OTCMKTS:HCMLY

LafargeHolcim Competitors

$12.67
+0.24 (+1.93 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$12.62
Now: $12.67
$12.69
50-Day Range
$10.99
MA: $11.67
$12.43
52-Week Range
$7.15
Now: $12.67
$12.50
Volume77,072 shs
Average Volume54,992 shs
Market Capitalization$39.01 billion
P/E Ratio18.63
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.35

Competitors

LafargeHolcim (OTCMKTS:HCMLY) Vs. SHW, VCISY, CRH, DHI, LEN, and OTIS

Should you be buying HCMLY stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "construction" are considered alternatives and competitors to LafargeHolcim, including The Sherwin-Williams (SHW), Vinci (VCISY), CRH (CRH), D.R. Horton (DHI), Lennar (LEN), and Otis Worldwide (OTIS).

The Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) and LafargeHolcim (OTCMKTS:HCMLY) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and LafargeHolcim's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Sherwin-Williams10.41%56.69%10.66%
LafargeHolcimN/AN/AN/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares The Sherwin-Williams and LafargeHolcim's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Sherwin-Williams$17.90 billion4.01$1.54 billion$21.1212.64
LafargeHolcim$26.90 billion1.45$2.26 billion$0.6818.63

LafargeHolcim has higher revenue and earnings than The Sherwin-Williams. The Sherwin-Williams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LafargeHolcim, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

76.5% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of LafargeHolcim shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of The Sherwin-Williams shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for The Sherwin-Williams and LafargeHolcim, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Sherwin-Williams131502.74
LafargeHolcim04902.69

The Sherwin-Williams presently has a consensus target price of $285.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 6.90%. Given The Sherwin-Williams' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe The Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than LafargeHolcim.

Volatility and Risk

The Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LafargeHolcim has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The Sherwin-Williams beats LafargeHolcim on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Vinci (OTCMKTS:VCISY) and LafargeHolcim (OTCMKTS:HCMLY) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Vinci and LafargeHolcim's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
VinciN/AN/AN/A
LafargeHolcimN/AN/AN/A

Risk and Volatility

Vinci has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LafargeHolcim has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.5% of Vinci shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of LafargeHolcim shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Vinci and LafargeHolcim's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vinci$53.83 billion1.17$3.65 billionN/AN/A
LafargeHolcim$26.90 billion1.45$2.26 billion$0.6818.63

Vinci has higher revenue and earnings than LafargeHolcim.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Vinci and LafargeHolcim, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Vinci02802.80
LafargeHolcim04902.69

Summary

Vinci beats LafargeHolcim on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

CRH (NYSE:CRH) and LafargeHolcim (OTCMKTS:HCMLY) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares CRH and LafargeHolcim's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CRHN/AN/AN/A
LafargeHolcimN/AN/AN/A

Volatility and Risk

CRH has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LafargeHolcim has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

4.0% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of LafargeHolcim shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CRH and LafargeHolcim's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRH$32.09 billion1.19$2.16 billion$2.5619.00
LafargeHolcim$26.90 billion1.45$2.26 billion$0.6818.63

LafargeHolcim has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CRH. LafargeHolcim is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRH, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for CRH and LafargeHolcim, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CRH23902.50
LafargeHolcim04902.69

CRH currently has a consensus price target of $5.05, indicating a potential downside of 89.62%. Given CRH's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than LafargeHolcim.

Summary

CRH beats LafargeHolcim on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

D.R. Horton (NYSE:DHI) and LafargeHolcim (OTCMKTS:HCMLY) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares D.R. Horton and LafargeHolcim's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
D.R. Horton11.69%20.67%13.14%
LafargeHolcimN/AN/AN/A

Volatility and Risk

D.R. Horton has a beta of 1.7, indicating that its stock price is 70% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LafargeHolcim has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.2% of D.R. Horton shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of LafargeHolcim shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of D.R. Horton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares D.R. Horton and LafargeHolcim's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
D.R. Horton$20.31 billion1.73$2.37 billion$6.1615.64
LafargeHolcim$26.90 billion1.45$2.26 billion$0.6818.63

D.R. Horton has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LafargeHolcim. D.R. Horton is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LafargeHolcim, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for D.R. Horton and LafargeHolcim, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
D.R. Horton031712.90
LafargeHolcim04902.69

D.R. Horton currently has a consensus price target of $86.4762, indicating a potential downside of 10.27%. Given D.R. Horton's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe D.R. Horton is more favorable than LafargeHolcim.

