Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free GS Stock Alerts

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

Gluskin Sheff + Associates logo
Compare

GS vs. BN, BAM, IGM, ONEX, and GLXY

Should you buy Gluskin Sheff + Associates stock or one of its competitors? Gluskin Sheff + Associates's main competitors and comparable companies include Brookfield (BN), Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), IGM Financial (IGM), Onex (ONEX), and Galaxy Digital (GLXY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Brookfield (TSE:BN) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Brookfield has a consensus target price of C$58.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.88%. Given Gluskin Sheff + Associates' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gluskin Sheff + Associates is more favorable than Brookfield.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Brookfield
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50

Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share. Brookfield pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.409863, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield has a beta of 1.59828, suggesting that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$66.20B0.00C$18.86BC$2.36N/A
BrookfieldC$77.06B1.76C$630.07MC$0.54112.70

In the previous week, Brookfield had 1 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Brookfield and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Brookfield's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brookfield
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Brookfield has a net margin of 1.72% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield's return on equity of 2.87% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesN/A N/A N/A
Brookfield 1.72%2.87%2.31%

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Brookfield shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.1% of Brookfield shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Brookfield beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.40% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 32.62% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brookfield Asset Management50.40% 32.62% 0.88%
Gluskin Sheff + Associates N/A N/A N/A

Brookfield Asset Management presently has a consensus price target of C$75.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.46%. Given Gluskin Sheff + Associates' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gluskin Sheff + Associates is more favorable than Brookfield Asset Management.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management had 1 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Brookfield Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that Brookfield Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Asset Management
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

13.5% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Asset Management. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Asset ManagementC$4.82B24.98C$2.42BC$1.7443.30
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$66.20B0.00C$18.86BC$2.36N/A

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.324674, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.409863, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to IGM Financial?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and IGM Financial (TSE:IGM) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

IGM Financial has a net margin of 29.82% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. IGM Financial's return on equity of 12.91% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesN/A N/A N/A
IGM Financial 29.82%12.91%4.51%

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.409863, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IGM Financial has a beta of 1.041738, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. IGM Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that IGM Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
IGM Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.9% of IGM Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 66.6% of IGM Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than IGM Financial. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than IGM Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$66.20B0.00C$18.86BC$2.36N/A
IGM FinancialC$4.09B5.03C$934.91MC$4.9418.02

IGM Financial has a consensus target price of C$82.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.88%. Given Gluskin Sheff + Associates' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gluskin Sheff + Associates is more favorable than IGM Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
IGM Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share. IGM Financial pays an annual dividend of C$2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. IGM Financial pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

IGM Financial beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Onex?

Onex (TSE:ONEX) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Onex pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share. Onex pays out 3.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Onex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Onex. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Onex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OnexC$750M11.73C$441.34MC$8.2813.95
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$66.20B0.00C$18.86BC$2.36N/A

Onex has a beta of 0.71334, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.409863, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

38.9% of Onex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.0% of Onex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Onex presently has a consensus target price of C$153.60, indicating a potential upside of 32.98%. Given Onex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Onex is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Onex
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Onex had 9 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Onex and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Onex's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that Onex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Onex
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Onex has a net margin of 96.42% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Onex's return on equity of 6.52% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Onex96.42% 6.52% 4.04%
Gluskin Sheff + Associates N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Onex beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Galaxy Digital. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesC$66.20B0.00C$18.86BC$2.36N/A
Galaxy DigitalC$43.76B0.12C$1.97B-C$0.61N/A

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Galaxy Digital has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Galaxy Digital's return on equity of 18.71% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + AssociatesN/A N/A N/A
Galaxy Digital 0.57%18.71%N/A

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.409863, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Galaxy Digital's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.00 indicating that Galaxy Digital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Galaxy Digital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Galaxy Digital tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gluskin Sheff + Associates News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGluskin Sheff + AssociatesCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$423.25BC$5.74BC$14.16BC$12.73B
Dividend Yield1.74%7.38%5.87%6.20%
P/E Ratio21.0138.1229.3437.73
Price / SalesN/A1,226.74514.319.73
Price / Cash16.0548.3337.4982.29
Price / BookN/A3.693.714.60
Net IncomeC$18.86BC$417.15MC$1.31BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-0.04%0.60%0.77%0.93%
1 Month Performance-9.97%0.76%1.56%4.00%
1 Year PerformanceN/A7.79%12.52%35.62%

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GS
Gluskin Sheff + Associates
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$423.25BC$66.20B21.0148,500
BN
Brookfield
1.5415 of 5 stars		C$61.50
-0.3%		C$58.50
-4.9%		-32.8%C$150.75BC$75.74B120.59180,000
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management
1.2022 of 5 stars		C$73.19
-1.7%		C$75.00
+2.5%		-12.2%C$116.87BC$5.47B41.822,400
IGM
IGM Financial
1.9553 of 5 stars		C$90.20
+1.0%		C$82.00
-9.1%		+83.6%C$20.83BC$4.09B18.263,300
ONEX
Onex
3.4458 of 5 stars		C$111.96
-0.7%		C$150.00
+34.0%		+1.0%C$8.54BC$873M13.52492

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:GS) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel