S&P 500   4,272.12 (-1.51%)
DOW   33,593.94 (-1.21%)
QQQ   354.37 (-1.46%)
AAPL   172.39 (-2.10%)
MSFT   311.06 (-2.04%)
META   298.51 (-0.77%)
GOOGL   128.32 (-2.13%)
AMZN   126.35 (-3.75%)
TSLA   244.05 (-1.19%)
NVDA   421.02 (-0.28%)
NIO   8.45 (+1.20%)
BABA   85.77 (-1.66%)
AMD   96.04 (-1.38%)
T   15.01 (-0.33%)
F   12.42 (-1.27%)
MU   68.07 (-0.74%)
CGC   0.89 (-5.22%)
GE   109.77 (-1.75%)
DIS   79.86 (-1.42%)
AMC   7.94 (-2.46%)
PFE   32.60 (-1.15%)
PYPL   58.77 (-0.15%)
NFLX   377.58 (-1.88%)
S&P 500   4,272.12 (-1.51%)
DOW   33,593.94 (-1.21%)
QQQ   354.37 (-1.46%)
AAPL   172.39 (-2.10%)
MSFT   311.06 (-2.04%)
META   298.51 (-0.77%)
GOOGL   128.32 (-2.13%)
AMZN   126.35 (-3.75%)
TSLA   244.05 (-1.19%)
NVDA   421.02 (-0.28%)
NIO   8.45 (+1.20%)
BABA   85.77 (-1.66%)
AMD   96.04 (-1.38%)
T   15.01 (-0.33%)
F   12.42 (-1.27%)
MU   68.07 (-0.74%)
CGC   0.89 (-5.22%)
GE   109.77 (-1.75%)
DIS   79.86 (-1.42%)
AMC   7.94 (-2.46%)
PFE   32.60 (-1.15%)
PYPL   58.77 (-0.15%)
NFLX   377.58 (-1.88%)
S&P 500   4,272.12 (-1.51%)
DOW   33,593.94 (-1.21%)
QQQ   354.37 (-1.46%)
AAPL   172.39 (-2.10%)
MSFT   311.06 (-2.04%)
META   298.51 (-0.77%)
GOOGL   128.32 (-2.13%)
AMZN   126.35 (-3.75%)
TSLA   244.05 (-1.19%)
NVDA   421.02 (-0.28%)
NIO   8.45 (+1.20%)
BABA   85.77 (-1.66%)
AMD   96.04 (-1.38%)
T   15.01 (-0.33%)
F   12.42 (-1.27%)
MU   68.07 (-0.74%)
CGC   0.89 (-5.22%)
GE   109.77 (-1.75%)
DIS   79.86 (-1.42%)
AMC   7.94 (-2.46%)
PFE   32.60 (-1.15%)
PYPL   58.77 (-0.15%)
NFLX   377.58 (-1.88%)
S&P 500   4,272.12 (-1.51%)
DOW   33,593.94 (-1.21%)
QQQ   354.37 (-1.46%)
AAPL   172.39 (-2.10%)
MSFT   311.06 (-2.04%)
META   298.51 (-0.77%)
GOOGL   128.32 (-2.13%)
AMZN   126.35 (-3.75%)
TSLA   244.05 (-1.19%)
NVDA   421.02 (-0.28%)
NIO   8.45 (+1.20%)
BABA   85.77 (-1.66%)
AMD   96.04 (-1.38%)
T   15.01 (-0.33%)
F   12.42 (-1.27%)
MU   68.07 (-0.74%)
CGC   0.89 (-5.22%)
GE   109.77 (-1.75%)
DIS   79.86 (-1.42%)
AMC   7.94 (-2.46%)
PFE   32.60 (-1.15%)
PYPL   58.77 (-0.15%)
NFLX   377.58 (-1.88%)
Most-Downgraded StocksMost-Downgraded
NYSE:FL

Foot Locker (FL) ESG Rating & Sustainability Data

$17.10
-0.34 (-1.95%)
(As of 02:40 PM ET)
Compare
Today's Range
$17.10
▼
$17.79
50-Day Range
$16.69
▼
$26.88
52-Week Range
$14.84
▼
$47.22
Volume
2.57 million shs
Average Volume
3.71 million shs
Market Capitalization
$1.61 billion
P/E Ratio
11.10
Dividend Yield
9.36%
Price Target
$27.32
ProfileAnalyst RatingsChartCompetitorsDividendEarningsFinancialsInsider TradesInstitutional OwnershipHeadlinesOptions ChainSEC FilingsShort InterestSocial MediaSustainability

