NASDAQ:EVOP

EVO Payments Competitors

$28.37
-0.06 (-0.21 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$28.00
Now: $28.37
$28.92
50-Day Range
$25.36
MA: $27.57
$31.28
52-Week Range
$12.68
Now: $28.37
$31.99
Volume199,718 shs
Average Volume354,170 shs
Market Capitalization$2.35 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.73

Competitors

EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) Vs. NLSN, FOUR, CNXC, FVRR, RBA, and CDK

Should you be buying EVOP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "business services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to EVO Payments, including Nielsen (NLSN), Shift4 Payments (FOUR), Concentrix (CNXC), Fiverr International (FVRR), Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), and CDK Global (CDK).

Nielsen (NYSE:NLSN) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

52.7% of EVO Payments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Nielsen shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Nielsen has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Nielsen and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nielsen-2.38%22.28%3.45%
EVO Payments-1.37%-6.43%2.97%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Nielsen and EVO Payments, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nielsen03602.67
EVO Payments03402.57

Nielsen presently has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.14%. EVO Payments has a consensus price target of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given EVO Payments' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EVO Payments is more favorable than Nielsen.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Nielsen and EVO Payments' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nielsen$6.50 billion1.41$-415,000,000.00$1.6915.13
EVO Payments$485.78 million4.83$-10,100,000.00$0.6642.98

EVO Payments has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nielsen. Nielsen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EVO Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Shift4 Payments (NYSE:FOUR) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Shift4 Payments and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Shift4 PaymentsN/AN/AN/A
EVO Payments-1.37%-6.43%2.97%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Shift4 Payments and EVO Payments' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shift4 PaymentsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
EVO Payments$485.78 million4.83$-10,100,000.00$0.6642.98

Shift4 Payments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than EVO Payments.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

33.4% of Shift4 Payments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 12.2% of Shift4 Payments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Shift4 Payments and EVO Payments, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Shift4 Payments04902.69
EVO Payments03402.57

Shift4 Payments presently has a consensus price target of $66.00, indicating a potential downside of 34.91%. EVO Payments has a consensus price target of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given EVO Payments' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe EVO Payments is more favorable than Shift4 Payments.

Summary

EVO Payments beats Shift4 Payments on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Concentrix (NASDAQ:CNXC) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Concentrix and EVO Payments' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Concentrix$4.72 billion1.70$164.81 million$5.8926.15
EVO Payments$485.78 million4.83$-10,100,000.00$0.6642.98

Concentrix has higher revenue and earnings than EVO Payments. Concentrix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EVO Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Concentrix and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ConcentrixN/AN/AN/A
EVO Payments-1.37%-6.43%2.97%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Concentrix and EVO Payments, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Concentrix00303.00
EVO Payments03402.57

Concentrix currently has a consensus target price of $122.50, indicating a potential downside of 20.45%. EVO Payments has a consensus target price of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given EVO Payments' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe EVO Payments is more favorable than Concentrix.

Summary

Concentrix beats EVO Payments on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fiverr International (NYSE:FVRR) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both mid-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Fiverr International and EVO Payments' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fiverr International$107.07 million65.61$-33,540,000.00($1.18)-192.08
EVO Payments$485.78 million4.83$-10,100,000.00$0.6642.98

EVO Payments has higher revenue and earnings than Fiverr International. Fiverr International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EVO Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

57.9% of Fiverr International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Fiverr International and EVO Payments, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Fiverr International13702.55
EVO Payments03402.57

Fiverr International currently has a consensus target price of $222.1667, indicating a potential downside of 1.98%. EVO Payments has a consensus target price of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given Fiverr International's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Fiverr International is more favorable than EVO Payments.

Risk & Volatility

Fiverr International has a beta of 2.24, suggesting that its stock price is 124% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Fiverr International and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Fiverr International-8.69%-4.48%-2.97%
EVO Payments-1.37%-6.43%2.97%

Summary

EVO Payments beats Fiverr International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (NYSE:RBA) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers and EVO Payments, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers14202.14
EVO Payments03402.57

Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers currently has a consensus target price of $58.9167, indicating a potential downside of 5.63%. EVO Payments has a consensus target price of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.82%. Given EVO Payments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EVO Payments is more favorable than Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers.

