SeaWorld Entertainment Competitors

SeaWorld Entertainment (NYSE:SEAS) and Vail Resorts (NYSE:MTN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

SeaWorld Entertainment has a beta of 2.37, suggesting that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vail Resorts has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Vail Resorts' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Vail Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than SeaWorld Entertainment. SeaWorld Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vail Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for SeaWorld Entertainment and Vail Resorts, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SeaWorld Entertainment currently has a consensus target price of $40.2143, suggesting a potential downside of 19.47%. Vail Resorts has a consensus target price of $289.1538, suggesting a potential downside of 5.01%. Given Vail Resorts' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vail Resorts is more favorable than SeaWorld Entertainment.

Profitability

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Vail Resorts' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Vail Resorts shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Vail Resorts beats SeaWorld Entertainment on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

SeaWorld Entertainment (NYSE:SEAS) and Madison Square Garden Sports (NYSE:MSGS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

SeaWorld Entertainment has a beta of 2.37, suggesting that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Madison Square Garden Sports' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SeaWorld Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Madison Square Garden Sports. Madison Square Garden Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SeaWorld Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for SeaWorld Entertainment and Madison Square Garden Sports, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SeaWorld Entertainment currently has a consensus target price of $40.2143, suggesting a potential downside of 19.47%. Madison Square Garden Sports has a consensus target price of $205.8889, suggesting a potential upside of 11.94%. Given Madison Square Garden Sports' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more favorable than SeaWorld Entertainment.

Profitability

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Madison Square Garden Sports' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Madison Square Garden Sports shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Madison Square Garden Sports beats SeaWorld Entertainment on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

SeaWorld Entertainment (NYSE:SEAS) and Six Flags Entertainment (NYSE:SIX) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

SeaWorld Entertainment has a beta of 2.37, suggesting that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 2.45, suggesting that its share price is 145% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Six Flags Entertainment's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Six Flags Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than SeaWorld Entertainment. Six Flags Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SeaWorld Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for SeaWorld Entertainment and Six Flags Entertainment, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SeaWorld Entertainment currently has a consensus target price of $40.2143, suggesting a potential downside of 19.47%. Six Flags Entertainment has a consensus target price of $34.8462, suggesting a potential downside of 25.69%. Given SeaWorld Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe SeaWorld Entertainment is more favorable than Six Flags Entertainment.

Profitability

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Six Flags Entertainment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.9% of Six Flags Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Six Flags Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Six Flags Entertainment beats SeaWorld Entertainment on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

SeaWorld Entertainment (NYSE:SEAS) and International Game Technology (NYSE:IGT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

SeaWorld Entertainment has a beta of 2.37, suggesting that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, International Game Technology has a beta of 2.34, suggesting that its share price is 134% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and International Game Technology's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SeaWorld Entertainment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than International Game Technology. International Game Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SeaWorld Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for SeaWorld Entertainment and International Game Technology, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SeaWorld Entertainment currently has a consensus target price of $40.2143, suggesting a potential downside of 19.47%. International Game Technology has a consensus target price of $18.2750, suggesting a potential upside of 9.96%. Given International Game Technology's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe International Game Technology is more favorable than SeaWorld Entertainment.

Profitability

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and International Game Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of International Game Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

SeaWorld Entertainment (NYSE:SEAS) and Rush Street Interactive (NYSE:RSI) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.9% of Rush Street Interactive shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for SeaWorld Entertainment and Rush Street Interactive, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SeaWorld Entertainment currently has a consensus target price of $40.2143, suggesting a potential downside of 19.47%. Rush Street Interactive has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 81.82%. Given Rush Street Interactive's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Rush Street Interactive is more favorable than SeaWorld Entertainment.

Profitability

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Rush Street Interactive's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SeaWorld Entertainment and Rush Street Interactive's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SeaWorld Entertainment has higher revenue and earnings than Rush Street Interactive.

Summary

Rush Street Interactive beats SeaWorld Entertainment on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cedar Fair (NYSE:FUN) and SeaWorld Entertainment (NYSE:SEAS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.5% of Cedar Fair shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Cedar Fair shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of SeaWorld Entertainment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Cedar Fair has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SeaWorld Entertainment has a beta of 2.37, indicating that its share price is 137% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Cedar Fair and SeaWorld Entertainment, as provided by MarketBeat.

Cedar Fair currently has a consensus price target of $49.10, suggesting a potential downside of 1.07%. SeaWorld Entertainment has a consensus price target of $40.2143, suggesting a potential downside of 19.47%. Given Cedar Fair's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cedar Fair is more favorable than SeaWorld Entertainment.

Profitability

This table compares Cedar Fair and SeaWorld Entertainment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cedar Fair and SeaWorld Entertainment's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cedar Fair has higher revenue and earnings than SeaWorld Entertainment. Cedar Fair is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SeaWorld Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cedar Fair beats SeaWorld Entertainment on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.