NYSE:SWM

Schweitzer-Mauduit International Competitors

$48.26
-0.15 (-0.31 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$48.00
Now: $48.26
$48.64
50-Day Range
$43.77
MA: $47.69
$50.52
52-Week Range
$24.84
Now: $48.26
$50.78
Volume83,116 shs
Average Volume201,941 shs
Market Capitalization$1.52 billion
P/E Ratio17.11
Dividend Yield3.64%
Beta1.11

Competitors

Schweitzer-Mauduit International (NYSE:SWM) Vs. PPC, OLLI, HELE, FLO, LANC, and NOMD

Should you be buying SWM stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to Schweitzer-Mauduit International, including Pilgrim's Pride (PPC), Ollie's Bargain Outlet (OLLI), Helen of Troy (HELE), Flowers Foods (FLO), Lancaster Colony (LANC), and Nomad Foods (NOMD).

Schweitzer-Mauduit International (NYSE:SWM) and Pilgrim's Pride (NASDAQ:PPC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Pilgrim's Pride, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Schweitzer-Mauduit International0000N/A
Pilgrim's Pride01302.75

Pilgrim's Pride has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.45%. Given Pilgrim's Pride's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pilgrim's Pride is more favorable than Schweitzer-Mauduit International.

Profitability

This table compares Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Pilgrim's Pride's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Schweitzer-Mauduit International8.58%19.15%7.38%
Pilgrim's Pride1.55%9.83%3.33%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Pilgrim's Pride's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schweitzer-Mauduit International$1.02 billion1.48$85.80 million$3.5513.59
Pilgrim's Pride$11.41 billion0.51$455.92 million$1.6214.86

Pilgrim's Pride has higher revenue and earnings than Schweitzer-Mauduit International. Schweitzer-Mauduit International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pilgrim's Pride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Schweitzer-Mauduit International has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pilgrim's Pride has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.3% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.1% of Pilgrim's Pride shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 78.7% of Pilgrim's Pride shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Schweitzer-Mauduit International beats Pilgrim's Pride on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ollie's Bargain Outlet (NASDAQ:OLLI) and Schweitzer-Mauduit International (NYSE:SWM) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Volatility & Risk

Ollie's Bargain Outlet has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schweitzer-Mauduit International has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.3% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are held by institutional investors. 16.4% of Ollie's Bargain Outlet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ollie's Bargain Outlet and Schweitzer-Mauduit International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ollie's Bargain Outlet$1.41 billion4.13$141.13 million$1.9645.33
Schweitzer-Mauduit International$1.02 billion1.48$85.80 million$3.5513.59

Ollie's Bargain Outlet has higher revenue and earnings than Schweitzer-Mauduit International. Schweitzer-Mauduit International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ollie's Bargain Outlet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ollie's Bargain Outlet and Schweitzer-Mauduit International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ollie's Bargain Outlet13.31%16.64%11.00%
Schweitzer-Mauduit International8.58%19.15%7.38%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Ollie's Bargain Outlet and Schweitzer-Mauduit International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ollie's Bargain Outlet45602.13
Schweitzer-Mauduit International0000N/A

Ollie's Bargain Outlet currently has a consensus price target of $94.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.81%. Given Ollie's Bargain Outlet's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ollie's Bargain Outlet is more favorable than Schweitzer-Mauduit International.

Summary

Ollie's Bargain Outlet beats Schweitzer-Mauduit International on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Helen of Troy (NASDAQ:HELE) and Schweitzer-Mauduit International (NYSE:SWM) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Helen of Troy and Schweitzer-Mauduit International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Helen of Troy04102.20
Schweitzer-Mauduit International0000N/A

Helen of Troy currently has a consensus price target of $236.75, suggesting a potential upside of 11.33%. Given Helen of Troy's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Helen of Troy is more favorable than Schweitzer-Mauduit International.

Volatility and Risk

Helen of Troy has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schweitzer-Mauduit International has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.1% of Helen of Troy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Helen of Troy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Helen of Troy and Schweitzer-Mauduit International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Helen of Troy11.25%24.39%14.29%
Schweitzer-Mauduit International8.58%19.15%7.38%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Helen of Troy and Schweitzer-Mauduit International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Helen of Troy$1.71 billion3.04$152.33 million$8.4725.11
Schweitzer-Mauduit International$1.02 billion1.48$85.80 million$3.5513.59

Helen of Troy has higher revenue and earnings than Schweitzer-Mauduit International. Schweitzer-Mauduit International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Helen of Troy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Helen of Troy beats Schweitzer-Mauduit International on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) and Schweitzer-Mauduit International (NYSE:SWM) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Flowers Foods and Schweitzer-Mauduit International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Flowers Foods2.30%19.41%7.65%
Schweitzer-Mauduit International8.58%19.15%7.38%