Key ESG Takeaways for Foot Locker

The keytakeaways are AI-generated and highlight the main contributors behind the net impact scores of Foot Locker. The insights are based on millions of scientific articles, along with the company-specific product and service portfolio.
  • Foot Locker seems to create the most significant positive value in categories , , and . The positive contribution in the impact category is mostly driven by its Online retail of sporting equipment, Physical retail of sporting goods at a sporting goods store, Online retail of clothing, and Physical retail of luggage and bags at a clothing store products.
  • On the other hand, these positive outcomes are achieved by using resources or causing negative impacts in categories , , and . The largest negative impact of Foot Locker in category seems to be driven mostly by its Online retail of clothing, Physical retail of clothing at a clothing store, and Online retail of footwear products.
  • To improve its net impact, a company can either grow its positive impacts, or reduce its negative impacts. For example, by doubling its Online retail of sporting equipment business, Foot Locker would improve its net impact ratio by 11 percentage points.

FL Impact Ratio

Net impact ratio represents the net impact of a company. It is defined as the (positive impacts - negative impacts) / positive impacts. The maximum value for net impact ratio is 100%, representing a theoretical company with no negative impacts. The minimum value is -∞. Net scores depend on the value sets that determine the importance of different impact categories.
+0.0%
The default value set, where each category is given the same weight.

Value Sets Value sets can be used to assess how different stakeholder values or emphasis on certain values might affect the net impact ratio.

Millennials
Value set of millennials (b. 1980 - 1999), based on Upright's annual Impact at Work survey.
+20.4%
Most Wanted Workforce
Value set of the most wanted workforce, based on Upright's annual Impact at Work survey.
-20.4%
Society First
Value set that emphasizes society impacts over other impacts.
-10.6%
Knowledge First
Value set that emphasizes knowledge impacts over other impacts.
-1.7%
Health First
Value set that emphasizes health impacts over other impacts.
+42.9%

Foot Locker ESG Score + Net Impact Profile

ImpactNegativeScorePositive
+0.94
+0.94
+0.99
+0.99
+0.25
+0.25
-0.06
-0.06
+0.00
-0.08
-0.07
+0.01
+0.01
+0.01
+0.05
+0.05
-0.00
+0.02
+0.02
-0.86
-0.86
-0.10
+0.37
+0.46
-0.02
-0.01
+0.01
+0.03
+0.03
-0.01
+0.11
+0.12
-0.02
+0.45
+0.47
-1.35
-1.31
+0.04
-0.20
-0.19
+0.01
-0.11
-0.11
+0.00
-0.04
-0.04
+0.00
-0.57
-0.56
+0.01

Upright Model Version 0.4.0
ESG Data Last Updated: April 1, 2022


About Upright's Net Impact Model

Upright Model

Upright's Net Impact Data quantifies the holistic value creation and impact of companies. It details both the negative and positive impacts a company has on the environment, health of people, society and knowledge, and forms a net sum of these costs and gains based on the economic costs of each impact category. The data is produced by Upright's Net Impact model, which is a mathematical model of the economy that produces continuously updated estimates of the net impact of companies by means of an information integration algorithm. The data is primarily sourced from the CORE open access database, which contains over 200 million scientific papers. Other sources of data include open databases published by the World Bank, IMF, WHO, OECD, IPCC, CDC and USDA.













Foot Locker ESG Rating - Frequently Asked Questions

How is Foot Locker doing in terms of sustainability?

According to The Upright Project, which measures holistic value creation and impact of companies, Foot Locker has a net impact ratio of 0.0%, indicating an overall neutral sustainability impact. Foot Locker seems to create the most significant positive value in the categories of Taxes, Jobs, and Meaning & joy. On the other hand, these positive outcomes are achieved by using resources or causing negative impacts in the categories of GHG emissions, Scarce human capital, and Waste. Learn more on the sustainability of Foot Locker.


More ESG Stocks and Research Tools

Related Companies:
Stock Lists:
Sustainability Tools:
This page (NYSE:FL) was last updated on 9/26/2023 by MarketBeat.com Staff

My Account -