ElringKlinger Competitors

ElringKlinger (ETR:ZIL2) and Hugo Boss (ETR:BOSS) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares ElringKlinger and Hugo Boss' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for ElringKlinger and Hugo Boss, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ElringKlinger currently has a consensus price target of €13.27, indicating a potential downside of 3.23%. Hugo Boss has a consensus price target of €30.47, indicating a potential downside of 16.90%. Given ElringKlinger's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe ElringKlinger is more favorable than Hugo Boss.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ElringKlinger and Hugo Boss' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ElringKlinger has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hugo Boss. ElringKlinger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hugo Boss, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

ElringKlinger pays an annual dividend of €0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Hugo Boss pays an annual dividend of €0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. ElringKlinger pays out -77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hugo Boss pays out -1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ElringKlinger is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

ElringKlinger (ETR:ZIL2) and CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA (ETR:CWC) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Dividends

ElringKlinger pays an annual dividend of €0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA pays an annual dividend of €2.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. ElringKlinger pays out -77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA pays out 32.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ElringKlinger is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares ElringKlinger and CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ElringKlinger and CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ElringKlinger. ElringKlinger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for ElringKlinger and CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ElringKlinger currently has a consensus price target of €13.27, indicating a potential downside of 3.23%. CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA has a consensus price target of €126.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.37%. Given ElringKlinger's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe ElringKlinger is more favorable than CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA.

Summary

CEWE Stiftung & Co. KGaA beats ElringKlinger on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

ElringKlinger (ETR:ZIL2) and SAF-Holland (ETR:SFQ) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Dividends

ElringKlinger pays an annual dividend of €0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. SAF-Holland pays an annual dividend of €0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. ElringKlinger pays out -77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SAF-Holland pays out 150.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ElringKlinger is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares ElringKlinger and SAF-Holland's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ElringKlinger and SAF-Holland's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SAF-Holland has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ElringKlinger. ElringKlinger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SAF-Holland, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for ElringKlinger and SAF-Holland, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ElringKlinger presently has a consensus target price of €13.27, indicating a potential downside of 3.23%. SAF-Holland has a consensus target price of €15.29, indicating a potential upside of 12.15%. Given SAF-Holland's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SAF-Holland is more favorable than ElringKlinger.

Summary

SAF-Holland beats ElringKlinger on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

ElringKlinger (ETR:ZIL2) and Lotto24 (ETR:LO24) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares ElringKlinger and Lotto24's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares ElringKlinger and Lotto24's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lotto24 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ElringKlinger. ElringKlinger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lotto24, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for ElringKlinger and Lotto24, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ElringKlinger presently has a consensus target price of €13.27, indicating a potential downside of 3.23%. Given ElringKlinger's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ElringKlinger is more favorable than Lotto24.

Summary

Lotto24 beats ElringKlinger on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

ElringKlinger (ETR:ZIL2) and home24 (ETR:H24) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares ElringKlinger and home24's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares ElringKlinger and home24's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

home24 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ElringKlinger. home24 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ElringKlinger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for ElringKlinger and home24, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ElringKlinger presently has a consensus target price of €13.27, indicating a potential downside of 3.23%. home24 has a consensus target price of €32.33, indicating a potential upside of 62.15%. Given home24's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe home24 is more favorable than ElringKlinger.

Summary

home24 beats ElringKlinger on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

ElringKlinger (ETR:ZIL2) and Steinhoff International (ETR:SNH) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Dividends

ElringKlinger pays an annual dividend of €0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Steinhoff International pays an annual dividend of €0.03 per share and has a dividend yield of 24.8%. ElringKlinger pays out -77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Steinhoff International pays out -5.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Profitability

This table compares ElringKlinger and Steinhoff International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ElringKlinger and Steinhoff International's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ElringKlinger has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Steinhoff International. ElringKlinger is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steinhoff International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for ElringKlinger and Steinhoff International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ElringKlinger presently has a consensus target price of €13.27, indicating a potential downside of 3.23%. Given ElringKlinger's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ElringKlinger is more favorable than Steinhoff International.

Summary

ElringKlinger beats Steinhoff International on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.