Do analysts prefer GS or BN?

Brookfield has a consensus target price of C$58.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.41%. Given Brookfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Brookfield 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33

Does the media favor GS or BN?

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Brookfield's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.67 indicating that Brookfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Brookfield 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer GS or IGM?

IGM Financial has a consensus price target of C$82.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.86%. Given IGM Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe IGM Financial is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 IGM Financial 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.43

Do analysts rate ONEX or GS?

Onex presently has a consensus target price of C$154.67, suggesting a potential upside of 53.90%. Given Onex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Onex is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Onex 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ONEX or GS?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Onex. Onex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Onex C$750M 10.22 C$441.34M C$6.72 14.96 Gluskin Sheff + Associates C$66.20B 5.04 C$18.86B C$2.36 17.70

Does the media refer more to GS or GLXY?

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Galaxy Digital's score of 0.01 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Gluskin Sheff + Associates 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Galaxy Digital 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

C$41.76 -0.61 (-1.44%)

As of 10/14/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Compare

GS vs. BN, BAM, IGM, ONEX, and GLXY

Should you buy Gluskin Sheff + Associates stock or one of its competitors? Gluskin Sheff + Associates's main competitors and comparable companies include Brookfield (BN), Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), IGM Financial (IGM), Onex (ONEX), and Galaxy Digital (GLXY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Brookfield (TSE:BN) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$66.20B	5.04	C$18.86B	C$2.36	17.70
Brookfield	C$77.06B	1.48	C$630.07M	C$0.54	94.69

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Brookfield's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' score of 0.67 indicating that Brookfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Brookfield	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.2% of Brookfield shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.1% of Brookfield shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Brookfield pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brookfield pays out 48.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.49785, indicating that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brookfield has a beta of 1.640153, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Brookfield has a consensus target price of C$58.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.41%. Given Brookfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brookfield is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Brookfield	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

Brookfield has a net margin of 1.80% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield's return on equity of 3.05% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A
Brookfield	1.80%	3.05%	2.31%

Summary

Brookfield beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Brookfield Asset Management (TSE:BAM) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

13.2% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 14.1% of Brookfield Asset Management shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Brookfield Asset Management has a beta of 1.538137, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.49785, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Brookfield Asset Management pays an annual dividend of C$1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Brookfield Asset Management pays out 108.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Brookfield Asset Management had 1 more articles in the media than Gluskin Sheff + Associates. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Brookfield Asset Management and 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Brookfield Asset Management's score of 0.65 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Brookfield Asset Management	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Brookfield Asset Management presently has a consensus target price of C$75.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.04%. Given Brookfield Asset Management's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Brookfield Asset Management is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Brookfield Asset Management	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.20
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Asset Management. Gluskin Sheff + Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brookfield Asset Management	C$4.82B	21.06	C$2.42B	C$1.74	36.52
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$66.20B	5.04	C$18.86B	C$2.36	17.70

Brookfield Asset Management has a net margin of 50.40% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield Asset Management's return on equity of 34.28% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brookfield Asset Management	50.40%	34.28%	0.88%
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Brookfield Asset Management beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to IGM Financial?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and IGM Financial (TSE:IGM) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates had 1 more articles in the media than IGM Financial. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates and 0 mentions for IGM Financial. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat IGM Financial's score of 0.67 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	Positive
IGM Financial	Positive

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than IGM Financial. IGM Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$66.20B	5.04	C$18.86B	C$2.36	17.70
IGM Financial	C$4.09B	4.55	C$934.91M	C$4.94	16.30

Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. IGM Financial pays an annual dividend of C$2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. IGM Financial pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.49785, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IGM Financial has a beta of 0.834661, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.5% of IGM Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 66.6% of IGM Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

IGM Financial has a net margin of 29.82% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. IGM Financial's return on equity of 12.91% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A
IGM Financial	29.82%	12.91%	4.51%

IGM Financial has a consensus price target of C$82.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.86%. Given IGM Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe IGM Financial is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
IGM Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

Summary

IGM Financial beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Onex?

