A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S Competitors

Agricultural Bank of China (OTCMKTS:ACGBY) and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (OTCMKTS:AMKBY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Agricultural Bank of China and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Agricultural Bank of China pays an annual dividend of $0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S pays an annual dividend of $0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S pays out 141.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Agricultural Bank of China and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S, as reported by MarketBeat.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Agricultural Bank of China and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Agricultural Bank of China has higher revenue and earnings than A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S.

Summary

Agricultural Bank of China beats A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Bank of China (OTCMKTS:BACHY) and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (OTCMKTS:AMKBY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

Bank of China has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Bank of China and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Bank of China has higher revenue and earnings than A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Bank of China and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S, as reported by MarketBeat.

Dividends

Bank of China pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S pays an annual dividend of $0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S pays out 141.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Bank of China and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Bank of China beats A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (OTCMKTS:AMKBY) and Industria de Diseño Textil (OTCMKTS:IDEXY) are both large-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Industria de Diseño Textil has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Industria de Diseño Textil's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Industria de Diseño Textil has lower revenue, but higher earnings than A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S. Industria de Diseño Textil is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Industria de Diseño Textil, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Dividends

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S pays an annual dividend of $0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Industria de Diseño Textil pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S pays out 141.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Industria de Diseño Textil pays out 23.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Industria de Diseño Textil shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Industria de Diseño Textil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Industria de Diseño Textil beats A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (OTCMKTS:AMKBY) and Schneider Electric S.E. (OTCMKTS:SBGSY) are both large-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schneider Electric S.E. has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Schneider Electric S.E.'s top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Schneider Electric S.E. has lower revenue, but higher earnings than A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S. Schneider Electric S.E. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Schneider Electric S.E., as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Dividends

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S pays an annual dividend of $0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Schneider Electric S.E. pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S pays out 141.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Schneider Electric S.E. pays out 34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schneider Electric S.E. shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Schneider Electric S.E.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S beats Schneider Electric S.E. on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (OTCMKTS:AMKBY) and Airbus (OTCMKTS:EADSY) are both large-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Airbus has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its share price is 82% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Airbus' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Airbus. Airbus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Airbus, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.1% of A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Airbus shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Airbus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S beats Airbus on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (OTCMKTS:AMKBY) and Iberdrola (OTCMKTS:IBDRY) are both large-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Iberdrola has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Iberdrola's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Iberdrola has higher revenue and earnings than A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Iberdrola, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Dividends

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S pays an annual dividend of $0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Iberdrola pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S pays out 141.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Iberdrola shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S and Iberdrola's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Iberdrola beats A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.