NYSE:RE

Everest Re Group Stock Competitors

$252.32
-1.07 (-0.42 %)
(As of 09/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$251.85
$254.75
50-Day Range
$236.68
$273.68
52-Week Range
$193.02
$281.27
Volume199,879 shs
Average Volume283,896 shs
Market Capitalization$10.06 billion
P/E Ratio7.62
Dividend Yield2.45%
Beta0.65

Everest Re Group (NYSE:RE) Vs. TRV, ALL, HIG, CINF, MKL, and ACGL

Should you be buying Everest Re Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Everest Re Group include The Travelers Companies (TRV), The Allstate (ALL), The Hartford Financial Services Group (HIG), Cincinnati Financial (CINF), Markel (MKL), and Arch Capital Group (ACGL). These companies are all part of the "reinsurance" industry.These companies are all part of the "fire, marine, & casualty insurance" industry.

Everest Re Group (NYSE:RE) and The Travelers Companies (NYSE:TRV) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Everest Re Group and The Travelers Companies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Re Group$9.60 billion1.05$514.15 million$7.4633.82
The Travelers Companies$31.98 billion1.22$2.70 billion$10.4814.95

The Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Re Group. The Travelers Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Re Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Everest Re Group and The Travelers Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Everest Re Group11.87%9.13%2.73%
The Travelers Companies11.30%12.71%3.10%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.1% of Everest Re Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of The Travelers Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Everest Re Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of The Travelers Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Everest Re Group pays an annual dividend of $6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. The Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Everest Re Group pays out 83.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Travelers Companies pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Risk and Volatility

Everest Re Group has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Everest Re Group and The Travelers Companies, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Everest Re Group02402.67
The Travelers Companies24502.27

Everest Re Group currently has a consensus price target of $290.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.20%. The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $161.5455, suggesting a potential upside of 3.11%. Given Everest Re Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Everest Re Group is more favorable than The Travelers Companies.

Summary

The Travelers Companies beats Everest Re Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Allstate (NYSE:ALL) and Everest Re Group (NYSE:RE) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

75.0% of The Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Everest Re Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of The Allstate shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Everest Re Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for The Allstate and Everest Re Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Allstate07702.50
Everest Re Group02402.67

The Allstate currently has a consensus price target of $136.6531, suggesting a potential upside of 3.93%. Everest Re Group has a consensus price target of $290.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.20%. Given Everest Re Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Everest Re Group is more favorable than The Allstate.

Dividends

The Allstate pays an annual dividend of $3.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Everest Re Group pays an annual dividend of $6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. The Allstate pays out 22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Everest Re Group pays out 83.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Allstate is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Allstate and Everest Re Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Allstate$44.79 billion0.87$5.58 billion$14.738.93
Everest Re Group$9.60 billion1.05$514.15 million$7.4633.82

The Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Re Group. The Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Re Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares The Allstate and Everest Re Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Allstate8.27%22.27%4.54%
Everest Re Group11.87%9.13%2.73%

Risk & Volatility

The Allstate has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Everest Re Group has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Allstate beats Everest Re Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Hartford Financial Services Group (NYSE:HIG) and Everest Re Group (NYSE:RE) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.1% of The Hartford Financial Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Everest Re Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of The Hartford Financial Services Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Everest Re Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for The Hartford Financial Services Group and Everest Re Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Hartford Financial Services Group03802.73
Everest Re Group02402.67

The Hartford Financial Services Group currently has a consensus price target of $74.4615, suggesting a potential upside of 5.54%. Everest Re Group has a consensus price target of $290.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.20%. Given Everest Re Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Everest Re Group is more favorable than The Hartford Financial Services Group.

