NASDAQ:QIWI

Qiwi Competitors

$10.83
-0.12 (-1.10 %)
(As of 04/14/2021 12:06 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$10.83
Now: $10.83
$10.92
50-Day Range
$10.16
MA: $10.74
$11.33
52-Week Range
$9.69
Now: $10.83
$20.84
Volume3,424 shs
Average Volume461,103 shs
Market Capitalization$679.18 million
P/E Ratio7.08
Dividend Yield12.03%
Beta0.97

Competitors

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) Vs. ACCD, PHR, EVOP, EGOV, RPAY, and TTGT

Should you be buying QIWI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "business services, not elsewhere classified" are considered alternatives and competitors to Qiwi, including Accolade (ACCD), Phreesia (PHR), EVO Payments (EVOP), NIC (EGOV), Repay (RPAY), and TechTarget (TTGT).

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) and Accolade (NASDAQ:ACCD) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Qiwi and Accolade, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Qiwi12001.67
Accolade011002.91

Qiwi presently has a consensus price target of $13.25, indicating a potential upside of 22.35%. Accolade has a consensus price target of $54.6364, indicating a potential upside of 13.75%. Given Qiwi's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Qiwi is more favorable than Accolade.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

29.7% of Qiwi shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.7% of Accolade shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Qiwi and Accolade's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Qiwi16.07%30.61%11.88%
AccoladeN/AN/AN/A

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Qiwi and Accolade's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Qiwi$635.40 million1.07$74.90 million$1.736.26
AccoladeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than Accolade.

Summary

Qiwi beats Accolade on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) and Phreesia (NYSE:PHR) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Qiwi has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phreesia has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Qiwi and Phreesia, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Qiwi12001.67
Phreesia021002.83

Qiwi presently has a consensus price target of $13.25, indicating a potential upside of 22.35%. Phreesia has a consensus price target of $53.6429, indicating a potential upside of 2.14%. Given Qiwi's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Qiwi is more favorable than Phreesia.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

29.7% of Qiwi shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.4% of Phreesia shares are held by institutional investors. 28.2% of Phreesia shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Qiwi and Phreesia's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Qiwi16.07%30.61%11.88%
Phreesia-16.37%-16.07%-11.18%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Qiwi and Phreesia's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Qiwi$635.40 million1.07$74.90 million$1.736.26
Phreesia$124.78 million18.88$-20,290,000.00($4.50)-11.66

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than Phreesia. Phreesia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Qiwi, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Qiwi beats Phreesia on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) and EVO Payments (NASDAQ:EVOP) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Qiwi has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EVO Payments has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Qiwi and EVO Payments, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Qiwi12001.67
EVO Payments03402.57

Qiwi presently has a consensus price target of $13.25, indicating a potential upside of 22.35%. EVO Payments has a consensus price target of $27.2857, indicating a potential downside of 3.89%. Given Qiwi's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Qiwi is more favorable than EVO Payments.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

29.7% of Qiwi shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.7% of EVO Payments shares are held by institutional investors. 51.0% of EVO Payments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Qiwi and EVO Payments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Qiwi16.07%30.61%11.88%
EVO Payments-1.37%-6.43%2.97%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Qiwi and EVO Payments' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Qiwi$635.40 million1.07$74.90 million$1.736.26
EVO Payments$485.78 million4.83$-10,100,000.00$0.6643.02

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than EVO Payments. Qiwi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EVO Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Qiwi beats EVO Payments on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) and NIC (NASDAQ:EGOV) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Volatility and Risk

Qiwi has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NIC has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

29.7% of Qiwi shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.7% of NIC shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of NIC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Qiwi and NIC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Qiwi16.07%30.61%11.88%
NIC14.94%23.51%15.34%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Qiwi and NIC's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Qiwi$635.40 million1.07$74.90 million$1.736.26
NIC$354.20 million6.44$50.43 million$0.7744.10

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than NIC. Qiwi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NIC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Qiwi pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.8%. NIC pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Qiwi pays out 74.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NIC pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. NIC has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Qiwi and NIC, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Qiwi12001.67
NIC12012.25

Qiwi presently has a consensus price target of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. NIC has a consensus price target of $30.50, suggesting a potential downside of 10.16%. Given Qiwi's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Qiwi is more favorable than NIC.

