Yamana Gold Competitors

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Agnico Eagle Mines has higher revenue and earnings than Yamana Gold. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agnico Eagle Mines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Agnico Eagle Mines has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Yamana Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines, as reported by MarketBeat.

Yamana Gold presently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. Agnico Eagle Mines has a consensus price target of $87.6250, indicating a potential upside of 56.11%. Given Yamana Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than Agnico Eagle Mines.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Agnico Eagle Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.6% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Agnico Eagle Mines shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Agnico Eagle Mines pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Agnico Eagle Mines pays out 144.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yamana Gold has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Agnico Eagle Mines has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Agnico Eagle Mines beats Yamana Gold on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Sibanye Stillwater (NYSE:SBSW) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and Sibanye Stillwater's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Yamana Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Sibanye Stillwater. Yamana Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sibanye Stillwater, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sibanye Stillwater has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Yamana Gold and Sibanye Stillwater, as reported by MarketBeat.

Yamana Gold presently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. Sibanye Stillwater has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.08%. Given Yamana Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than Sibanye Stillwater.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Sibanye Stillwater's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Sibanye Stillwater shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Sibanye Stillwater pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sibanye Stillwater pays out 1,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yamana Gold has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Sibanye Stillwater has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Yamana Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Yamana Gold beats Sibanye Stillwater on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Kirkland Lake Gold (NYSE:KL) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of Kirkland Lake Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kirkland Lake Gold has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kirkland Lake Gold has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Yamana Gold. Kirkland Lake Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yamana Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Kirkland Lake Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kirkland Lake Gold pays out 27.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yamana Gold has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Kirkland Lake Gold has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Yamana Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.

Yamana Gold presently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. Kirkland Lake Gold has a consensus price target of $69.6250, indicating a potential upside of 111.50%. Given Kirkland Lake Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kirkland Lake Gold is more favorable than Yamana Gold.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Kirkland Lake Gold beats Yamana Gold on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and AngloGold Ashanti (NYSE:AU) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.6% of AngloGold Ashanti shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AngloGold Ashanti has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and AngloGold Ashanti's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Yamana Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AngloGold Ashanti. AngloGold Ashanti is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yamana Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. AngloGold Ashanti pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. AngloGold Ashanti pays out 8.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yamana Gold has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Yamana Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Yamana Gold and AngloGold Ashanti, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Yamana Gold currently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. AngloGold Ashanti has a consensus price target of $33.8225, indicating a potential upside of 67.60%. Given Yamana Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than AngloGold Ashanti.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and AngloGold Ashanti's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Yamana Gold beats AngloGold Ashanti on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Kinross Gold (NYSE:KGC) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.6% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Kinross Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kinross Gold has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and Kinross Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kinross Gold has higher revenue and earnings than Yamana Gold. Kinross Gold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yamana Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Kinross Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kinross Gold pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yamana Gold has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Kinross Gold has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Yamana Gold is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Yamana Gold and Kinross Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Yamana Gold currently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. Kinross Gold has a consensus price target of $11.7955, indicating a potential upside of 88.73%. Given Yamana Gold's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than Kinross Gold.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Kinross Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Kinross Gold beats Yamana Gold on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yamana Gold (NYSE:AUY) and Gold Fields (NYSE:GFI) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Yamana Gold and Gold Fields' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Yamana Gold and Gold Fields, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Yamana Gold currently has a consensus price target of $7.87, indicating a potential upside of 93.84%. Gold Fields has a consensus price target of $13.1375, indicating a potential upside of 59.82%. Given Yamana Gold's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Yamana Gold is more favorable than Gold Fields.

Dividends

Yamana Gold pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Gold Fields pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Yamana Gold pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gold Fields pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yamana Gold has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Gold Fields has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Yamana Gold has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gold Fields has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

45.0% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.4% of Gold Fields shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Yamana Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yamana Gold and Gold Fields' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Yamana Gold has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gold Fields. Gold Fields is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yamana Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Yamana Gold beats Gold Fields on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.