Risk & Volatility

Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

80.3% of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers13.03%19.76%7.55%
EVO Payments-1.37%-6.43%2.97%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers and EVO Payments' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers$1.32 billion5.21$149.04 million$1.3346.94
EVO Payments$485.78 million4.83$-10,100,000.00$0.6642.98

Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers has higher revenue and earnings than EVO Payments. EVO Payments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers beats EVO Payments on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) and CDK Global (NASDAQ:CDK) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.2% of CDK Global shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of CDK Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares EVO Payments and CDK Global's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EVO Payments$485.78 million4.83$-10,100,000.00$0.6642.98
CDK Global$1.96 billion3.36$207.50 million$3.0517.72

CDK Global has higher revenue and earnings than EVO Payments. CDK Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EVO Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its share price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CDK Global has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for EVO Payments and CDK Global, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
EVO Payments03402.57
CDK Global00303.00

EVO Payments currently has a consensus target price of $27.2857, suggesting a potential downside of 3.82%. CDK Global has a consensus target price of $64.75, suggesting a potential upside of 19.80%. Given CDK Global's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CDK Global is more favorable than EVO Payments.

Profitability

This table compares EVO Payments and CDK Global's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
EVO Payments-1.37%-6.43%2.97%
CDK Global9.25%-62.84%12.62%

Summary

CDK Global beats EVO Payments on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


