Groove Botanicals Competitors

Gulfport Energy (NASDAQ:GPOR) and Groove Botanicals (OTCMKTS:GRVE) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Gulfport Energy has a beta of 6.81, suggesting that its stock price is 581% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Groove Botanicals has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Gulfport Energy and Groove Botanicals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Gulfport Energy and Groove Botanicals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Gulfport Energy currently has a consensus price target of $4.00, indicating a potential upside of 8,233.33%. Given Gulfport Energy's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Gulfport Energy is more favorable than Groove Botanicals.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gulfport Energy and Groove Botanicals' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Groove Botanicals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gulfport Energy.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

83.4% of Gulfport Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Gulfport Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 55.1% of Groove Botanicals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gulfport Energy beats Groove Botanicals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Riverdale Oil and Gas (OTCMKTS:RVDO) and Groove Botanicals (OTCMKTS:GRVE) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Volatility & Risk

Riverdale Oil and Gas has a beta of -8.98, indicating that its share price is 998% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Groove Botanicals has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Riverdale Oil and Gas and Groove Botanicals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Riverdale Oil and Gas and Groove Botanicals' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Riverdale Oil and Gas and Groove Botanicals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Groove Botanicals beats Riverdale Oil and Gas on 1 of the 1 factors compared between the two stocks.

Groove Botanicals (OTCMKTS:GRVE) and ECA Marcellus Trust I (OTCMKTS:ECT) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Groove Botanicals has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ECA Marcellus Trust I has a beta of 2, meaning that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Groove Botanicals and ECA Marcellus Trust I's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ECA Marcellus Trust I has higher revenue and earnings than Groove Botanicals.

Profitability

This table compares Groove Botanicals and ECA Marcellus Trust I's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

2.0% of ECA Marcellus Trust I shares are held by institutional investors. 55.1% of Groove Botanicals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Groove Botanicals and ECA Marcellus Trust I, as reported by MarketBeat.

Summary

ECA Marcellus Trust I beats Groove Botanicals on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Groove Botanicals (OTCMKTS:GRVE) and Deep Well Oil & Gas (OTCMKTS:DWOG) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations for Groove Botanicals and Deep Well Oil & Gas, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Volatility and Risk

Groove Botanicals has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Deep Well Oil & Gas has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its share price is 52% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Groove Botanicals and Deep Well Oil & Gas' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Groove Botanicals and Deep Well Oil & Gas' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Summary

Deep Well Oil & Gas beats Groove Botanicals on 1 of the 1 factors compared between the two stocks.

Groove Botanicals (OTCMKTS:GRVE) and SandRidge Mississippian Trust I (OTCMKTS:SDTTU) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Groove Botanicals has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SandRidge Mississippian Trust I has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Groove Botanicals and SandRidge Mississippian Trust I's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Groove Botanicals and SandRidge Mississippian Trust I, as provided by MarketBeat.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Groove Botanicals and SandRidge Mississippian Trust I's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SandRidge Mississippian Trust I has higher revenue and earnings than Groove Botanicals.

Summary

SandRidge Mississippian Trust I beats Groove Botanicals on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Groove Botanicals (OTCMKTS:GRVE) and SandRidge Mississippian Trust II (OTCMKTS:SDRMU) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Groove Botanicals and SandRidge Mississippian Trust II, as provided by MarketBeat.

Volatility & Risk

Groove Botanicals has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SandRidge Mississippian Trust II has a beta of 1.7, meaning that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Groove Botanicals and SandRidge Mississippian Trust II's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Groove Botanicals and SandRidge Mississippian Trust II's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SandRidge Mississippian Trust II has higher revenue and earnings than Groove Botanicals.

Summary

SandRidge Mississippian Trust II beats Groove Botanicals on 5 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.