Do analysts rate GS or BN?

Brookfield has a consensus price target of C$58.50, indicating a potential upside of 5.01%. Given Brookfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Brookfield 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33

Do analysts prefer IGM or GS?

IGM Financial presently has a consensus price target of C$82.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.23%. Given IGM Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe IGM Financial is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score IGM Financial 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.43 Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media prefer IGM or GS?

In the previous week, IGM Financial had 2 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for IGM Financial and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat IGM Financial's score of 0.46 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment IGM Financial 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend GS or ONEX?

Onex has a consensus price target of C$153.60, indicating a potential upside of 34.91%. Given Onex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Onex is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Onex 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GS or ONEX?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Onex. Onex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gluskin Sheff + Associates C$66.20B 5.96 C$18.86B C$2.36 20.93 Onex C$750M 11.58 C$441.34M C$6.72 16.94

Does the media refer more to GS or ONEX?

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Onex's score of 0.00 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Onex 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer GS or GLXY?

In the previous week, Galaxy Digital had 2 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Galaxy Digital and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Galaxy Digital's score of -0.42 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Galaxy Digital 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

C$49.38 -0.07 (-0.14%)

As of 03:59 PM Eastern

Compare

GS vs. BN, BAM, IGM, ONEX, and GLXY

Should you buy Gluskin Sheff + Associates stock or one of its competitors? Gluskin Sheff + Associates's main competitors and comparable companies include Brookfield (BN), Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), IGM Financial (IGM), Onex (ONEX), and Galaxy Digital (GLXY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Brookfield (TSE:BN) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.5% of Brookfield shares are held by institutional investors. 19.1% of Brookfield shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates had 1 more articles in the media than Brookfield. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates and 0 mentions for Brookfield. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Brookfield's score of 0.00 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	Positive
Brookfield	Neutral

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$66.20B	5.96	C$18.86B	C$2.36	20.93
Brookfield	C$77.06B	1.61	C$630.07M	C$0.54	103.17

Brookfield has a net margin of 1.80% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield's return on equity of 3.05% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A
Brookfield	1.80%	3.05%	2.31%

Brookfield has a consensus price target of C$58.50, indicating a potential upside of 5.01%. Given Brookfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Brookfield	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.409863, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield has a beta of 1.59828, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Brookfield pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Brookfield beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.40% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 34.28% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brookfield Asset Management	50.40%	34.28%	0.88%
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A

Brookfield Asset Management presently has a consensus target price of C$75.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.14%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Brookfield Asset Management	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

13.4% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.324674, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.409863, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Asset Management. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Asset Management	C$4.82B	23.21	C$2.42B	C$1.74	40.23
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$66.20B	5.96	C$18.86B	C$2.36	20.93

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management had 1 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Brookfield Asset Management's score of 0.65 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Asset Management	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to IGM Financial?

IGM Financial (TSE:IGM) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

IGM Financial has a beta of 1.041738, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.409863, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, IGM Financial had 2 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for IGM Financial and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat IGM Financial's score of 0.46 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
IGM Financial	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

IGM Financial presently has a consensus price target of C$82.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.23%. Given IGM Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe IGM Financial is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
IGM Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

IGM Financial pays an annual dividend of C$2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. IGM Financial pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

IGM Financial has a net margin of 29.82% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. IGM Financial's return on equity of 12.91% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
IGM Financial	29.82%	12.91%	4.51%
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A

9.9% of IGM Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 66.6% of IGM Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than IGM Financial. IGM Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
IGM Financial	C$4.09B	4.94	C$934.91M	C$4.94	17.70
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$66.20B	5.96	C$18.86B	C$2.36	20.93

Summary

IGM Financial beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Onex?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Onex (TSE:ONEX) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Onex has a net margin of 101.81% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Onex's return on equity of 5.25% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A
Onex	101.81%	5.25%	4.04%

Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Onex pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Onex pays out 4.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Onex has a consensus price target of C$153.60, indicating a potential upside of 34.91%. Given Onex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Onex is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Onex	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Onex's score of 0.00 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Onex	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Onex. Onex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$66.20B	5.96	C$18.86B	C$2.36	20.93
Onex	C$750M	11.58	C$441.34M	C$6.72	16.94

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.9% of Onex shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.0% of Onex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.409863, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Onex has a beta of 0.71334, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Onex beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Galaxy Digital had 2 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Galaxy Digital and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Galaxy Digital's score of -0.42 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Galaxy Digital	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Galaxy Digital. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$66.20B	5.96	C$18.86B	C$2.36	20.93
Galaxy Digital	C$43.76B	0.12	C$1.97B	-C$0.61	N/A

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.409863, meaning that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Galaxy Digital has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Galaxy Digital's return on equity of 18.71% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A
Galaxy Digital	0.57%	18.71%	N/A

Summary

Gluskin Sheff + Associates beats Galaxy Digital on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gluskin Sheff + Associates News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Gluskin Sheff + Associates	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$394.58B	C$5.72B	C$14.29B	C$12.49B
Dividend Yield	1.78%	7.39%	5.88%	6.25%
P/E Ratio	20.93	31.65	26.17	39.34
Price / Sales	5.96	1,292.52	527.91	9.85
Price / Cash	16.05	48.21	39.59	82.29
Price / Book	16.52	1.98	2.13	4.73
Net Income	C$18.86B	C$419.47M	C$1.32B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	0.33%	-0.53%	0.24%	-0.25%
1 Month Performance	-1.59%	0.61%	1.56%	3.15%
1 Year Performance	N/A	7.62%	12.05%	28.90%

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GS Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	C$49.38 -0.1%	N/A	N/A	C$394.58B	C$66.20B	20.93	48,500
BN Brookfield	1.3169 of 5 stars	C$57.45 +0.0%	C$58.50 +1.8%	-38.2%	C$128.25B	C$77.06B	106.39	180,000
BAM Brookfield Asset Management	1.6865 of 5 stars	C$72.47 +0.4%	C$75.00 +3.5%	-14.2%	C$115.75B	C$4.82B	41.65	2,400
IGM IGM Financial	1.666 of 5 stars	C$87.58 +0.5%	C$82.00 -6.4%	+76.3%	C$20.22B	C$4.09B	17.73	3,300	News Coverage
ONEX Onex	2.6793 of 5 stars	C$113.11 -1.0%	C$153.60 +35.8%	-2.6%	C$8.63B	C$750M	16.83	492

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:GS) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

GS vs. BN, BAM, IGM, ONEX, and GLXY

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to IGM Financial?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Onex?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GS vs. The Competition

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

GS vs. BN, BAM, IGM, ONEX, and GLXY

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of GS or BN?

Does the media refer more to GS or BN?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GS or BN?

Is GS or BN more profitable?

Do analysts rate GS or BN?

Which has more volatility & risk, GS or BN?

Is GS or BN a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Is BAM or GS more profitable?

Do analysts prefer BAM or GS?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of BAM or GS?

Is BAM or GS a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, BAM or GS?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BAM or GS?

Does the media refer more to BAM or GS?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to IGM Financial?

Which has more risk and volatility, IGM or GS?

Does the media prefer IGM or GS?

Do analysts prefer IGM or GS?

Is IGM or GS a better dividend stock?

Is IGM or GS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in IGM or GS?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, IGM or GS?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Onex?

Is GS or ONEX more profitable?

Is GS or ONEX a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend GS or ONEX?

Does the media refer more to GS or ONEX?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GS or ONEX?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in GS or ONEX?

Which has more volatility & risk, GS or ONEX?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Does the media prefer GS or GLXY?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GS or GLXY?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, GS or GLXY?

Which has more volatility and risk, GS or GLXY?

Is GS or GLXY more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GS vs. The Competition

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools