Grammer Competitors

CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA (ETR:CWC) and Grammer (ETR:GMM) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA and Grammer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA pays an annual dividend of €2.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Grammer pays an annual dividend of €0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA pays out 32.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Grammer pays out -14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Grammer is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA and Grammer, as reported by MarketBeat.

CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA currently has a consensus price target of €126.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.41%. Grammer has a consensus price target of €23.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.24%. Given CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA is more favorable than Grammer.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA and Grammer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Grammer. Grammer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA beats Grammer on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

ElringKlinger (ETR:ZIL2) and Grammer (ETR:GMM) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for ElringKlinger and Grammer, as reported by MarketBeat.

ElringKlinger presently has a consensus target price of €13.27, suggesting a potential upside of 7.34%. Grammer has a consensus target price of €23.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.24%. Given ElringKlinger's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe ElringKlinger is more favorable than Grammer.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares ElringKlinger and Grammer's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ElringKlinger has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Grammer. ElringKlinger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grammer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares ElringKlinger and Grammer's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

ElringKlinger pays an annual dividend of €0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Grammer pays an annual dividend of €0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. ElringKlinger pays out -77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Grammer pays out -14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ElringKlinger is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

ElringKlinger beats Grammer on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grammer (ETR:GMM) and Lotto24 (ETR:LO24) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Grammer and Lotto24's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lotto24 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Grammer. Grammer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lotto24, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Grammer and Lotto24, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Grammer presently has a consensus price target of €23.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.24%. Given Grammer's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Grammer is more favorable than Lotto24.

Profitability

This table compares Grammer and Lotto24's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Lotto24 beats Grammer on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grammer (ETR:GMM) and SAF-Holland (ETR:SFQ) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Grammer and SAF-Holland's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Grammer and SAF-Holland, as provided by MarketBeat.

Grammer presently has a consensus price target of €23.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.24%. SAF-Holland has a consensus price target of €14.26, indicating a potential upside of 13.42%. Given SAF-Holland's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe SAF-Holland is more favorable than Grammer.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Grammer and SAF-Holland's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SAF-Holland has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Grammer. Grammer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SAF-Holland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Grammer pays an annual dividend of €0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. SAF-Holland pays an annual dividend of €0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Grammer pays out -14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SAF-Holland pays out 150.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

SAF-Holland beats Grammer on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grammer (ETR:GMM) and home24 (ETR:H24) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Grammer and home24's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

home24 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Grammer. home24 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grammer, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Grammer and home24's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Grammer and home24, as reported by MarketBeat.

Grammer presently has a consensus price target of €23.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.24%. home24 has a consensus price target of €24.33, suggesting a potential upside of 28.03%. Given home24's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe home24 is more favorable than Grammer.

Summary

home24 beats Grammer on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grammer (ETR:GMM) and Steinhoff International (ETR:SNH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Dividends

Grammer pays an annual dividend of €0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Steinhoff International pays an annual dividend of €0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.2%. Grammer pays out -14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Steinhoff International pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Grammer and Steinhoff International's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Grammer has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Steinhoff International. Grammer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steinhoff International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Grammer and Steinhoff International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Grammer and Steinhoff International, as reported by MarketBeat.

Grammer presently has a consensus price target of €23.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.24%. Given Grammer's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Grammer is more favorable than Steinhoff International.