Dividends

Flowers Foods pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Schweitzer-Mauduit International pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Flowers Foods pays out 83.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schweitzer-Mauduit International pays out 49.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowers Foods has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Schweitzer-Mauduit International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Schweitzer-Mauduit International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schweitzer-Mauduit International has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Flowers Foods and Schweitzer-Mauduit International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Flowers Foods$4.12 billion1.23$164.54 million$0.9624.88
Schweitzer-Mauduit International$1.02 billion1.48$85.80 million$3.5513.59

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Schweitzer-Mauduit International. Schweitzer-Mauduit International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowers Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Flowers Foods and Schweitzer-Mauduit International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Flowers Foods04002.00
Schweitzer-Mauduit International0000N/A

Flowers Foods presently has a consensus target price of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.50%. Given Flowers Foods' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flowers Foods is more favorable than Schweitzer-Mauduit International.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.5% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.2% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Flowers Foods beats Schweitzer-Mauduit International on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lancaster Colony (NASDAQ:LANC) and Schweitzer-Mauduit International (NYSE:SWM) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Lancaster Colony and Schweitzer-Mauduit International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lancaster Colony00103.00
Schweitzer-Mauduit International0000N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Lancaster Colony and Schweitzer-Mauduit International's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lancaster Colony$1.33 billion3.69$136.98 million$4.9336.28
Schweitzer-Mauduit International$1.02 billion1.48$85.80 million$3.5513.59

Lancaster Colony has higher revenue and earnings than Schweitzer-Mauduit International. Schweitzer-Mauduit International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lancaster Colony, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Lancaster Colony pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Schweitzer-Mauduit International pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Lancaster Colony pays out 60.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schweitzer-Mauduit International pays out 49.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lancaster Colony has increased its dividend for 26 consecutive years and Schweitzer-Mauduit International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Schweitzer-Mauduit International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk and Volatility

Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schweitzer-Mauduit International has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Lancaster Colony and Schweitzer-Mauduit International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lancaster Colony9.90%16.90%13.24%
Schweitzer-Mauduit International8.58%19.15%7.38%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

54.6% of Lancaster Colony shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are held by institutional investors. 31.7% of Lancaster Colony shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Lancaster Colony beats Schweitzer-Mauduit International on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schweitzer-Mauduit International (NYSE:SWM) and Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Nomad Foods, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Schweitzer-Mauduit International0000N/A
Nomad Foods01902.90

Nomad Foods has a consensus target price of $28.80, indicating a potential upside of 0.95%. Given Nomad Foods' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nomad Foods is more favorable than Schweitzer-Mauduit International.

Profitability

This table compares Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Nomad Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Schweitzer-Mauduit International8.58%19.15%7.38%
Nomad Foods8.56%10.37%4.38%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Nomad Foods' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schweitzer-Mauduit International$1.02 billion1.48$85.80 million$3.5513.59
Nomad Foods$2.60 billion1.89$172.48 million$1.3820.67

