S&P 500   3,819.72 (-1.31%)
DOW   31,270.09 (-0.39%)
QQQ   309.88 (-2.68%)
AAPL   122.43 (-2.15%)
MSFT   227.78 (-2.60%)
FB   256.06 (-1.14%)
GOOGL   2,013.77 (-2.46%)
TSLA   654.02 (-4.72%)
AMZN   3,009.35 (-2.75%)
NVDA   514.51 (-4.05%)
BABA   236.24 (+0.78%)
CGC   33.24 (-5.70%)
GE   13.52 (+4.16%)
MU   89.41 (-1.84%)
NIO   41.23 (-4.76%)
AMD   81.05 (-3.66%)
T   28.80 (+2.06%)
F   12.23 (-2.55%)
ACB   10.46 (-5.17%)
DIS   193.00 (-0.48%)
BA   229.25 (+2.74%)
NFLX   521.32 (-4.84%)
PFE   34.34 (+2.48%)
S&P 500   3,819.72 (-1.31%)
DOW   31,270.09 (-0.39%)
QQQ   309.88 (-2.68%)
AAPL   122.43 (-2.15%)
MSFT   227.78 (-2.60%)
FB   256.06 (-1.14%)
GOOGL   2,013.77 (-2.46%)
TSLA   654.02 (-4.72%)
AMZN   3,009.35 (-2.75%)
NVDA   514.51 (-4.05%)
BABA   236.24 (+0.78%)
CGC   33.24 (-5.70%)
GE   13.52 (+4.16%)
MU   89.41 (-1.84%)
NIO   41.23 (-4.76%)
AMD   81.05 (-3.66%)
T   28.80 (+2.06%)
F   12.23 (-2.55%)
ACB   10.46 (-5.17%)
DIS   193.00 (-0.48%)
BA   229.25 (+2.74%)
NFLX   521.32 (-4.84%)
PFE   34.34 (+2.48%)
S&P 500   3,819.72 (-1.31%)
DOW   31,270.09 (-0.39%)
QQQ   309.88 (-2.68%)
AAPL   122.43 (-2.15%)
MSFT   227.78 (-2.60%)
FB   256.06 (-1.14%)
GOOGL   2,013.77 (-2.46%)
TSLA   654.02 (-4.72%)
AMZN   3,009.35 (-2.75%)
NVDA   514.51 (-4.05%)
BABA   236.24 (+0.78%)
CGC   33.24 (-5.70%)
GE   13.52 (+4.16%)
MU   89.41 (-1.84%)
NIO   41.23 (-4.76%)
AMD   81.05 (-3.66%)
T   28.80 (+2.06%)
F   12.23 (-2.55%)
ACB   10.46 (-5.17%)
DIS   193.00 (-0.48%)
BA   229.25 (+2.74%)
NFLX   521.32 (-4.84%)
PFE   34.34 (+2.48%)
S&P 500   3,819.72 (-1.31%)
DOW   31,270.09 (-0.39%)
QQQ   309.88 (-2.68%)
AAPL   122.43 (-2.15%)
MSFT   227.78 (-2.60%)
FB   256.06 (-1.14%)
GOOGL   2,013.77 (-2.46%)
TSLA   654.02 (-4.72%)
AMZN   3,009.35 (-2.75%)
NVDA   514.51 (-4.05%)
BABA   236.24 (+0.78%)
CGC   33.24 (-5.70%)
GE   13.52 (+4.16%)
MU   89.41 (-1.84%)
NIO   41.23 (-4.76%)
AMD   81.05 (-3.66%)
T   28.80 (+2.06%)
F   12.23 (-2.55%)
ACB   10.46 (-5.17%)
DIS   193.00 (-0.48%)
BA   229.25 (+2.74%)
NFLX   521.32 (-4.84%)
PFE   34.34 (+2.48%)
Log in
OTCMKTS:HLMAF

Halma Competitors

$32.43
-0.04 (-0.12 %)
(As of 03/2/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$32.43
Now: $32.43
$33.13
50-Day Range
$31.96
MA: $34.58
$35.88
52-Week Range
$19.23
Now: $32.43
$35.99
Volume823 shs
Average Volume3,278 shs
Market Capitalization$12.31 billion
P/E Ratio44.42
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.74

Competitors

Halma (OTCMKTS:HLMAF) Vs. DNZOY, ITOCY, SUHJY, SWGAY, AMKBY, and HOCPY

Should you be buying HLMAF stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "private households" are considered alternatives and competitors to Halma, including DENSO (DNZOY), ITOCHU (ITOCY), Sun Hung Kai Properties (SUHJY), The Swatch Group (SWGAY), A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (AMKBY), and HOYA (HOCPY).

