Ferro Competitors

The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) and Ferro (NYSE:FOE) are both construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferro has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and Ferro's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro. The Sherwin-Williams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for The Sherwin-Williams and Ferro, as reported by MarketBeat.

The Sherwin-Williams currently has a consensus price target of $309.9412, suggesting a potential upside of 8.34%. Ferro has a consensus price target of $19.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 11.31%. Given The Sherwin-Williams' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe The Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than Ferro.

Profitability

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and Ferro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

76.5% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Ferro shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats Ferro on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferro (NYSE:FOE) and Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ferro has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ecolab has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ferro and Ecolab's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ecolab has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro. Ferro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ecolab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Ferro and Ecolab, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Ferro currently has a consensus target price of $19.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 11.31%. Ecolab has a consensus target price of $228.70, suggesting a potential upside of 2.07%. Given Ecolab's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ecolab is more favorable than Ferro.

Profitability

This table compares Ferro and Ecolab's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.6% of Ecolab shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Ferro shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Ecolab shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ecolab beats Ferro on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferro (NYSE:FOE) and International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE:IFF) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Ferro has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, International Flavors & Fragrances has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ferro and International Flavors & Fragrances' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

International Flavors & Fragrances has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro. International Flavors & Fragrances is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Ferro and International Flavors & Fragrances, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Ferro currently has a consensus target price of $19.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 11.31%. International Flavors & Fragrances has a consensus target price of $147.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 4.48%. Given International Flavors & Fragrances' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe International Flavors & Fragrances is more favorable than Ferro.

Profitability

This table compares Ferro and International Flavors & Fragrances' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Ferro shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of International Flavors & Fragrances shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

International Flavors & Fragrances beats Ferro on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ferro (NYSE:FOE) and Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Ferro and Albemarle's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Ferro and Albemarle, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Ferro currently has a consensus target price of $19.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 11.31%. Albemarle has a consensus target price of $142.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 13.23%. Given Ferro's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ferro is more favorable than Albemarle.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.4% of Albemarle shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Ferro shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Albemarle shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Ferro has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Albemarle has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ferro and Albemarle's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Albemarle has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro. Ferro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albemarle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Albemarle beats Ferro on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Celanese (NYSE:CE) and Ferro (NYSE:FOE) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Celanese and Ferro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Celanese has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferro has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Celanese and Ferro, as provided by MarketBeat.

Celanese currently has a consensus target price of $156.6667, indicating a potential downside of 6.29%. Ferro has a consensus target price of $19.3333, indicating a potential downside of 11.31%. Given Celanese's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Celanese is more favorable than Ferro.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

97.5% of Celanese shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Celanese shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Ferro shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Celanese and Ferro's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Celanese has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro. Celanese is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ferro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Celanese beats Ferro on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

RPM International (NYSE:RPM) and Ferro (NYSE:FOE) are both construction companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for RPM International and Ferro, as provided by MarketBeat.

RPM International presently has a consensus target price of $96.8750, indicating a potential downside of 0.11%. Ferro has a consensus target price of $19.3333, indicating a potential downside of 11.31%. Given RPM International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe RPM International is more favorable than Ferro.

Volatility and Risk

RPM International has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ferro has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

74.7% of RPM International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of RPM International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Ferro shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares RPM International and Ferro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares RPM International and Ferro's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

RPM International has higher revenue and earnings than Ferro. Ferro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RPM International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

RPM International beats Ferro on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.