OTCMKTS:NDGPY

Nine Dragons Paper Competitors

$29.31
-3.46 (-10.56 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$29.31
Now: $29.31
$29.31
50-Day Range
$32.77
MA: $35.71
$39.78
52-Week Range
$16.80
Now: $29.31
$39.91
Volume150 shs
Average Volume480 shs
Market Capitalization$6.88 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield3.81%
Beta0.73

Competitors

Nine Dragons Paper (OTCMKTS:NDGPY) Vs. IP, SUZ, UPMKY, UFS, SWM, and RFP

Should you be buying NDGPY stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "paper mills" are considered alternatives and competitors to Nine Dragons Paper, including International Paper (IP), Suzano (SUZ), UPM-Kymmene (UPMKY), Domtar (UFS), Schweitzer-Mauduit International (SWM), and Resolute Forest Products (RFP).

International Paper (NYSE:IP) and Nine Dragons Paper (OTCMKTS:NDGPY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

81.6% of International Paper shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of International Paper shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

International Paper pays an annual dividend of $2.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Nine Dragons Paper pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. International Paper pays out 46.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International Paper has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares International Paper and Nine Dragons Paper's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
International Paper2.37%17.27%3.79%
Nine Dragons PaperN/AN/AN/A

Risk & Volatility

International Paper has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nine Dragons Paper has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares International Paper and Nine Dragons Paper's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
International Paper$22.38 billion1.01$1.23 billion$4.4312.95
Nine Dragons Paper$7.30 billion0.94$592.75 millionN/AN/A

International Paper has higher revenue and earnings than Nine Dragons Paper.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for International Paper and Nine Dragons Paper, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
International Paper33802.36
Nine Dragons Paper0000N/A

International Paper currently has a consensus price target of $49.00, suggesting a potential downside of 14.59%. Given International Paper's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe International Paper is more favorable than Nine Dragons Paper.

Summary

International Paper beats Nine Dragons Paper on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Suzano (NYSE:SUZ) and Nine Dragons Paper (OTCMKTS:NDGPY) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Suzano and Nine Dragons Paper's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Suzano$6.32 billion2.75$-713,960,000.00N/AN/A
Nine Dragons Paper$7.30 billion0.94$592.75 millionN/AN/A

Nine Dragons Paper has higher revenue and earnings than Suzano.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Suzano and Nine Dragons Paper, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Suzano01302.75
Nine Dragons Paper0000N/A

Risk & Volatility

Suzano has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nine Dragons Paper has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.7% of Suzano shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Suzano and Nine Dragons Paper's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Suzano-54.24%73.71%5.33%
Nine Dragons PaperN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Suzano beats Nine Dragons Paper on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nine Dragons Paper (OTCMKTS:NDGPY) and UPM-Kymmene (OTCMKTS:UPMKY) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Nine Dragons Paper and UPM-Kymmene's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nine Dragons PaperN/AN/AN/A
UPM-Kymmene13.76%12.57%8.65%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Nine Dragons Paper and UPM-Kymmene's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nine Dragons Paper$7.30 billion0.94$592.75 millionN/AN/A
UPM-Kymmene$12.38 billion1.14$1.77 billion$2.659.98

UPM-Kymmene has higher revenue and earnings than Nine Dragons Paper.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.6% of UPM-Kymmene shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of UPM-Kymmene shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Nine Dragons Paper has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, UPM-Kymmene has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nine Dragons Paper and UPM-Kymmene, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nine Dragons Paper0000N/A
UPM-Kymmene0000N/A

Dividends

Nine Dragons Paper pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. UPM-Kymmene pays an annual dividend of $1.21 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. UPM-Kymmene pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

UPM-Kymmene beats Nine Dragons Paper on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nine Dragons Paper (OTCMKTS:NDGPY) and Domtar (NYSE:UFS) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Nine Dragons Paper and Domtar's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nine Dragons Paper$7.30 billion0.94$592.75 millionN/AN/A
Domtar$5.22 billion0.38$84 million$3.0013.19

Nine Dragons Paper has higher revenue and earnings than Domtar.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.7% of Domtar shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Domtar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Nine Dragons Paper and Domtar's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nine Dragons PaperN/AN/AN/A
Domtar-2.19%1.99%0.93%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Nine Dragons Paper and Domtar, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nine Dragons Paper0000N/A
Domtar05502.50

Domtar has a consensus target price of $36.80, suggesting a potential downside of 6.98%. Given Domtar's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Domtar is more favorable than Nine Dragons Paper.

