OTCMKTS:PBMLF

Pacific Booker Minerals Competitors

$1.61
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 05/7/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$1.61
$1.61
50-Day Range
$1.41
$1.85
52-Week Range
$1.04
$2.07
VolumeN/A
Average Volume4,806 shs
Market Capitalization$26.96 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.49

Competitors

Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) Vs. MPVDF, USAU, AAU, QTMM, RYSMF, and OPNT

Should you be buying PBMLF stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "metal mining" are considered alternatives and competitors to Pacific Booker Minerals, including Mountain Province Diamonds (MPVDF), U.S. Gold (USAU), Almaden Minerals (AAU), Quantum Materials (QTMM), Royal Standard Minerals (RYSMF), and Opiant Pharmaceuticals (OPNT).

Mountain Province Diamonds (OTCMKTS:MPVDF) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mountain Province Diamonds and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Mountain Province Diamonds10001.00
Pacific Booker Minerals0000N/A

Mountain Province Diamonds presently has a consensus price target of $0.10, suggesting a potential downside of 77.64%. Given Mountain Province Diamonds' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Mountain Province Diamonds is more favorable than Pacific Booker Minerals.

Risk and Volatility

Mountain Province Diamonds has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Mountain Province Diamonds and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mountain Province Diamonds$208.24 million0.45$-97,030,000.00N/AN/A
Pacific Booker MineralsN/AN/A$-800,000.00N/AN/A

Pacific Booker Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mountain Province Diamonds.

Profitability

This table compares Mountain Province Diamonds and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Mountain Province Diamonds-90.08%-20.73%-7.41%
Pacific Booker MineralsN/A-1.82%-1.82%

U.S. Gold (NASDAQ:USAU) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for U.S. Gold and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
U.S. Gold00203.00
Pacific Booker Minerals0000N/A

U.S. Gold presently has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.36%. Given U.S. Gold's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe U.S. Gold is more favorable than Pacific Booker Minerals.

Risk and Volatility

U.S. Gold has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its share price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

2.4% of U.S. Gold shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of U.S. Gold shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares U.S. Gold and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
U.S. GoldN/AN/A$-5,250,000.00($3.17)-3.41
Pacific Booker MineralsN/AN/A$-800,000.00N/AN/A

Profitability

This table compares U.S. Gold and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
U.S. GoldN/A-60.15%-57.57%
Pacific Booker MineralsN/A-1.82%-1.82%

Summary

U.S. Gold beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Almaden Minerals (NYSEAMERICAN:AAU) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Almaden Minerals has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Almaden Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Almaden Minerals00103.00
Pacific Booker Minerals0000N/A

Almaden Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $1.10, suggesting a potential upside of 97.81%. Given Almaden Minerals' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Almaden Minerals is more favorable than Pacific Booker Minerals.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

4.9% of Almaden Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Almaden Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Almaden MineralsN/AN/A$-2,840,000.00N/AN/A
Pacific Booker MineralsN/AN/A$-800,000.00N/AN/A

Profitability

This table compares Almaden Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Almaden MineralsN/A-4.57%-4.24%
Pacific Booker MineralsN/A-1.82%-1.82%

Summary

Almaden Minerals beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Quantum Materials (OTCMKTS:QTMM) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Quantum Materials has a beta of 2.7, suggesting that its stock price is 170% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Quantum Materials and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Quantum Materials0000N/A
Pacific Booker Minerals0000N/A

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.0% of Quantum Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.8% of Quantum Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Quantum Materials and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Materials$20,000.003,542.92$-9,400,000.00N/AN/A
Pacific Booker MineralsN/AN/A$-800,000.00N/AN/A

Pacific Booker Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quantum Materials.

Profitability

This table compares Quantum Materials and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Quantum MaterialsN/AN/AN/A
Pacific Booker MineralsN/A-1.82%-1.82%

Summary

Quantum Materials beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Royal Standard Minerals (OTCMKTS:RYSMF) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Risk & Volatility

Royal Standard Minerals has a beta of -88.64, meaning that its share price is 8,964% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Royal Standard Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Royal Standard Minerals0000N/A
Pacific Booker Minerals0000N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Royal Standard Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Royal Standard MineralsN/AN/A$-20,000.00N/AN/A
Pacific Booker MineralsN/AN/A$-800,000.00N/AN/A

Profitability

This table compares Royal Standard Minerals and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Royal Standard MineralsN/AN/A-109.46%
Pacific Booker MineralsN/A-1.82%-1.82%

Summary

Royal Standard Minerals beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Opiant Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:OPNT) and Pacific Booker Minerals (OTCMKTS:PBMLF) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

20.8% of Opiant Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.0% of Opiant Pharmaceuticals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Opiant Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pacific Booker Minerals has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Opiant Pharmaceuticals and Pacific Booker Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Opiant Pharmaceuticals0000N/A
Pacific Booker Minerals0000N/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Opiant Pharmaceuticals and Pacific Booker Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Opiant Pharmaceuticals$40.52 million1.34$11.59 million$0.2062.50
Pacific Booker MineralsN/AN/A$-800,000.00N/AN/A

Opiant Pharmaceuticals has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Booker Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares Opiant Pharmaceuticals and Pacific Booker Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Opiant Pharmaceuticals-0.39%-0.31%-0.27%
Pacific Booker MineralsN/A-1.82%-1.82%

Summary

Opiant Pharmaceuticals beats Pacific Booker Minerals on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.