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Schweitzer-Mauduit International. Schweitzer-Mauduit International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomad Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Schweitzer-Mauduit International has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.3% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.8% of Nomad Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Schweitzer-Mauduit International beats Nomad Foods on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Schweitzer-Mauduit International Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Pilgrim's Pride logo
PPC
Pilgrim's Pride
1.5$24.07-0.6%$5.87 billion$11.41 billion31.67Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Ollie's Bargain Outlet logo
OLLI
Ollie's Bargain Outlet
1.1$88.84-2.5%$5.82 billion$1.41 billion25.68Insider Selling
Gap Up
Helen of Troy logo
HELE
Helen of Troy
1.7$212.65-1.9%$5.19 billion$1.71 billion23.60
Flowers Foods logo
FLO
Flowers Foods
1.3$23.88-1.3%$5.06 billion$4.12 billion51.91
Lancaster Colony logo
LANC
Lancaster Colony
2.0$178.85-0.2%$4.93 billion$1.33 billion36.95News Coverage
Nomad Foods logo
NOMD
Nomad Foods
1.5$28.53-0.4%$4.91 billion$2.60 billion23.78
Leslie's logo
LESL
Leslie's
1.3$24.95-0.7%$4.66 billion$1.11 billion59.40Analyst Downgrade
National Beverage logo
FIZZ
National Beverage
1.3$47.91-3.5%$4.47 billion$1.00 billion13.93Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gap Down
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.3$63.11-3.0%$4.25 billion$574.57 million29.77Gap Down
The Hain Celestial Group logo
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group
1.5$42.56-2.9%$4.25 billion$2.05 billion163.69News Coverage
Gap Down
Celsius logo
CELH
Celsius
1.5$53.54-2.0%$3.89 billion$75.15 million764.97Analyst Report
WD-40 logo
WDFC
WD-40
1.4$280.07-10.5%$3.83 billion$423.35 million63.65Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Hillenbrand logo
HI
Hillenbrand
2.0$50.46-2.3%$3.79 billion$2.52 billion-62.30Gap Up
Sanderson Farms logo
SAFM
Sanderson Farms
1.7$162.76-0.5%$3.63 billion$3.56 billion129.18
Grocery Outlet logo
GO
Grocery Outlet
1.2$37.90-1.3%$3.61 billion$2.56 billion39.89Insider Selling
News Coverage
Gap Up
BRF logo
BRFS
BRF
1.3$4.28-3.3%$3.48 billion$8.13 billion13.81
Utz Brands logo
UTZ
Utz Brands
1.5$25.25-1.8%$3.45 billionN/A0.00Dividend Announcement
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas logo
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas
1.3$18.61-1.7%$3.44 billion$2.41 billion27.37Analyst Report
News Coverage
Energizer logo
ENR
Energizer
2.4$48.88-0.1%$3.34 billion$2.74 billion-30.94
JW.B
John Wiley & Sons
0.6$55.54-0.0%$3.11 billion$1.83 billion-80.49News Coverage
The Simply Good Foods logo
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods
1.6$31.33-1.4%$3.00 billion$816.64 million49.73Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
J & J Snack Foods logo
JJSF
J & J Snack Foods
1.6$156.29-0.7%$2.97 billion$1.02 billion164.52
TreeHouse Foods logo
THS
TreeHouse Foods
1.2$50.95-3.8%$2.85 billion$4.29 billion-509.50Gap Down
Coca-Cola Consolidated logo
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0.7$303.15-1.0%$2.84 billion$4.83 billion29.81
Nu Skin Enterprises logo
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises
2.1$51.78-0.3%$2.63 billion$2.42 billion17.43
Medifast logo
MED
Medifast
2.4$221.23-0.2%$2.60 billion$713.67 million27.69
Purple Innovation logo
PRPL
Purple Innovation
2.1$34.01-1.4%$2.27 billion$428.36 million-109.71Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Up
Inter Parfums logo
IPAR
Inter Parfums
1.6$71.35-0.5%$2.26 billion$713.51 million71.35
Vector Group logo
VGR
Vector Group
1.3$14.47-1.5%$2.23 billion$1.90 billion32.89News Coverage
Tootsie Roll Industries logo
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries
0.9$32.45-0.4%$2.21 billion$523.62 million37.15News Coverage
Edgewell Personal Care logo
EPC
Edgewell Personal Care
1.7$38.59-2.2%$2.09 billion$1.95 billion31.12Gap Down
Industrias Bachoco logo
IBA
Industrias Bachoco
1.4$41.45-0.4%$2.07 billion$3.26 billion15.35Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
United Natural Foods logo
UNFI
United Natural Foods
1.4$35.30-0.2%$1.99 billion$26.51 billion18.58Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Hostess Brands logo
TWNK
Hostess Brands
1.3$14.66-1.1%$1.91 billion$907.67 million29.32
B&G Foods logo
BGS
B&G Foods
1.6$29.53-0.7%$1.91 billion$1.66 billion14.62
Tattooed Chef logo
TTCF
Tattooed Chef
0.9$19.19-0.0%$1.56 billionN/A0.00
SunOpta logo
STKL
SunOpta
1.5$14.89-1.7%$1.55 billion$1.19 billion-114.54
Franchise Group logo
FRG
Franchise Group
2.8$37.40-2.1%$1.50 billion$132.55 million0.00Gap Up
e.l.f. Beauty logo
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty
1.3$27.85-1.1%$1.43 billion$282.85 million146.59
UVV
Universal
1.2$57.64-2.2%$1.41 billion$1.91 billion25.50Unusual Options Activity
Mission Produce logo
AVO
Mission Produce
1.3$19.88-0.3%$1.40 billionN/A0.00Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
Meredith logo
MDP
Meredith
1.3$30.27-0.2%$1.38 billion$2.85 billion-3.29
Calavo Growers logo
CVGW
Calavo Growers
1.7$76.75-1.4%$1.36 billion$1.06 billion-98.40
Fresh Del Monte Produce logo
FDP
Fresh Del Monte Produce
1.1$28.64-0.9%$1.36 billion$4.49 billion59.67
Tupperware Brands logo
TUP
Tupperware Brands
1.5$27.02-3.0%$1.34 billion$1.80 billion84.44Gap Up
Matthews International logo
MATW
Matthews International
2.3$41.19-0.9%$1.30 billion$1.50 billion-14.71Analyst Downgrade
Arko logo
ARKO
Arko
1.7$10.21-0.6%$1.27 billionN/A0.00Analyst Downgrade
The Chefs' Warehouse logo
CHEF
The Chefs' Warehouse
1.2$31.96-0.9%$1.21 billion$1.59 billion-31.96
MGP Ingredients logo
MGPI
MGP Ingredients
1.8$64.14-0.5%$1.09 billion$362.74 million26.29
Scholastic logo
SCHL
Scholastic
1.8$30.63-0.4%$1.05 billion$1.49 billion-17.31
This page was last updated on 4/10/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.