S&P 500   3,831.70 (+0.06%)
DOW   31,063.14 (-1.08%)
QQQ   314.93 (+0.67%)
AAPL   122.80 (+1.50%)
MSFT   233.03 (+1.76%)
FB   262.09 (+2.91%)
GOOGL   2,026.49 (+0.52%)
AMZN   3,071.54 (+0.47%)
TSLA   672.48 (-1.43%)
NVDA   545.85 (+2.55%)
BABA   239.76 (-0.17%)
CGC   32.42 (-2.38%)
GE   12.63 (-1.02%)
MU   91.20 (+3.50%)
NIO   46.10 (-1.52%)
AMD   84.02 (+1.94%)
T   28.00 (-2.20%)
F   11.72 (-0.34%)
ACB   10.65 (-1.57%)
DIS   189.03 (-1.02%)
BA   211.68 (-2.20%)
NFLX   540.54 (-1.13%)
BAC   34.94 (-2.76%)
S&P 500   3,831.70 (+0.06%)
DOW   31,063.14 (-1.08%)
QQQ   314.93 (+0.67%)
AAPL   122.80 (+1.50%)
MSFT   233.03 (+1.76%)
FB   262.09 (+2.91%)
GOOGL   2,026.49 (+0.52%)
AMZN   3,071.54 (+0.47%)
TSLA   672.48 (-1.43%)
NVDA   545.85 (+2.55%)
BABA   239.76 (-0.17%)
CGC   32.42 (-2.38%)
GE   12.63 (-1.02%)
MU   91.20 (+3.50%)
NIO   46.10 (-1.52%)
AMD   84.02 (+1.94%)
T   28.00 (-2.20%)
F   11.72 (-0.34%)
ACB   10.65 (-1.57%)
DIS   189.03 (-1.02%)
BA   211.68 (-2.20%)
NFLX   540.54 (-1.13%)
BAC   34.94 (-2.76%)
S&P 500   3,831.70 (+0.06%)
DOW   31,063.14 (-1.08%)
QQQ   314.93 (+0.67%)
AAPL   122.80 (+1.50%)
MSFT   233.03 (+1.76%)
FB   262.09 (+2.91%)
GOOGL   2,026.49 (+0.52%)
AMZN   3,071.54 (+0.47%)
TSLA   672.48 (-1.43%)
NVDA   545.85 (+2.55%)
BABA   239.76 (-0.17%)
CGC   32.42 (-2.38%)
GE   12.63 (-1.02%)
MU   91.20 (+3.50%)
NIO   46.10 (-1.52%)
AMD   84.02 (+1.94%)
T   28.00 (-2.20%)
F   11.72 (-0.34%)
ACB   10.65 (-1.57%)
DIS   189.03 (-1.02%)
BA   211.68 (-2.20%)
NFLX   540.54 (-1.13%)
BAC   34.94 (-2.76%)
S&P 500   3,831.70 (+0.06%)
DOW   31,063.14 (-1.08%)
QQQ   314.93 (+0.67%)
AAPL   122.80 (+1.50%)
MSFT   233.03 (+1.76%)
FB   262.09 (+2.91%)
GOOGL   2,026.49 (+0.52%)
AMZN   3,071.54 (+0.47%)
TSLA   672.48 (-1.43%)
NVDA   545.85 (+2.55%)
BABA   239.76 (-0.17%)
CGC   32.42 (-2.38%)
GE   12.63 (-1.02%)
MU   91.20 (+3.50%)
NIO   46.10 (-1.52%)
AMD   84.02 (+1.94%)
T   28.00 (-2.20%)
F   11.72 (-0.34%)
ACB   10.65 (-1.57%)
DIS   189.03 (-1.02%)
BA   211.68 (-2.20%)
NFLX   540.54 (-1.13%)
BAC   34.94 (-2.76%)
Log in
NYSE:AUY

Yamana Gold Competitors

$4.03
-0.23 (-5.40 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 02:21 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$4.01
Now: $4.03
$4.26
50-Day Range
$4.40
MA: $4.95
$5.88
52-Week Range
$2.23
Now: $4.03
$7.02
Volume1.23 million shs
Average Volume17.32 million shs
Market Capitalization$3.89 billion
P/E Ratio31.00
Dividend Yield2.22%
Beta1.4

