NYSEAMERICAN:DNN

Denison Mines Competitors

$1.18
+0.03 (+2.17 %)
(As of 05/7/2021 11:55 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$1.14
$1.21
50-Day Range
$0.34
$0.72
52-Week Range
$0.30
$1.81
Volume237,533 shs
Average Volume26.50 million shs
Market Capitalization$941.91 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.16

Competitors

Denison Mines (NYSEAMERICAN:DNN) Vs. MXCHY, FUL, SXT, CBT, TROX, and AG

Should you be buying DNN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "basic materials" are considered alternatives and competitors to Denison Mines, including Orbia Advance (MXCHY), H.B. Fuller (FUL), Sensient Technologies (SXT), Cabot (CBT), Tronox (TROX), and First Majestic Silver (AG).

Denison Mines (NYSEAMERICAN:DNN) and Orbia Advance (OTCMKTS:MXCHY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Denison Mines and Orbia Advance's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Denison Mines$11.72 million80.37$-13,670,000.00($0.02)-58.75
Orbia Advance$6.99 billion0.00$206.73 million$0.20N/A

Orbia Advance has higher revenue and earnings than Denison Mines. Denison Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Orbia Advance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Denison Mines and Orbia Advance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Denison Mines-103.08%-7.12%-5.00%
Orbia Advance2.01%5.22%1.53%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

11.9% of Denison Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Denison Mines has a beta of 2.16, meaning that its share price is 116% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Orbia Advance has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its share price is 90% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Denison Mines and Orbia Advance, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Denison Mines02102.33
Orbia Advance01002.00

Denison Mines presently has a consensus target price of $1.45, suggesting a potential upside of 23.93%.

Summary

Orbia Advance beats Denison Mines on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

H.B. Fuller (NYSE:FUL) and Denison Mines (NYSEAMERICAN:DNN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

H.B. Fuller has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Denison Mines has a beta of 2.16, meaning that its share price is 116% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.4% of H.B. Fuller shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Denison Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of H.B. Fuller shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares H.B. Fuller and Denison Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
H.B. Fuller4.19%11.18%3.49%
Denison Mines-103.08%-7.12%-5.00%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares H.B. Fuller and Denison Mines' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
H.B. Fuller$2.90 billion1.24$130.82 million$2.9623.29
Denison Mines$11.72 million80.37$-13,670,000.00($0.02)-58.75

H.B. Fuller has higher revenue and earnings than Denison Mines. Denison Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H.B. Fuller, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for H.B. Fuller and Denison Mines, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
H.B. Fuller03302.50
Denison Mines02102.33

H.B. Fuller currently has a consensus target price of $59.60, indicating a potential downside of 13.41%. Denison Mines has a consensus target price of $1.45, indicating a potential upside of 23.93%. Given Denison Mines' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Denison Mines is more favorable than H.B. Fuller.

Summary

H.B. Fuller beats Denison Mines on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sensient Technologies (NYSE:SXT) and Denison Mines (NYSEAMERICAN:DNN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Sensient Technologies has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Denison Mines has a beta of 2.16, meaning that its share price is 116% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.9% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Denison Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Sensient Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Sensient Technologies and Denison Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sensient Technologies5.12%13.65%6.97%
Denison Mines-103.08%-7.12%-5.00%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sensient Technologies and Denison Mines' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sensient Technologies$1.32 billion2.70$82.05 million$2.9628.51
Denison Mines$11.72 million80.37$-13,670,000.00($0.02)-58.75

Sensient Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Denison Mines. Denison Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sensient Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Sensient Technologies and Denison Mines, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sensient Technologies00103.00
Denison Mines02102.33

Sensient Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $70.00, indicating a potential downside of 17.32%. Denison Mines has a consensus target price of $1.45, indicating a potential upside of 23.93%. Given Denison Mines' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Denison Mines is more favorable than Sensient Technologies.

Summary

Sensient Technologies beats Denison Mines on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cabot (NYSE:CBT) and Denison Mines (NYSEAMERICAN:DNN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Cabot has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its share price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Denison Mines has a beta of 2.16, meaning that its share price is 116% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Cabot and Denison Mines, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cabot12302.33
Denison Mines02102.33

Cabot currently has a consensus target price of $66.8571, indicating a potential upside of 6.21%. Denison Mines has a consensus target price of $1.45, indicating a potential upside of 23.93%. Given Denison Mines' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Denison Mines is more favorable than Cabot.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cabot and Denison Mines' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cabot$2.61 billion1.36$-238,000,000.00$2.0830.26
Denison Mines$11.72 million80.37$-13,670,000.00($0.02)-58.75

Denison Mines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cabot. Denison Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cabot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.2% of Cabot shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Denison Mines shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Cabot shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Cabot and Denison Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cabot-9.10%11.67%3.92%
Denison Mines-103.08%-7.12%-5.00%

Summary

Cabot beats Denison Mines on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tronox (NYSE:TROX) and Denison Mines (NYSEAMERICAN:DNN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Tronox and Denison Mines, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tronox11202.25
Denison Mines02102.33

Tronox presently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential downside of 44.77%. Denison Mines has a consensus price target of $1.45, indicating a potential upside of 23.93%. Given Denison Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Denison Mines is more favorable than Tronox.