DENSO (OTCMKTS:DNZOY) and Halma (OTCMKTS:HLMAF) are both large-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares DENSO and Halma's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DENSO$47.41 billion1.03$626.51 million$0.4077.75
Halma$1.70 billion7.23$234.45 million$0.7344.42

DENSO has higher revenue and earnings than Halma. Halma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DENSO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

DENSO has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halma has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for DENSO and Halma, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
DENSO01213.00
Halma25001.71

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of DENSO shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares DENSO and Halma's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
DENSO-2.32%-2.94%-1.83%
HalmaN/AN/AN/A

Summary

DENSO beats Halma on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

ITOCHU (OTCMKTS:ITOCY) and Halma (OTCMKTS:HLMAF) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares ITOCHU and Halma's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ITOCHU4.47%11.84%4.19%
HalmaN/AN/AN/A

Volatility & Risk

ITOCHU has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Halma has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.2% of ITOCHU shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for ITOCHU and Halma, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ITOCHU00103.00
Halma25001.71

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares ITOCHU and Halma's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ITOCHU$101.26 billion0.46$4.61 billion$6.1910.07
Halma$1.70 billion7.23$234.45 million$0.7344.42

ITOCHU has higher revenue and earnings than Halma. ITOCHU is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

ITOCHU beats Halma on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halma (OTCMKTS:HLMAF) and Sun Hung Kai Properties (OTCMKTS:SUHJY) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Halma and Sun Hung Kai Properties, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Halma25001.71
Sun Hung Kai Properties00103.00

Volatility & Risk

Halma has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sun Hung Kai Properties has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Halma and Sun Hung Kai Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
HalmaN/AN/AN/A
Sun Hung Kai PropertiesN/AN/AN/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Halma and Sun Hung Kai Properties' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halma$1.70 billion7.23$234.45 million$0.7344.42
Sun Hung Kai Properties$10.66 billion4.22$3.04 billion$1.3111.84

Sun Hung Kai Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Halma. Sun Hung Kai Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.1% of Sun Hung Kai Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Sun Hung Kai Properties beats Halma on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halma (OTCMKTS:HLMAF) and The Swatch Group (OTCMKTS:SWGAY) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Halma and The Swatch Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Halma25001.71
The Swatch Group17302.18

Profitability

This table compares Halma and The Swatch Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
HalmaN/AN/AN/A
The Swatch GroupN/AN/AN/A

Risk & Volatility

Halma has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Swatch Group has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Halma and The Swatch Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halma$1.70 billion7.23$234.45 million$0.7344.42
The Swatch Group$8.30 billion5.38$734.74 millionN/AN/A

The Swatch Group has higher revenue and earnings than Halma.

Summary

The Swatch Group beats Halma on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halma (OTCMKTS:HLMAF) and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S (OTCMKTS:AMKBY) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Halma and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Halma25001.71
A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S22802.50

Risk & Volatility

Halma has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Halma and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
HalmaN/AN/AN/A
A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S3.88%5.59%2.91%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Halma and A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halma$1.70 billion7.23$234.45 million$0.7344.42
A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S$38.89 billion1.15$-84,000,000.00$0.1292.83

Halma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S. Halma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S beats Halma on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Halma (OTCMKTS:HLMAF) and HOYA (OTCMKTS:HOCPY) are both large-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Halma and HOYA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
HalmaN/AN/AN/A
HOYA19.23%16.58%13.21%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Halma and HOYA's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Halma$1.70 billion7.23$234.45 million$0.7344.42
HOYA$5.31 billion8.19$1.05 billion$2.7941.47

HOYA has higher revenue and earnings than Halma. HOYA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Halma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Halma has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, HOYA has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.2% of HOYA shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Halma and HOYA, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Halma25001.71
HOYA00203.00