Dividends

The Hartford Financial Services Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Everest Re Group pays an annual dividend of $6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 24.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Everest Re Group pays out 83.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Hartford Financial Services Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Hartford Financial Services Group and Everest Re Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Hartford Financial Services Group$20.52 billion1.19$1.74 billion$5.7812.21
Everest Re Group$9.60 billion1.05$514.15 million$7.4633.82

The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Re Group. The Hartford Financial Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Re Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares The Hartford Financial Services Group and Everest Re Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Hartford Financial Services Group10.05%12.47%3.00%
Everest Re Group11.87%9.13%2.73%

Risk & Volatility

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Everest Re Group has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Hartford Financial Services Group beats Everest Re Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cincinnati Financial (NASDAQ:CINF) and Everest Re Group (NYSE:RE) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Everest Re Group has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Cincinnati Financial and Everest Re Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cincinnati Financial02302.60
Everest Re Group02402.67

Cincinnati Financial currently has a consensus price target of $126.80, suggesting a potential upside of 7.56%. Everest Re Group has a consensus price target of $290.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.20%. Given Everest Re Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Everest Re Group is more favorable than Cincinnati Financial.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

66.4% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.1% of Everest Re Group shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Everest Re Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Cincinnati Financial and Everest Re Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cincinnati Financial30.25%7.71%3.00%
Everest Re Group11.87%9.13%2.73%

Dividends

Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Everest Re Group pays an annual dividend of $6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Cincinnati Financial pays out 76.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Everest Re Group pays out 83.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Cincinnati Financial and Everest Re Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cincinnati Financial$7.54 billion2.52$1.22 billion$3.2835.94
Everest Re Group$9.60 billion1.05$514.15 million$7.4633.82

Cincinnati Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Everest Re Group. Everest Re Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cincinnati Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Everest Re Group beats Cincinnati Financial on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Everest Re Group (NYSE:RE) and Markel (NYSE:MKL) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Everest Re Group has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Markel has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Everest Re Group and Markel, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Everest Re Group02402.67
Markel01002.00

Everest Re Group presently has a consensus target price of $290.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.20%. Markel has a consensus target price of $1,141.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 6.33%. Given Everest Re Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Everest Re Group is more favorable than Markel.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.1% of Everest Re Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.3% of Markel shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Everest Re Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Markel shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Everest Re Group and Markel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Everest Re Group11.87%9.13%2.73%
Markel21.04%5.90%1.71%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Everest Re Group and Markel's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Re Group$9.60 billion1.05$514.15 million$7.4633.82
Markel$9.74 billion1.72$816.03 million$26.2446.45

Markel has higher revenue and earnings than Everest Re Group. Everest Re Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Markel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Everest Re Group (NYSE:RE) and Arch Capital Group (NASDAQ:ACGL) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Everest Re Group has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Everest Re Group and Arch Capital Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Everest Re Group02402.67
Arch Capital Group03402.57

Everest Re Group presently has a consensus target price of $290.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 15.20%. Arch Capital Group has a consensus target price of $44.25, suggesting a potential upside of 13.00%. Given Everest Re Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Everest Re Group is more favorable than Arch Capital Group.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

94.1% of Everest Re Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.6% of Arch Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Everest Re Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Arch Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Everest Re Group and Arch Capital Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Everest Re Group11.87%9.13%2.73%
Arch Capital Group21.77%7.86%2.33%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Everest Re Group and Arch Capital Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Everest Re Group$9.60 billion1.05$514.15 million$7.4633.82
Arch Capital Group$8.53 billion1.82$1.41 billion$1.3628.79

Arch Capital Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Everest Re Group. Arch Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everest Re Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Everest Re Group beats Arch Capital Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Everest Re Group Competitors List

