Qiwi Competitors

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) and Accolade (NASDAQ:ACCD) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Qiwi and Accolade, as provided by MarketBeat.

Qiwi presently has a consensus price target of $13.25, indicating a potential upside of 22.35%. Accolade has a consensus price target of $54.6364, indicating a potential upside of 13.75%. Given Qiwi's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Qiwi is more favorable than Accolade.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

29.7% of Qiwi shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.7% of Accolade shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Qiwi and Accolade's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Qiwi and Accolade's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than Accolade.

Summary

Qiwi beats Accolade on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) and Phreesia (NYSE:PHR) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Qiwi has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phreesia has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Qiwi and Phreesia, as provided by MarketBeat.

Qiwi presently has a consensus price target of $13.25, indicating a potential upside of 22.35%. Phreesia has a consensus price target of $53.6429, indicating a potential upside of 2.14%. Given Qiwi's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Qiwi is more favorable than Phreesia.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

29.7% of Qiwi shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.4% of Phreesia shares are held by institutional investors. 28.2% of Phreesia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Qiwi and Phreesia's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Qiwi and Phreesia's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than Phreesia. Phreesia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Qiwi, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Qiwi beats Phreesia on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Qiwi has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Qiwi and EVO Payments, as provided by MarketBeat.

Qiwi presently has a consensus price target of $13.25, indicating a potential upside of 22.35%. EVO Payments has a consensus price target of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.89%. Given Qiwi's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Qiwi is more favorable than EVO Payments.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

29.7% of Qiwi shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Qiwi and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Qiwi and EVO Payments' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than EVO Payments. Qiwi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EVO Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Qiwi beats EVO Payments on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) and NIC (NASDAQ:EGOV) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Volatility and Risk

Qiwi has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NIC has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.7% of Qiwi shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of NIC shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of NIC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Qiwi and NIC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Qiwi and NIC's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than NIC. Qiwi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NIC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Qiwi pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. NIC pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Qiwi pays out 74.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NIC pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. NIC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Qiwi and NIC, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Qiwi presently has a consensus price target of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. NIC has a consensus price target of $30.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.16%. Given Qiwi's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Qiwi is more favorable than NIC.

Summary

NIC beats Qiwi on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) and Repay (NASDAQ:RPAY) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Qiwi has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Repay has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Qiwi and Repay, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Qiwi presently has a consensus price target of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Repay has a consensus price target of $27.9231, suggesting a potential upside of 18.02%. Given Qiwi's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Qiwi is more favorable than Repay.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Qiwi and Repay's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than Repay.

Profitability

This table compares Qiwi and Repay's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

29.7% of Qiwi shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.1% of Repay shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of Repay shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Qiwi beats Repay on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

TechTarget (NASDAQ:TTGT) and Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

TechTarget has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Qiwi has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for TechTarget and Qiwi, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

TechTarget currently has a consensus target price of $88.20, suggesting a potential upside of 18.42%. Qiwi has a consensus target price of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Given Qiwi's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Qiwi is more favorable than TechTarget.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares TechTarget and Qiwi's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than TechTarget. Qiwi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechTarget, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares TechTarget and Qiwi's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

84.6% of TechTarget shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Qiwi shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of TechTarget shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Qiwi beats TechTarget on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.