NYSE:RDCRowan Companies Competitors & Alternatives

Rowan Companies (NYSE:RDC) and Helmerich & Payne (NYSE:HP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Rowan Companies and Helmerich & Payne's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Helmerich & Payne has higher revenue and earnings than Rowan Companies. Rowan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helmerich & Payne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Rowan Companies and Helmerich & Payne's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.1% of Rowan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Rowan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Helmerich & Payne shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Rowan Companies has a beta of 2.52, suggesting that its share price is 152% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Rowan Companies and Helmerich & Payne, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Helmerich & Payne has a consensus target price of $28.3368, indicating a potential upside of 58.13%. Given Helmerich & Payne's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Helmerich & Payne is more favorable than Rowan Companies.

Summary

Helmerich & Payne beats Rowan Companies on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Rowan Companies (NYSE:RDC) and Transocean (NYSE:RIG) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Rowan Companies and Transocean's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Rowan Companies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Transocean. Rowan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transocean, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Rowan Companies and Transocean's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

99.1% of Rowan Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Transocean shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Rowan Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.8% of Transocean shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Rowan Companies has a beta of 2.52, suggesting that its share price is 152% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Transocean has a beta of 2.43, suggesting that its share price is 143% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Rowan Companies and Transocean, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Transocean has a consensus target price of $4.4289, indicating a potential upside of 150.22%. Given Transocean's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Transocean is more favorable than Rowan Companies.

Summary

Transocean beats Rowan Companies on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Rowan Companies (NYSE:RDC) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Rowan Companies and Patterson-UTI Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $7.6348, indicating a potential upside of 134.20%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Rowan Companies.

Profitability

This table compares Rowan Companies and Patterson-UTI Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Rowan Companies and Patterson-UTI Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Rowan Companies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rowan Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

99.1% of Rowan Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Rowan Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Rowan Companies has a beta of 2.52, meaning that its stock price is 152% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.69, meaning that its stock price is 169% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Patterson-UTI Energy beats Rowan Companies on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Rowan Companies (NYSE:RDC) and Baytex Energy (NYSE:BTE) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

99.1% of Rowan Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.1% of Baytex Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Rowan Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Rowan Companies and Baytex Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Rowan Companies and Baytex Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Baytex Energy has a consensus price target of $0.90, indicating a potential upside of 84.99%. Given Baytex Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Baytex Energy is more favorable than Rowan Companies.

Risk & Volatility

Rowan Companies has a beta of 2.52, meaning that its stock price is 152% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baytex Energy has a beta of 3.22, meaning that its stock price is 222% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Rowan Companies and Baytex Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Baytex Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Rowan Companies. Rowan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baytex Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Baytex Energy beats Rowan Companies on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Rowan Companies (NYSE:RDC) and Seadrill (NYSE:SDRL) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

99.1% of Rowan Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.0% of Seadrill shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Rowan Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Rowan Companies and Seadrill's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Rowan Companies and Seadrill, as reported by MarketBeat.

Given Seadrill's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Seadrill is more favorable than Rowan Companies.

Volatility & Risk

Rowan Companies has a beta of 2.52, meaning that its share price is 152% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Seadrill has a beta of 2.96, meaning that its share price is 196% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Rowan Companies and Seadrill's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Rowan Companies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Seadrill.

Summary

Rowan Companies beats Seadrill on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Rowan Companies (NYSE:RDC) and Oasis Midstream Partners (NYSE:OMP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Rowan Companies and Oasis Midstream Partners' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Oasis Midstream Partners has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rowan Companies. Rowan Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oasis Midstream Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Rowan Companies and Oasis Midstream Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

99.1% of Rowan Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.0% of Oasis Midstream Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Rowan Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Rowan Companies and Oasis Midstream Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.

Oasis Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $13.2857, indicating a potential upside of 82.00%. Given Oasis Midstream Partners' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Oasis Midstream Partners is more favorable than Rowan Companies.

Volatility & Risk

Rowan Companies has a beta of 2.52, meaning that its share price is 152% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oasis Midstream Partners has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Oasis Midstream Partners beats Rowan Companies on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.