Competitor NameBTM RankShare PriceAnalysts' Price TargetMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
The Travelers Companies logo
TRV
The Travelers Companies
2.4$156.67
-0.6%
$161.55
-3.1%
$39.09 billion$31.98 billion10.5430,600
The Allstate logo
ALL
The Allstate
2.7$131.48
-0.2%
$136.65
-3.9%
$38.88 billion$44.79 billion10.3642,160Short Interest ↑
The Hartford Financial Services Group logo
HIG
The Hartford Financial Services Group
3.0$70.55
-0.2%
$74.46
-5.5%
$24.49 billion$20.52 billion11.9418,500Analyst Report
Short Interest ↓
News Coverage
Cincinnati Financial logo
CINF
Cincinnati Financial
1.9$117.89
-0.3%
$126.80
-7.6%
$19.00 billion$7.54 billion6.705,266
Markel logo
MKL
Markel
2.2$1,218.81
-0.1%
$1,141.67
-6.3%
$16.73 billion$9.74 billion6.4418,900Short Interest ↓
Arch Capital Group logo
ACGL
Arch Capital Group
2.4$39.16
-0.5%
$44.25
-13.0%
$15.51 billion$8.53 billion7.864,500
Loews logo
L
Loews
2.3$53.65
-0.6%
$87.00
-62.2%
$13.80 billion$12.58 billion9.2812,200
W. R. Berkley logo
WRB
W. R. Berkley
2.5$72.17
-0.7%
$81.56
-13.0%
$12.81 billion$8.10 billion14.497,495
CNA Financial logo
CNA
CNA Financial
2.6$43.15
-0.9%
$44.50
-3.1%
$11.71 billion$10.81 billion9.185,800
American Financial Group logo
AFG
American Financial Group
2.7$133.06
-0.7%
$118.75
-10.8%
$11.28 billion$7.91 billion5.057,600Dividend Cut
News Coverage
American Financial Group logo
AFG
American Financial Group
2.8$133.06
-0.7%
$118.75
-10.8%
$11.28 billion$7.91 billion5.057,600Dividend Cut
News Coverage
Alleghany logo
Y
Alleghany
2.2$621.50
-0.7%
$857.50
-38.0%
$8.62 billion$8.90 billion9.4910,407
RenaissanceRe logo
RNR
RenaissanceRe
2.2$143.90
-0.6%
$189.80
-31.9%
$6.78 billion$5.17 billion17.63604
The Hanover Insurance Group logo
THG
The Hanover Insurance Group
2.7$131.46
-0.7%
$146.00
-11.1%
$4.69 billion$4.83 billion9.674,300
Selective Insurance Group logo
SIGI
Selective Insurance Group
2.6$77.73
-1.0%
$82.00
-5.5%
$4.67 billion$2.92 billion11.092,400Positive News
RLI logo
RLI
RLI
2.3$102.19
-1.3%
$114.33
-11.9%
$4.62 billion$983.63 million16.59869Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Lemonade logo
LMND
Lemonade
1.6$72.28
-0.6%
$77.75
-7.6%
$4.45 billion$94.40 million-25.10567
Enstar Group logo
ESGR
Enstar Group
1.7$236.07
-0.6%
N/A$4.34 billion$2.66 billion0.001,189High Trading Volume
Kemper logo
KMPR
Kemper
3.0$65.50
-1.8%
$75.00
-14.5%
$4.17 billion$5.21 billion15.719,500News Coverage
AXIS Capital logo
AXS
AXIS Capital
2.3$46.54
-0.9%
$59.33
-27.5%
$3.95 billion$4.84 billion15.011,921Options Volume
Kinsale Capital Group logo
KNSL
Kinsale Capital Group
2.8$160.94
-0.9%
$222.50
-38.3%
$3.67 billion$459.89 million30.71329
White Mountains Insurance Group logo
WTM
White Mountains Insurance Group
1.5$1,068.12
-0.8%
N/A$3.32 billion$1.18 billion4.221,366Short Interest ↓
News Coverage
Positive News
Mercury General logo
MCY
Mercury General
2.3$57.34
-0.1%
N/A$3.17 billion$3.78 billion6.334,300Positive News
Hippo logo
HIPO
Hippo
0.2$5.25
-3.0%
N/A$2.93 billionN/A0.001Short Interest ↑
High Trading Volume
State Auto Financial logo
STFC