Summary

NIC beats Qiwi on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) and Repay (NASDAQ:RPAY) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Qiwi has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Repay has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Qiwi and Repay, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Qiwi12001.67
Repay011202.92

Qiwi presently has a consensus price target of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Repay has a consensus price target of $27.9231, suggesting a potential upside of 18.02%. Given Qiwi's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Qiwi is more favorable than Repay.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Qiwi and Repay's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Qiwi$635.40 million1.07$74.90 million$1.736.26
Repay$104.60 million19.94$-40,030,000.00N/AN/A

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than Repay.

Profitability

This table compares Qiwi and Repay's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Qiwi16.07%30.61%11.88%
Repay-12.06%3.75%2.07%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

29.7% of Qiwi shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.1% of Repay shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of Repay shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Qiwi beats Repay on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

TechTarget (NASDAQ:TTGT) and Qiwi (NASDAQ:QIWI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

TechTarget has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Qiwi has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for TechTarget and Qiwi, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
TechTarget01402.80
Qiwi12001.67

TechTarget currently has a consensus target price of $88.20, suggesting a potential upside of 18.42%. Qiwi has a consensus target price of $13.25, suggesting a potential upside of 22.35%. Given Qiwi's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Qiwi is more favorable than TechTarget.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares TechTarget and Qiwi's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TechTarget$133.96 million15.64$16.88 million$0.62120.11
Qiwi$635.40 million1.07$74.90 million$1.736.26

Qiwi has higher revenue and earnings than TechTarget. Qiwi is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TechTarget, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares TechTarget and Qiwi's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
TechTarget12.90%10.81%7.48%
Qiwi16.07%30.61%11.88%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

