PolyMet Mining Competitors

North American Palladium (OTCMKTS:PALDF) and PolyMet Mining (NYSEAMERICAN:PLM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for North American Palladium and PolyMet Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares North American Palladium and PolyMet Mining's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

North American Palladium has higher revenue and earnings than PolyMet Mining.

Profitability

This table compares North American Palladium and PolyMet Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

North American Palladium has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its share price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PolyMet Mining has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

1.1% of PolyMet Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of North American Palladium shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

North American Palladium beats PolyMet Mining on 8 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sierra Metals (NYSEAMERICAN:SMTS) and PolyMet Mining (NYSEAMERICAN:PLM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

55.4% of Sierra Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of PolyMet Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Sierra Metals and PolyMet Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sierra Metals currently has a consensus price target of $3.85, suggesting a potential upside of 0.00%. Given Sierra Metals' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Sierra Metals is more favorable than PolyMet Mining.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sierra Metals and PolyMet Mining's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Sierra Metals has higher revenue and earnings than PolyMet Mining.

Profitability

This table compares Sierra Metals and PolyMet Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Sierra Metals has a beta of 1.81, indicating that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PolyMet Mining has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Sierra Metals beats PolyMet Mining on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

PolyMet Mining (NYSEAMERICAN:PLM) and Augusta Gold (OTCMKTS:BFGC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PolyMet Mining and Augusta Gold's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

1.1% of PolyMet Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.0% of Augusta Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

PolyMet Mining has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Augusta Gold has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for PolyMet Mining and Augusta Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares PolyMet Mining and Augusta Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Augusta Gold beats PolyMet Mining on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jaguar Mining (OTCMKTS:JAGGF) and PolyMet Mining (NYSEAMERICAN:PLM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Jaguar Mining and PolyMet Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Jaguar Mining and PolyMet Mining's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Jaguar Mining has higher revenue and earnings than PolyMet Mining.

Volatility and Risk

Jaguar Mining has a beta of 2.48, suggesting that its share price is 148% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PolyMet Mining has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

1.1% of PolyMet Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Jaguar Mining and PolyMet Mining, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Jaguar Mining presently has a consensus price target of $9.65, indicating a potential upside of 65.98%. Given Jaguar Mining's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Jaguar Mining is more favorable than PolyMet Mining.

Summary

Jaguar Mining beats PolyMet Mining on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

PolyMet Mining (NYSEAMERICAN:PLM) and Jaguar Mining (OTCMKTS:JAGGD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares PolyMet Mining and Jaguar Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.1% of PolyMet Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for PolyMet Mining and Jaguar Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Risk & Volatility

PolyMet Mining has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Jaguar Mining has a beta of 2.75, indicating that its stock price is 175% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares PolyMet Mining and Jaguar Mining's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Jaguar Mining has higher revenue and earnings than PolyMet Mining.

Summary

Jaguar Mining beats PolyMet Mining on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fission Uranium (OTCMKTS:FCUUF) and PolyMet Mining (NYSEAMERICAN:PLM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Fission Uranium and PolyMet Mining, as reported by MarketBeat.

Fission Uranium currently has a consensus target price of $0.65, indicating a potential upside of 21.50%. Given Fission Uranium's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Fission Uranium is more favorable than PolyMet Mining.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fission Uranium and PolyMet Mining's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Fission Uranium has a beta of 2.78, suggesting that its stock price is 178% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PolyMet Mining has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Fission Uranium and PolyMet Mining's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Fission Uranium shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of PolyMet Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.