NYSE:GHL

Greenhill & Co., Inc. Competitors

$18.50
-0.70 (-3.65 %)
(As of 04/20/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$18.18
Now: $18.50
$19.27
50-Day Range
$15.36
MA: $17.04
$19.20
52-Week Range
$7.82
Now: $18.50
$19.37
Volume155,046 shs
Average Volume210,064 shs
Market Capitalization$360.97 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield1.04%
Beta0.98

Competitors

Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) Vs. MS, SCHW, GS, RJF, LPLA, and SF

Should you be buying GHL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "investment banking & brokerage" are considered alternatives and competitors to Greenhill & Co., Inc., including Morgan Stanley (MS), The Charles Schwab (SCHW), The Goldman Sachs Group (GS), Raymond James (RJF), LPL Financial (LPLA), and Stifel Financial (SF).

Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and Morgan Stanley's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenhill & Co., Inc.$301.01 million1.20$10.98 million$0.5037.00
Morgan Stanley$53.82 billion2.69$9.04 billion$4.9815.52

Morgan Stanley has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc.. Morgan Stanley is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenhill & Co., Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Morgan Stanley pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Morgan Stanley has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Morgan Stanley is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Greenhill & Co., Inc. and Morgan Stanley, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Greenhill & Co., Inc.11102.00
Morgan Stanley061402.70

Greenhill & Co., Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. Morgan Stanley has a consensus price target of $71.4211, suggesting a potential downside of 7.59%. Given Morgan Stanley's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Morgan Stanley is more favorable than Greenhill & Co., Inc..

Volatility & Risk

Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Morgan Stanley shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Morgan Stanley shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and Morgan Stanley's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Greenhill & Co., Inc.-2.80%-38.14%-1.60%
Morgan Stanley19.16%12.33%1.02%

Summary

Morgan Stanley beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) and The Charles Schwab (NYSE:SCHW) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Charles Schwab's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenhill & Co., Inc.$301.01 million1.20$10.98 million$0.5037.00
The Charles Schwab$10.72 billion10.73$3.70 billion$2.7223.42

The Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc.. The Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenhill & Co., Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. The Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Charles Schwab pays out 26.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. The Charles Schwab is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Charles Schwab, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Greenhill & Co., Inc.11102.00
The Charles Schwab04912.79

Greenhill & Co., Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. The Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $68.90, suggesting a potential upside of 8.18%. Given The Charles Schwab's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Charles Schwab is more favorable than Greenhill & Co., Inc..

Volatility & Risk

Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Charles Schwab has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of The Charles Schwab shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.8% of The Charles Schwab shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Charles Schwab's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Greenhill & Co., Inc.-2.80%-38.14%-1.60%
The Charles Schwab29.80%13.52%0.86%

Summary

The Charles Schwab beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) and The Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:GS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of The Goldman Sachs Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of The Goldman Sachs Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Greenhill & Co., Inc.11102.00
The Goldman Sachs Group151502.67

Greenhill & Co., Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. The Goldman Sachs Group has a consensus price target of $349.1429, suggesting a potential upside of 5.20%. Given The Goldman Sachs Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Goldman Sachs Group is more favorable than Greenhill & Co., Inc..

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenhill & Co., Inc.$301.01 million1.20$10.98 million$0.5037.00
The Goldman Sachs Group$53.92 billion2.13$8.47 billion$21.0315.78

The Goldman Sachs Group has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc.. The Goldman Sachs Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenhill & Co., Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. The Goldman Sachs Group pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Goldman Sachs Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. The Goldman Sachs Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Greenhill & Co., Inc.-2.80%-38.14%-1.60%
The Goldman Sachs Group16.65%11.23%0.83%

Volatility & Risk

Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Goldman Sachs Group beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Raymond James (NYSE:RJF) and Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.1% of Raymond James shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 10.8% of Raymond James shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Raymond James and Greenhill & Co., Inc., as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Raymond James02902.82
Greenhill & Co., Inc.11102.00

Raymond James presently has a consensus target price of $120.80, suggesting a potential downside of 4.66%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a consensus target price of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. Given Raymond James' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Raymond James is more favorable than Greenhill & Co., Inc..

