S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
S&P 500   3,629.65 (-0.16%)
DOW   29,872.47 (-0.58%)
Log in
NYSE:FTSI

FTS International Competitors

$17.24
-0.27 (-1.54 %)
(As of 11/25/2020 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$17.01
Now: $17.24
$18.12
50-Day Range
$3.11
MA: $5.02
$17.51
52-Week Range
$11.51
Now: $17.24
$18.85
Volume303,153 shs
Average Volume627,016 shs
Market Capitalization$92.77 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.21

Competitors

FTS International (NYSE:FTSI) Vs. NOA, NGS, TUSK, KLXE, RNGR, and NCSM

Should you be buying FTSI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "oil & gas field services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to FTS International, including North American Construction Group (NOA), Natural Gas Services Group (NGS), Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK), KLX Energy Services (KLXE), Ranger Energy Services (RNGR), and NCS Multistage (NCSM).

FTS International (NYSE:FTSI) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

FTS International has a beta of 2.21, indicating that its share price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for FTS International and North American Construction Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FTS International42001.33
North American Construction Group01402.80

FTS International presently has a consensus target price of $33.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 93.35%. North American Construction Group has a consensus target price of $14.90, suggesting a potential upside of 43.13%. Given FTS International's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe FTS International is more favorable than North American Construction Group.

Profitability

This table compares FTS International and North American Construction Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FTS International-16.92%-290.64%-11.24%
North American Construction Group8.50%23.22%5.93%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

47.3% of FTS International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.6% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of FTS International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares FTS International and North American Construction Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTS International$776.60 million0.12$-72,900,000.00($1.40)-12.31
North American Construction Group$541.89 million0.60$27.79 million$1.139.21

North American Construction Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FTS International. FTS International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

North American Construction Group beats FTS International on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Natural Gas Services Group (NYSE:NGS) and FTS International (NYSE:FTSI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Natural Gas Services Group and FTS International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Natural Gas Services Group-12.78%-0.29%-0.25%
FTS International-16.92%-290.64%-11.24%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Natural Gas Services Group and FTS International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Natural Gas Services Group00203.00
FTS International42001.33

Natural Gas Services Group presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.76%. FTS International has a consensus price target of $33.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 93.35%. Given FTS International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FTS International is more favorable than Natural Gas Services Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

84.8% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of FTS International shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of Natural Gas Services Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of FTS International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Natural Gas Services Group and FTS International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Natural Gas Services Group$78.44 million2.01$-13,860,000.00N/AN/A
FTS International$776.60 million0.12$-72,900,000.00($1.40)-12.31

Natural Gas Services Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FTS International.

Risk & Volatility

Natural Gas Services Group has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FTS International has a beta of 2.21, suggesting that its share price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Natural Gas Services Group beats FTS International on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and FTS International (NYSE:FTSI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Mammoth Energy Services and FTS International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mammoth Energy Services0000N/A
FTS International42001.33

FTS International has a consensus price target of $33.3333, indicating a potential upside of 93.35%. Given FTS International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FTS International is more favorable than Mammoth Energy Services.

Risk and Volatility

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FTS International has a beta of 2.21, indicating that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and FTS International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services$625.01 million0.16$-79,040,000.00N/AN/A
FTS International$776.60 million0.12$-72,900,000.00($1.40)-12.31

FTS International has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

64.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of FTS International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of FTS International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Mammoth Energy Services and FTS International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services-57.79%-13.39%-9.27%
FTS International-16.92%-290.64%-11.24%

Summary

FTS International beats Mammoth Energy Services on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

KLX Energy Services (NASDAQ:KLXE) and FTS International (NYSE:FTSI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares KLX Energy Services and FTS International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KLX Energy Services$544 million0.11$-96,400,000.00($21.60)-0.32
FTS International$776.60 million0.12$-72,900,000.00($1.40)-12.31

FTS International has higher revenue and earnings than KLX Energy Services. FTS International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLX Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares KLX Energy Services and FTS International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
KLX Energy Services-101.67%-35.07%-13.60%
FTS International-16.92%-290.64%-11.24%

Risk and Volatility

KLX Energy Services has a beta of 3.23, meaning that its stock price is 223% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FTS International has a beta of 2.21, meaning that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for KLX Energy Services and FTS International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
KLX Energy Services02302.60
FTS International42001.33

KLX Energy Services presently has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 177.37%. FTS International has a consensus price target of $33.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 93.35%. Given KLX Energy Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe KLX Energy Services is more favorable than FTS International.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

47.3% of FTS International shares are held by institutional investors. 10.7% of KLX Energy Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of FTS International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FTS International beats KLX Energy Services on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR) and FTS International (NYSE:FTSI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Ranger Energy Services and FTS International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ranger Energy Services-1.45%-2.45%-1.72%
FTS International-16.92%-290.64%-11.24%

Volatility and Risk

Ranger Energy Services has a beta of 2.06, meaning that its share price is 106% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FTS International has a beta of 2.21, meaning that its share price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

26.1% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of FTS International shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ranger Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of FTS International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ranger Energy Services and FTS International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ranger Energy Services$336.90 million0.17$1.80 million$0.2514.52
FTS International$776.60 million0.12$-72,900,000.00($1.40)-12.31

Ranger Energy Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FTS International. FTS International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ranger Energy Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Ranger Energy Services and FTS International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ranger Energy Services03102.25
FTS International42001.33

Ranger Energy Services currently has a consensus target price of $6.25, suggesting a potential upside of 72.18%. FTS International has a consensus target price of $33.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 93.35%. Given FTS International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FTS International is more favorable than Ranger Energy Services.

Summary

Ranger Energy Services beats FTS International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

NCS Multistage (NASDAQ:NCSM) and FTS International (NYSE:FTSI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

78.4% of NCS Multistage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of FTS International shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of NCS Multistage shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of FTS International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares NCS Multistage and FTS International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
NCS Multistage-51.90%-13.07%-9.86%
FTS International-16.92%-290.64%-11.24%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for NCS Multistage and FTS International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
NCS Multistage12102.00
FTS International42001.33

NCS Multistage currently has a consensus price target of $1.3833, indicating a potential upside of 18.23%. FTS International has a consensus price target of $33.3333, indicating a potential upside of 93.35%. Given FTS International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FTS International is more favorable than NCS Multistage.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares NCS Multistage and FTS International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NCS Multistage$205.49 million0.27$-32,820,000.00($0.24)-4.88
FTS International$776.60 million0.12$-72,900,000.00($1.40)-12.31

NCS Multistage has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FTS International. FTS International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NCS Multistage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

NCS Multistage has a beta of 2.05, indicating that its stock price is 105% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FTS International has a beta of 2.21, indicating that its stock price is 121% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

NCS Multistage beats FTS International on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

pixel
Ad True Market Insiders
#1 Way to Picking Winning Stocks in 2020
Most ultra-rich investors ignore stock fundamentals, which have no real impact on stock prices. Only 1 indicator tells the whole truth -- but most investors have never heard of it. This is how wealth is made in the stock market today.

FTS International Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
North American Construction Group logo
NOA
North American Construction Group
2.2$10.41-1.2%$322.54 million$541.89 million8.82
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.4$11.69-0.1%$157.45 million$78.44 million-15.59
Mammoth Energy Services logo
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services
1.2$2.17-0.5%$99.31 million$625.01 million-0.50
KLXE
KLX Energy Services
1.4$6.85-4.7%$57.55 million$544 million-0.09Upcoming Earnings
Ranger Energy Services logo
RNGR
Ranger Energy Services
1.7$3.63-5.2%$55.88 million$336.90 million-7.26
NCS Multistage logo
NCSM
NCS Multistage
1.4$1.17-12.0%$55.22 million$205.49 million-0.80
CSI Compressco logo
CCLP
CSI Compressco
1.3$0.95-5.3%$44.98 million$476.58 million-0.88
USWS
U.S. Well Services
1.4$0.44-11.4%$32.46 million$514.76 million-0.10
RCON
Recon Technology
0.6$1.35-6.7%$9.72 million$9.30 million0.00High Trading Volume
Superior Energy Services logo
SPN
Superior Energy Services
1.2$0.25-0.0%$3.67 million$1.43 billion-0.01
pixel
This page was last updated on 11/26/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.