EVO Payments Competitors

Nielsen (NYSE:NLSN) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

52.7% of EVO Payments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Nielsen shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Nielsen has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Nielsen and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Nielsen and EVO Payments, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Nielsen presently has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.14%. EVO Payments has a consensus price target of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given EVO Payments' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EVO Payments is more favorable than Nielsen.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Nielsen and EVO Payments' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

EVO Payments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nielsen. Nielsen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EVO Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Shift4 Payments (NYSE:FOUR) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Shift4 Payments and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Shift4 Payments and EVO Payments' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Shift4 Payments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than EVO Payments.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

33.4% of Shift4 Payments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 12.2% of Shift4 Payments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Shift4 Payments and EVO Payments, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Shift4 Payments presently has a consensus price target of $66.00, indicating a potential downside of 34.91%. EVO Payments has a consensus price target of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given EVO Payments' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe EVO Payments is more favorable than Shift4 Payments.

Summary

EVO Payments beats Shift4 Payments on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Concentrix (NASDAQ:CNXC) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Concentrix and EVO Payments' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Concentrix has higher revenue and earnings than EVO Payments. Concentrix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EVO Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Concentrix and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Concentrix and EVO Payments, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Concentrix currently has a consensus target price of $122.50, indicating a potential downside of 20.45%. EVO Payments has a consensus target price of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given EVO Payments' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe EVO Payments is more favorable than Concentrix.

Summary

Concentrix beats EVO Payments on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fiverr International (NYSE:FVRR) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both mid-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fiverr International and EVO Payments' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

EVO Payments has higher revenue and earnings than Fiverr International. Fiverr International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EVO Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

57.9% of Fiverr International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Fiverr International and EVO Payments, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Fiverr International currently has a consensus target price of $222.1667, indicating a potential downside of 1.98%. EVO Payments has a consensus target price of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given Fiverr International's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Fiverr International is more favorable than EVO Payments.

Risk & Volatility

Fiverr International has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Fiverr International and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

EVO Payments beats Fiverr International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (NYSE:RBA) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers and EVO Payments, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers currently has a consensus target price of $58.9167, indicating a potential downside of 5.63%. EVO Payments has a consensus target price of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given EVO Payments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EVO Payments is more favorable than Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers.

Risk & Volatility

Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.3% of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers and EVO Payments' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers has higher revenue and earnings than EVO Payments. EVO Payments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers beats EVO Payments on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) and CDK Global (NASDAQ:CDK) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of CDK Global shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of CDK Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares EVO Payments and CDK Global's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CDK Global has higher revenue and earnings than EVO Payments. CDK Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EVO Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its share price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CDK Global has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for EVO Payments and CDK Global, as reported by MarketBeat.

EVO Payments currently has a consensus target price of $27.2857, suggesting a potential downside of 3.82%. CDK Global has a consensus target price of $64.75, suggesting a potential upside of 19.80%. Given CDK Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CDK Global is more favorable than EVO Payments.

Profitability

This table compares EVO Payments and CDK Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CDK Global beats EVO Payments on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.