Experience Investment Competitors

Experience Investment (NASDAQ:EXPC) and Foley Trasimene Acquisition (NYSE:WPF) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Experience Investment and Foley Trasimene Acquisition's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Experience Investment and Foley Trasimene Acquisition, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Experience Investment and Foley Trasimene Acquisition's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

69.7% of Experience Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Foley Trasimene Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Experience Investment beats Foley Trasimene Acquisition on 1 of the 1 factors compared between the two stocks.

Arko (NASDAQ:ARKO) and Experience Investment (NASDAQ:EXPC) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Volatility & Risk

Arko has a beta of 0.08, suggesting that its share price is 92% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Experience Investment has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Arko and Experience Investment's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

69.1% of Arko shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Experience Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Arko and Experience Investment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Arko presently has a consensus price target of $12.6667, suggesting a potential upside of 24.06%. Given Arko's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Arko is more favorable than Experience Investment.

Profitability

This table compares Arko and Experience Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Arko beats Experience Investment on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jaws Acquisition (NYSE:JWS) and Experience Investment (NASDAQ:EXPC) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.3% of Jaws Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Experience Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Jaws Acquisition and Experience Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Jaws Acquisition and Experience Investment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Jaws Acquisition and Experience Investment's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Summary

Experience Investment beats Jaws Acquisition on 1 of the 1 factors compared between the two stocks.

Experience Investment (NASDAQ:EXPC) and Brooge Energy (NASDAQ:BROG) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Experience Investment and Brooge Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Experience Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brooge Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Experience Investment and Brooge Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Experience Investment and Brooge Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Given Brooge Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brooge Energy is more favorable than Experience Investment.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

69.7% of Experience Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of Brooge Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Experience Investment has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brooge Energy has a beta of -0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 144% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Fisker (NYSE:FSR) and Experience Investment (NASDAQ:EXPC) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fisker and Experience Investment's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

69.7% of Experience Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 25.0% of Fisker shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Fisker has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Experience Investment has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Fisker and Experience Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Fisker and Experience Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Fisker presently has a consensus price target of $26.3333, indicating a potential upside of 71.00%. Given Fisker's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Fisker is more favorable than Experience Investment.

Summary

Fisker beats Experience Investment on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cohn Robbins (NYSE:CRHC) and Experience Investment (NASDAQ:EXPC) are both small-cap unclassified companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Cohn Robbins and Experience Investment, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

69.7% of Experience Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Cohn Robbins and Experience Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Cohn Robbins and Experience Investment's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Summary

Experience Investment beats Cohn Robbins on 1 of the 1 factors compared between the two stocks.