Resources-4,346.59%-77.14%-32.40%

Summary

TransGlobe Energy beats Torchlight Energy Resources on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

TransGlobe Energy (NASDAQ:TGA) and Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

26.2% of TransGlobe Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of TransGlobe Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for TransGlobe Energy and Falcon Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TransGlobe Energy00103.00
Falcon Minerals03202.40

Falcon Minerals has a consensus target price of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.27%. Given Falcon Minerals' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Falcon Minerals is more favorable than TransGlobe Energy.

Profitability

This table compares TransGlobe Energy and Falcon Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TransGlobe Energy-47.93%-17.29%-11.53%
Falcon Minerals10.72%1.90%1.60%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TransGlobe Energy and Falcon Minerals' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TransGlobe Energy$278.93 million0.38$-3,990,000.00N/AN/A
Falcon Minerals$68.46 million4.97$14.35 million$0.3112.74

Falcon Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TransGlobe Energy.

Dividends

TransGlobe Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Falcon Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Falcon Minerals pays out 96.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Falcon Minerals has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Falcon Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

TransGlobe Energy has a beta of 2.97, indicating that its share price is 197% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its share price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats TransGlobe Energy on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

TETRA Technologies (NYSE:TTI) and TransGlobe Energy (NASDAQ:TGA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for TETRA Technologies and TransGlobe Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TETRA Technologies02202.50
TransGlobe Energy00103.00

TETRA Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $2.0625, suggesting a potential downside of 17.50%. Given TETRA Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TETRA Technologies is more favorable than TransGlobe Energy.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares TETRA Technologies and TransGlobe Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TETRA Technologies$1.04 billion0.30$-147,410,000.00($0.05)-50.00
TransGlobe Energy$278.93 million0.38$-3,990,000.00N/AN/A

TransGlobe Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TETRA Technologies.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

44.2% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.2% of TransGlobe Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of TETRA Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of TransGlobe Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares TETRA Technologies and TransGlobe Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TETRA Technologies-17.78%-11.74%-1.24%
TransGlobe Energy-47.93%-17.29%-11.53%

Risk and Volatility

TETRA Technologies has a beta of 3.36, suggesting that its stock price is 236% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TransGlobe Energy has a beta of 2.97, suggesting that its stock price is 197% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

TETRA Technologies beats TransGlobe Energy on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


TransGlobe Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Berry Petroleum logo
BRY
Berry Petroleum
1.1$4.96flat$396.45 million$559.41 million-1.92Earnings Announcement
Dividend Cut
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
0.9$32.59flat$391.70 million$837.28 million-0.48Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Hess Midstream logo
HESM
Hess Midstream
1.9$20.97flat$378.05 million$848.30 million17.05High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Torchlight Energy Resources logo
TRCH
Torchlight Energy Resources
0.6$2.48flat$353.67 million$750,000.00-12.40Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
FLMN
Falcon Minerals
1.3$3.95flat$340.07 million$68.46 million39.50Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
0.9$2.50flat$314.94 million$1.04 billion-2.14Earnings Announcement
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
VIST
Vista Oil & Gas
0.6$2.70flat$235.72 million$415.98 million-1.76Upcoming Earnings
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.2$14.64flat$222.53 million$471.22 million-1.30
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
0.6$3.28flat$188.46 million$84.52 million-4.37News Coverage
BATL
Battalion Oil
0.3$11.60flat$187.97 millionN/A-1.07Gap Down
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.5$5.01flat$180.00 million$266.85 million-0.34Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
AMPY
Amplify Energy
1.0$2.92flat$109.96 million$275.58 million-0.24News Coverage
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.5$8.00flat$95.50 million$288.63 million-0.30Upcoming Earnings
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
0.6$3.92flat$93.53 million$26.69 million65.34Gap Up
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
0.8$46.80flat$93.32 million$104.82 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
PHX
PHX Minerals
1.4$3.51flat$78.74 million$28.97 million-2.54News Coverage
Gap Down
PermRock Royalty Trust logo
PRT
PermRock Royalty Trust
1.2$5.03flat$61.22 million$10.44 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
VOC Energy Trust logo
VOC
VOC Energy Trust
0.9$2.97flat$50.49 million$9.21 million5.50Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
MV Oil Trust logo
MVO
MV Oil Trust
1.0$4.14flat$47.61 million$12.99 million4.45Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
PVL
Permianville Royalty Trust
0.8$1.41flat$46.53 million$44.96 million6.41Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
HighPoint Resources logo
HPR
HighPoint Resources
1.5$10.08flat$43.39 million$452.66 million-0.04Upcoming Earnings
Abraxas Petroleum logo
AXAS
Abraxas Petroleum
0.8$3.87flat$32.52 million$129.15 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
U.S. Energy logo
USEG
U.S. Energy
0.8$4.67flat$20.81 million$6.57 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
Sundance Energy logo
SNDE
Sundance Energy
0.9$2.46flat$16.92 million$203.58 million-4.24Gap Down
Gulfport Energy logo
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
2.0$0.09flat$13.67 million$1.35 billion0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 2/28/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.