NASDAQ:WIFI

Boingo Wireless Competitors

$13.90
-0.11 (-0.79 %)
(As of 04/12/2021 11:55 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$13.89
Now: $13.90
$13.92
50-Day Range
$11.40
MA: $13.67
$14.26
52-Week Range
$8.69
Now: $13.90
$15.92
Volume12,473 shs
Average Volume977,500 shs
Market Capitalization$621.58 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.08

Competitors

Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) Vs. SIMO, AVYA, COHU, CUB, MAXR, and EGOV

Should you be buying WIFI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "computer and technology" are considered alternatives and competitors to Boingo Wireless, including Silicon Motion Technology (SIMO), Avaya (AVYA), Cohu (COHU), Cubic (CUB), Maxar Technologies (MAXR), and NIC (EGOV).

Silicon Motion Technology (NASDAQ:SIMO) and Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Silicon Motion Technology and Boingo Wireless' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Silicon Motion Technology$457.25 million5.14$64.40 million$1.8236.75
Boingo Wireless$263.79 million2.36$-10,300,000.00($0.23)-60.43

Silicon Motion Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Boingo Wireless. Boingo Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Silicon Motion Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Silicon Motion Technology has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Silicon Motion Technology and Boingo Wireless, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Silicon Motion Technology02602.75
Boingo Wireless04402.50

Silicon Motion Technology presently has a consensus price target of $68.25, suggesting a potential upside of 2.72%. Boingo Wireless has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Boingo Wireless' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than Silicon Motion Technology.

Profitability

This table compares Silicon Motion Technology and Boingo Wireless' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Silicon Motion Technology18.92%18.13%14.40%
Boingo Wireless-6.40%-17.43%-2.43%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

66.7% of Silicon Motion Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Silicon Motion Technology beats Boingo Wireless on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Avaya (NYSE:AVYA) and Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Avaya and Boingo Wireless' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Avaya$2.87 billion0.89$-680,000,000.00$3.289.27
Boingo Wireless$263.79 million2.36$-10,300,000.00($0.23)-60.43

Boingo Wireless has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Avaya. Boingo Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avaya, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Avaya has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Avaya and Boingo Wireless, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Avaya03702.70
Boingo Wireless04402.50

Avaya presently has a consensus price target of $29.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.78%. Boingo Wireless has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Boingo Wireless' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than Avaya.

Profitability

This table compares Avaya and Boingo Wireless' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Avaya-23.67%22.43%1.53%
Boingo Wireless-6.40%-17.43%-2.43%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Avaya shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Avaya beats Boingo Wireless on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cohu (NASDAQ:COHU) and Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cohu and Boingo Wireless' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cohu$583.33 million4.01$-69,700,000.00($0.21)-231.38
Boingo Wireless$263.79 million2.36$-10,300,000.00($0.23)-60.43

Boingo Wireless has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cohu. Cohu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Boingo Wireless, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Cohu has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Cohu and Boingo Wireless, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cohu00603.00
Boingo Wireless04402.50

Cohu presently has a consensus price target of $46.8571, suggesting a potential downside of 3.37%. Boingo Wireless has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Boingo Wireless' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than Cohu.

Profitability

This table compares Cohu and Boingo Wireless' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cohu-7.98%1.57%0.69%
Boingo Wireless-6.40%-17.43%-2.43%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

84.3% of Cohu shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cohu shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cohu beats Boingo Wireless on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cubic (NYSE:CUB) and Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cubic and Boingo Wireless' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cubic$1.48 billion1.61$-3,220,000.00$3.3222.54
Boingo Wireless$263.79 million2.36$-10,300,000.00($0.23)-60.43

Cubic has higher revenue and earnings than Boingo Wireless. Boingo Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cubic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Cubic has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Cubic and Boingo Wireless, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cubic08302.27
Boingo Wireless04402.50

Cubic presently has a consensus price target of $65.20, suggesting a potential downside of 12.86%. Boingo Wireless has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Boingo Wireless' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than Cubic.

