H&E Equipment Services Competitors

H&E Equipment Services (NASDAQ:HEES) and Fastenal (NASDAQ:FAST) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

66.4% of H&E Equipment Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.1% of Fastenal shares are held by institutional investors. 11.7% of H&E Equipment Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Fastenal shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

H&E Equipment Services pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Fastenal pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. H&E Equipment Services pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fastenal pays out 81.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. H&E Equipment Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Fastenal has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. H&E Equipment Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for H&E Equipment Services and Fastenal, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

H&E Equipment Services currently has a consensus target price of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.84%. Fastenal has a consensus target price of $44.7778, suggesting a potential upside of 1.38%. Given H&E Equipment Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe H&E Equipment Services is more favorable than Fastenal.

Volatility and Risk

H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 2.4, meaning that its stock price is 140% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fastenal has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and Fastenal's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fastenal has higher revenue and earnings than H&E Equipment Services. H&E Equipment Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fastenal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and Fastenal's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

H&E Equipment Services beats Fastenal on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

H&E Equipment Services (NASDAQ:HEES) and United Rentals (NYSE:URI) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

66.4% of H&E Equipment Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of United Rentals shares are held by institutional investors. 11.7% of H&E Equipment Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of United Rentals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for H&E Equipment Services and United Rentals, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

H&E Equipment Services currently has a consensus target price of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.84%. United Rentals has a consensus target price of $192.4444, suggesting a potential downside of 33.32%. Given H&E Equipment Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe H&E Equipment Services is more favorable than United Rentals.

Volatility & Risk

H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 2.4, meaning that its share price is 140% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, United Rentals has a beta of 2.25, meaning that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and United Rentals' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

United Rentals has higher revenue and earnings than H&E Equipment Services. H&E Equipment Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Rentals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and United Rentals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

United Rentals beats H&E Equipment Services on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

H&E Equipment Services (NASDAQ:HEES) and W.W. Grainger (NYSE:GWW) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

66.4% of H&E Equipment Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.6% of W.W. Grainger shares are held by institutional investors. 11.7% of H&E Equipment Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of W.W. Grainger shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

H&E Equipment Services pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. W.W. Grainger pays an annual dividend of $6.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. H&E Equipment Services pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. W.W. Grainger pays out 35.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. H&E Equipment Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and W.W. Grainger has raised its dividend for 50 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for H&E Equipment Services and W.W. Grainger, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

H&E Equipment Services currently has a consensus target price of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.84%. W.W. Grainger has a consensus target price of $371.6923, suggesting a potential downside of 1.92%. Given H&E Equipment Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe H&E Equipment Services is more favorable than W.W. Grainger.

Volatility and Risk

H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 2.4, meaning that its stock price is 140% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, W.W. Grainger has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and W.W. Grainger's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

W.W. Grainger has higher revenue and earnings than H&E Equipment Services. H&E Equipment Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than W.W. Grainger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and W.W. Grainger's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

W.W. Grainger beats H&E Equipment Services on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

H&E Equipment Services (NASDAQ:HEES) and Watsco (NYSE:WSO) are both industrial products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and Watsco's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 2.4, meaning that its stock price is 140% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Watsco has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

66.4% of H&E Equipment Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Watsco shares are held by institutional investors. 11.7% of H&E Equipment Services shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of Watsco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for H&E Equipment Services and Watsco, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

H&E Equipment Services currently has a consensus target price of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.84%. Watsco has a consensus target price of $217.25, suggesting a potential downside of 7.02%. Given H&E Equipment Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe H&E Equipment Services is more favorable than Watsco.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and Watsco's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Watsco has higher revenue and earnings than H&E Equipment Services. H&E Equipment Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Watsco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

H&E Equipment Services pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Watsco pays an annual dividend of $7.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. H&E Equipment Services pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Watsco pays out 109.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. H&E Equipment Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Watsco has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. H&E Equipment Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

H&E Equipment Services (NASDAQ:HEES) and Air Lease (NYSE:AL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Profitability

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and Air Lease's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 2.4, indicating that its stock price is 140% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Air Lease has a beta of 2.2, indicating that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

66.4% of H&E Equipment Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Air Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of H&E Equipment Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.9% of Air Lease shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for H&E Equipment Services and Air Lease, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

H&E Equipment Services currently has a consensus target price of $33.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.84%. Air Lease has a consensus target price of $44.25, indicating a potential downside of 7.19%. Given H&E Equipment Services' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe H&E Equipment Services is more favorable than Air Lease.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and Air Lease's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Air Lease has higher revenue and earnings than H&E Equipment Services. Air Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H&E Equipment Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

H&E Equipment Services pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Air Lease pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. H&E Equipment Services pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Air Lease pays out 12.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. H&E Equipment Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Air Lease has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Air Lease beats H&E Equipment Services on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

H&E Equipment Services (NASDAQ:HEES) and MSC Industrial Direct (NYSE:MSM) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and MSC Industrial Direct's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MSC Industrial Direct has higher revenue and earnings than H&E Equipment Services. H&E Equipment Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSC Industrial Direct, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

H&E Equipment Services pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. MSC Industrial Direct pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. H&E Equipment Services pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MSC Industrial Direct pays out 63.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. H&E Equipment Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and MSC Industrial Direct has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk & Volatility

H&E Equipment Services has a beta of 2.4, indicating that its stock price is 140% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MSC Industrial Direct has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for H&E Equipment Services and MSC Industrial Direct, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

H&E Equipment Services currently has a consensus target price of $33.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.84%. MSC Industrial Direct has a consensus target price of $82.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.09%. Given H&E Equipment Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe H&E Equipment Services is more favorable than MSC Industrial Direct.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

66.4% of H&E Equipment Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of MSC Industrial Direct shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of H&E Equipment Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.4% of MSC Industrial Direct shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares H&E Equipment Services and MSC Industrial Direct's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

MSC Industrial Direct beats H&E Equipment Services on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.