Volvere (VLE) Competitors

Volvere has a beta of 0.595, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curtis Banks Group has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Volvere's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Curtis Banks Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Volvere has a net margin of 7.90% compared to Curtis Banks Group's net margin of -9.86%. Volvere's return on equity of 9.96% beat Curtis Banks Group's return on equity.

7.6% of Volvere shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.1% of Curtis Banks Group shares are held by institutional investors. 35.0% of Volvere shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.5% of Curtis Banks Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volvere has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Curtis Banks Group. Curtis Banks Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

abrdn New Dawn has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volvere has a beta of 0.595, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Volvere has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn New Dawn. abrdn New Dawn is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, abrdn New Dawn's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Volvere'saverage media sentiment score.

66.8% of abrdn New Dawn shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Volvere shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of abrdn New Dawn shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.0% of Volvere shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volvere has a net margin of 7.90% compared to abrdn New Dawn's net margin of 0.00%. Volvere's return on equity of 9.96% beat abrdn New Dawn's return on equity.

Montanaro European Smaller has a net margin of 20,362.04% compared to Volvere's net margin of 7.90%. Volvere's return on equity of 9.96% beat Montanaro European Smaller's return on equity.

7.6% of Volvere shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.5% of Montanaro European Smaller shares are held by institutional investors. 35.0% of Volvere shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Montanaro European Smaller shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Montanaro European Smaller has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Volvere. Montanaro European Smaller is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Volvere's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Montanaro European Smaller'saverage media sentiment score.

Volvere has a beta of 0.595, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Montanaro European Smaller has a beta of 1.4660654, meaning that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, JPMorgan China Growth & Income had 1 more articles in the media than Volvere. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for JPMorgan China Growth & Income and 0 mentions for Volvere. Volvere's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan China Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Volvere has a beta of 0.595, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a beta of 0.8422751, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

7.6% of Volvere shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by institutional investors. 35.0% of Volvere shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of JPMorgan China Growth & Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has higher revenue and earnings than Volvere. JPMorgan China Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income has a net margin of 300.88% compared to Volvere's net margin of 7.90%. JPMorgan China Growth & Income's return on equity of 24.72% beat Volvere's return on equity.