OTCMKTS:TURV

Two Rivers Water & Farming Competitors

$0.35
+0.02 (+6.15 %)
(As of 04/22/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$0.33
Now: $0.35
$0.38
50-Day Range
$0.05
MA: $0.18
$0.32
52-Week Range
$0.04
Now: $0.35
$0.38
Volume677,945 shs
Average Volume916,341 shs
Market Capitalization$39.15 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta3.19

Competitors

Two Rivers Water & Farming (OTCMKTS:TURV) Vs. SANW, SEED, CLAD, RKDA, NNUTU, and TYHT

Should you be buying TURV stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "agricultural production - crops" are considered alternatives and competitors to Two Rivers Water & Farming, including S&W Seed (SANW), Origin Agritech (SEED), China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development (CLAD), Arcadia Biosciences (RKDA), Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards (NNUTU), and Shineco (TYHT).

S&W Seed (NASDAQ:SANW) and Two Rivers Water & Farming (OTCMKTS:TURV) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.7% of S&W Seed shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of S&W Seed shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of Two Rivers Water & Farming shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares S&W Seed and Two Rivers Water & Farming's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&W Seed$79.58 million1.74$-19,670,000.00($0.55)-7.18
Two Rivers Water & Farming$70,000.00559.26$3.72 millionN/AN/A

Two Rivers Water & Farming has lower revenue, but higher earnings than S&W Seed.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for S&W Seed and Two Rivers Water & Farming, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
S&W Seed00203.00
Two Rivers Water & Farming0000N/A

S&W Seed presently has a consensus target price of $5.50, suggesting a potential upside of 39.24%. Given S&W Seed's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe S&W Seed is more favorable than Two Rivers Water & Farming.

Risk and Volatility

S&W Seed has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Two Rivers Water & Farming has a beta of 3.19, meaning that its share price is 219% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares S&W Seed and Two Rivers Water & Farming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
S&W Seed-27.01%-25.28%-13.21%
Two Rivers Water & FarmingN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Two Rivers Water & Farming beats S&W Seed on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Origin Agritech (NASDAQ:SEED) and Two Rivers Water & Farming (OTCMKTS:TURV) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

3.0% of Origin Agritech shares are held by institutional investors. 19.6% of Two Rivers Water & Farming shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Origin Agritech and Two Rivers Water & Farming's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Origin Agritech$13.43 million6.44$-9,020,000.00N/AN/A
Two Rivers Water & Farming$70,000.00559.26$3.72 millionN/AN/A

Two Rivers Water & Farming has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Origin Agritech.

Profitability

This table compares Origin Agritech and Two Rivers Water & Farming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Origin AgritechN/AN/AN/A
Two Rivers Water & FarmingN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Origin Agritech and Two Rivers Water & Farming, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Origin Agritech0000N/A
Two Rivers Water & Farming0000N/A

Volatility & Risk

Origin Agritech has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Two Rivers Water & Farming has a beta of 3.19, meaning that its stock price is 219% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Two Rivers Water & Farming beats Origin Agritech on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development (OTCMKTS:CLAD) and Two Rivers Water & Farming (OTCMKTS:TURV) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development and Two Rivers Water & Farming's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture DevelopmentN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Two Rivers Water & Farming$70,000.00559.26$3.72 millionN/AN/A

Two Rivers Water & Farming has higher revenue and earnings than China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development and Two Rivers Water & Farming, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development0000N/A
Two Rivers Water & Farming0000N/A

Risk and Volatility

China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development has a beta of 236.55, indicating that its share price is 23,555% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Two Rivers Water & Farming has a beta of 3.19, indicating that its share price is 219% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development and Two Rivers Water & Farming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture DevelopmentN/AN/AN/A
Two Rivers Water & FarmingN/AN/AN/A

Arcadia Biosciences (NASDAQ:RKDA) and Two Rivers Water & Farming (OTCMKTS:TURV) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Arcadia Biosciences has a beta of -0.62, meaning that its share price is 162% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Two Rivers Water & Farming has a beta of 3.19, meaning that its share price is 219% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Arcadia Biosciences and Two Rivers Water & Farming's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Arcadia Biosciences$1.17 million47.60$-28,810,000.00($3.37)-0.77
Two Rivers Water & Farming$70,000.00559.26$3.72 millionN/AN/A