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Raymond James and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Raymond James$8.17 billion2.14$818 million$6.1120.74
Greenhill & Co., Inc.$301.01 million1.20$10.98 million$0.5037.00

Raymond James has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc.. Raymond James is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenhill & Co., Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Raymond James pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Raymond James pays out 25.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Raymond James has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Greenhill & Co., Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Raymond James is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Raymond James and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Raymond James10.02%12.29%1.88%
Greenhill & Co., Inc.-2.80%-38.14%-1.60%

Volatility & Risk

Raymond James has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Raymond James beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

LPL Financial (NASDAQ:LPLA) and Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

95.7% of LPL Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of LPL Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for LPL Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc., as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
LPL Financial01802.89
Greenhill & Co., Inc.11102.00

LPL Financial presently has a consensus target price of $125.45, suggesting a potential downside of 11.31%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a consensus target price of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. Given Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greenhill & Co., Inc. is more favorable than LPL Financial.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares LPL Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LPL Financial$5.62 billion2.01$559.88 million$7.1819.70
Greenhill & Co., Inc.$301.01 million1.20$10.98 million$0.5037.00

LPL Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc.. LPL Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenhill & Co., Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

LPL Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. LPL Financial pays out 13.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. LPL Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Greenhill & Co., Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares LPL Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
LPL Financial8.50%49.27%8.93%
Greenhill & Co., Inc.-2.80%-38.14%-1.60%

Volatility & Risk

LPL Financial has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

LPL Financial beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stifel Financial (NYSE:SF) and Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Stifel Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Greenhill & Co., Inc. is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

56.5% of Stifel Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Stifel Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Stifel Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc., as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Stifel Financial23101.83
Greenhill & Co., Inc.11102.00

Stifel Financial presently has a consensus target price of $51.2222, suggesting a potential downside of 23.02%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a consensus target price of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. Given Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greenhill & Co., Inc. is more favorable than Stifel Financial.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Stifel Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stifel Financial$3.34 billion2.10$448.40 millionN/AN/A
Greenhill & Co., Inc.$301.01 million1.20$10.98 million$0.5037.00

Stifel Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc..

Volatility & Risk

Stifel Financial has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Stifel Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Stifel Financial12.26%14.78%1.94%
Greenhill & Co., Inc.-2.80%-38.14%-1.60%

Summary

Stifel Financial beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Greenhill & Co., Inc. Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Morgan Stanley logo
MS
Morgan Stanley
2.0$77.29-3.5%$147.01 billion$53.82 billion13.03Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
The Charles Schwab logo
SCHW
The Charles Schwab
1.9$63.69-3.4%$115.02 billion$10.72 billion29.49Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
The Goldman Sachs Group logo
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group
2.2$331.88-3.4%$114.76 billion$53.92 billion13.98Dividend Announcement
Analyst Revision
Raymond James logo
RJF
Raymond James
1.9$126.71-2.1%$17.45 billion$8.17 billion21.77Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
LPL Financial logo
LPLA
LPL Financial
1.5$141.44-3.4%$11.30 billion$5.62 billion23.53
Stifel Financial logo
SF
Stifel Financial
1.0$66.54-3.1%$7.00 billion$3.34 billion18.02
Evercore logo
EVR
Evercore
2.4$135.65-2.7%$5.70 billion$2.01 billion24.31Upcoming Earnings
Lazard logo
LAZ
Lazard
2.4$45.56-1.7%$4.79 billion$2.67 billion17.87Analyst Report
BGC Partners logo
BGCP
BGC Partners
1.3$5.79-2.2%$2.14 billion$2.10 billion52.64
Piper Jaffray Companies logo
PJC
Piper Jaffray Companies
1.7$81.10-0.0%$1.16 billion$800.99 million13.23News Coverage
Gap Down
Cowen logo
COWN
Cowen
1.7$38.01-3.7%$1.01 billion$1.05 billion9.16
Oppenheimer logo
OPY
Oppenheimer
1.0$44.29-2.0%$561.60 million$1.03 billion8.95
(FBRC) logo
FBRC
(FBRC)
1.1$17.55-0.0%$124.61 millionN/A0.00
This page was last updated on 4/21/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.