Which has higher valuation & earnings, BX or GS?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Biox. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Biox, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Biox C$12.59B 16.91 C$4.76B C$0.35 44.69 Gluskin Sheff + Associates C$60.45B 6.92 C$16.15B C$2.00 25.91

Is BX or GS more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Biox N/A N/A N/A Gluskin Sheff + Associates N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate GS or BAM?

Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus price target of C$75.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.62%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Brookfield Asset Management 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.20

Does the media favor GS or BAM?

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Brookfield Asset Management 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend GS or SSRM?

SSR Mining has a consensus price target of C$47.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.75%. Given SSR Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SSR Mining is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 SSR Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, GS or SSRM?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than SSR Mining. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SSR Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Gluskin Sheff + Associates C$60.45B 6.92 C$16.15B C$2.00 25.91 SSR Mining C$1.89B 4.61 -C$341.77M C$1.05 38.42

Does the media refer more to GS or SSRM?

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled SSR Mining'saverage media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral SSR Mining 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate GS or AC?

Air Canada has a consensus price target of C$23.39, suggesting a potential upside of 5.66%. Given Air Canada's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Air Canada is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Air Canada 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media refer more to GS or AC?

In the previous week, Air Canada had 1 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Air Canada and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Air Canada's score of -0.02 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Air Canada 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer GS or GLXY?

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Galaxy Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that Galaxy Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Galaxy Digital 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

C$51.69 +0.79 (+1.55%)

As of 02:37 PM Eastern

Compare

GS vs. BX, BAM, SSRM, AC, and GLXY

Should you buy Gluskin Sheff + Associates stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gluskin Sheff + Associates with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gluskin Sheff + Associates include Biox (BX), Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), SSR Mining (SSRM), Air Canada (AC), and Galaxy Digital (GLXY). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Biox?

Biox (TSE:BX) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both large-cap trading companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and institutional ownership.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Biox. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Biox, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Biox	C$12.59B	16.91	C$4.76B	C$0.35	44.69
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$60.45B	6.92	C$16.15B	C$2.00	25.91

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates had 1 more articles in the media than Biox. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates and 0 mentions for Biox. Biox's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Gluskin Sheff + Associates'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Biox	Neutral
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	Neutral

Biox has a beta of 2.147917, suggesting that its share price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.378303, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Biox shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Biox	N/A	N/A	N/A
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A

Biox pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Biox pays out 123.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Biox and Gluskin Sheff + Associates tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) are both large-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus price target of C$75.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.62%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Brookfield Asset Management	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.20

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.378303, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.304406, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Asset Management. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$60.45B	6.92	C$16.15B	C$2.00	25.91
Brookfield Asset Management	C$4.77B	22.69	C$2.42B	C$1.56	43.46

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.81% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 30.06% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A
Brookfield Asset Management	50.81%	30.06%	0.88%

Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.82 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 116.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Brookfield Asset Management	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.5% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to SSR Mining?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and SSR Mining (TSE:SSRM) are both trading companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

SSR Mining has a net margin of 12.26% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. SSR Mining's return on equity of 6.80% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A
SSR Mining	12.26%	6.80%	-1.42%

SSR Mining has a consensus price target of C$47.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.75%. Given SSR Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SSR Mining is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
SSR Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.378303, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SSR Mining has a beta of 1.273625, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled SSR Mining'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
SSR Mining	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.1% of SSR Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of SSR Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than SSR Mining. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SSR Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$60.45B	6.92	C$16.15B	C$2.00	25.91
SSR Mining	C$1.89B	4.61	-C$341.77M	C$1.05	38.42

Summary

SSR Mining beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Air Canada?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Air Canada (TSE:AC) are both trading companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.3% of Air Canada shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Air Canada shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Air Canada has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Air Canada's return on equity of 34.23% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A
Air Canada	3.46%	34.23%	4.12%

Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Air Canada pays an annual dividend of C$0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Air Canada pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.378303, indicating that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Air Canada has a beta of 2.076614, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Air Canada had 1 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Air Canada and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Air Canada's score of -0.02 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Air Canada	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Air Canada. Air Canada is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$60.45B	6.92	C$16.15B	C$2.00	25.91
Air Canada	C$22.96B	0.28	C$2.54B	C$2.42	9.15

Air Canada has a consensus price target of C$23.39, suggesting a potential upside of 5.66%. Given Air Canada's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Air Canada is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Air Canada	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

Air Canada beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) are both trading companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.378303, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Galaxy Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that Galaxy Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Galaxy Digital	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Galaxy Digital has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Galaxy Digital's return on equity of 18.71% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A
Galaxy Digital	0.57%	18.71%	N/A

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Galaxy Digital. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$60.45B	6.92	C$16.15B	C$2.00	25.91
Galaxy Digital	C$43.76B	0.12	C$1.97B	-C$0.61	N/A

Summary

Gluskin Sheff + Associates beats Galaxy Digital on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gluskin Sheff + Associates News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Gluskin Sheff + Associates	Asset Management Industry	Finance Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$418.48B	C$2.47B	C$13.94B	C$12.31B
Dividend Yield	1.61%	6.05%	5.75%	6.19%
P/E Ratio	25.91	25.84	20.12	36.86
Price / Sales	6.92	2,123.60	147.16	10.72
Price / Cash	16.05	60.16	19.50	82.29
Price / Book	17.29	1.38	2.25	4.55
Net Income	C$16.15B	C$264.62M	C$1.14B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	3.28%	0.95%	1.28%	1.62%
1 Month Performance	13.21%	1.32%	2.13%	0.80%
1 Year Performance	N/A	11.67%	12.59%	43.57%

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GS Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	C$51.69 +1.6%	N/A	N/A	C$418.48B	C$60.45B	25.91	48,500	Gap Up
BX Biox	N/A	C$14.52 -3.2%	N/A	N/A	C$195.78B	C$12.59B	41.04	4,700	Gap Up
BAM Brookfield Asset Management	2.3995 of 5 stars	C$64.38 -0.8%	C$75.00 +16.5%	-11.1%	C$103.65B	C$4.77B	41.27	2,400	Positive News
SSRM SSR Mining	1.5611 of 5 stars	C$37.25 -9.0%	C$47.50 +27.5%	+119.9%	C$8.49B	C$1.89B	35.48	2,500	Gap Up
AC Air Canada	2.1991 of 5 stars	C$21.41 +0.4%	C$23.39 +9.3%	+16.0%	C$6.15B	C$22.96B	8.85	20	News Coverage Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:GS) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

GS vs. BX, BAM, SSRM, AC, and GLXY

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Biox?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to SSR Mining?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Air Canada?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GS vs. The Competition

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

GS vs. BX, BAM, SSRM, AC, and GLXY

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Biox?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, BX or GS?

Does the media favor BX or GS?

Which has more risk and volatility, BX or GS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BX or GS?

Is BX or GS more profitable?

Is BX or GS a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Do analysts rate GS or BAM?

Which has more risk and volatility, GS or BAM?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GS or BAM?

Is GS or BAM more profitable?

Is GS or BAM a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor GS or BAM?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GS or BAM?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to SSR Mining?

Is GS or SSRM more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GS or SSRM?

Which has more risk & volatility, GS or SSRM?

Does the media refer more to GS or SSRM?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GS or SSRM?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, GS or SSRM?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Air Canada?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GS or AC?

Is GS or AC more profitable?

Is GS or AC a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, GS or AC?

Does the media refer more to GS or AC?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GS or AC?

Do analysts rate GS or AC?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Which has more volatility & risk, GS or GLXY?

Does the media prefer GS or GLXY?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GS or GLXY?

Is GS or GLXY more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GS or GLXY?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GS vs. The Competition

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools