NASDAQ:EIGIEndurance International Group Competitors & Alternatives

Endurance International Group (NASDAQ:EIGI) and Bottomline Technologies (NASDAQ:EPAY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Endurance International Group and Bottomline Technologies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Endurance International Group currently has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 60.49%. Bottomline Technologies has a consensus target price of $49.75, suggesting a potential upside of 0.51%. Given Endurance International Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Endurance International Group is more favorable than Bottomline Technologies.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Endurance International Group and Bottomline Technologies' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Bottomline Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endurance International Group. Endurance International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bottomline Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Endurance International Group has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bottomline Technologies has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

83.7% of Endurance International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of Bottomline Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.6% of Endurance International Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Bottomline Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Endurance International Group and Bottomline Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Bottomline Technologies beats Endurance International Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Endurance International Group (NASDAQ:EIGI) and Micro Focus International (NYSE:MFGP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Endurance International Group and Micro Focus International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Endurance International Group currently has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 60.49%. Micro Focus International has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.57%. Given Endurance International Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Endurance International Group is more favorable than Micro Focus International.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Endurance International Group and Micro Focus International's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Micro Focus International has higher revenue and earnings than Endurance International Group. Endurance International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Micro Focus International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Endurance International Group has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Micro Focus International has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

83.7% of Endurance International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.6% of Micro Focus International shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.6% of Endurance International Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Endurance International Group and Micro Focus International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Micro Focus International beats Endurance International Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Endurance International Group (NASDAQ:EIGI) and CommVault Systems (NASDAQ:CVLT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Endurance International Group and CommVault Systems, as provided by MarketBeat.

Endurance International Group currently has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 60.49%. CommVault Systems has a consensus target price of $50.20, suggesting a potential upside of 29.05%. Given Endurance International Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Endurance International Group is more favorable than CommVault Systems.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Endurance International Group and CommVault Systems' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CommVault Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endurance International Group. Endurance International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CommVault Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Endurance International Group has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

83.7% of Endurance International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of CommVault Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.6% of Endurance International Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.0% of CommVault Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Endurance International Group and CommVault Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CommVault Systems beats Endurance International Group on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Endurance International Group (NASDAQ:EIGI) and Progress Software (NASDAQ:PRGS) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Endurance International Group and Progress Software's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

83.7% of Endurance International Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.7% of Progress Software shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.6% of Endurance International Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Progress Software shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Endurance International Group has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its stock price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Progress Software has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Endurance International Group and Progress Software's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Progress Software has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endurance International Group. Endurance International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Progress Software, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Endurance International Group and Progress Software, as provided by MarketBeat.

Endurance International Group currently has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 60.49%. Progress Software has a consensus target price of $46.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.85%. Given Endurance International Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Endurance International Group is more favorable than Progress Software.

Summary

Progress Software beats Endurance International Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Endurance International Group (NASDAQ:EIGI) and Cerence (NASDAQ:CRNC) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Endurance International Group and Cerence's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.7% of Endurance International Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of Cerence shares are held by institutional investors. 50.6% of Endurance International Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Cerence shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Endurance International Group and Cerence's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cerence has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Endurance International Group. Endurance International Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cerence, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Endurance International Group and Cerence, as provided by MarketBeat.

Endurance International Group currently has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 60.49%. Cerence has a consensus target price of $35.7143, suggesting a potential downside of 16.08%. Given Endurance International Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Endurance International Group is more favorable than Cerence.

Summary

Cerence beats Endurance International Group on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Endurance International Group (NASDAQ:EIGI) and Zuora (NYSE:ZUO) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Endurance International Group and Zuora's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.7% of Endurance International Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.3% of Zuora shares are held by institutional investors. 50.6% of Endurance International Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Zuora shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Endurance International Group has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Zuora has a beta of 2.2, indicating that its share price is 120% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Endurance International Group and Zuora's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Endurance International Group has higher revenue and earnings than Zuora. Zuora is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Endurance International Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Endurance International Group and Zuora, as provided by MarketBeat.

Endurance International Group currently has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 60.49%. Zuora has a consensus target price of $15.2143, suggesting a potential upside of 18.49%. Given Endurance International Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Endurance International Group is more favorable than Zuora.

Summary

Endurance International Group beats Zuora on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.