NASDAQ:CLCT

Collectors Universe Competitors

Notice: This company has been marked as potentially delisted and may not be actively trading.
$91.92
0.00 (0.00 %)
(As of 02/8/2021)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$91.92
Now: $91.92
$91.92
50-Day Range
$77.48
MA: $90.95
$91.92
52-Week Range
$13.26
Now: $91.92
$92.39
VolumeN/A
Average Volume403,696 shs
Market Capitalization$854.76 million
P/E Ratio63.83
Dividend Yield0.76%
Beta1.66

Competitors

Collectors Universe (NASDAQ:CLCT) Vs. HMSY, EXLS, ACCD, PHR, EVOP, and EGOV

Should you be buying CLCT stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "business services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Collectors Universe, including HMS (HMSY), ExlService (EXLS), Accolade (ACCD), Phreesia (PHR), EVO Payments (EVOP), and NIC (EGOV).

HMS (NASDAQ:HMSY) and Collectors Universe (NASDAQ:CLCT) are both medical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares HMS and Collectors Universe's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HMS$626.40 million5.23$87.22 million$1.1532.15
Collectors Universe$78.89 million10.83$10.79 millionN/AN/A

HMS has higher revenue and earnings than Collectors Universe.

Profitability

This table compares HMS and Collectors Universe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
HMS8.51%8.86%6.18%
Collectors Universe14.68%53.79%24.81%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

95.8% of HMS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.7% of Collectors Universe shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of HMS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Collectors Universe shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

HMS has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Collectors Universe has a beta of 1.66, indicating that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for HMS and Collectors Universe, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
HMS012102.08
Collectors Universe0000N/A

HMS currently has a consensus price target of $34.25, indicating a potential downside of 7.37%. Given HMS's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe HMS is more favorable than Collectors Universe.

Summary

Collectors Universe beats HMS on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

ExlService (NASDAQ:EXLS) and Collectors Universe (NASDAQ:CLCT) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ExlService and Collectors Universe's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ExlService$991.35 million3.13$67.66 million$2.4338.19
Collectors Universe$78.89 million10.83$10.79 millionN/AN/A

ExlService has higher revenue and earnings than Collectors Universe.

Profitability

This table compares ExlService and Collectors Universe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ExlService8.14%13.65%7.62%
Collectors Universe14.68%53.79%24.81%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

94.8% of ExlService shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.7% of Collectors Universe shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of ExlService shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Collectors Universe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

ExlService has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Collectors Universe has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for ExlService and Collectors Universe, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ExlService06202.25
Collectors Universe0000N/A

ExlService presently has a consensus price target of $73.40, indicating a potential downside of 20.91%. Given ExlService's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe ExlService is more favorable than Collectors Universe.

Accolade (NASDAQ:ACCD) and Collectors Universe (NASDAQ:CLCT) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Accolade and Collectors Universe's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AccoladeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Collectors Universe$78.89 million10.83$10.79 millionN/AN/A

Collectors Universe has higher revenue and earnings than Accolade.

Profitability

This table compares Accolade and Collectors Universe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AccoladeN/AN/AN/A
Collectors Universe14.68%53.79%24.81%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

34.7% of Accolade shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.7% of Collectors Universe shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Collectors Universe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Accolade and Collectors Universe, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Accolade011002.91
Collectors Universe0000N/A

Accolade presently has a consensus price target of $54.6364, indicating a potential upside of 15.80%. Given Accolade's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Accolade is more favorable than Collectors Universe.

Summary

Collectors Universe beats Accolade on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Phreesia (NYSE:PHR) and Collectors Universe (NASDAQ:CLCT) are both medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Phreesia and Collectors Universe's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phreesia$124.78 million19.03$-20,290,000.00($4.50)-11.75
Collectors Universe$78.89 million10.83$10.79 millionN/AN/A

Collectors Universe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Phreesia.

