Cellcom Israel Competitors

T-Mobile US (NASDAQ:TMUS) and Cellcom Israel (NYSE:CEL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares T-Mobile US and Cellcom Israel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares T-Mobile US and Cellcom Israel's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

T-Mobile US has higher revenue and earnings than Cellcom Israel.

Risk and Volatility

T-Mobile US has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cellcom Israel has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

58.5% of T-Mobile US shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.1% of Cellcom Israel shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of T-Mobile US shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for T-Mobile US and Cellcom Israel, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

T-Mobile US currently has a consensus price target of $141.7083, indicating a potential upside of 19.52%. Given T-Mobile US's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe T-Mobile US is more favorable than Cellcom Israel.

Summary

T-Mobile US beats Cellcom Israel on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Vodafone Group (NASDAQ:VOD) and Cellcom Israel (NYSE:CEL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Vodafone Group and Cellcom Israel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Vodafone Group and Cellcom Israel's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cellcom Israel has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vodafone Group.

Volatility and Risk

Vodafone Group has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cellcom Israel has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

8.3% of Vodafone Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.1% of Cellcom Israel shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Vodafone Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Vodafone Group and Cellcom Israel, as reported by MarketBeat.

Vodafone Group presently has a consensus price target of $16.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.68%. Given Vodafone Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Vodafone Group is more favorable than Cellcom Israel.

Summary

Vodafone Group beats Cellcom Israel on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Chunghwa Telecom (NYSE:CHT) and Cellcom Israel (NYSE:CEL) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Chunghwa Telecom and Cellcom Israel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Chunghwa Telecom and Cellcom Israel's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Chunghwa Telecom has higher revenue and earnings than Cellcom Israel.

Volatility and Risk

Chunghwa Telecom has a beta of 0.06, meaning that its stock price is 94% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cellcom Israel has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.8% of Chunghwa Telecom shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.1% of Cellcom Israel shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Chunghwa Telecom shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Chunghwa Telecom and Cellcom Israel, as reported by MarketBeat.

Summary

Chunghwa Telecom beats Cellcom Israel on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

TELUS (NYSE:TU) and Cellcom Israel (NYSE:CEL) are both utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares TELUS and Cellcom Israel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares TELUS and Cellcom Israel's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

TELUS has higher revenue and earnings than Cellcom Israel.

Volatility and Risk

TELUS has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cellcom Israel has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

49.5% of TELUS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.1% of Cellcom Israel shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for TELUS and Cellcom Israel, as reported by MarketBeat.

TELUS presently has a consensus price target of $29.1250, indicating a potential upside of 42.28%. Given TELUS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe TELUS is more favorable than Cellcom Israel.

Summary

TELUS beats Cellcom Israel on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Unicom (Hong Kong) (NYSE:CHU) and Cellcom Israel (NYSE:CEL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Profitability

This table compares China Unicom (Hong Kong) and Cellcom Israel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

China Unicom (Hong Kong) has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cellcom Israel has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares China Unicom (Hong Kong) and Cellcom Israel's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

China Unicom (Hong Kong) has higher revenue and earnings than Cellcom Israel.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.9% of China Unicom (Hong Kong) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.1% of Cellcom Israel shares are held by institutional investors. 77.5% of China Unicom (Hong Kong) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for China Unicom (Hong Kong) and Cellcom Israel, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

China Unicom (Hong Kong) beats Cellcom Israel on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (NYSE:SKM) and Cellcom Israel (NYSE:CEL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

8.1% of SK Telecom Co.,Ltd shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.1% of Cellcom Israel shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of SK Telecom Co.,Ltd shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SK Telecom Co.,Ltd and Cellcom Israel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

SK Telecom Co.,Ltd has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cellcom Israel has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for SK Telecom Co.,Ltd and Cellcom Israel, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares SK Telecom Co.,Ltd and Cellcom Israel's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SK Telecom Co.,Ltd has higher revenue and earnings than Cellcom Israel.

Summary

SK Telecom Co.,Ltd beats Cellcom Israel on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.