Volatility and Risk

Tronox has a beta of 2.65, indicating that its stock price is 165% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Denison Mines has a beta of 2.16, indicating that its stock price is 116% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tronox and Denison Mines' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tronox$2.64 billion1.35$-109,000,000.00$0.4750.15
Denison Mines$11.72 million80.37$-13,670,000.00($0.02)-58.75

Denison Mines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tronox. Denison Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tronox, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Tronox and Denison Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tronox34.63%7.18%1.29%
Denison Mines-103.08%-7.12%-5.00%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

54.3% of Tronox shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Denison Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Tronox shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tronox beats Denison Mines on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

First Majestic Silver (NYSE:AG) and Denison Mines (NYSEAMERICAN:DNN) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for First Majestic Silver and Denison Mines, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
First Majestic Silver04102.20
Denison Mines02102.33

First Majestic Silver presently has a consensus price target of $10.9375, indicating a potential downside of 33.27%. Denison Mines has a consensus price target of $1.45, indicating a potential upside of 23.93%. Given Denison Mines' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Denison Mines is more favorable than First Majestic Silver.

Volatility and Risk

First Majestic Silver has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Denison Mines has a beta of 2.16, indicating that its stock price is 116% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares First Majestic Silver and Denison Mines' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Majestic Silver$363.94 million10.03$-40,470,000.00$0.04409.50
Denison Mines$11.72 million80.37$-13,670,000.00($0.02)-58.75

Denison Mines has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Majestic Silver. Denison Mines is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Majestic Silver, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares First Majestic Silver and Denison Mines' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
First Majestic Silver-14.98%1.96%1.26%
Denison Mines-103.08%-7.12%-5.00%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.0% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Denison Mines shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of First Majestic Silver shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

First Majestic Silver beats Denison Mines on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ad Green Leaf Stock Journal
Retail Goes D2C
The way people shop continues to evolve. This company has created an online e-commerce platform designed to assist innovators in meeting sales growth goals.