Onex (TSE:ONEX) and Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

38.6% of Onex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.0% of Onex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Onex presently has a consensus target price of C$154.67, suggesting a potential upside of 53.90%. Given Onex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Onex is more favorable than Gluskin Sheff + Associates.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Onex	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Onex has a net margin of 101.81% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Onex's return on equity of 5.25% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Onex	101.81%	5.25%	4.04%
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A

Onex has a beta of 0.838433, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.49785, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

Onex pays an annual dividend of C$0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays an annual dividend of C$0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Onex pays out 4.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gluskin Sheff + Associates pays out 25.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates had 1 more articles in the media than Onex. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gluskin Sheff + Associates and 0 mentions for Onex. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Onex's score of 0.00 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Onex	Neutral
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	Positive

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Onex. Onex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Onex	C$750M	10.22	C$441.34M	C$6.72	14.96
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$66.20B	5.04	C$18.86B	C$2.36	17.70

Summary

Onex beats Gluskin Sheff + Associates on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (TSE:GS) and Galaxy Digital (TSE:GLXY) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Gluskin Sheff + Associates and Gluskin Sheff + Associates both had 1 articles in the media. Gluskin Sheff + Associates' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Galaxy Digital's score of 0.01 indicating that Gluskin Sheff + Associates is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Galaxy Digital	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Galaxy Digital. Galaxy Digital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gluskin Sheff + Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	C$66.20B	5.04	C$18.86B	C$2.36	17.70
Galaxy Digital	C$43.76B	0.12	C$1.97B	-C$0.61	N/A

Gluskin Sheff + Associates has a beta of 1.49785, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Galaxy Digital has a beta of 1.18511, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

0.0% of Gluskin Sheff + Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Galaxy Digital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Galaxy Digital has a net margin of 0.57% compared to Gluskin Sheff + Associates' net margin of 0.00%. Galaxy Digital's return on equity of 18.71% beat Gluskin Sheff + Associates' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	N/A	N/A
Galaxy Digital	0.57%	18.71%	N/A

Summary

Gluskin Sheff + Associates beats Galaxy Digital on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gluskin Sheff + Associates News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

GS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Gluskin Sheff + Associates	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	TSE Exchange
Market Cap	C$370.33B	C$5.11B	C$13.53B	C$12.65B
Dividend Yield	2.06%	7.62%	6.09%	6.34%
P/E Ratio	17.70	28.14	22.86	37.34
Price / Sales	4.79	1,130.40	476.86	8.35
Price / Cash	16.05	47.58	43.36	82.29
Price / Book	13.97	3.44	2.68	4.34
Net Income	N/A	C$415.07M	C$1.32B	C$299.09M
7 Day Performance	-0.26%	-0.76%	-0.87%	-0.72%
1 Month Performance	-10.04%	-1.90%	-2.87%	-2.17%
1 Year Performance	N/A	7.43%	8.68%	13.30%

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
GS Gluskin Sheff + Associates	N/A	C$41.76 -1.4%	N/A	N/A	C$370.33B	C$69.70B	17.70	47,400	News Coverage Gap Up High Trading Volume
BN Brookfield	2.341 of 5 stars	C$52.95 +1.3%	C$58.50 +10.5%	-19.7%	C$118.20B	C$77.06B	98.06	250,000
BAM Brookfield Asset Management	2.6355 of 5 stars	C$65.52 +2.0%	C$75.00 +14.5%	-20.0%	C$104.65B	C$4.82B	37.66	5,800
IGM IGM Financial	1.9288 of 5 stars	C$81.21 +1.4%	C$82.00 +1.0%	+51.5%	C$18.75B	C$4.09B	16.44	3,594
ONEX Onex	N/A	C$103.43 +0.9%	C$154.67 +49.5%	-15.3%	C$7.89B	C$750M	15.39	330

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (TSE:GS) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

GS vs. BN, BAM, IGM, ONEX, and GLXY

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to IGM Financial?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Onex?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GS vs. The Competition

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Gluskin Sheff + Associates (GS) Competitors

GS vs. BN, BAM, IGM, ONEX, and GLXY

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, GS or BN?

Does the media favor GS or BN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in GS or BN?

Is GS or BN a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, GS or BN?

Do analysts prefer GS or BN?

Is GS or BN more profitable?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Brookfield Asset Management?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BAM or GS?

Which has more volatility and risk, BAM or GS?

Is BAM or GS a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to BAM or GS?

Do analysts recommend BAM or GS?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BAM or GS?

Is BAM or GS more profitable?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to IGM Financial?

Does the media refer more to GS or IGM?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GS or IGM?

Is GS or IGM a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, GS or IGM?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GS or IGM?

Is GS or IGM more profitable?

Do analysts prefer GS or IGM?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Onex?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ONEX or GS?

Do analysts rate ONEX or GS?

Is ONEX or GS more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, ONEX or GS?

Is ONEX or GS a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor ONEX or GS?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ONEX or GS?

Summary

How does Gluskin Sheff + Associates compare to Galaxy Digital?

Does the media refer more to GS or GLXY?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, GS or GLXY?

Which has more risk & volatility, GS or GLXY?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of GS or GLXY?

Is GS or GLXY more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

GS vs. The Competition

Gluskin Sheff + Associates Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools