Greenhill & Co., Inc. Competitors

Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and Morgan Stanley's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Morgan Stanley has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc.. Morgan Stanley is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenhill & Co., Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Morgan Stanley pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 28.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Morgan Stanley has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Morgan Stanley is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Greenhill & Co., Inc. and Morgan Stanley, as provided by MarketBeat.

Greenhill & Co., Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. Morgan Stanley has a consensus price target of $71.4211, suggesting a potential downside of 7.59%. Given Morgan Stanley's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Morgan Stanley is more favorable than Greenhill & Co., Inc..

Volatility & Risk

Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.8% of Morgan Stanley shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Morgan Stanley shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and Morgan Stanley's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Morgan Stanley beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) and The Charles Schwab (NYSE:SCHW) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Charles Schwab's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc.. The Charles Schwab is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenhill & Co., Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. The Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Charles Schwab pays out 26.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. The Charles Schwab is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Charles Schwab, as provided by MarketBeat.

Greenhill & Co., Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. The Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $68.90, suggesting a potential upside of 8.18%. Given The Charles Schwab's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Charles Schwab is more favorable than Greenhill & Co., Inc..

Volatility & Risk

Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Charles Schwab has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of The Charles Schwab shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.8% of The Charles Schwab shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Charles Schwab's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

The Charles Schwab beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) and The Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:GS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.1% of The Goldman Sachs Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of The Goldman Sachs Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Greenhill & Co., Inc. currently has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. The Goldman Sachs Group has a consensus price target of $349.1429, suggesting a potential upside of 5.20%. Given The Goldman Sachs Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe The Goldman Sachs Group is more favorable than Greenhill & Co., Inc..

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Goldman Sachs Group has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc.. The Goldman Sachs Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenhill & Co., Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. The Goldman Sachs Group pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Goldman Sachs Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. The Goldman Sachs Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Greenhill & Co., Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Goldman Sachs Group beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Raymond James (NYSE:RJF) and Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.1% of Raymond James shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 10.8% of Raymond James shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Raymond James and Greenhill & Co., Inc., as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Raymond James presently has a consensus target price of $120.80, suggesting a potential downside of 4.66%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a consensus target price of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. Given Raymond James' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Raymond James is more favorable than Greenhill & Co., Inc..

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Raymond James and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Raymond James has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc.. Raymond James is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenhill & Co., Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Raymond James pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Raymond James pays out 25.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Raymond James has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Greenhill & Co., Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Raymond James is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Raymond James and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Raymond James has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Raymond James beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

LPL Financial (NASDAQ:LPLA) and Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

95.7% of LPL Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of LPL Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for LPL Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc., as reported by MarketBeat.com.

LPL Financial presently has a consensus target price of $125.45, suggesting a potential downside of 11.31%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a consensus target price of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. Given Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greenhill & Co., Inc. is more favorable than LPL Financial.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares LPL Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

LPL Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc.. LPL Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenhill & Co., Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

LPL Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. LPL Financial pays out 13.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. LPL Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Greenhill & Co., Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares LPL Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

LPL Financial has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

LPL Financial beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stifel Financial (NYSE:SF) and Greenhill & Co., Inc. (NYSE:GHL) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Stifel Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Greenhill & Co., Inc. is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

56.5% of Stifel Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.1% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Stifel Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.4% of Greenhill & Co., Inc. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Stifel Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc., as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Stifel Financial presently has a consensus target price of $51.2222, suggesting a potential downside of 23.02%. Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a consensus target price of $16.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.81%. Given Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greenhill & Co., Inc. is more favorable than Stifel Financial.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Stifel Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Stifel Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Greenhill & Co., Inc..

Volatility & Risk

Stifel Financial has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Greenhill & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Stifel Financial and Greenhill & Co., Inc.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Stifel Financial beats Greenhill & Co., Inc. on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.