Competitors

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) Vs. AEM, SBSW, KL, AU, KGC, and GFI

Should you be buying AUY stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "gold & silver ores" are considered alternatives and competitors to Yamana Gold, including Agnico Eagle Mines (AEM), Sibanye Stillwater (SBSW), Kirkland Lake Gold (KL), AngloGold Ashanti (AU), Kinross Gold (KGC), and Gold Fields (GFI).

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold$1.61 billion2.41$225.60 million$0.1331.00
Agnico Eagle Mines$2.49 billion5.47$473.17 million$0.9757.78

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Yamana Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yamana Gold04802.67
Agnico Eagle Mines03702.70

Yamana Gold presently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $87.6250, indicating a potential upside of 56.11%. Given Yamana Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yamana Gold7.77%5.42%3.19%
Agnico Eagle Mines21.54%7.22%4.10%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 144.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yamana Gold has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Agnico Eagle Mines has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Yamana Gold on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and Sibanye Stillwater's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold$1.61 billion2.41$225.60 million$0.1331.00
Sibanye Stillwater$5.04 billion2.67$4.30 million$0.011,843.00

Yamana Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sibanye Stillwater. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sibanye Stillwater, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Yamana Gold and Sibanye Stillwater, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yamana Gold04802.67
Sibanye Stillwater00403.00

Yamana Gold presently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.08%. Given Yamana Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than Sibanye Stillwater.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Sibanye Stillwater's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yamana Gold7.77%5.42%3.19%
Sibanye StillwaterN/AN/AN/A

Institutional and Insider Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sibanye Stillwater pays out 1,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yamana Gold has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Sibanye Stillwater has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Yamana Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Yamana Gold beats Sibanye Stillwater on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold$1.61 billion2.41$225.60 million$0.1331.00
Kirkland Lake Gold$1.38 billion6.35$560.08 million$2.7411.97

Kirkland Lake Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Yamana Gold. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yamana Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yamana Gold has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Kirkland Lake Gold has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Yamana Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yamana Gold04802.67
Kirkland Lake Gold10902.80

Yamana Gold presently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus price target of $69.6250, indicating a potential upside of 111.50%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Yamana Gold.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yamana Gold7.77%5.42%3.19%
Kirkland Lake Gold33.21%21.03%15.33%

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Yamana Gold on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.6% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and AngloGold Ashanti's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold$1.61 billion2.41$225.60 million$0.1331.00
AngloGold Ashanti$3.53 billion2.36$-12,000,000.00$0.9122.01

Yamana Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AngloGold Ashanti. AngloGold Ashanti is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yamana Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. AngloGold Ashanti pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. AngloGold Ashanti pays out 8.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yamana Gold has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Yamana Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Yamana Gold and AngloGold Ashanti, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yamana Gold04802.67
AngloGold Ashanti03402.57

Yamana Gold currently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. AngloGold Ashanti has a consensus price target of $33.8225, indicating a potential upside of 67.60%. Given Yamana Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than AngloGold Ashanti.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and AngloGold Ashanti's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yamana Gold7.77%5.42%3.19%
AngloGold AshantiN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Yamana Gold beats AngloGold Ashanti on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.6% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and Kinross Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold$1.61 billion2.41$225.60 million$0.1331.00
Kinross Gold$3.50 billion2.23$718.60 million$0.3418.26

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Yamana Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yamana Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinross Gold pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yamana Gold has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Kinross Gold has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Yamana Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Yamana Gold and Kinross Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yamana Gold04802.67
Kinross Gold02912.92

Yamana Gold currently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $11.7955, indicating a potential upside of 88.73%. Given Yamana Gold's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Kinross Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yamana Gold7.77%5.42%3.19%
Kinross Gold26.92%14.20%8.02%

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Yamana Gold on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Gold Fields' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yamana Gold7.77%5.42%3.19%
Gold FieldsN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Yamana Gold and Gold Fields, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yamana Gold04802.67
Gold Fields03302.50

Yamana Gold currently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $13.1375, indicating a potential upside of 59.82%. Given Yamana Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gold Fields pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yamana Gold has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Gold Fields has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.4% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and Gold Fields' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yamana Gold$1.61 billion2.41$225.60 million$0.1331.00
Gold Fields$2.97 billion2.44$161.60 million$0.4219.52

Yamana Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gold Fields. Gold Fields is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yamana Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Yamana Gold beats Gold Fields on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


Yamana Gold Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Agnico Eagle Mines logo
AEM
Agnico Eagle Mines
2.4$56.05-4.8%$14.30 billion$2.49 billion21.31Analyst Report
Sibanye Stillwater logo
SBSW
Sibanye Stillwater
2.0$18.43-4.2%$14.04 billion$5.04 billion1,843.00Dividend Cut
Kirkland Lake Gold logo
KL
Kirkland Lake Gold
2.6$32.80-5.4%$9.23 billion$1.38 billion11.55Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
AngloGold Ashanti logo
AU
AngloGold Ashanti
2.3$20.03-3.1%$8.57 billion$3.53 billion22.01Dividend Increase
Analyst Upgrade
Kinross Gold logo
KGC
Kinross Gold
2.6$6.21-6.0%$8.28 billion$3.50 billion7.31
Gold Fields logo
GFI
Gold Fields
2.4$8.20-3.7%$7.51 billion$2.97 billion19.52Dividend Increase
Analyst Upgrade
Pan American Silver logo
PAAS
Pan American Silver
1.8$33.09-7.1%$7.45 billion$1.35 billion114.11Gap Up
First Majestic Silver logo
AG
First Majestic Silver
1.1$18.04-5.0%$4.22 billion$363.94 million-72.16Analyst Revision
Gap Up
Alamos Gold logo
AGI
Alamos Gold
2.5$7.07-7.2%$2.98 billion$683.10 million26.19Earnings Announcement
Coeur Mining logo
CDE
Coeur Mining
1.3$9.08-6.8%$2.36 billion$711.50 million-8.41Analyst Upgrade
Gap Up
Harmony Gold Mining logo
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining
0.9$3.78-3.7%$2.12 billion$2.02 billion-37.80
Eldorado Gold logo
EGO
Eldorado Gold
2.0$10.47-10.6%$2.03 billion$617.80 million10.17Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Osisko Gold Royalties logo
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties
2.4$9.94-4.2%$1.73 billion$295.86 million-13.43Analyst Report
News Coverage
Fortuna Silver Mines logo
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines
1.2$7.48-6.4%$1.47 billion$257.19 million57.54Gap Up
IAMGOLD logo
IAG
IAMGOLD
1.9$2.92-5.1%$1.46 billion$1.07 billion-3.65
Seabridge Gold logo
SA
Seabridge Gold
1.2$17.15-4.9%$1.33 billionN/A-245.00
Sandstorm Gold logo
SAND
Sandstorm Gold
2.1$6.03-5.8%$1.24 billion$89.43 million150.79
Endeavour Silver logo
EXK
Endeavour Silver
1.2$5.91-8.3%$1.02 billion$121.72 million-22.73Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
MMX
Maverix Metals
1.7$4.83-3.7%$703.70 million$33.24 million96.60Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Announcement
DRDGOLD logo
DRD
DRDGOLD
1.7$9.14-1.2%$635.38 million$269.51 million17.58Dividend Increase
McEwen Mining logo
MUX
McEwen Mining
1.4$1.11-2.3%$484.88 million$117.02 million-2.83
HYMC
Hycroft Mining
1.8$6.90-1.9%$419.99 millionN/A0.00
KOR
Corvus Gold
0.1$1.92-4.2%$253.29 millionN/A-14.77Gap Up
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.4$1.37-5.1%$169.67 millionN/A-12.02
FURY
Fury Gold Mines
1.7$1.37-5.1%$169.67 millionN/A-12.02
CHNR
China Natural Resources
0.4$2.00-6.0%$52.81 million$1.86 million0.00
This page was last updated on 2/26/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.