Pacific Basin Shipping Competitors

Pacific Basin Shipping (OTCMKTS:PCFBY) and Atlas (NYSE:ATCO) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Atlas' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Atlas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pacific Basin Shipping. Atlas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pacific Basin Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Pacific Basin Shipping and Atlas, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Atlas has a consensus target price of $18.1429, indicating a potential upside of 31.57%. Given Atlas' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Atlas is more favorable than Pacific Basin Shipping.

Profitability

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Atlas' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Pacific Basin Shipping has a beta of 0.22, indicating that its share price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Atlas has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.3% of Pacific Basin Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Atlas shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Pacific Basin Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Atlas pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Pacific Basin Shipping pays out 45.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Atlas pays out 64.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Atlas has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Atlas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Atlas beats Pacific Basin Shipping on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pacific Basin Shipping (OTCMKTS:PCFBY) and Star Bulk Carriers (NASDAQ:SBLK) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Star Bulk Carriers' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pacific Basin Shipping has higher revenue and earnings than Star Bulk Carriers. Pacific Basin Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Star Bulk Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Pacific Basin Shipping and Star Bulk Carriers, as reported by MarketBeat.

Star Bulk Carriers has a consensus target price of $20.5333, indicating a potential downside of 7.09%. Given Star Bulk Carriers' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Star Bulk Carriers is more favorable than Pacific Basin Shipping.

Profitability

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Star Bulk Carriers' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Pacific Basin Shipping has a beta of 0.22, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.3% of Pacific Basin Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.2% of Star Bulk Carriers shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Star Bulk Carriers beats Pacific Basin Shipping on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pacific Basin Shipping (OTCMKTS:PCFBY) and Euronav (NYSE:EURN) are both transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Euronav's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Euronav has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pacific Basin Shipping. Euronav is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pacific Basin Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Pacific Basin Shipping and Euronav, as reported by MarketBeat.

Euronav has a consensus target price of $12.3750, indicating a potential upside of 31.09%. Given Euronav's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Euronav is more favorable than Pacific Basin Shipping.

Profitability

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Euronav's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Pacific Basin Shipping has a beta of 0.22, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Euronav has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.3% of Pacific Basin Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.3% of Euronav shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Pacific Basin Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Euronav pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Pacific Basin Shipping pays out 45.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Euronav pays out 14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Euronav is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Euronav beats Pacific Basin Shipping on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pacific Basin Shipping (OTCMKTS:PCFBY) and Frontline (NYSE:FRO) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Frontline's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Frontline has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pacific Basin Shipping. Frontline is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pacific Basin Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Pacific Basin Shipping and Frontline, as reported by MarketBeat.

Frontline has a consensus target price of $7.8080, indicating a potential downside of 3.37%. Given Frontline's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Frontline is more favorable than Pacific Basin Shipping.

Profitability

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Frontline's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Pacific Basin Shipping has a beta of 0.22, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Frontline has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.3% of Pacific Basin Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.9% of Frontline shares are held by institutional investors. 48.1% of Frontline shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Pacific Basin Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Frontline pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.9%. Pacific Basin Shipping pays out 45.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Frontline pays out 146.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Frontline beats Pacific Basin Shipping on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pacific Basin Shipping (OTCMKTS:PCFBY) and Costamare (NYSE:CMRE) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Costamare's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Costamare has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pacific Basin Shipping. Costamare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pacific Basin Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Pacific Basin Shipping and Costamare, as reported by MarketBeat.

Costamare has a consensus target price of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 22.78%. Given Costamare's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Costamare is more favorable than Pacific Basin Shipping.

Profitability

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Costamare's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Pacific Basin Shipping has a beta of 0.22, suggesting that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Costamare has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.3% of Pacific Basin Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Costamare shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Pacific Basin Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Pacific Basin Shipping pays out 45.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Costamare pays out 44.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Costamare has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Costamare is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Costamare beats Pacific Basin Shipping on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pacific Basin Shipping (OTCMKTS:PCFBY) and Danaos (NYSE:DAC) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.3% of Pacific Basin Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.5% of Danaos shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Danaos' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Danaos has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pacific Basin Shipping. Danaos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pacific Basin Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Pacific Basin Shipping has a beta of 0.22, meaning that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Danaos has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Pacific Basin Shipping and Danaos, as reported by MarketBeat.

Danaos has a consensus target price of $44.4167, indicating a potential downside of 25.71%. Given Danaos' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Danaos is more favorable than Pacific Basin Shipping.

Profitability

This table compares Pacific Basin Shipping and Danaos' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Danaos beats Pacific Basin Shipping on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.