Profitability

This table compares Cubic and Boingo Wireless' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cubic-0.26%10.97%4.72%
Boingo Wireless-6.40%-17.43%-2.43%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Cubic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Boingo Wireless beats Cubic on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Maxar Technologies (NYSE:MAXR) and Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

70.5% of Maxar Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Maxar Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Maxar Technologies and Boingo Wireless' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Maxar Technologies23.17%-12.49%-2.18%
Boingo Wireless-6.40%-17.43%-2.43%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Maxar Technologies and Boingo Wireless, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Maxar Technologies04602.60
Boingo Wireless04402.50

Maxar Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $45.10, suggesting a potential upside of 20.59%. Boingo Wireless has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. Given Boingo Wireless' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than Maxar Technologies.

Risk and Volatility

Maxar Technologies has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Maxar Technologies and Boingo Wireless' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Maxar Technologies$1.67 billion1.39$109 million($2.10)-17.86
Boingo Wireless$263.79 million2.36$-10,300,000.00($0.23)-60.43

Maxar Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Boingo Wireless. Boingo Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maxar Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Maxar Technologies beats Boingo Wireless on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Boingo Wireless (NASDAQ:WIFI) and NIC (NASDAQ:EGOV) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.2% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of NIC shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Boingo Wireless shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of NIC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Boingo Wireless and NIC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Boingo Wireless-6.40%-17.43%-2.43%
NIC14.94%23.51%15.34%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Boingo Wireless and NIC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Boingo Wireless04402.50
NIC12012.25

Boingo Wireless presently has a consensus target price of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.30%. NIC has a consensus target price of $30.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.19%. Given Boingo Wireless' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Boingo Wireless is more favorable than NIC.

Risk & Volatility

Boingo Wireless has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NIC has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Boingo Wireless and NIC's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Boingo Wireless$263.79 million2.36$-10,300,000.00($0.23)-60.43
NIC$354.20 million6.44$50.43 million$0.7744.10

NIC has higher revenue and earnings than Boingo Wireless. Boingo Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NIC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

