NYSE:AMK

AssetMark Financial Competitors

$22.16
+0.09 (+0.41 %)
(As of 04/21/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$22.01
Now: $22.16
$22.41
50-Day Range
$22.04
MA: $23.25
$24.85
52-Week Range
$20.56
Now: $22.16
$29.45
Volume83,598 shs
Average Volume101,992 shs
Market Capitalization$1.61 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.23

Competitors

AssetMark Financial (NYSE:AMK) Vs. JHG, EVR, LAZ, HLNE, HLI, and AB

Should you be buying AMK stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investment advice" are considered alternatives and competitors to AssetMark Financial, including Janus Henderson Group (JHG), Evercore (EVR), Lazard (LAZ), Hamilton Lane (HLNE), Houlihan Lokey (HLI), and AllianceBernstein (AB).

AssetMark Financial (NYSE:AMK) and Janus Henderson Group (NYSE:JHG) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for AssetMark Financial and Janus Henderson Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AssetMark Financial03202.40
Janus Henderson Group26101.89

AssetMark Financial currently has a consensus price target of $27.80, indicating a potential upside of 25.45%. Janus Henderson Group has a consensus price target of $25.1286, indicating a potential downside of 25.01%. Given AssetMark Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe AssetMark Financial is more favorable than Janus Henderson Group.

Risk and Volatility

AssetMark Financial has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Janus Henderson Group has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

23.5% of AssetMark Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.2% of Janus Henderson Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.3% of AssetMark Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Janus Henderson Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares AssetMark Financial and Janus Henderson Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AssetMark Financial-0.16%2.84%2.03%
Janus Henderson Group3.71%10.41%6.93%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AssetMark Financial and Janus Henderson Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AssetMark Financial$417.94 million3.84$-420,000.00$0.5441.04
Janus Henderson Group$2.19 billion2.63$427.60 million$2.4713.57

Janus Henderson Group has higher revenue and earnings than AssetMark Financial. Janus Henderson Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AssetMark Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Janus Henderson Group beats AssetMark Financial on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

AssetMark Financial (NYSE:AMK) and Evercore (NYSE:EVR) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for AssetMark Financial and Evercore, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AssetMark Financial03202.40
Evercore01713.00

AssetMark Financial currently has a consensus price target of $27.80, indicating a potential upside of 25.45%. Evercore has a consensus price target of $138.7778, indicating a potential upside of 1.05%. Given AssetMark Financial's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe AssetMark Financial is more favorable than Evercore.

Risk and Volatility

AssetMark Financial has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Evercore has a beta of 1.75, meaning that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

23.5% of AssetMark Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Evercore shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.3% of AssetMark Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.8% of Evercore shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares AssetMark Financial and Evercore's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AssetMark Financial-0.16%2.84%2.03%
Evercore11.80%27.11%12.25%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AssetMark Financial and Evercore's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AssetMark Financial$417.94 million3.84$-420,000.00$0.5441.04
Evercore$2.01 billion2.87$297.44 million$7.7017.84

Evercore has higher revenue and earnings than AssetMark Financial. Evercore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AssetMark Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Evercore beats AssetMark Financial on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

AssetMark Financial (NYSE:AMK) and Lazard (NYSE:LAZ) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

23.5% of AssetMark Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.5% of Lazard shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.3% of AssetMark Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Lazard shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

AssetMark Financial has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lazard has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares AssetMark Financial and Lazard's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AssetMark Financial-0.16%2.84%2.03%
Lazard11.62%47.79%6.01%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares AssetMark Financial and Lazard's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AssetMark Financial$417.94 million3.84$-420,000.00$0.5441.04
Lazard$2.67 billion1.82$286.50 million$3.2814.09

Lazard has higher revenue and earnings than AssetMark Financial. Lazard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AssetMark Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for AssetMark Financial and Lazard, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AssetMark Financial03202.40
Lazard14402.33

AssetMark Financial currently has a consensus price target of $27.80, indicating a potential upside of 25.45%. Lazard has a consensus price target of $42.6667, indicating a potential downside of 7.67%. Given AssetMark Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe AssetMark Financial is more favorable than Lazard.