Summary

D.R. Horton beats LafargeHolcim on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lennar (NYSE:LEN) and LafargeHolcim (OTCMKTS:HCMLY) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Volatility and Risk

Lennar has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LafargeHolcim has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Lennar and LafargeHolcim, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lennar0101002.50
LafargeHolcim04902.69

Lennar currently has a consensus price target of $96.5263, indicating a potential downside of 8.83%. Given Lennar's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Lennar is more favorable than LafargeHolcim.

Profitability

This table compares Lennar and LafargeHolcim's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lennar10.96%14.17%8.21%
LafargeHolcimN/AN/AN/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Lennar and LafargeHolcim's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lennar$22.49 billion1.48$2.47 billion$7.7013.75
LafargeHolcim$26.90 billion1.45$2.26 billion$0.6818.63

Lennar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LafargeHolcim. Lennar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LafargeHolcim, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

81.5% of Lennar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of LafargeHolcim shares are held by institutional investors. 8.6% of Lennar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lennar beats LafargeHolcim on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

LafargeHolcim (OTCMKTS:HCMLY) and Otis Worldwide (NYSE:OTIS) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for LafargeHolcim and Otis Worldwide, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
LafargeHolcim04902.69
Otis Worldwide04502.56

Otis Worldwide has a consensus target price of $73.7143, indicating a potential upside of 4.44%. Given Otis Worldwide's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Otis Worldwide is more favorable than LafargeHolcim.

Profitability

This table compares LafargeHolcim and Otis Worldwide's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
LafargeHolcimN/AN/AN/A
Otis WorldwideN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares LafargeHolcim and Otis Worldwide's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LafargeHolcim$26.90 billion1.45$2.26 billion$0.6818.63
Otis WorldwideN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

LafargeHolcim has higher revenue and earnings than Otis Worldwide.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of LafargeHolcim shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Otis Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

LafargeHolcim beats Otis Worldwide on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.


LafargeHolcim Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
The Sherwin-Williams logo
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams
2.5$266.92+3.7%$71.75 billion$17.90 billion13.17Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Vinci logo
VCISY
Vinci
0.4$26.69+2.5%$63.15 billion$53.83 billion0.00News Coverage
CRH logo
CRH
CRH
1.8$48.63+1.2%$38.12 billion$32.09 billion19.00High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
D.R. Horton logo
DHI
D.R. Horton
2.5$96.37+3.4%$35.05 billion$20.31 billion15.01Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Lennar logo
LEN
Lennar
2.4$105.88+2.8%$33.18 billion$22.49 billion13.47Analyst Report
Gap Up
Otis Worldwide logo
OTIS
Otis Worldwide
1.9$70.58+0.6%$30.33 billionN/A0.00
Weyerhaeuser logo
WY
Weyerhaeuser
1.3$39.32+2.1%$29.44 billion$6.55 billion95.90
United Rentals logo
URI
United Rentals
1.5$328.14+0.8%$23.73 billion$9.35 billion26.00Analyst Report
News Coverage
Vulcan Materials logo
VMC
Vulcan Materials
1.6$175.67+0.5%$23.31 billion$4.93 billion38.27Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Martin Marietta Materials logo
MLM
Martin Marietta Materials
1.8$351.57+1.0%$21.90 billion$4.74 billion32.86Analyst Revision
Ferrovial logo
FRRVY
Ferrovial
0.5$26.68+0.8%$19.55 billion$6.78 billion0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
HeidelbergCement logo
HDELY
HeidelbergCement
1.3$19.31+1.6%$19.16 billion$21.12 billion15.20Analyst Upgrade
Increase in Short Interest
NVR logo
NVR
NVR
1.7$4,984.85+2.8%$18.32 billion$7.22 billion22.97Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Jacobs Engineering Group logo
J
Jacobs Engineering Group
2.0$133.78+0.1%$17.40 billion$13.57 billion36.06Insider Selling
Rollins logo
ROL
Rollins
1.3$35.27+0.1%$17.36 billion$2.02 billion69.61
Masco logo
MAS
Masco
2.0$64.59+2.1%$16.40 billion$6.71 billion11.94Analyst Downgrade
Insider Selling
News Coverage
Atlantia logo
ATASY
Atlantia
0.6$9.77+0.9%$16.14 billion$14.13 billion108.56Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
James Hardie Industries logo
JHX
James Hardie Industries
0.6$33.42+0.9%$14.85 billion$2.61 billion101.27Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Sekisui House logo
SKHSY
Sekisui House
0.9$21.59+0.6%$14.78 billion$22.16 billion13.01Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Persimmon logo
PSMMY
Persimmon
1.3$90.35+0.9%$14.41 billion$4.66 billion13.15
PulteGroup logo
PHM
PulteGroup
2.5$54.22+1.4%$14.34 billion$10.21 billion11.32Analyst Report
Howmet Aerospace logo
HWM
Howmet Aerospace
1.9$32.70+1.1%$14.18 billion$14.19 billion31.14Unusual Options Activity
Alfa Laval AB (publ) logo
ALFVY
Alfa Laval AB (publ)
0.5$33.42+2.2%$14.02 billion$4.92 billion27.85Dividend Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Quanta Services logo
PWR
Quanta Services
1.9$95.70+0.4%$13.24 billion$12.11 billion35.31Decrease in Short Interest
Lennox International logo
LII
Lennox International
1.4$333.99+1.6%$12.61 billion$3.81 billion35.99Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Spirax-Sarco Engineering logo
SPXSF
Spirax-Sarco Engineering
0.7$165.20+0.0%$12.17 billion$1.59 billion48.88News Coverage
Trex logo
TREX
Trex
1.6$104.98+1.6%$12.16 billion$745.35 million72.65Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
RPM International logo
RPM
RPM International
2.3$93.47+2.4%$12.11 billion$5.51 billion28.32Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Floor & Decor logo
FND
Floor & Decor
1.7$112.59+4.4%$11.75 billion$2.05 billion68.65Analyst Report
Insider Selling
News Coverage
CRWOY
China Railway Group
1.0$11.30+0.0%$11.11 billion$123.12 billion0.00
CEMEX logo
CX
CEMEX
1.3$7.52+0.7%$11.06 billion$13.13 billion-6.32Decrease in Short Interest
Watsco logo
WSO
Watsco
1.3$283.68+1.4%$10.95 billion$4.77 billion46.50Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Revision
Watsco logo
WSO.B
Watsco
0.6$278.39+0.3%$10.70 billion$4.77 billion45.64Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Owens Corning logo
OC
Owens Corning
2.0$97.09+1.4%$10.19 billion$7.16 billion-19.38Analyst Downgrade
Insider Selling
News Coverage
Taylor Wimpey logo
TWODY
Taylor Wimpey
1.6$27.24+4.6%$9.93 billion$5.54 billion10.56Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
AECOM logo
ACM
AECOM
1.5$67.05+0.4%$9.90 billion$13.24 billion-56.82
Advanced Drainage Systems logo
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems
1.5$117.00+3.2%$8.29 billion$1.67 billion95.90Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Gap Up
Anhui Conch Cement logo
AHCHY
Anhui Conch Cement
1.2$31.11+1.0%$8.09 billion$22.72 billion7.10News Coverage
Thor Industries logo
THO
Thor Industries
2.0$140.20+2.2%$7.76 billion$8.17 billion27.28
TopBuild logo
BLD
TopBuild
1.5$232.06+0.8%$7.67 billion$2.62 billion34.90Analyst Report
Toll Brothers logo
TOL
Toll Brothers
2.4$61.29+2.8%$7.55 billion$7.08 billion17.77Analyst Report
Insider Selling
News Coverage
MasTec logo
MTZ
MasTec
1.4$101.65+3.0%$7.54 billion$7.18 billion24.32News Coverage
The AZEK logo
AZEK
The AZEK
1.8$48.61+2.3%$7.52 billion$899.26 million82.39Analyst Report
Insider Selling
News Coverage
The Weir Group logo
WEGRY
The Weir Group
0.8$13.95+1.6%$7.24 billion$3.40 billion24.91Analyst Upgrade
Louisiana-Pacific logo
LPX
Louisiana-Pacific
1.2$66.71+2.0%$7.11 billion$2.31 billion39.01
China Railway Construction logo
CWYCY
China Railway Construction
1.1$5.15+0.0%$6.99 billion$120.17 billion2.75
Obayashi logo
OBYCF
Obayashi
0.9$9.50+0.0%$6.82 billion$19.07 billion6.55Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
EMCOR Group logo
EME
EMCOR Group
1.3$119.93+1.0%$6.57 billion$9.17 billion48.36
Shimizu logo
SHMUY
Shimizu
1.0$34.03+1.7%$6.53 billion$15.62 billion7.91
China Communications Construction logo
CCCGY
China Communications Construction
1.8$8.00+0.0%$6.47 billion$78.45 billion2.63
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.