NIC beats Boingo Wireless on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Boingo Wireless Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Silicon Motion Technology logo
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology
2.1$66.88-3.7%$2.44 billion$457.25 million22.52Analyst Report
Avaya logo
AVYA
Avaya
1.3$30.41-4.6%$2.43 billion$2.87 billion-4.16
Cohu logo
COHU
Cohu
1.5$48.59-2.6%$2.40 billion$583.33 million-43.77
Cubic logo
CUB
Cubic
1.4$74.83-0.0%$2.38 billion$1.48 billion-575.62
Maxar Technologies logo
MAXR
Maxar Technologies
2.1$37.51-2.7%$2.37 billion$1.67 billion6.07
NIC logo
EGOV
NIC
1.6$33.96-0.1%$2.28 billion$354.20 million37.73
EchoStar logo
SATS
EchoStar
1.6$24.30-0.2%$2.27 billion$1.89 billion-25.05
Rambus logo
RMBS
Rambus
1.0$20.32-0.2%$2.27 billion$224.03 million-56.44
MicroVision logo
MVIS
MicroVision
0.5$13.16-8.1%$2.24 billion$8.89 million-119.64
Ultra Clean logo
UCTT
Ultra Clean
1.5$54.78-0.5%$2.24 billion$1.07 billion50.72Analyst Report
Telos logo
TLS
Telos
1.7$33.99-1.2%$2.22 billionN/A0.00
InterDigital logo
IDCC
InterDigital
2.3$71.45-0.3%$2.20 billion$318.92 million37.21
Criteo logo
CRTO
Criteo
1.4$37.55-4.3%$2.18 billion$2.26 billion34.77
Baozun logo
BZUN
Baozun
2.1$34.64-1.5%$2.18 billion$1.05 billion43.85
ON24 logo
ONTF
ON24
2.1$44.96-2.6%$2.14 billionN/A0.00
Eventbrite logo
EB
Eventbrite
1.1$22.66-1.4%$2.14 billion$326.80 million-8.99
Talend logo
TLND
Talend
1.2$64.09-1.0%$2.09 billion$247.98 million-27.99News Coverage
Perficient logo
PRFT
Perficient
1.5$63.31-0.8%$2.08 billion$565.53 million62.07
Bottomline Technologies (de) logo
EPAY
Bottomline Technologies (de)
1.7$46.41-0.8%$2.07 billion$442.22 million-257.82News Coverage
TechTarget logo
TTGT
TechTarget
1.5$72.10-0.7%$2.04 billion$133.96 million114.45
NetScout Systems logo
NTCT
NetScout Systems
1.2$28.37-2.0%$2.04 billion$891.82 million94.57
Infinera logo
INFN
Infinera
1.2$9.98-0.7%$2.04 billion$1.30 billion-6.93
Super Micro Computer logo
SMCI
Super Micro Computer
1.6$39.62-0.2%$2.01 billion$3.34 billion25.08Insider Selling
Knowles logo
KN
Knowles
1.5$21.23-0.2%$1.97 billion$854.80 million-530.62
Progress Software logo
PRGS
Progress Software
1.6$45.00-0.5%$1.97 billion$413.30 million25.71
Sumo Logic logo
SUMO
Sumo Logic
1.5$19.14-0.1%$1.97 billionN/A0.00
PROS logo
PRO
PROS
0.9$43.91-0.8%$1.96 billion$250.33 million-24.67
Zuora logo
ZUO
Zuora
1.0$16.12-1.9%$1.96 billion$276.06 million-23.36Insider Selling
Nano Dimension logo
NNDM
Nano Dimension
0.6$7.42-5.4%$1.95 billion$7.07 million-5.34
Blink Charging logo
BLNK
Blink Charging
0.7$41.17-7.1%$1.85 billion$2.76 million-91.49
PAR Technology logo
PAR
PAR Technology
1.3$84.15-0.5%$1.84 billion$187.23 million-51.00Analyst Report
Ping Identity logo
PING
Ping Identity
2.2$22.64-0.7%$1.83 billion$242.90 million-323.43
Materialise logo
MTLS
Materialise
0.8$33.17-4.6%$1.82 billion$220.31 million-414.63
Sapiens International logo
SPNS
Sapiens International
1.7$32.36-0.0%$1.77 billion$325.67 million52.19
OSI Systems logo
OSIS
OSI Systems
1.6$97.17-0.0%$1.75 billion$1.17 billion28.17
Methode Electronics logo
MEI
Methode Electronics
2.0$45.34-0.1%$1.74 billion$1.02 billion13.22
Evolent Health logo
EVH
Evolent Health
1.2$20.20-0.0%$1.74 billion$846.38 million-3.31
Domo logo
DOMO
Domo
1.9$56.06-2.7%$1.72 billion$173.40 million-16.94
SiTime logo
SITM
SiTime
1.6$98.33-1.4%$1.71 billion$84.07 million-142.51
Vuzix logo
VUZI
Vuzix
0.9$27.09-8.0%$1.69 billion$6.67 million-33.86
Ichor logo
ICHR
Ichor
1.7$58.94-1.3%$1.68 billion$620.84 million47.15
Cambium Networks logo
CMBM
Cambium Networks
1.5$63.73-1.9%$1.63 billion$267.03 million236.05
Unisys logo
UIS
Unisys
1.0$24.83-2.8%$1.62 billion$2.95 billion1.70
TTM Technologies logo
TTMI
TTM Technologies
1.2$14.95-0.1%$1.60 billion$2.69 billion9.34
QAD logo
QADA
QAD
1.5$76.01-0.2%$1.58 billion$310.77 million475.09
FARO Technologies logo
FARO
FARO Technologies
1.6$85.64-1.8%$1.57 billion$381.77 million-19.64
Plantronics logo
PLT
Plantronics
1.2$35.19-8.0%$1.57 billion$1.70 billion-1.70
Quotient Technology logo
QUOT
Quotient Technology
1.2$17.24-2.1%$1.56 billion$436.16 million-30.79
Docebo logo
DCBO
Docebo
1.7$47.28-0.9%$1.56 billionN/A0.00
CSG Systems International logo
CSGS
CSG Systems International
1.9$46.26-0.9%$1.54 billion$996.81 million22.03
This page was last updated on 4/12/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.