Free Trial

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

Gluskin Sheff + Associates logo
C$44.04 +0.74 (+1.71%)
As of 05/5/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

GS vs. BX, BAM, SSRM, AC, and GLXY

Should you be buying Gluskin Sheff + Associates stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Gluskin Sheff + Associates include Biox (BX), Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), SSR Mining (SSRM), Air Canada (AC), and Galaxy Digital (GLXY). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Biox?

Biox (TSE:BX) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both large-cap trading companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BioxN/A N/A N/A
Gluskin Sheff + Associates N/A N/A N/A

0.0% of Biox shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates had 1 more articles in the media than Biox. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates and 0 mentions for Biox. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Biox's score of 0.00 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Biox Neutral
Gluskin Sheff + Associates Positive

Biox has a beta of 2.147917, indicating that its share price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.340523, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Biox. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Biox, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BioxC$12.59B16.68C$4.80BC$0.3543.75
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$60.45B5.90C$16.15BC$2.0022.07

Biox pays an annual dividend of C$0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Biox pays out 123.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Gluskin Sheff + Associates beats Biox on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) are both large-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 52.82% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 28.97% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesN/A N/A N/A
Brookfield Asset Management 52.82%28.97%0.88%

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Brookfield Asset Management's score of 0.00 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Asset Management. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$60.45B5.90C$16.15BC$2.0022.07
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.61B23.47C$2.42BC$1.5442.88

Brookfield Asset Management has a consensus price target of C$75.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.58%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.340523, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.313727, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 113.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.8% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to SSR Mining?

SSR Mining (TSE:SSRM) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both trading companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

51.6% of SSR Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of SSR Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SSR Mining has a net margin of 24.34% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. SSR Mining's return on equity of 12.03% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SSR Mining24.34% 12.03% -1.42%
Gluskin Sheff + Associates N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, SSR Mining had 5 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for SSR Mining and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. SSR Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.59 indicating that SSR Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SSR Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than SSR Mining. SSR Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SSR MiningC$1.63B4.83-C$341.77MC$1.8520.79
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$60.45B5.90C$16.15BC$2.0022.07

SSR Mining has a beta of 1.181759, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.340523, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

SSR Mining currently has a consensus target price of C$47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 23.47%. Given SSR Mining's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe SSR Mining is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SSR Mining
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

SSR Mining beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Air Canada?

Air Canada (TSE:AC) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both trading companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

18.8% of Air Canada shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Air Canada shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Air Canada has a net margin of 3.46% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Air Canada's return on equity of 34.23% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Air Canada3.46% 34.23% 4.12%
Gluskin Sheff + Associates N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Air Canada had 14 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Air Canada and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Air Canada's score of -0.14 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Air Canada
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Air Canada. Air Canada is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Air CanadaC$22.96B0.24C$2.54BC$2.427.77
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$60.45B5.90C$16.15BC$2.0022.07

Air Canada pays an annual dividend of C$0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Air Canada pays out 8.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Air Canada has a beta of 1.63121, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.340523, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Air Canada currently has a consensus target price of C$23.39, suggesting a potential upside of 24.43%. Given Air Canada's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Air Canada is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Air Canada
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Air Canada beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) are both trading companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Galaxy Digital has a net margin of 0.74% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Galaxy Digital's return on equity of 27.63% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesN/A N/A N/A
Galaxy Digital 0.74%27.63%N/A

In the previous week, Galaxy Digital had 3 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Galaxy Digital and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Galaxy Digital's score of -0.38 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Galaxy Digital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.340523, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Galaxy Digital. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$60.45B5.90C$16.15BC$2.0022.07
Galaxy DigitalC$43.76B0.12C$1.97B-C$0.61N/A

Summary

Gluskin Sheff + Associates beats Galaxy Digital on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gluskin Sheff + Associates News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GS vs. The Competition

MetricGluskin Sheff + AssociatesAsset Management IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$362.40BC$2.33BC$13.34BC$11.79B
Dividend Yield1.90%5.98%5.80%6.23%
P/E Ratio22.0725.7523.2723.86
Price / Sales5.902,080.38189.4913.48
Price / Cash16.0560.1820.2482.69
Price / Book14.731.353.434.48
Net IncomeC$16.15BC$265.53MC$1.11BC$300.68M
7 Day Performance1.38%2.36%0.85%0.71%
1 Month Performance5.79%5.44%4.13%2.45%
1 Year PerformanceN/A14.70%13.82%56.12%

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GS
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
N/AC$44.04
+1.7%
N/AN/AC$362.40BC$60.45B22.0748,500
BX
Biox
N/AC$15.31
-0.6%
N/AN/AC$132.57BC$12.41B43.614,700
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management
2.2242 of 5 stars
C$64.97
-0.7%
C$82.50
+27.0%
-11.4%C$106.43BC$4.61B42.192,400
SSRM
SSR Mining
4.0259 of 5 stars
C$41.73
+2.1%
C$47.50
+13.8%
+166.0%C$8.55BC$1.63B22.562,500
AC
Air Canada
3.8594 of 5 stars
C$18.55
+1.6%
C$23.69
+27.7%
+25.3%C$5.46BC$22.37B9.9720

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:GS) was last updated on 5/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners