NASDAQ:LYL

Dragon Victory International Competitors

$1.22

-0.08 (-6.15 %)

(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$1.19

Now: $1.22▼

$1.29

50-Day Range

$1.30

MA: $1.71▼

$2.26

52-Week Range

$0.85

Now: $1.22▼

$4.94

Volume932,707 shs

Average Volume1.95 million shs

Market Capitalization$14.20 million

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta0.05

Dragon Victory International (NASDAQ:LYL) Vs. ARCC, PSEC, GBDC, TSLX, NMFC, and PFLT

Should you be buying LYL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investors, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Dragon Victory International, including Ares Capital (ARCC), Prospect Capital (PSEC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT).

Dragon Victory International vs. Ares Capital Stock

Dragon Victory International (NASDAQ:LYL) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and profitability.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.2% of Dragon Victory International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.3% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Ares Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Dragon Victory International has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Dragon Victory International and Ares Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dragon Victory International	$10,000.00	1,419.71	$-1,420,000.00	N/A	N/A
Ares Capital	$1.53 billion	5.61	$793 million	$1.89	10.38

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Dragon Victory International.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Dragon Victory International and Ares Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dragon Victory International	0	0	0	0	N/A
Ares Capital	0	2	5	0	2.71

Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $17.75, indicating a potential downside of 9.53%. Given Ares Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Dragon Victory International.

Profitability

This table compares Dragon Victory International and Ares Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dragon Victory International	N/A	N/A	N/A
Ares Capital	21.28%	10.05%	4.63%

Summary

Ares Capital beats Dragon Victory International on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dragon Victory International vs. Prospect Capital Stock

Dragon Victory International (NASDAQ:LYL) and Prospect Capital (NASDAQ:PSEC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Dragon Victory International and Prospect Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dragon Victory International	N/A	N/A	N/A
Prospect Capital	22.08%	8.16%	4.72%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Dragon Victory International and Prospect Capital, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dragon Victory International	0	0	0	0	N/A
Prospect Capital	2	0	0	0	1.00

Prospect Capital has a consensus target price of $4.50, indicating a potential downside of 44.10%. Given Prospect Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Prospect Capital is more favorable than Dragon Victory International.

Risk & Volatility

Dragon Victory International has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.2% of Dragon Victory International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.3% of Prospect Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 26.8% of Prospect Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Dragon Victory International and Prospect Capital's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dragon Victory International	$10,000.00	1,419.71	$-1,420,000.00	N/A	N/A
Prospect Capital	$623.53 million	5.00	$-16,220,000.00	$0.72	11.18

Dragon Victory International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Prospect Capital.

Summary

Prospect Capital beats Dragon Victory International on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dragon Victory International vs. Golub Capital BDC Stock

Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) and Dragon Victory International (NASDAQ:LYL) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Golub Capital BDC and Dragon Victory International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golub Capital BDC	18.35%	7.95%	3.99%
Dragon Victory International	N/A	N/A	N/A

Insider and Institutional Ownership

36.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Dragon Victory International shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Golub Capital BDC and Dragon Victory International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golub Capital BDC	0	2	0	0	2.00
Dragon Victory International	0	0	0	0	N/A

Golub Capital BDC presently has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential downside of 25.23%. Given Golub Capital BDC's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than Dragon Victory International.

Volatility & Risk

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dragon Victory International has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Golub Capital BDC and Dragon Victory International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golub Capital BDC	$298.95 million	8.60	$54.87 million	$1.22	12.61
Dragon Victory International	$10,000.00	1,419.71	$-1,420,000.00	N/A	N/A

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Dragon Victory International.

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats Dragon Victory International on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dragon Victory International vs. Sixth Street Specialty Lending Stock

Dragon Victory International (NASDAQ:LYL) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Dragon Victory International and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dragon Victory International	$10,000.00	1,419.71	$-1,420,000.00	N/A	N/A
Sixth Street Specialty Lending	$251.49 million	6.04	$128.28 million	$1.94	11.54

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Dragon Victory International.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Dragon Victory International and Sixth Street Specialty Lending, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dragon Victory International	0	0	0	0	N/A
Sixth Street Specialty Lending	0	0	7	0	3.00

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus target price of $19.1429, indicating a potential downside of 14.46%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Dragon Victory International.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.2% of Dragon Victory International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.7% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Dragon Victory International has a beta of 0.05, suggesting that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Dragon Victory International and Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dragon Victory International	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sixth Street Specialty Lending	59.17%	13.52%	6.95%

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats Dragon Victory International on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dragon Victory International vs. New Mountain Finance Stock

Dragon Victory International (NASDAQ:LYL) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.2% of Dragon Victory International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.5% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Dragon Victory International and New Mountain Finance's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dragon Victory International	N/A	N/A	N/A
New Mountain Finance	4.94%	10.30%	3.93%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Dragon Victory International and New Mountain Finance, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dragon Victory International	0	0	0	0	N/A
New Mountain Finance	0	2	2	0	2.50

New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $11.1667, suggesting a potential downside of 14.04%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Dragon Victory International.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Dragon Victory International and New Mountain Finance's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dragon Victory International	$10,000.00	1,419.71	$-1,420,000.00	N/A	N/A
New Mountain Finance	$276.51 million	4.55	$112.56 million	$1.27	10.23

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Dragon Victory International.

Volatility and Risk

Dragon Victory International has a beta of 0.05, suggesting that its share price is 95% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats Dragon Victory International on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Dragon Victory International vs. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Stock

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NASDAQ:PFLT) and Dragon Victory International (NASDAQ:LYL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Risk and Volatility

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 1.97, indicating that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dragon Victory International has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its stock price is 95% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.3% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Dragon Victory International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and Dragon Victory International's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$95.49 million	5.14	$18.41 million	$1.12	11.31
Dragon Victory International	$10,000.00	1,419.71	$-1,420,000.00	N/A	N/A

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Dragon Victory International.

Profitability

This table compares PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and Dragon Victory International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	19.28%	9.04%	3.59%
Dragon Victory International	N/A	N/A	N/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and Dragon Victory International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	0	1	2	0	2.67
Dragon Victory International	0	0	0	0	N/A

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.13%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Dragon Victory International.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Dragon Victory International on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.