ECA Marcellus Trust I Competitors

HighPoint Resources (NYSE:HPR) and ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECTM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares HighPoint Resources and ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for HighPoint Resources and ECA Marcellus Trust I, as provided by MarketBeat.

HighPoint Resources presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 217.12%. Given HighPoint Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe HighPoint Resources is more favorable than ECA Marcellus Trust I.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.4% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of HighPoint Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

HighPoint Resources has a beta of 4.5, indicating that its stock price is 350% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares HighPoint Resources and ECA Marcellus Trust I's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has lower revenue, but higher earnings than HighPoint Resources.

Summary

ECA Marcellus Trust I beats HighPoint Resources on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Abraxas Petroleum (NASDAQ:AXAS) and ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECTM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.4% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Abraxas Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Abraxas Petroleum has a beta of 3.53, indicating that its stock price is 253% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Abraxas Petroleum and ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Abraxas Petroleum and ECA Marcellus Trust I, as provided by MarketBeat.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Abraxas Petroleum and ECA Marcellus Trust I's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Abraxas Petroleum.

Summary

ECA Marcellus Trust I beats Abraxas Petroleum on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECTM) and Gulfport Energy (OTCMKTS:GPORQ) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.4% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.9% of Gulfport Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulfport Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gulfport Energy has a beta of 5.58, suggesting that its stock price is 458% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and Gulfport Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gulfport Energy.

Profitability

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and Gulfport Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for ECA Marcellus Trust I and Gulfport Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

ECA Marcellus Trust I beats Gulfport Energy on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

New Concept Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:GBR) and ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECTM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for New Concept Energy and ECA Marcellus Trust I, as provided by MarketBeat.

Risk & Volatility

New Concept Energy has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares New Concept Energy and ECA Marcellus Trust I's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher revenue and earnings than New Concept Energy.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.6% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of New Concept Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares New Concept Energy and ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

New Concept Energy beats ECA Marcellus Trust I on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECTM) and U.S. Energy (NASDAQ:USEG) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for ECA Marcellus Trust I and U.S. Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Volatility & Risk

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Energy has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and U.S. Energy's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Energy.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.4% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of U.S. Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 48.0% of U.S. Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and U.S. Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

ECA Marcellus Trust I beats U.S. Energy on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECTM) and Barnwell Industries (NYSEAMERICAN:BRN) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for ECA Marcellus Trust I and Barnwell Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Volatility & Risk

ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Barnwell Industries has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its share price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and Barnwell Industries' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Barnwell Industries.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.4% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Barnwell Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares ECA Marcellus Trust I and Barnwell Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

ECA Marcellus Trust I beats Barnwell Industries on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.