Profitability

This table compares Phreesia and Collectors Universe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Phreesia-16.37%-16.07%-11.18%
Collectors Universe14.68%53.79%24.81%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.4% of Phreesia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.7% of Collectors Universe shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.2% of Phreesia shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Collectors Universe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Phreesia has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Collectors Universe has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Phreesia and Collectors Universe, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Phreesia021002.83
Collectors Universe0000N/A

Phreesia presently has a consensus price target of $53.6429, indicating a potential upside of 1.44%. Given Phreesia's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Phreesia is more favorable than Collectors Universe.

EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) and Collectors Universe (NASDAQ:CLCT) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares EVO Payments and Collectors Universe's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EVO Payments$485.78 million4.83$-10,100,000.00$0.6642.98
Collectors Universe$78.89 million10.83$10.79 millionN/AN/A

Collectors Universe has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EVO Payments.

Profitability

This table compares EVO Payments and Collectors Universe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
EVO Payments-1.37%-6.43%2.97%
Collectors Universe14.68%53.79%24.81%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

52.7% of EVO Payments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.7% of Collectors Universe shares are owned by institutional investors. 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Collectors Universe shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Collectors Universe has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for EVO Payments and Collectors Universe, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
EVO Payments03402.57
Collectors Universe0000N/A

EVO Payments presently has a consensus price target of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given EVO Payments' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe EVO Payments is more favorable than Collectors Universe.

Summary

Collectors Universe beats EVO Payments on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

NIC (NASDAQ:EGOV) and Collectors Universe (NASDAQ:CLCT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares NIC and Collectors Universe's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NIC$354.20 million6.45$50.43 million$0.7744.13
Collectors Universe$78.89 million10.83$10.79 millionN/AN/A

NIC has higher revenue and earnings than Collectors Universe.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for NIC and Collectors Universe, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
NIC12012.25
Collectors Universe0000N/A

NIC presently has a consensus price target of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 10.24%. Given NIC's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe NIC is more favorable than Collectors Universe.

Risk & Volatility

NIC has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Collectors Universe has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares NIC and Collectors Universe's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
NIC14.94%23.51%15.34%
Collectors Universe14.68%53.79%24.81%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

89.7% of NIC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.7% of Collectors Universe shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of NIC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Collectors Universe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

NIC pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Collectors Universe pays an annual dividend of $0.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. NIC pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NIC has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. NIC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

NIC beats Collectors Universe on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Collectors Universe Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
HMS logo
HMSY
HMS
1.4$36.98flat$3.28 billion$626.40 million60.61News Coverage
ExlService logo
EXLS
ExlService
1.3$92.81flat$3.11 billion$991.35 million40.89
Accolade logo
ACCD
Accolade
1.5$47.18flat$2.62 billionN/A0.00Analyst Report
Phreesia logo
PHR
Phreesia
1.6$52.88flat$2.37 billion$124.78 million-88.13
EVO Payments logo
EVOP
EVO Payments
1.4$28.37flat$2.35 billion$485.78 million-105.07
NIC logo
EGOV
NIC
1.6$33.98flat$2.28 billion$354.20 million37.76
Repay logo
RPAY
Repay
1.5$24.22flat$2.13 billion$104.60 million-71.23Insider Selling
TechTarget logo
TTGT
TechTarget
1.5$72.58flat$2.04 billion$133.96 million115.21Analyst Report
Gap Up
CBIZ logo
CBZ
CBIZ
1.3$33.62flat$1.80 billion$948.42 million24.19
Cardtronics logo
CATM
Cardtronics
1.1$38.82flat$1.75 billion$1.35 billion77.64
B. Riley Financial logo
RILY
B. Riley Financial
1.1$61.41flat$1.67 billion$652.11 million38.87Gap Up
Conduent logo
CNDT
Conduent
1.1$6.73flat$1.43 billion$4.47 billion-2.05
Radware logo
RDWR
Radware
1.7$26.71flat$1.25 billion$252.07 million92.10
GreenSky logo
GSKY
GreenSky
1.3$6.20flat$1.13 billion$529.65 million124.02
QuinStreet logo
QNST
QuinStreet
2.0$20.16flat$1.07 billion$490.34 million34.17
Tabula Rasa HealthCare logo
TRHC
Tabula Rasa HealthCare
1.3$43.16flat$1.07 billion$284.71 million-16.23
i3 Verticals logo
IIIV
i3 Verticals
1.7$32.47flat$1.04 billion$150.13 million-811.75Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gravity logo
GRVY
Gravity
0.7$127.88flat$888.64 million$307.18 million22.05Gap Down
Viad logo
VVI
Viad
1.1$41.18flat$843.28 million$1.37 billion-4.33
OptimizeRx logo
OPRX
OptimizeRx
1.5$49.35flat$829.43 million$24.60 million-129.87
Advantage Solutions logo
ADV
Advantage Solutions
1.7$12.89flat$728.29 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
Ideanomics logo
IDEX
Ideanomics
0.5$2.95flat$704.96 million$44.57 million-2.50Gap Down
Rimini Street logo
RMNI
Rimini Street
1.7$9.03flat$694.50 million$281.05 million-34.73
Qiwi logo
QIWI
Qiwi
1.7$10.64flat$667.27 million$635.40 million6.95
Liquidity Services logo
LQDT
Liquidity Services
1.3$18.87flat$659.00 million$205.94 million-171.55Analyst Downgrade
Cass Information Systems logo
CASS
Cass Information Systems
0.9$45.64flat$657.08 million$157.24 million26.53
Newtek Business Services logo
NEWT
Newtek Business Services
1.4$27.55flat$617.12 million$59.29 million18.49Analyst Downgrade
International Money Express logo
IMXI
International Money Express
2.0$14.97flat$572.12 million$319.60 million19.19Analyst Upgrade
MoneyGram International logo
MGI
MoneyGram International
1.4$6.49flat$503.48 million$1.29 billion-17.08Gap Down
Priority Technology logo
PRTH
Priority Technology
1.7$7.10flat$480.23 million$371.85 million25.36
RGP
Resources Connection
1.7$14.29flat$464.54 million$703.35 million37.61Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Limelight Networks logo
LLNW
Limelight Networks
1.8$3.58flat$444.40 million$200.63 million-59.67
UXIN
Uxin
0.5$1.40flat$414.25 million$227.64 million-0.81Gap Up
Digital Media Solutions logo
DMS
Digital Media Solutions
1.3$12.28flat$397.79 millionN/A0.00Analyst Report
Emerald logo
EEX
Emerald
0.7$5.49flat$396.78 million$360.90 million-0.60Gap Down
Waitr logo
WTRH
Waitr
1.6$2.81flat$313.38 million$191.68 million-0.91
QH
Quhuo
0.7$6.01flat$311.70 million$295.30 million0.00
comScore logo
SCOR
comScore
2.0$3.47flat$262.98 million$388.64 million-4.28
Points International logo
PCOM
Points International
1.1$16.00flat$238.64 million$401.18 million-99.99
PaySign logo
PAYS
PaySign
1.1$4.14flat$208.85 million$34.67 million-69.00Gap Down
MOGU logo
MOGU
MOGU
1.8$1.97flat$189.79 million$117.97 million-0.76Gap Up
DHI Group logo
DHX
DHI Group
2.1$2.95flat$154.39 million$149.37 million-5.00Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Gap Down
PFSweb logo
PFSW
PFSweb
1.4$7.07flat$144.12 million$294.02 million-58.91
ServiceSource International logo
SREV
ServiceSource International
1.8$1.41flat$137.20 million$216.13 million-6.71News Coverage
Exela Technologies logo
XELA
Exela Technologies
0.8$2.17flat$127.96 million$1.56 billion-0.64Gap Down
36Kr logo
KRKR
36Kr
1.3$3.39flat$127.11 million$94.17 million-6.05News Coverage
Steel Connect logo
STCN
Steel Connect
0.6$1.90flat$119.70 million$782.81 million-7.31News Coverage
Gap Down
MKD
Molecular Data
0.0$1.03flat$118.49 million$1.90 billion0.00
China Customer Relations Centers logo
CCRC
China Customer Relations Centers
0.5$6.26flat$114.75 million$173.41 million0.00
Marchex logo
MCHX
Marchex
1.5$2.89flat$114.36 million$106.13 million-4.07Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/11/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.