Pacific Booker Minerals Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
MPVDF
Mountain Province Diamonds
0.6$0.45flat$94.13 million$208.24 million-0.67Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
U.S. Gold logo
USAU
U.S. Gold
1.4$10.82flat$76.38 millionN/A-3.41Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
AAU
Almaden Minerals
1.1$0.56flat$76.31 millionN/A-18.54Upcoming Earnings
Quantum Materials logo
QTMM
Quantum Materials
0.5$0.10flat$70.86 million$20,000.000.00Gap Up
RYSMF
Royal Standard Minerals
0.5$0.07flat$61.42 millionN/A-6.67
Opiant Pharmaceuticals logo
OPNT
Opiant Pharmaceuticals
0.5$12.50flat$54.14 million$40.52 million-124.99Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Wealth Minerals logo
WMLLF
Wealth Minerals
0.5$0.26flat$45.18 millionN/A-6.50
Avalon Advanced Materials logo
AVLNF
Avalon Advanced Materials
0.7$0.12flat$42.66 million$100,000.000.00Gap Up
Paramount Gold Nevada logo
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
1.7$1.05flat$38.04 million$730,000.000.00News Coverage
Bunker Hill Mining logo
BHLL
Bunker Hill Mining
0.5$0.24flat$34.21 millionN/A-0.60Gap Down
Pure Energy Minerals logo
PEMIF
Pure Energy Minerals
0.5$1.02flat$32.93 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
LEXX
Lexaria Bioscience
0.0$6.26flat$31.95 million$380,000.000.00High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
ATLRF
Atlatsa Resources
0.5$0.05flat$29.99 million$4.26 million0.00High Trading Volume
Gap Up
Silver Bull Resources logo
SVBL
Silver Bull Resources
0.5$0.80flat$26.97 millionN/A-10.00Gap Down
SFEG
Santa Fe Gold
0.6$0.06flat$25.73 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
Gap Up
Quaterra Resources logo
QTRRF
Quaterra Resources
0.6$0.12flat$25.15 millionN/A0.00Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
AMLM
American Lithium Minerals
1.0$0.35flat$24.14 millionN/A0.00
LXRP
Lexaria Bioscience
0.5N/AN/A$22.56 million$380,000.000.00High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Lomiko Metals logo
LMRMF
Lomiko Metals
0.4$0.11flat$19.55 millionN/A-5.63Gap Down
New Age Metals logo
NMTLF
New Age Metals
0.0$0.12flat$16.48 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
Gap Down
VSMR
Verify Smart
0.0$0.10flat$11.56 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
Alderon Iron Ore logo
AXXDF
Alderon Iron Ore
0.5$0.08flat$11.34 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
Cerro Grande Mining logo
CEGMF
Cerro Grande Mining
0.5$0.03flat$11.12 millionN/A0.00
Thunder Mountain Gold logo
THMG
Thunder Mountain Gold
0.7$0.15flat$8.72 million$1.95 million4.83
Pelangio Exploration logo
PGXPF
Pelangio Exploration
0.5$0.12flat$8.54 millionN/A-3.05
CPTRF
Captor Capital
0.1$0.17flat$6.69 million$9.39 million-0.38News Coverage
Gap Up
CNYCF
Searchlight Resources
0.0$0.06flat$5.76 millionN/A-2.96High Trading Volume
Gap Down
RCCMF
Nippon Dragon Resources
0.0$0.03flat$5.05 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
HREEF
Stans Energy
0.8$0.02flat$3.93 millionN/A0.18News Coverage
Gap Down
SRCH
Searchlight Minerals
0.5$0.02flat$3.40 millionN/A0.00
MGHCF
Minco Capital
0.6$0.07flat$3.30 millionN/A-1.38Gap Down
BAJFF
Camrova Resources
0.0$0.07flat$1.61 millionN/A-3.49Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
GMOL
General Moly
0.1$0.01flat$1.45 millionN/A-0.01
GMOLQ
General Moly
0.1$0.01flat$1.45 millionN/A-0.01
EXPL
Endurance Exploration Group
0.8$0.03flat$1.43 millionN/A0.00
QRMLF
Quest Rare Minerals
0.5$0.02flat$1.30 millionN/A0.00Gap Up
Blue Gem Enterprise logo
BGEM
Blue Gem Enterprise
0.0$0.00flat$463,000.00N/A0.00Gap Up
Adamant DRI Processing and Minerals Group logo
ADMG
Adamant DRI Processing and Minerals Group
0.6$0.03flat$409,000.00$50,000.000.00
IWMG
I-Wellness Marketing Group
0.0$0.00flat$67,000.00N/A0.00
Modern Cinema Group logo
MOCI
Modern Cinema Group
0.0$0.14flat$0.00N/A0.00Gap Down
MNVN
Mondial Ventures
0.0$0.00flat$0.00N/A0.00
RVNG
Raven Gold
0.0$0.01flat$0.00N/A0.00
RCKE
Rock Energy Resources
0.3$0.00flat$0.00N/A0.00
WCYN
West Canyon Energy
0.0$0.01flat$0.00N/A0.00High Trading Volume
This page was last updated on 5/8/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.