AU Optronics Competitors

Maxim Integrated Products (NASDAQ:MXIM) and AU Optronics (OTCMKTS:AUOTY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Maxim Integrated Products and AU Optronics' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Maxim Integrated Products has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AU Optronics. AU Optronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maxim Integrated Products, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Maxim Integrated Products and AU Optronics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.0% of Maxim Integrated Products shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Maxim Integrated Products shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of AU Optronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Maxim Integrated Products has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AU Optronics has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Maxim Integrated Products and AU Optronics, as provided by MarketBeat.

Maxim Integrated Products presently has a consensus target price of $70.5625, suggesting a potential downside of 24.26%. Given Maxim Integrated Products' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Maxim Integrated Products is more favorable than AU Optronics.

Summary

Maxim Integrated Products beats AU Optronics on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kyocera (OTCMKTS:KYOCY) and AU Optronics (OTCMKTS:AUOTY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Kyocera and AU Optronics' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Kyocera has higher revenue and earnings than AU Optronics. AU Optronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyocera, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Kyocera and AU Optronics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.2% of Kyocera shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.0% of AU Optronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Kyocera has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AU Optronics has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Kyocera and AU Optronics, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Kyocera beats AU Optronics on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

United Microelectronics (NYSE:UMC) and AU Optronics (OTCMKTS:AUOTY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares United Microelectronics and AU Optronics' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

United Microelectronics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AU Optronics.

Profitability

This table compares United Microelectronics and AU Optronics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

4.0% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.0% of United Microelectronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of AU Optronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

United Microelectronics has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AU Optronics has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for United Microelectronics and AU Optronics, as provided by MarketBeat.

United Microelectronics presently has a consensus target price of $11.55, suggesting a potential upside of 17.86%. Given United Microelectronics' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe United Microelectronics is more favorable than AU Optronics.

Summary

United Microelectronics beats AU Optronics on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Enphase Energy (NASDAQ:ENPH) and AU Optronics (OTCMKTS:AUOTY) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Enphase Energy and AU Optronics' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Enphase Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AU Optronics. AU Optronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enphase Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Enphase Energy and AU Optronics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

72.8% of Enphase Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.1% of Enphase Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of AU Optronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AU Optronics has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Enphase Energy and AU Optronics, as provided by MarketBeat.

Enphase Energy presently has a consensus target price of $177.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Enphase Energy's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Enphase Energy is more favorable than AU Optronics.

Summary

Enphase Energy beats AU Optronics on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Qorvo (NASDAQ:QRVO) and AU Optronics (OTCMKTS:AUOTY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Qorvo and AU Optronics, as provided by MarketBeat.

Qorvo presently has a consensus target price of $177.6190, suggesting a potential upside of 1.65%. Given Qorvo's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Qorvo is more favorable than AU Optronics.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

84.6% of Qorvo shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Qorvo shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.0% of AU Optronics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Qorvo has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AU Optronics has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Qorvo and AU Optronics' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Qorvo has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AU Optronics. AU Optronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Qorvo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Qorvo and AU Optronics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Qorvo beats AU Optronics on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

AU Optronics (OTCMKTS:AUOTY) and Advantest (OTCMKTS:ATEYY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for AU Optronics and Advantest, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Volatility and Risk

AU Optronics has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Advantest has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AU Optronics and Advantest's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Advantest has lower revenue, but higher earnings than AU Optronics. AU Optronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Advantest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares AU Optronics and Advantest's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Advantest beats AU Optronics on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.