Summary

Lazard beats AssetMark Financial on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

AssetMark Financial (NYSE:AMK) and Hamilton Lane (NASDAQ:HLNE) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.5% of AssetMark Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Hamilton Lane shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of AssetMark Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.6% of Hamilton Lane shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

AssetMark Financial has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hamilton Lane has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares AssetMark Financial and Hamilton Lane's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AssetMark Financial-0.16%2.84%2.03%
Hamilton Lane19.78%44.51%20.35%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AssetMark Financial and Hamilton Lane's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AssetMark Financial$417.94 million3.84$-420,000.00$0.5441.04
Hamilton Lane$274.05 million17.27$60.83 million$2.0144.62

Hamilton Lane has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AssetMark Financial. AssetMark Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hamilton Lane, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for AssetMark Financial and Hamilton Lane, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AssetMark Financial03202.40
Hamilton Lane03202.40

AssetMark Financial presently has a consensus price target of $27.80, indicating a potential upside of 25.45%. Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $87.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.44%. Given AssetMark Financial's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AssetMark Financial is more favorable than Hamilton Lane.

Summary

Hamilton Lane beats AssetMark Financial on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

AssetMark Financial (NYSE:AMK) and Houlihan Lokey (NYSE:HLI) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.5% of AssetMark Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.5% of Houlihan Lokey shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of AssetMark Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.0% of Houlihan Lokey shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

AssetMark Financial has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Houlihan Lokey has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares AssetMark Financial and Houlihan Lokey's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AssetMark Financial-0.16%2.84%2.03%
Houlihan Lokey18.06%19.18%12.48%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AssetMark Financial and Houlihan Lokey's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AssetMark Financial$417.94 million3.84$-420,000.00$0.5441.04
Houlihan Lokey$1.16 billion4.06$183.79 million$3.2021.31

Houlihan Lokey has higher revenue and earnings than AssetMark Financial. Houlihan Lokey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AssetMark Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for AssetMark Financial and Houlihan Lokey, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AssetMark Financial03202.40
Houlihan Lokey24001.67

AssetMark Financial presently has a consensus price target of $27.80, indicating a potential upside of 25.45%. Houlihan Lokey has a consensus price target of $66.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.23%. Given AssetMark Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AssetMark Financial is more favorable than Houlihan Lokey.

Summary

Houlihan Lokey beats AssetMark Financial on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

AssetMark Financial (NYSE:AMK) and AllianceBernstein (NYSE:AB) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.5% of AssetMark Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of AllianceBernstein shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of AssetMark Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of AllianceBernstein shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

AssetMark Financial has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AllianceBernstein has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares AssetMark Financial and AllianceBernstein's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AssetMark Financial-0.16%2.84%2.03%
AllianceBernstein7.33%17.85%17.84%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AssetMark Financial and AllianceBernstein's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AssetMark Financial$417.94 million3.84$-420,000.00$0.5441.04
AllianceBernstein$3.52 billion1.14$238.56 million$2.5216.15

AllianceBernstein has higher revenue and earnings than AssetMark Financial. AllianceBernstein is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AssetMark Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for AssetMark Financial and AllianceBernstein, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AssetMark Financial03202.40
AllianceBernstein05302.38

AssetMark Financial presently has a consensus price target of $27.80, indicating a potential upside of 25.45%. AllianceBernstein has a consensus price target of $36.8750, indicating a potential downside of 9.38%. Given AssetMark Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe AssetMark Financial is more favorable than AllianceBernstein.

Summary

AllianceBernstein beats AssetMark Financial on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