State Auto Financial
1.5$51.20
-0.4%
$18.00
-64.8%
$2.26 billion$1.48 billion23.272,025
Palomar logo
PLMR
Palomar
2.3$86.24
-0.0%
$98.00
-13.6%
$2.19 billion$168.46 million210.35122
Horace Mann Educators logo
HMN
Horace Mann Educators
2.3$38.98
-0.0%
$40.00
-2.6%
$1.62 billion$1.31 billion9.651,490
SPNT
SiriusPoint
1.4$9.30
-1.4%
N/A$1.51 billion$889.79 million2.6043Short Interest ↑
High Trading Volume
ProAssurance logo
PRA
ProAssurance
1.9$23.56
-0.0%
$27.67
-17.4%
$1.27 billion$874.94 million-35.16970News Coverage
James River Group logo
JRVR
James River Group
2.8$32.97
-1.8%
$55.00
-66.8%
$1.23 billion$668.69 million-12.78683Short Interest ↓
Analyst Revision
Safety Insurance Group logo
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group
1.7$76.94
-0.6%
N/A$1.15 billion$846.25 million6.74586Short Interest ↓
Positive News
Employers logo
EIG
Employers
2.8$38.40
-0.1%
$49.00
-27.6%
$1.09 billion$711.40 million7.74691
AMERISAFE logo
AMSF
AMERISAFE
2.2$53.98
-1.6%
N/A$1.05 billion$339.48 million11.02394Positive News
HCI Group logo
HCI
HCI Group
2.4$106.53
-0.5%
$106.67
-0.1%
$900.61 million$310.44 million35.04436
BlackRock TCP Capital logo
TCPC
BlackRock TCP Capital
2.1$13.70
-1.8%
$14.25
-4.0%
$791.41 million$172.10 million4.2816,200
United Fire Group logo
UFCS
United Fire Group
3.0$22.83
-1.2%
$33.00
-44.5%
$573.42 million$1.07 billion-40.051,165Insider Selling
ProSight Global logo
PROS
ProSight Global
1.7$12.85
-0.0%
$13.00
-1.2%
$562.56 million$816.11 million11.37351News Coverage
ProSight Global logo
PROS
ProSight Global
1.2$12.85
-0.0%
$13.00
-1.2%
$562.56 million$878.06 million13.82351
Metromile logo
MILE
Metromile
1.9$4.16
-1.7%
$6.50
-56.3%
$527.18 millionN/A0.00259News Coverage
Trean Insurance Group logo
TIG
Trean Insurance Group
2.2$10.04
-1.3%
$15.00
-49.4%
$513.79 million$202.11 million5.77334
Donegal Group logo
DGICA
Donegal Group
2.5$14.43
-0.1%
N/A$450.87 million$777.82 million8.11873
Universal Insurance logo
UVE
Universal Insurance
2.7$12.88
-2.0%
$16.00
-24.2%
$402.75 million$1.07 billion14.80909News Coverage
Global Indemnity Group logo
GBLI
Global Indemnity Group
2.1$26.74
-0.1%
N/A$385.78 million$583.55 million-148.56390Dividend Announcement
NI logo
NODK
NI
1.1$18.04
-1.2%
N/A$383.98 million$306.36 million12.03205
Tiptree logo
TIPT
Tiptree
1.8$9.85
-0.2%
N/A$329.06 million$810.30 million5.531,372News Coverage
Maiden logo
MHLD
Maiden
1.7$3.27
-1.8%
$2.00
-38.8%
$282.59 million$184.12 million1.8952Short Interest ↓
Greenlight Capital Re logo
GLRE
Greenlight Capital Re
1.7$7.31
-0.5%
N/A$247.20 million$484.09 million4.9735Short Interest ↑
Negative News
Heritage Insurance logo
HRTG
Heritage Insurance
2.9$5.54
-9.4%
$14.00
-152.7%
$155.16 million$593.39 million-13.19641High Trading Volume
Kingsway Financial Services logo
KFS
Kingsway Financial Services
1.5$5.26
-1.1%
N/A$126.54 million$61.36 million0.00239
United Insurance logo
UIHC
United Insurance
2.7$2.80
-2.9%
$6.25
-123.2%
$120.98 million$846.66 million-0.80478High Trading Volume
This page was last updated on 9/16/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research.