Superconductor Technologies Competitors

Blonder Tongue Laboratories (NYSEAMERICAN:BDR) and Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Blonder Tongue Laboratories has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Blonder Tongue Laboratories and Superconductor Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Blonder Tongue Laboratories has higher revenue and earnings than Superconductor Technologies.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Blonder Tongue Laboratories and Superconductor Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares Blonder Tongue Laboratories and Superconductor Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

5.6% of Blonder Tongue Laboratories shares are held by institutional investors. 63.4% of Blonder Tongue Laboratories shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Superconductor Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Blonder Tongue Laboratories beats Superconductor Technologies on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Simlatus (OTCMKTS:SIML) and Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Simlatus has a beta of 3.52, indicating that its stock price is 252% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, indicating that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Simlatus and Superconductor Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Superconductor Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Simlatus.

Profitability

This table compares Simlatus and Superconductor Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Simlatus and Superconductor Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

GTX (OTCMKTS:GTXO) and Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

GTX has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its share price is 151% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.0% of GTX shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Superconductor Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GTX and Superconductor Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

GTX has higher revenue and earnings than Superconductor Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares GTX and Superconductor Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for GTX and Superconductor Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Summary

GTX beats Superconductor Technologies on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) and AfterMaster (OTCMKTS:AFTM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of AfterMaster shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Superconductor Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of AfterMaster shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Superconductor Technologies and AfterMaster's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Superconductor Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than AfterMaster.

Risk and Volatility

Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AfterMaster has a beta of -1.35, meaning that its stock price is 235% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Superconductor Technologies and AfterMaster's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Superconductor Technologies and AfterMaster, as reported by MarketBeat.

Summary

AfterMaster beats Superconductor Technologies on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) and Andrea Electronics (OTCMKTS:ANDR) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Andrea Electronics has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Superconductor Technologies and Andrea Electronics' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Andrea Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Superconductor Technologies.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Superconductor Technologies and Andrea Electronics, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares Superconductor Technologies and Andrea Electronics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Andrea Electronics beats Superconductor Technologies on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Northstar Electronics (OTCMKTS:NEIK) and Superconductor Technologies (OTCMKTS:SCON) are both small-cap aerospace companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Northstar Electronics has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Superconductor Technologies has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Northstar Electronics and Superconductor Technologies' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Northstar Electronics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Superconductor Technologies.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Northstar Electronics and Superconductor Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Profitability

This table compares Northstar Electronics and Superconductor Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Northstar Electronics beats Superconductor Technologies on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.