First Pacific Competitors

Macquarie Infrastructure (NYSE:MIC) and First Pacific (OTCMKTS:FPAFY) are both multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.8% of Macquarie Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of First Pacific shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of Macquarie Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Macquarie Infrastructure has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Pacific has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Macquarie Infrastructure and First Pacific's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Macquarie Infrastructure and First Pacific's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Macquarie Infrastructure has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Pacific.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Macquarie Infrastructure and First Pacific, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Macquarie Infrastructure currently has a consensus price target of $39.1429, suggesting a potential upside of 28.38%. Given Macquarie Infrastructure's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Macquarie Infrastructure is more favorable than First Pacific.

Dividends

Macquarie Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. First Pacific pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Macquarie Infrastructure pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Macquarie Infrastructure beats First Pacific on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Federal Signal (NYSE:FSS) and First Pacific (OTCMKTS:FPAFY) are both multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Dividends

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. First Pacific pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Federal Signal pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

87.6% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of First Pacific shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Federal Signal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Federal Signal and First Pacific's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Federal Signal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Pacific.

Risk and Volatility

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Pacific has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Federal Signal and First Pacific's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Federal Signal and First Pacific, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Federal Signal currently has a consensus target price of $35.00, indicating a potential downside of 5.02%. Given Federal Signal's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than First Pacific.

Summary

Federal Signal beats First Pacific on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

First Pacific (OTCMKTS:FPAFY) and Shanghai Industrial (OTCMKTS:SGHIY) are both small-cap multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Dividends

First Pacific pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Shanghai Industrial pays an annual dividend of $0.53 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.0% of First Pacific shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares First Pacific and Shanghai Industrial's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Shanghai Industrial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Pacific.

Volatility and Risk

First Pacific has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shanghai Industrial has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares First Pacific and Shanghai Industrial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for First Pacific and Shanghai Industrial, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

First Pacific beats Shanghai Industrial on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Raven Industries (NASDAQ:RAVN) and First Pacific (OTCMKTS:FPAFY) are both small-cap multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Raven Industries and First Pacific's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Raven Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Pacific.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Raven Industries and First Pacific, as reported by MarketBeat.

Raven Industries presently has a consensus price target of $31.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.91%. Given Raven Industries' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Raven Industries is more favorable than First Pacific.

Profitability

This table compares Raven Industries and First Pacific's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.4% of Raven Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of First Pacific shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Raven Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Raven Industries has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Pacific has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Raven Industries beats First Pacific on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

First Pacific (OTCMKTS:FPAFY) and Griffon (NYSE:GFF) are both small-cap multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares First Pacific and Griffon's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Griffon has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Pacific.

Dividends

First Pacific pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Griffon pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Griffon pays out 19.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Griffon has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for First Pacific and Griffon, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Griffon has a consensus target price of $29.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.93%. Given Griffon's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Griffon is more favorable than First Pacific.

Profitability

This table compares First Pacific and Griffon's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.0% of First Pacific shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Griffon shares are held by institutional investors. 9.3% of Griffon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

First Pacific has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Griffon has a beta of 2, meaning that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Griffon beats First Pacific on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

First Pacific (OTCMKTS:FPAFY) and Barloworld (OTCMKTS:BRRAY) are both small-cap multi-sector conglomerates companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.0% of First Pacific shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares First Pacific and Barloworld's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Barloworld has lower revenue, but higher earnings than First Pacific.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for First Pacific and Barloworld, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Risk and Volatility

First Pacific has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Barloworld has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares First Pacific and Barloworld's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Barloworld beats First Pacific on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.