Two Rivers Water & Farming has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Arcadia Biosciences.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

8.0% of Arcadia Biosciences shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of Arcadia Biosciences shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.6% of Two Rivers Water & Farming shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Arcadia Biosciences and Two Rivers Water & Farming, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Arcadia Biosciences00203.00
Two Rivers Water & Farming0000N/A

Arcadia Biosciences presently has a consensus price target of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 319.85%. Given Arcadia Biosciences' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Arcadia Biosciences is more favorable than Two Rivers Water & Farming.

Profitability

This table compares Arcadia Biosciences and Two Rivers Water & Farming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Arcadia Biosciences-1,499.85%-177.69%-60.11%
Two Rivers Water & FarmingN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Two Rivers Water & Farming beats Arcadia Biosciences on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards (OTCMKTS:NNUTU) and Two Rivers Water & Farming (OTCMKTS:TURV) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards has a beta of -1176.69, meaning that its share price is 117,769% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Two Rivers Water & Farming has a beta of 3.19, meaning that its share price is 219% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards and Two Rivers Water & Farming's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hawaiian Macadamia Nut OrchardsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Two Rivers Water & Farming$70,000.00559.26$3.72 millionN/AN/A

Two Rivers Water & Farming has higher revenue and earnings than Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards and Two Rivers Water & Farming, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards0000N/A
Two Rivers Water & Farming0000N/A

Profitability

This table compares Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards and Two Rivers Water & Farming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hawaiian Macadamia Nut OrchardsN/AN/AN/A
Two Rivers Water & FarmingN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Two Rivers Water & Farming beats Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards on 2 of the 2 factors compared between the two stocks.

Two Rivers Water & Farming (OTCMKTS:TURV) and Shineco (NASDAQ:TYHT) are both small-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

4.4% of Shineco shares are held by institutional investors. 19.6% of Two Rivers Water & Farming shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Shineco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Two Rivers Water & Farming and Shineco, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Two Rivers Water & Farming0000N/A
Shineco0000N/A

Profitability

This table compares Two Rivers Water & Farming and Shineco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Two Rivers Water & FarmingN/AN/AN/A
Shineco-28.36%-8.54%-7.23%

Risk & Volatility

Two Rivers Water & Farming has a beta of 3.19, indicating that its stock price is 219% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shineco has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Two Rivers Water & Farming and Shineco's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Two Rivers Water & Farming$70,000.00559.26$3.72 millionN/AN/A
Shineco$23.68 million1.12$-6,630,000.00N/AN/A

Two Rivers Water & Farming has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Shineco.

Summary

Two Rivers Water & Farming beats Shineco on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.


Two Rivers Water & Farming Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
S&W Seed logo
SANW
S&W Seed
1.8$3.95+2.8%$138.56 million$79.58 million-6.08Analyst Report
News Coverage
SEED
Origin Agritech
0.6$15.21+8.5%$87.00 million$13.43 million0.00
CLAD
China Liaoning Dingxu Ecological Agriculture Development
0.0$4.00+0.0%$59.38 millionN/A0.00
Arcadia Biosciences logo
RKDA
Arcadia Biosciences
1.3$2.61+0.4%$55.90 million$1.17 million-1.26
Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards logo
NNUTU
Hawaiian Macadamia Nut Orchards
0.5$3,750.00+0.0%$37.50 millionN/A0.00
TYHT
Shineco
0.6$7.29+2.7%$27.30 million$23.68 million0.00High Trading Volume
Gap Up
MRGO
Margo Caribe
0.3$7.50+0.0%$21.45 millionN/A0.00
Scheid Vineyards logo
SVIN
Scheid Vineyards
0.0$18.50+0.0%$16.30 million$51.03 million-1.39
YaSheng Group logo
HERB
YaSheng Group
0.0$0.05+0.0%$8.49 millionN/A0.00
YEWB
Yew Bio-Pharm Group
1.0$0.16+0.0%$8.09 million$27.88 million12.00
This page was last updated on 4/23/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.