JZ Capital Partners (JZCP) Competitors

Henderson European Focus Trust has higher revenue and earnings than JZ Capital Partners. JZ Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Henderson European Focus Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Henderson European Focus Trust has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JZ Capital Partners has a beta of 0.22, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Henderson European Focus Trust has a net margin of 94.44% compared to JZ Capital Partners' net margin of -70.37%. Henderson European Focus Trust's return on equity of 21.72% beat JZ Capital Partners' return on equity.

44.2% of Henderson European Focus Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of JZ Capital Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of Henderson European Focus Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JZ Capital Partners shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Henderson European Focus Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JZ Capital Partners'average media sentiment score.

1.3% of JZ Capital Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of JZ Capital Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Fidelity Asian Values shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelity Asian Values has a net margin of 87.46% compared to JZ Capital Partners' net margin of -70.37%. Fidelity Asian Values' return on equity of 17.85% beat JZ Capital Partners' return on equity.

JZ Capital Partners has a beta of 0.22, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelity Asian Values has a beta of 0.374, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, JZ Capital Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelity Asian Values'average media sentiment score.

Fidelity Asian Values has higher revenue and earnings than JZ Capital Partners. JZ Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelity Asian Values, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Manchester & London has a net margin of 91.75% compared to JZ Capital Partners' net margin of -70.37%. Manchester & London's return on equity of 18.18% beat JZ Capital Partners' return on equity.

Manchester & London has a beta of 0.9021258, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JZ Capital Partners has a beta of 0.22, meaning that its share price is 78% less volatile than the broader market.

Manchester & London has higher revenue and earnings than JZ Capital Partners. JZ Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manchester & London, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

1.9% of Manchester & London shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of JZ Capital Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.6% of Manchester & London shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JZ Capital Partners shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Manchester & London had 1 more articles in the media than JZ Capital Partners. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Manchester & London and 0 mentions for JZ Capital Partners. Manchester & London's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat JZ Capital Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Manchester & London is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Chrysalis Investments has a net margin of 184.47% compared to JZ Capital Partners' net margin of -70.37%. Chrysalis Investments' return on equity of 14.16% beat JZ Capital Partners' return on equity.

In the previous week, Chrysalis Investments had 3 more articles in the media than JZ Capital Partners. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Chrysalis Investments and 0 mentions for JZ Capital Partners. Chrysalis Investments' average media sentiment score of 1.86 beat JZ Capital Partners' score of 0.00 indicating that Chrysalis Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

JZ Capital Partners has a beta of 0.22, indicating that its stock price is 78% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chrysalis Investments has a beta of 1.2766949, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Chrysalis Investments has higher revenue and earnings than JZ Capital Partners. JZ Capital Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chrysalis Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

1.3% of JZ Capital Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.3% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of JZ Capital Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Chrysalis Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.