Summary

HOYA beats Halma on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Halma Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
DENSO logo
DNZOY
DENSO
1.1$31.10-0.6%$49.01 billion$47.41 billion-49.36Analyst Upgrade
Increase in Short Interest
ITOCHU logo
ITOCY
ITOCHU
1.1$62.33-0.5%$46.44 billion$101.26 billion10.75Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Sun Hung Kai Properties logo
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
1.6$15.51-0.9%$44.94 billion$10.66 billion11.84Dividend Increase
Increase in Short Interest
The Swatch Group logo
SWGAY
The Swatch Group
0.5$15.31-0.1%$44.66 billion$8.30 billion0.00Analyst Upgrade
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S logo
AMKBY
A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S
1.3$11.14-0.2%$44.63 billion$38.89 billion29.32Increase in Short Interest
HOYA logo
HOCPY
HOYA
1.1$115.70-0.4%$43.49 billion$5.31 billion42.69Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Bank of Communications logo
BCMXY
Bank of Communications
1.2$14.37-0.0%$42.68 billion$60.07 billion4.56
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft in München logo
MURGY
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft in München
0.8$30.29-2.4%$42.44 billion$61.62 billion31.23Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
SMC logo
SMCAY
SMC
1.3$30.84-1.7%$41.55 billion$4.84 billion43.44
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA logo
HENKY
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
1.4$22.62-0.7%$39.63 billion$22.53 billion16.76Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
JMHLY
Jardine Matheson
0.1$53.92-3.4%$39.61 billion$40.92 billion0.00Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Compass Group logo
CMPGY
Compass Group
0.8$21.32-1.8%$38.03 billion$25.75 billion88.83Increase in Short Interest
Sands China logo
SCHYY
Sands China
0.9$46.46-1.8%$37.58 billion$8.81 billion18.51Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
Vestas Wind Systems A/S logo
VWDRY
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
1.2$62.01-2.1%$37.57 billion$13.61 billion70.47Analyst Report
News Coverage
China Shenhua Energy logo
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy
1.3$7.53-0.9%$37.42 billion$35.00 billion6.84Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme logo
ESLOY
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme
1.4$82.74-0.4%$36.15 billion$19.48 billion33.63Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Sandvik logo
SDVKY
Sandvik
0.8$27.75-0.5%$34.81 billion$10.92 billion52.36Analyst Downgrade
Flutter Entertainment logo
PDYPY
Flutter Entertainment
0.4$98.85-2.0%$34.67 billion$2.73 billion51.75Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) logo
HNNMY
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
0.7$4.74-0.4%$34.62 billion$24.63 billion158.00Decrease in Short Interest
Seven & i logo
SVNDY
Seven & i
1.6$19.23-3.2%$34.02 billion$61.13 billion20.46Analyst Upgrade
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
Amadeus IT Group logo
AMADY
Amadeus IT Group
0.5$74.98-0.4%$33.78 billion$6.25 billion-258.54Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Nippon Paint logo
NPCPF
Nippon Paint
0.9$101.50-0.0%$32.55 billion$6.35 billion98.54
Japan Tobacco logo
JAPAY
Japan Tobacco
1.1$8.89-1.3%$31.55 billion$19.96 billion11.70
TTNDY
Techtronic Industries
0.2$82.24-3.5%$30.14 billion$7.67 billion0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Fujitsu logo
FJTSY
Fujitsu
0.9$29.33-0.2%$29.72 billion$35.49 billion22.22Decrease in Short Interest
Experian logo
EXPGY
Experian
1.4$32.25-0.1%$29.58 billion$5.18 billion31.62
Kuehne + Nagel International logo
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International
0.9$47.97-1.0%$28.72 billion$21.23 billion35.53Decrease in Short Interest
Swire Pacific logo
SWRAY
Swire Pacific
1.6$7.38-2.0%$28.69 billion$10.93 billion2.94Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
CK Hutchison logo
CKHUY
CK Hutchison
0.7$7.42-1.3%$28.61 billion$38.34 billion0.00
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) logo
SNPTF
Sunny Optical Technology (Group)
0.5$25.68-0.0%$28.17 billion$5.48 billion0.00
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) logo
ASAZY
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ)
1.4$13.07-1.5%$27.58 billion$9.95 billion31.88Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Zalando logo
ZLNDY
Zalando
0.4$51.80-0.3%$26.45 billion$7.26 billion235.47Upcoming Earnings
Associated British Foods logo
ASBFY
Associated British Foods
1.0$33.28-0.5%$26.35 billion$18.00 billion31.70Analyst Downgrade
Increase in Short Interest
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions logo
MGDDY
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
1.5$29.47-2.0%$26.28 billion$27.03 billion13.58Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Ashtead Group logo
ASHTY
Ashtead Group
1.4$226.90-0.1%$25.49 billion$5.84 billion31.34
Wilmar International logo
WLMIY
Wilmar International
0.7$40.14-0.2%$25.36 billion$42.64 billion19.68Gap Up
Sampo Oyj logo
SAXPY
Sampo Oyj
0.8$22.47-1.6%$25.17 billion$12.62 billion17.55Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Unicharm logo
UNICY
Unicharm
0.9$8.03-0.5%$23.85 billion$6.55 billion61.77Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
UniCredit logo
UNCFF
UniCredit
1.2$10.40-1.0%$23.30 billion$25.52 billion10.83
Ocado Group logo
OCDDY
Ocado Group
0.4$62.00-0.3%$23.21 billion$2.26 billion-81.58Decrease in Short Interest
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank
0.9$9.38-0.0%$22.95 billion$47.62 billion0.00
Kerry Group logo
KRYAY
Kerry Group
1.3$129.62-4.8%$22.90 billion$8.11 billion29.39Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Sino Biopharmaceutical logo
SBMFF
Sino Biopharmaceutical
0.8$1.20-5.0%$22.66 billion$3.51 billion0.00Gap Down
BAE Systems logo
BAESY
BAE Systems
1.4$28.10-2.1%$22.62 billion$22.52 billion13.77Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Sysmex logo
SSMXY
Sysmex
0.6$53.67-0.8%$22.40 billion$2.78 billion81.32Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Nomura Research Institute logo
NRILY
Nomura Research Institute
1.1$32.00-0.0%$22.21 billion$4.87 billion37.65Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
SGS logo
SGSOY
SGS
1.4$28.93-0.2%$21.89 billion$6.64 billion32.51Decrease in Short Interest
Suzuki Motor logo
SZKMY
Suzuki Motor
1.5$176.60-2.6%$21.68 billion$32.03 billion20.95Analyst Upgrade
Increase in Short Interest
SMNNY
Shimano
0.5$22.42-1.4%$20.78 billion$3.33 billion41.84Decrease in Short Interest
CIADY
China Mengniu Dairy
0.9$52.45-3.3%$20.71 billion$11.44 billion34.51Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
This page was last updated on 3/3/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.