84.6% of TechTarget shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.7% of Qiwi shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of TechTarget shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Qiwi beats TechTarget on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Qiwi Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Accolade logo
ACCD
Accolade
1.5$48.03-0.4%$2.65 billionN/A0.00Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
Phreesia logo
PHR
Phreesia
1.6$52.48-2.6%$2.29 billion$124.78 million-87.47Analyst Downgrade
Insider Selling
Unusual Options Activity
EVO Payments logo
EVOP
EVO Payments
1.4$28.39-2.4%$2.29 billion$485.78 million-105.15
NIC logo
EGOV
NIC
1.6$33.96-0.0%$2.28 billion$354.20 million37.73Increase in Short Interest
Repay logo
RPAY
Repay
1.5$23.70-0.1%$2.09 billion$104.60 million-69.70
TechTarget logo
TTGT
TechTarget
1.7$74.47-1.8%$2.06 billion$133.96 million118.21Analyst Upgrade
B. Riley Financial logo
RILY
B. Riley Financial
0.8$69.92-0.9%$1.88 billion$652.11 million44.25Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
CBIZ logo
CBZ
CBIZ
1.3$33.51-0.8%$1.78 billion$948.42 million24.11
Cardtronics logo
CATM
Cardtronics
1.1$38.81-0.0%$1.75 billion$1.35 billion77.62
Conduent logo
CNDT
Conduent
1.1$7.04-4.4%$1.43 billion$4.47 billion-2.14
Radware logo
RDWR
Radware
1.5$28.15-1.2%$1.30 billion$252.07 million97.07Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
GreenSky logo
GSKY
GreenSky
1.3$6.24-1.8%$1.12 billion$529.65 million124.82
Tabula Rasa HealthCare logo
TRHC
Tabula Rasa HealthCare
1.3$43.94-0.2%$1.09 billion$284.71 million-16.52
QuinStreet logo
QNST
QuinStreet
2.0$20.12-0.6%$1.07 billion$490.34 million34.10Decrease in Short Interest
i3 Verticals logo
IIIV
i3 Verticals
1.7$33.09-2.0%$1.04 billion$150.13 million-827.25
Gravity logo
GRVY
Gravity
0.7$126.50-0.4%$882.52 million$307.18 million21.81Decrease in Short Interest
OptimizeRx logo
OPRX
OptimizeRx
1.5$51.07-0.6%$863.88 million$24.60 million-134.39Analyst Report
News Coverage
Viad logo
VVI
Viad
1.1$42.00-2.4%$839.39 million$1.37 billion-4.42
Advantage Solutions logo
ADV
Advantage Solutions
1.7$12.81-1.2%$732.24 millionN/A0.00
Rimini Street logo
RMNI
Rimini Street
1.7$8.70-1.0%$662.20 million$281.05 million-33.46News Coverage
Cass Information Systems logo
CASS
Cass Information Systems
0.9$45.89-0.2%$659.10 million$157.24 million26.68Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Ideanomics logo
IDEX
Ideanomics
0.6$2.91-6.9%$647.61 million$44.57 million-2.47Analyst Report
Gap Up
Liquidity Services logo
LQDT
Liquidity Services
1.3$18.29-1.1%$631.41 million$205.94 million-166.27Increase in Short Interest
Newtek Business Services logo
NEWT
Newtek Business Services
1.4$27.72-0.9%$615.55 million$59.29 million18.60Decrease in Short Interest
International Money Express logo
IMXI
International Money Express
2.0$14.84-0.5%$564.48 million$319.60 million19.03
MoneyGram International logo
MGI
MoneyGram International
1.4$7.02-2.4%$531.41 million$1.29 billion-18.47
Priority Technology logo
PRTH
Priority Technology
1.7$7.16-1.8%$484.29 million$371.85 million25.57
Resources Connection logo
RGP
Resources Connection
1.5$14.37-1.5%$459.99 million$703.35 million37.82
Limelight Networks logo
LLNW
Limelight Networks
1.8$3.57-2.5%$454.33 million$200.63 million-59.50Decrease in Short Interest
Digital Media Solutions logo
DMS
Digital Media Solutions
1.3$12.36-1.5%$400.38 millionN/A0.00Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Up
Emerald logo
EEX
Emerald
0.7$5.41-3.9%$375.83 million$360.90 million-0.59Increase in Short Interest
UXIN
Uxin
0.5$1.28-1.6%$372.82 million$227.64 million-0.74
Waitr logo
WTRH
Waitr
1.6$2.81-0.7%$311.15 million$191.68 million-0.91
QH
Quhuo
0.7$5.43-5.5%$297.42 million$295.30 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
comScore logo
SCOR
comScore
2.0$3.34-0.0%$253.13 million$388.64 million-4.12
Points International logo
PCOM
Points International
1.1$15.08-0.5%$226.11 million$401.18 million-94.24Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
PaySign logo
PAYS
PaySign
1.1$4.12-0.2%$208.35 million$34.67 million-68.67
MOGU logo
MOGU
MOGU
1.8$1.76-4.5%$177.26 million$117.97 million-0.68Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
DHI Group logo
DHX
DHI Group
2.0$3.19-3.1%$161.72 million$149.37 million-5.41
PFSweb logo
PFSW
PFSweb
1.4$7.21-2.2%$143.71 million$294.02 million-60.08Gap Down
ServiceSource International logo
SREV
ServiceSource International
1.8$1.40-1.4%$138.17 million$216.13 million-6.67News Coverage
36Kr logo
KRKR
36Kr
1.3$3.30-0.9%$122.61 million$94.17 million-5.89Increase in Short Interest
Exela Technologies logo
XELA
Exela Technologies
0.8$2.06-1.5%$119.71 million$1.56 billion-0.61Increase in Short Interest
Marchex logo
MCHX
Marchex
1.8$3.00-3.0%$115.15 million$106.13 million-4.23Insider Buying
Gap Down
China Customer Relations Centers logo
CCRC
China Customer Relations Centers
0.5$6.26-0.0%$114.75 million$173.41 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Steel Connect logo
STCN
Steel Connect
0.6$1.79-1.7%$112.77 million$782.81 million-6.88Unusual Options Activity
MKD
Molecular Data
0.0$0.96-2.6%$112.72 million$1.90 billion0.00News Coverage
HGBL
Heritage Global
2.1$3.00-0.0%$106.07 million$26.17 million23.08Decrease in Short Interest
TC
TuanChe
0.7$3.99-0.5%$80.24 million$92.62 million-3.12Earnings Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
NCTY
The9
0.5$25.16-0.9%$77.16 million$50,000.000.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/14/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.