Skip to main content
OTCMKTS:SCON

Superconductor Technologies Competitors

$1.11
+0.07 (+6.73 %)
(As of 05/14/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$1.02
$1.11
50-Day Range
$1.03
$1.43
52-Week Range
$0.77
$9.10
Volume5,735 shs
Average Volume35,913 shs
Market Capitalization$3.50 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.49

Competitors

Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) Vs. BDR, SIML, GTXO, AFTM, ANDR, and NEIK

Should you be buying SCON stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "radio & t.v. communications equipment" are considered alternatives and competitors to Superconductor Technologies, including Blonder Tongue Laboratories (BDR), Simlatus (SIML), GTX (GTXO), AfterMaster (AFTM), Andrea Electronics (ANDR), and Northstar Electronics (NEIK).

Blonder Tongue Laboratories (NYSEAMERICAN:BDR) and Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Blonder Tongue Laboratories has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Blonder Tongue Laboratories and Superconductor Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blonder Tongue Laboratories$19.84 million0.70$-740,000.00N/AN/A
Superconductor Technologies$550,000.006.36$-9,230,000.00N/AN/A

Blonder Tongue Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Superconductor Technologies.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Blonder Tongue Laboratories and Superconductor Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Blonder Tongue Laboratories0000N/A
Superconductor Technologies0000N/A

Profitability

This table compares Blonder Tongue Laboratories and Superconductor Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Blonder Tongue Laboratories-52.07%-180.97%-54.66%
Superconductor TechnologiesN/A-199.09%-153.32%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

5.6% of Blonder Tongue Laboratories shares are held by institutional investors. 63.4% of Blonder Tongue Laboratories shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Superconductor Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Blonder Tongue Laboratories beats Superconductor Technologies on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Simlatus (OTCMKTS:SIML) and Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Simlatus has a beta of 3.52, indicating that its stock price is 252% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Simlatus and Superconductor Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Simlatus$120,000.0068.64$-52,410,000.00N/AN/A
Superconductor Technologies$550,000.006.36$-9,230,000.00N/AN/A

Superconductor Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Simlatus.

Profitability

This table compares Simlatus and Superconductor Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
SimlatusN/AN/A-82,074.06%
Superconductor TechnologiesN/A-199.09%-153.32%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Simlatus and Superconductor Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Simlatus0000N/A
Superconductor Technologies0000N/A

GTX (OTCMKTS:GTXO) and Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

GTX has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its share price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.0% of GTX shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Superconductor Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GTX and Superconductor Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GTX$1.50 million3.85$-590,000.00N/AN/A
Superconductor Technologies$550,000.006.36$-9,230,000.00N/AN/A

GTX has higher revenue and earnings than Superconductor Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares GTX and Superconductor Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
GTX-9.76%N/A-26.40%
Superconductor TechnologiesN/A-199.09%-153.32%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for GTX and Superconductor Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
GTX0000N/A
Superconductor Technologies0000N/A

Summary

GTX beats Superconductor Technologies on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) and AfterMaster (OTCMKTS:AFTM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of AfterMaster shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Superconductor Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of AfterMaster shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Superconductor Technologies and AfterMaster's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Superconductor Technologies$550,000.006.36$-9,230,000.00N/AN/A
AfterMaster$980,000.005.22$-9,300,000.00N/AN/A

Superconductor Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AfterMaster.

Risk and Volatility

Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AfterMaster has a beta of -1.35, meaning that its stock price is 235% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Superconductor Technologies and AfterMaster's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Superconductor TechnologiesN/A-199.09%-153.32%
AfterMasterN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Superconductor Technologies and AfterMaster, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Superconductor Technologies0000N/A
AfterMaster0000N/A

Summary

AfterMaster beats Superconductor Technologies on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) and Andrea Electronics (OTCMKTS:ANDR) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Andrea Electronics has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Superconductor Technologies and Andrea Electronics' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Superconductor Technologies$550,000.006.36$-9,230,000.00N/AN/A
Andrea Electronics$1.89 million2.16$-550,000.00N/AN/A

Andrea Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Superconductor Technologies.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Superconductor Technologies and Andrea Electronics, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Superconductor Technologies0000N/A
Andrea Electronics0000N/A

Profitability

This table compares Superconductor Technologies and Andrea Electronics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Superconductor TechnologiesN/A-199.09%-153.32%
Andrea Electronics-44.49%N/A-57.25%

Summary

Andrea Electronics beats Superconductor Technologies on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Northstar Electronics (OTCMKTS:NEIK) and Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) are both small-cap aerospace companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Northstar Electronics has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Northstar Electronics and Superconductor Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northstar ElectronicsN/AN/A$-580,000.00N/AN/A
Superconductor Technologies$550,000.006.36$-9,230,000.00N/AN/A

Northstar Electronics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Superconductor Technologies.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Northstar Electronics and Superconductor Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Northstar Electronics0000N/A
Superconductor Technologies0000N/A

Profitability

This table compares Northstar Electronics and Superconductor Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Northstar ElectronicsN/AN/A-91.66%
Superconductor TechnologiesN/A-199.09%-153.32%

Summary

Northstar Electronics beats Superconductor Technologies on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.


Superconductor Technologies Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
BDR
Blonder Tongue Laboratories
0.7$1.16+2.6%$13.88 million$19.84 million0.00News Coverage
Gap Down
Simlatus logo
SIML
Simlatus
0.5$0.00+0.0%$8.24 million$120,000.000.00Gap Down
GTX logo
GTXO
GTX
0.5$0.03+0.0%$5.78 million$1.50 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
AfterMaster logo
AFTM
AfterMaster
0.4$0.01+0.0%$5.12 million$980,000.000.00Gap Up
Andrea Electronics logo
ANDR
Andrea Electronics
0.5$0.06+16.7%$4.09 million$1.89 million0.00Gap Up
NEIK
Northstar Electronics
0.4$0.01+0.0%$1.09 millionN/A0.00
Proxim Wireless logo
PRXM
Proxim Wireless
0.0$3.44+0.0%$826,000.00N/A0.00
CMRO
COMARCO
0.4$0.02+20.5%$300,000.00N/A0.00Gap Down
WGNR
Wegener
0.0$0.03+0.0%$0.00N/A0.00
ZSTN
ZST Digital Networks
0.2$0.01+0.0%$0.00N/A0.00
This page was last updated on 5/15/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more about MarketBeat.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.