AssetMark Financial Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Janus Henderson Group logo
JHG
Janus Henderson Group
1.9$33.51+2.3%$5.78 billion$2.19 billion76.16
Evercore logo
EVR
Evercore
2.4$137.34+1.2%$5.77 billion$2.01 billion24.61Upcoming Earnings
Lazard logo
LAZ
Lazard
2.4$46.21+1.4%$4.85 billion$2.67 billion18.12Analyst Report
Hamilton Lane logo
HLNE
Hamilton Lane
1.5$89.69+0.5%$4.73 billion$274.05 million46.47Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Houlihan Lokey logo
HLI
Houlihan Lokey
2.1$68.20+1.4%$4.70 billion$1.16 billion22.43News Coverage
AllianceBernstein logo
AB
AllianceBernstein
2.0$40.69+2.0%$4.00 billion$3.52 billion14.74
Artisan Partners Asset Management logo
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management
2.2$54.09+2.1%$3.71 billion$799 million18.40Upcoming Earnings
Moelis & Company logo
MC
Moelis & Company
1.7$55.17+2.4%$3.53 billion$746.53 million43.79Upcoming Earnings
Cohen & Steers logo
CNS
Cohen & Steers
2.1$68.30+2.2%$3.29 billion$410.83 million28.22
Focus Financial Partners logo
FOCS
Focus Financial Partners
1.6$44.14+2.4%$3.17 billion$1.22 billion183.92Analyst Downgrade
StepStone Group logo
STEP
StepStone Group
1.1$32.98+1.2%$3.13 billionN/A0.00
Federated Hermes logo
FHI
Federated Hermes
1.4$30.04+0.6%$2.98 billion$1.33 billion9.72Analyst Downgrade
Noah logo
NOAH
Noah
1.9$41.70+1.3%$2.55 billion$253.09 million19.31
GCM Grosvenor logo
GCMG
GCM Grosvenor
1.6$11.71+1.0%$2.18 billionN/A0.00Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Virtus Investment Partners logo
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
1.7$253.50+2.0%$1.94 billion$563.25 million38.24Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Victory Capital logo
VCTR
Victory Capital
1.6$28.18+0.9%$1.91 billion$612.37 million10.63Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
BrightSphere Investment Group logo
BSIG
BrightSphere Investment Group
2.0$23.12+1.4%$1.84 billion$819.50 million12.43
PJT Partners logo
PJT
PJT Partners
1.9$71.81+2.1%$1.71 billion$717.64 million20.58Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Sculptor Capital Management logo
SCU
Sculptor Capital Management
1.3$21.89+1.2%$1.24 billion$597.35 million-11.00Insider Selling
Pzena Investment Management logo
PZN
Pzena Investment Management
0.9$10.50+1.4%$747.29 million$150.75 million50.00Dividend Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Diamond Hill Investment Group logo
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
1.4$160.71+1.3%$507.84 million$136.62 million13.91Upcoming Earnings
Barings BDC logo
BBDC
Barings BDC
2.2$10.35+0.4%$496.41 million$75.65 million-258.75
Fidus Investment logo
FDUS
Fidus Investment
1.6$16.49+0.3%$402.97 million$77.11 million18.32News Coverage
PUYI
Puyi
0.5$5.04+2.2%$303.73 million$18.33 million0.00
Value Line logo
VALU
Value Line
1.1$31.01+1.6%$296.89 million$40.30 million16.67Dividend Increase
Saratoga Investment logo
SAR
Saratoga Investment
1.6$25.00+0.9%$279.25 million$58.45 million8.65News Coverage
Monroe Capital logo
MRCC
Monroe Capital
1.1$10.70+0.2%$227.95 million$68.19 million-53.50
Silvercrest Asset Management Group logo
SAMG
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
2.3$15.01+0.6%$216.59 million$102.15 million13.40
WHG
Westwood Holdings Group
1.0$16.97+1.4%$143.07 million$84.08 million73.79
StoneCastle Financial logo
BANX
StoneCastle Financial
1.5$19.90+0.2%$130.58 million$16.35 million64.20News Coverage
Manning & Napier logo
MN
Manning & Napier
0.5$7.26+2.2%$124.44 million$136 million40.33Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
U.S. Global Investors logo
GROW
U.S. Global Investors
0.4$7.56+4.1%$113.90 million$4.48 million0.00
Great Elm Capital logo
GECC
Great Elm Capital
1.7$3.33+0.6%$78.28 million$27.04 million-1.37
HNNA
Hennessy Advisors
1.4$9.04+0.1%$66.53 million$33.39 million8.53News Coverage
PHCF
Puhui Wealth Investment Management
0.4$3.99+2.5%$45.92 million$2.18 million0.00
Medley Management logo
MDLY
Medley Management
0.5$4.67+5.4%$3.13 million$48.84 million-0.58Insider Selling
This page was last updated on 4/21/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.