EVO Payments Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Nielsen logo
NLSN
Nielsen
1.1$25.57-0.1%$9.15 billion$6.50 billion-60.88
Shift4 Payments logo
FOUR
Shift4 Payments
0.9$101.40-1.2%$8.17 billionN/A0.00
CNXC
Concentrix
1.7$154.00-0.6%$8.01 billion$4.72 billion26.15
Fiverr International logo
FVRR
Fiverr International
1.2$226.65-1.1%$7.03 billion$107.07 million-527.08
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers logo
RBA
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers
1.8$62.43-1.4%$6.86 billion$1.32 billion39.51Analyst Revision
News Coverage
CDK Global logo
CDK
CDK Global
2.0$54.05-0.3%$6.58 billion$1.96 billion36.52
Grubhub logo
GRUB
Grubhub
1.2$65.53-0.2%$6.11 billion$1.31 billion-52.42Insider Selling
Maximus logo
MMS
Maximus
2.0$94.07-0.9%$5.78 billion$3.46 billion27.67
HealthEquity logo
HQY
HealthEquity
1.8$69.33-2.6%$5.76 billion$531.99 million1,386.88Analyst Revision
Alliance Data Systems logo
ADS
Alliance Data Systems
2.6$109.81-1.7%$5.46 billion$5.58 billion15.75Analyst Report
TriNet Group logo
TNET
TriNet Group
1.5$81.16-1.8%$5.36 billion$3.86 billion18.70News Coverage
MPLN
MultiPlan
1.2$6.25-0.3%$4.18 billionN/A0.00Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
American Well logo
AMWL
American Well
1.4$17.14-1.6%$4.08 billionN/A0.00Insider Selling
Envestnet logo
ENV
Envestnet
1.2$74.70-0.5%$4.04 billion$900.13 million-574.62Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Stamps.com logo
STMP
Stamps.com
1.7$205.64-0.5%$3.78 billion$571.85 million25.48
WNS logo
WNS
WNS
1.8$72.40-0.5%$3.60 billion$928.30 million35.84
HMS logo
HMSY
HMS
1.4$36.98-0.0%$3.28 billion$626.40 million60.61
ExlService logo
EXLS
ExlService
1.3$92.81-0.6%$3.11 billion$991.35 million40.89
Accolade logo
ACCD
Accolade
1.5$47.18-0.8%$2.62 billionN/A0.00Analyst Report
Phreesia logo
PHR
Phreesia
1.6$52.88-0.6%$2.37 billion$124.78 million-88.13
NIC logo
EGOV
NIC
1.6$33.98-0.1%$2.28 billion$354.20 million37.76
Repay logo
RPAY
Repay
1.5$24.22-1.1%$2.13 billion$104.60 million-71.23Insider Selling
TechTarget logo
TTGT
TechTarget
1.5$72.58-2.2%$2.04 billion$133.96 million115.21Analyst Report
Gap Up
CBIZ logo
CBZ
CBIZ
1.3$33.62-0.9%$1.80 billion$948.42 million24.19
Cardtronics logo
CATM
Cardtronics
1.1$38.82-0.1%$1.75 billion$1.35 billion77.64
B. Riley Financial logo
RILY
B. Riley Financial
1.1$61.41-2.3%$1.67 billion$652.11 million38.87Gap Up
Conduent logo
CNDT
Conduent
1.1$6.73-1.0%$1.43 billion$4.47 billion-2.05
Radware logo
RDWR
Radware
1.7$26.71-0.4%$1.25 billion$252.07 million92.10
GreenSky logo
GSKY
GreenSky
1.3$6.20-1.5%$1.13 billion$529.65 million124.02
QuinStreet logo
QNST
QuinStreet
2.0$20.16-0.7%$1.07 billion$490.34 million34.17
Tabula Rasa HealthCare logo
TRHC
Tabula Rasa HealthCare
1.3$43.16-0.1%$1.07 billion$284.71 million-16.23
i3 Verticals logo
IIIV
i3 Verticals
1.7$32.47-1.1%$1.04 billion$150.13 million-811.75Analyst Upgrade
Gravity logo
GRVY
Gravity
0.7$127.88-4.6%$888.64 million$307.18 million22.05Gap Down
Viad logo
VVI
Viad
1.1$41.18-0.5%$843.28 million$1.37 billion-4.33
OptimizeRx logo
OPRX
OptimizeRx
1.5$49.35-0.7%$829.43 million$24.60 million-129.87
Advantage Solutions logo
ADV
Advantage Solutions
1.7$12.89-0.4%$728.29 millionN/A0.00News Coverage
Ideanomics logo
IDEX
Ideanomics
0.5$2.95-3.7%$704.96 million$44.57 million-2.50Gap Down
Rimini Street logo
RMNI
Rimini Street
1.7$9.03-1.1%$694.50 million$281.05 million-34.73
Qiwi logo
QIWI
Qiwi
1.7$10.64-0.9%$667.27 million$635.40 million6.95
Liquidity Services logo
LQDT
Liquidity Services
1.3$18.87-1.0%$659.00 million$205.94 million-171.55Analyst Downgrade
Cass Information Systems logo
CASS
Cass Information Systems
0.9$45.64-0.5%$657.08 million$157.24 million26.53
Newtek Business Services logo
NEWT
Newtek Business Services
1.4$27.55-0.0%$617.12 million$59.29 million18.49Analyst Downgrade
International Money Express logo
IMXI
International Money Express
2.0$14.97-1.6%$572.12 million$319.60 million19.19Analyst Upgrade
MoneyGram International logo
MGI
MoneyGram International
1.4$6.49-2.5%$503.48 million$1.29 billion-17.08Gap Down
Priority Technology logo
PRTH
Priority Technology
1.7$7.10-0.8%$480.23 million$371.85 million25.36
RGP
Resources Connection
1.7$14.29-1.9%$464.54 million$703.35 million37.61Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Limelight Networks logo
LLNW
Limelight Networks
1.8$3.58-0.8%$444.40 million$200.63 million-59.67
UXIN
Uxin
0.5$1.40-2.9%$414.25 million$227.64 million-0.81Gap Up
Digital Media Solutions logo
DMS
Digital Media Solutions
1.3$12.28-0.9%$397.79 millionN/A0.00Analyst Report
Emerald logo
EEX
Emerald
0.7$5.49-4.4%$396.78 million$360.90 million-0.60Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/10/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.