Risk and Volatility

Nine Dragons Paper has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Domtar has a beta of 1.93, suggesting that its stock price is 93% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Domtar beats Nine Dragons Paper on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Schweitzer-Mauduit International (NYSE:SWM) and Nine Dragons Paper (OTCMKTS:NDGPY) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Schweitzer-Mauduit International pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Nine Dragons Paper pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Schweitzer-Mauduit International pays out 49.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Schweitzer-Mauduit International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

Schweitzer-Mauduit International has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nine Dragons Paper has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.3% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Schweitzer-Mauduit International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Nine Dragons Paper's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Schweitzer-Mauduit International8.58%19.15%7.38%
Nine Dragons PaperN/AN/AN/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Nine Dragons Paper's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Schweitzer-Mauduit International$1.02 billion1.53$85.80 million$3.5514.01
Nine Dragons Paper$7.30 billion0.94$592.75 millionN/AN/A

Nine Dragons Paper has higher revenue and earnings than Schweitzer-Mauduit International.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Schweitzer-Mauduit International and Nine Dragons Paper, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Schweitzer-Mauduit International0000N/A
Nine Dragons Paper0000N/A

Summary

Schweitzer-Mauduit International beats Nine Dragons Paper on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nine Dragons Paper (OTCMKTS:NDGPY) and Resolute Forest Products (NYSE:RFP) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Nine Dragons Paper has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Resolute Forest Products has a beta of 3.2, suggesting that its share price is 220% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.0% of Resolute Forest Products shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Resolute Forest Products shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Nine Dragons Paper and Resolute Forest Products, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nine Dragons Paper0000N/A
Resolute Forest Products10302.50

Resolute Forest Products has a consensus target price of $7.6875, indicating a potential downside of 48.02%. Given Resolute Forest Products' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Resolute Forest Products is more favorable than Nine Dragons Paper.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Nine Dragons Paper and Resolute Forest Products' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nine Dragons Paper$7.30 billion0.94$592.75 millionN/AN/A
Resolute Forest Products$2.92 billion0.41$-47,000,000.00N/AN/A

Nine Dragons Paper has higher revenue and earnings than Resolute Forest Products.

Profitability

This table compares Nine Dragons Paper and Resolute Forest Products' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nine Dragons PaperN/AN/AN/A
Resolute Forest Products-0.33%-3.37%-1.14%

Summary

Nine Dragons Paper beats Resolute Forest Products on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.


Nine Dragons Paper Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
International Paper logo
IP
International Paper
1.9$57.37-1.2%$22.54 billion$22.38 billion45.90Decrease in Short Interest
Suzano logo
SUZ
Suzano
0.5$12.78-0.2%$17.40 billion$6.32 billion-5.15Decrease in Short Interest
UPM-Kymmene logo
UPMKY
UPM-Kymmene
1.4$26.45-3.2%$14.12 billion$12.38 billion9.98News Coverage
Gap Down
Domtar logo
UFS
Domtar
1.7$39.56-4.7%$1.99 billion$5.22 billion-21.62Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Schweitzer-Mauduit International logo
SWM
Schweitzer-Mauduit International
1.4$49.74-0.3%$1.56 billion$1.02 billion17.64Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Resolute Forest Products logo
RFP
Resolute Forest Products
1.0$14.79-14.1%$1.20 billion$2.92 billion-211.29High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Gap Down
Neenah logo
NP
Neenah
1.3$54.82-0.9%$923.22 million$938.50 million-87.02News Coverage
Glatfelter logo
GLT
Glatfelter
1.6$17.06-0.4%$758.35 million$927.67 million-23.05Decrease in Short Interest
Verso logo
VRS
Verso
2.2$16.41-2.0%$542.71 million$2.44 billion3.03Analyst Revision
HAIPF
Hadera Paper
0.0$62.00-0.0%$393.64 millionN/A0.00
BPM logo
BPMI
BPM
0.0$0.04-0.0%$0.00N/A0.00
TISUQ
Orchids Paper Products
0.0$0.00-14.0%$0.00$186.68 million0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.