Viking Energy Group Competitors

Amplify Energy (NYSE:AMPY) and Viking Energy Group (OTCMKTS:VKIN) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Amplify Energy has a beta of 4.31, meaning that its stock price is 331% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Viking Energy Group has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

56.0% of Amplify Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Amplify Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of Viking Energy Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Amplify Energy and Viking Energy Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Amplify Energy currently has a consensus price target of $2.20, suggesting a potential downside of 37.14%. Given Amplify Energy's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Amplify Energy is more favorable than Viking Energy Group.

Profitability

This table compares Amplify Energy and Viking Energy Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Amplify Energy and Viking Energy Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Viking Energy Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Amplify Energy.

Evolution Petroleum (NYSEAMERICAN:EPM) and Viking Energy Group (OTCMKTS:VKIN) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

68.3% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Evolution Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of Viking Energy Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Viking Energy Group has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Evolution Petroleum and Viking Energy Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Evolution Petroleum and Viking Energy Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Evolution Petroleum has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Viking Energy Group.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Evolution Petroleum and Viking Energy Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Evolution Petroleum currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 58.73%. Given Evolution Petroleum's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Evolution Petroleum is more favorable than Viking Energy Group.

Obsidian Energy (OTCMKTS:OBELF) and Viking Energy Group (OTCMKTS:VKIN) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.2% of Obsidian Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 20.1% of Viking Energy Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Obsidian Energy and Viking Energy Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Profitability

This table compares Obsidian Energy and Viking Energy Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Obsidian Energy and Viking Energy Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Viking Energy Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Obsidian Energy.

Risk & Volatility

Obsidian Energy has a beta of 2.42, meaning that its share price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Viking Energy Group has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its share price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Viking Energy Group beats Obsidian Energy on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Viking Energy Group (OTCMKTS:VKIN) and TransGlobe Energy (NASDAQ:TGA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Viking Energy Group and TransGlobe Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

26.2% of TransGlobe Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.1% of Viking Energy Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of TransGlobe Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Viking Energy Group has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TransGlobe Energy has a beta of 2.97, indicating that its share price is 197% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Viking Energy Group and TransGlobe Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Viking Energy Group and TransGlobe Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

TransGlobe Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Viking Energy Group.

Summary

TransGlobe Energy beats Viking Energy Group on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Viking Energy Group (OTCMKTS:VKIN) and PEDEVCO (NYSEAMERICAN:PED) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Viking Energy Group and PEDEVCO's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Viking Energy Group and PEDEVCO's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

PEDEVCO has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Viking Energy Group.

Volatility and Risk

Viking Energy Group has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PEDEVCO has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.2% of PEDEVCO shares are held by institutional investors. 20.1% of Viking Energy Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 76.3% of PEDEVCO shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Viking Energy Group and PEDEVCO, as provided by MarketBeat.

Summary

Viking Energy Group beats PEDEVCO on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Viking Energy Group (OTCMKTS:VKIN) and Epsilon Energy (NASDAQ:EPSN) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Viking Energy Group and Epsilon Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

Volatility and Risk

Viking Energy Group has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Epsilon Energy has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Viking Energy Group and Epsilon Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Epsilon Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Viking Energy Group.

Profitability

This table compares Viking Energy Group and Epsilon Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

42.9% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 20.1% of Viking Energy Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of Epsilon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Epsilon Energy beats Viking Energy Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.