Boingo Wireless Competitors

Silicon Motion Technology (NASDAQ:SIMO) and Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Silicon Motion Technology and Boingo Wireless' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Silicon Motion Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Boingo Wireless. Boingo Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Silicon Motion Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Silicon Motion Technology has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Silicon Motion Technology and Boingo Wireless, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Silicon Motion Technology presently has a consensus price target of $68.25, suggesting a potential upside of 2.72%. Boingo Wireless has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Boingo Wireless' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than Silicon Motion Technology.

Profitability

This table compares Silicon Motion Technology and Boingo Wireless' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

66.7% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Silicon Motion Technology beats Boingo Wireless on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Avaya (NYSE:AVYA) and Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Avaya and Boingo Wireless' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Boingo Wireless has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Avaya. Boingo Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avaya, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Avaya has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Avaya and Boingo Wireless, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Avaya presently has a consensus price target of $29.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.78%. Boingo Wireless has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Boingo Wireless' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than Avaya.

Profitability

This table compares Avaya and Boingo Wireless' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Avaya shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Avaya beats Boingo Wireless on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cohu (NASDAQ:COHU) and Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cohu and Boingo Wireless' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Boingo Wireless has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cohu. Cohu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boingo Wireless, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Cohu has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Cohu and Boingo Wireless, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Cohu presently has a consensus price target of $46.8571, suggesting a potential downside of 3.37%. Boingo Wireless has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Boingo Wireless' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than Cohu.

Profitability

This table compares Cohu and Boingo Wireless' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

84.3% of Cohu shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cohu shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cohu beats Boingo Wireless on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cubic (NYSE:CUB) and Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cubic and Boingo Wireless' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cubic has higher revenue and earnings than Boingo Wireless. Boingo Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cubic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Cubic has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Cubic and Boingo Wireless, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Cubic presently has a consensus price target of $65.20, suggesting a potential downside of 12.86%. Boingo Wireless has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Boingo Wireless' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than Cubic.

Profitability

This table compares Cubic and Boingo Wireless' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Cubic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Boingo Wireless beats Cubic on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Maxar Technologies (NYSE:MAXR) and Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

70.5% of Maxar Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Maxar Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Maxar Technologies and Boingo Wireless' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Maxar Technologies and Boingo Wireless, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Maxar Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $45.10, suggesting a potential upside of 20.59%. Boingo Wireless has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Boingo Wireless' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than Maxar Technologies.

Risk and Volatility

Maxar Technologies has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Maxar Technologies and Boingo Wireless' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Maxar Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Boingo Wireless. Boingo Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maxar Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Maxar Technologies beats Boingo Wireless on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) and NIC (NASDAQ:EGOV) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of NIC shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of NIC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Boingo Wireless and NIC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Boingo Wireless and NIC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Boingo Wireless presently has a consensus target price of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. NIC has a consensus target price of $30.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.19%. Given Boingo Wireless' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than NIC.

Risk & Volatility

Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NIC has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Boingo Wireless and NIC's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

NIC has higher revenue and earnings than Boingo Wireless. Boingo Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NIC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

NIC beats Boingo Wireless on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.