Denison Mines Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Orbia Advance logo
MXCHY
Orbia Advance
1.2N/AN/A$3.68 billion$6.99 billion17.50
H.B. Fuller logo
FUL
H.B. Fuller
2.0$68.94+0.1%$3.61 billion$2.90 billion31.34
Sensient Technologies logo
SXT
Sensient Technologies
1.8$84.38+0.0%$3.58 billion$1.32 billion53.07Analyst Upgrade
Cabot logo
CBT
Cabot
1.8$62.95+0.0%$3.56 billion$2.61 billion-14.85Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
Tronox logo
TROX
Tronox
1.8$23.57+0.2%$3.56 billion$2.64 billion3.70Dividend Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Increase in Short Interest
First Majestic Silver logo
AG
First Majestic Silver
1.1$16.38+2.7%$3.55 billion$363.94 million-65.52News Coverage
Ingevity logo
NGVT
Ingevity
1.7$86.07+0.4%$3.46 billion$1.29 billion19.97Analyst Report
Alamos Gold logo
AGI
Alamos Gold
2.2$8.71+0.6%$3.40 billion$683.10 million32.26
NovaGold Resources logo
NG
NovaGold Resources
0.6$9.55+0.4%$3.15 billionN/A-95.50
Allegheny Technologies logo
ATI
Allegheny Technologies
1.1$24.18+2.3%$3.15 billion$4.12 billion-7.63Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Amyris logo
AMRS
Amyris
1.5$12.51+8.8%$3.12 billion$152.56 million-5.61Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Stepan logo
SCL
Stepan
2.2$137.28+0.5%$3.10 billion$1.86 billion26.92Insider Selling
HUIHY
Huabao International
0.0$48.83+0.0%$3.04 billion$613.68 million0.00
Methanex logo
MEOH
Methanex
1.6$39.43+0.3%$3.01 billion$2.78 billion-23.61Dividend Announcement
Analyst Revision
Harmony Gold Mining logo
HMY
Harmony Gold Mining
1.3$5.14+5.6%$2.99 billion$2.02 billion-51.40News Coverage
Victrex logo
VTXPF
Victrex
0.8$32.95+0.0%$2.85 billion$375.32 million24.23
Minerals Technologies logo
MTX
Minerals Technologies
1.8$81.36+1.4%$2.79 billion$1.79 billion25.43Earnings Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical logo
SHI
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
1.1$25.01+0.1%$2.70 billion$14.24 billion833.94Analyst Upgrade
Trinseo logo
TSE
Trinseo
1.8$68.12+0.8%$2.66 billion$3.78 billion-48.31Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
News Coverage
Outokumpu Oyj logo
OUTKY
Outokumpu Oyj
0.6$3.14+2.5%$2.58 billion$7.17 billion-24.15Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Hydrofarm Holdings Group logo
HYFM
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1.3$63.22+2.7%$2.56 billionN/A0.00
Innospec logo
IOSP
Innospec
1.8$102.92+0.1%$2.53 billion$1.51 billion69.07Earnings Announcement
Dividend Increase
Analyst Upgrade
Livent logo
LTHM
Livent
1.3$18.07+4.6%$2.53 billion$388.40 million-200.78Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Equinox Gold logo
EQX
Equinox Gold
1.5$8.91+4.9%$2.52 billion$281.70 million-42.43Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gap Up
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. logo
BVN
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
1.1$10.31+4.2%$2.51 billion$867.89 million-20.22
Ube Industries logo
UBEOY
Ube Industries
1.1$11.59+0.0%$2.46 billion$6.28 billion0.00Upcoming Earnings
Domtar logo
UFS
Domtar
1.4$47.83+1.4%$2.44 billion$5.22 billion-26.14Earnings Announcement
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Compass Minerals International logo
CMP
Compass Minerals International
1.7$70.32+0.4%$2.38 billion$1.49 billion29.30Earnings Announcement
GrowGeneration logo
GRWG
GrowGeneration
1.7$43.35+6.2%$2.38 billion$79 million867.17Upcoming Earnings
Grupo Simec logo
SIM
Grupo Simec
0.8$15.17+1.2%$2.35 billion$1.78 billion16.25
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais logo
USNZY
Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais
1.1$4.42+5.0%$2.32 billion$3.63 billion110.53Analyst Downgrade
Hudbay Minerals logo
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
1.8$9.00+4.0%$2.26 billion$1.24 billion-15.25Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Coeur Mining logo
CDE
Coeur Mining
1.3$9.15+0.9%$2.25 billion$711.50 million-8.47Analyst Upgrade
Osisko Gold Royalties logo
OR
Osisko Gold Royalties
2.5$13.64+2.9%$2.22 billion$295.86 million-18.43Upcoming Earnings
Pretium Resources logo
PVG
Pretium Resources
2.0$11.43+0.6%$2.16 billion$484.54 million23.33Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
NexGen Energy logo
NXE
NexGen Energy
1.3$4.70+2.1%$2.16 billionN/A-52.22Upcoming Earnings
CSW Industrials logo
CSWI
CSW Industrials
1.1$134.02+0.2%$2.09 billion$385.87 million40.01
Salzgitter logo
SZGPY
Salzgitter
0.6$3.40+5.0%$2.04 billion$9.57 billion-3.62Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gap Up
Kronos Worldwide logo
KRO
Kronos Worldwide
1.6$17.40+0.8%$2.03 billion$1.73 billion32.22Earnings Announcement
Capstone Mining logo
CSFFF
Capstone Mining
1.1$4.93+6.1%$2.02 billion$418.66 million-493.00Gap Up
Eldorado Gold logo
EGO
Eldorado Gold
1.8$11.10+0.7%$2.00 billion$617.80 million10.78Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
PQ Group logo
PQG
PQ Group
1.7$14.82+1.5%$2.00 billion$1.57 billion46.31Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Carpenter Technology logo
CRS
Carpenter Technology
1.5$40.74+1.5%$1.99 billion$2.18 billion-22.26Analyst Revision
Ero Copper logo
ERRPF
Ero Copper
1.2$22.41+1.8%$1.97 billionN/A0.00Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Up
Sappi logo
SPPJY
Sappi
0.7$3.40+0.0%$1.86 billion$4.61 billion-13.60News Coverage
MAG Silver logo
MAG
MAG Silver
1.5$19.32+0.9%$1.85 billionN/A-92.00
Centamin logo
CELTF
Centamin
1.6$1.60+4.4%$1.85 billion$652.34 million20.00Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Up
Cal-Maine Foods logo
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods
2.2$37.13+0.7%$1.83 billion$1.35 billion27.10
Tokuyama logo
TKYMY
Tokuyama
1.1$12.06+0.0%$1.74 billion$2.91 billion9.28
Ranpak logo
PACK
Ranpak
1.4$20.73+1.3%$1.59 billion$269.50 million-66.87Earnings Announcement
This page was last updated on 5/7/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.