Pacific Booker Minerals Competitors

Mountain Province Diamonds (OTCMKTS:MPVDF) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mountain Province Diamonds and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Mountain Province Diamonds presently has a consensus price target of $0.10, suggesting a potential downside of 77.64%. Given Mountain Province Diamonds' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Mountain Province Diamonds is more favorable than Pacific Booker Minerals.

Risk and Volatility

Mountain Province Diamonds has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Mountain Province Diamonds and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pacific Booker Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mountain Province Diamonds.

Profitability

This table compares Mountain Province Diamonds and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

U.S. Gold (NASDAQ:USAU) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for U.S. Gold and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

U.S. Gold presently has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.36%. Given U.S. Gold's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe U.S. Gold is more favorable than Pacific Booker Minerals.

Risk and Volatility

U.S. Gold has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its share price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.4% of U.S. Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of U.S. Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares U.S. Gold and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares U.S. Gold and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

U.S. Gold beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Almaden Minerals (NYSEAMERICAN:AAU) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Almaden Minerals has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Almaden Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Almaden Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $1.10, suggesting a potential upside of 97.81%. Given Almaden Minerals' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Almaden Minerals is more favorable than Pacific Booker Minerals.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

4.9% of Almaden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Almaden Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Almaden Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Almaden Minerals beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Quantum Materials (OTCMKTS:QTMM) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Quantum Materials has a beta of 2.7, suggesting that its stock price is 170% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Quantum Materials and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.0% of Quantum Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.8% of Quantum Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Quantum Materials and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pacific Booker Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quantum Materials.

Profitability

This table compares Quantum Materials and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Quantum Materials beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Royal Standard Minerals (OTCMKTS:RYSMF) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Royal Standard Minerals has a beta of -88.64, meaning that its share price is 8,964% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Royal Standard Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Royal Standard Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Royal Standard Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Royal Standard Minerals beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Opiant Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:OPNT) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

20.8% of Opiant Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.0% of Opiant Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Opiant Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Opiant Pharmaceuticals and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Opiant Pharmaceuticals and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Opiant Pharmaceuticals has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Booker Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares Opiant Pharmaceuticals and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Opiant Pharmaceuticals beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.