MJ Competitors

MJ (OTCMKTS:MJNE) and Steel Connect (NASDAQ:STCN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares MJ and Steel Connect's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for MJ and Steel Connect, as provided by MarketBeat.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MJ and Steel Connect's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Steel Connect has higher revenue and earnings than MJ.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

46.6% of Steel Connect shares are held by institutional investors. 11.4% of Steel Connect shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

MJ has a beta of -0.57, meaning that its share price is 157% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Steel Connect has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Steel Connect beats MJ on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Customer Relations Centers (NASDAQ:CCRC) and MJ (OTCMKTS:MJNE) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares China Customer Relations Centers and MJ's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for China Customer Relations Centers and MJ, as provided by MarketBeat.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Customer Relations Centers and MJ's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

China Customer Relations Centers has higher revenue and earnings than MJ.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.2% of China Customer Relations Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

China Customer Relations Centers has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MJ has a beta of -0.57, indicating that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

China Customer Relations Centers beats MJ on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Heritage Global (NASDAQ:HGBL) and MJ (OTCMKTS:MJNE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.3% of Heritage Global shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.4% of Heritage Global shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Heritage Global and MJ's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Heritage Global has higher revenue and earnings than MJ.

Volatility & Risk

Heritage Global has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MJ has a beta of -0.57, indicating that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Heritage Global and MJ's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Heritage Global and MJ, as provided by MarketBeat.

Heritage Global presently has a consensus target price of $4.50, indicating a potential upside of 49.01%. Given Heritage Global's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Heritage Global is more favorable than MJ.

Summary

Heritage Global beats MJ on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Marchex (NASDAQ:MCHX) and MJ (OTCMKTS:MJNE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

66.3% of Marchex shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Marchex shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Marchex and MJ's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Marchex has higher revenue and earnings than MJ.

Volatility and Risk

Marchex has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MJ has a beta of -0.57, suggesting that its share price is 157% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Marchex and MJ's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Marchex and MJ, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Marchex currently has a consensus price target of $4.3750, indicating a potential upside of 68.27%. Given Marchex's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Marchex is more favorable than MJ.

Summary

Marchex beats MJ on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Molecular Data (NASDAQ:MKD) and MJ (OTCMKTS:MJNE) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

19.7% of Molecular Data shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Molecular Data and MJ's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MJ has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Molecular Data.

Profitability

This table compares Molecular Data and MJ's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Molecular Data and MJ, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

MJ (OTCMKTS:MJNE) and 36Kr (NASDAQ:KRKR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares MJ and 36Kr's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for MJ and 36Kr, as provided by MarketBeat.

36Kr has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 154.24%. Given 36Kr's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 36Kr is more favorable than MJ.

Risk & Volatility

MJ has a beta of -0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, 36Kr has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MJ and 36Kr's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

36Kr has higher revenue and earnings than MJ.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.1% of 36Kr shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

36Kr beats MJ on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.