Xilinx Competitors

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Xilinx (NASDAQ:XLNX) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares NVIDIA and Xilinx's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

65.7% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Xilinx shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of NVIDIA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Xilinx shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

NVIDIA has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xilinx has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for NVIDIA and Xilinx, as provided by MarketBeat.

NVIDIA presently has a consensus price target of $584.1944, indicating a potential upside of 5.51%. Xilinx has a consensus price target of $121.2353, indicating a potential downside of 9.08%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Xilinx.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares NVIDIA and Xilinx's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Xilinx. Xilinx is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

NVIDIA pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Xilinx pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. NVIDIA pays out 13.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Xilinx pays out 45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Xilinx has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Xilinx is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

NVIDIA beats Xilinx on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) and Xilinx (NASDAQ:XLNX) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Intel and Xilinx's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Intel and Xilinx, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Intel currently has a consensus target price of $61.7714, suggesting a potential downside of 1.76%. Xilinx has a consensus target price of $121.2353, suggesting a potential downside of 9.08%. Given Intel's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Intel is more favorable than Xilinx.

Dividends

Intel pays an annual dividend of $1.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Xilinx pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Intel pays out 28.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Xilinx pays out 45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Intel has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Xilinx has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Intel is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

Intel has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xilinx has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

63.3% of Intel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Xilinx shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Intel shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Xilinx shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Intel and Xilinx's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Intel has higher revenue and earnings than Xilinx. Intel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xilinx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Intel beats Xilinx on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) and Xilinx (NASDAQ:XLNX) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Broadcom pays an annual dividend of $14.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Xilinx pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Broadcom pays out 78.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Xilinx pays out 45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Broadcom has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Xilinx has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Broadcom and Xilinx's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Broadcom and Xilinx, as provided by MarketBeat.

Broadcom presently has a consensus price target of $434.8846, indicating a potential downside of 11.17%. Xilinx has a consensus price target of $121.2353, indicating a potential downside of 9.08%. Given Xilinx's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Xilinx is more favorable than Broadcom.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

80.6% of Broadcom shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Xilinx shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Broadcom shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Xilinx shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Broadcom and Xilinx's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Xilinx. Broadcom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xilinx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Broadcom has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xilinx has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Broadcom beats Xilinx on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:TXN) and Xilinx (NASDAQ:XLNX) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Texas Instruments and Xilinx's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.1% of Texas Instruments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Xilinx shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Texas Instruments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Xilinx shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Texas Instruments has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Xilinx has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Texas Instruments pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Xilinx pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Texas Instruments pays out 77.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Xilinx pays out 45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Texas Instruments has increased its dividend for 17 consecutive years and Xilinx has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Texas Instruments is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Texas Instruments and Xilinx, as provided by MarketBeat.

Texas Instruments currently has a consensus target price of $166.5185, indicating a potential downside of 6.28%. Xilinx has a consensus target price of $121.2353, indicating a potential downside of 9.08%. Given Texas Instruments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Texas Instruments is more favorable than Xilinx.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Texas Instruments and Xilinx's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Texas Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Xilinx. Texas Instruments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xilinx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Texas Instruments beats Xilinx on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Xilinx (NASDAQ:XLNX) and Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Xilinx has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Micron Technology has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Xilinx and Micron Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

84.5% of Xilinx shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Micron Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Xilinx shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Micron Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Xilinx and Micron Technology, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Xilinx presently has a consensus price target of $121.2353, suggesting a potential downside of 9.08%. Micron Technology has a consensus price target of $91.1818, suggesting a potential downside of 3.49%. Given Micron Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Micron Technology is more favorable than Xilinx.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Xilinx and Micron Technology's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Micron Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Xilinx. Micron Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xilinx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Xilinx beats Micron Technology on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Xilinx (NASDAQ:XLNX) and Analog Devices (NASDAQ:ADI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

84.5% of Xilinx shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of Analog Devices shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Xilinx shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Xilinx and Analog Devices' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than Xilinx. Analog Devices is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xilinx, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Xilinx has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Analog Devices has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Xilinx pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Analog Devices pays an annual dividend of $2.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Xilinx pays out 45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Analog Devices pays out 56.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Xilinx has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Analog Devices has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Xilinx and Analog Devices' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Xilinx and Analog Devices, as reported by MarketBeat.

Xilinx currently has a consensus target price of $121.2353, suggesting a potential downside of 9.08%. Analog Devices has a consensus target price of $154.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.29%. Given Analog Devices' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Analog Devices is more favorable than Xilinx.

Summary

Analog Devices beats Xilinx on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.