Pure Energy Minerals Competitors

Pure Energy Minerals (OTCMKTS:PEMIF) and Dakota Territory Resource (OTCMKTS:DTRC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Pure Energy Minerals and Dakota Territory Resource's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Pure Energy Minerals and Dakota Territory Resource, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Volatility & Risk

Pure Energy Minerals has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dakota Territory Resource has a beta of -1.64, meaning that its share price is 264% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Pure Energy Minerals and Dakota Territory Resource's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Pure Energy Minerals beats Dakota Territory Resource on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mountain Province Diamonds (OTCMKTS:MPVDF) and Pure Energy Minerals (OTCMKTS:PEMIF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Mountain Province Diamonds and Pure Energy Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Mountain Province Diamonds and Pure Energy Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Mountain Province Diamonds presently has a consensus price target of $0.10, suggesting a potential downside of 77.64%. Given Mountain Province Diamonds' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mountain Province Diamonds is more favorable than Pure Energy Minerals.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Mountain Province Diamonds and Pure Energy Minerals' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Pure Energy Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mountain Province Diamonds.

Volatility and Risk

Mountain Province Diamonds has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pure Energy Minerals has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Pure Energy Minerals beats Mountain Province Diamonds on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pure Energy Minerals (OTCMKTS:PEMIF) and U.S. Gold (NASDAQ:USAU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Pure Energy Minerals and U.S. Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Pure Energy Minerals and U.S. Gold's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

2.4% of U.S. Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of U.S. Gold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Pure Energy Minerals and U.S. Gold, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

U.S. Gold has a consensus target price of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.36%. Given U.S. Gold's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe U.S. Gold is more favorable than Pure Energy Minerals.

Risk and Volatility

Pure Energy Minerals has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Gold has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its share price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Pure Energy Minerals (OTCMKTS:PEMIF) and Almaden Minerals (NYSEAMERICAN:AAU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Pure Energy Minerals and Almaden Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Almaden Minerals has a consensus target price of $1.10, suggesting a potential upside of 97.81%. Given Almaden Minerals' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Almaden Minerals is more favorable than Pure Energy Minerals.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

4.9% of Almaden Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Pure Energy Minerals and Almaden Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Pure Energy Minerals has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Almaden Minerals has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pure Energy Minerals and Almaden Minerals' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Summary

Pure Energy Minerals beats Almaden Minerals on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Quantum Materials (OTCMKTS:QTMM) and Pure Energy Minerals (OTCMKTS:PEMIF) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Quantum Materials and Pure Energy Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Quantum Materials and Pure Energy Minerals' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pure Energy Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quantum Materials.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of Quantum Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.8% of Quantum Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Quantum Materials and Pure Energy Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Quantum Materials has a beta of 2.7, suggesting that its stock price is 170% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pure Energy Minerals has a beta of 2.11, suggesting that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Quantum Materials beats Pure Energy Minerals on 6 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pure Energy Minerals (OTCMKTS:PEMIF) and Royal Standard Minerals (OTCMKTS:RYSMF) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Profitability

This table compares Pure Energy Minerals and Royal Standard Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Pure Energy Minerals and Royal Standard Minerals, as provided by MarketBeat.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Pure Energy Minerals and Royal Standard Minerals' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Pure Energy Minerals has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Royal Standard Minerals has a beta of -88.64, meaning that its stock price is 8,964% less volatile than the S&P 500.