NASDAQ:SGMS

Scientific Games Competitors

$47.40
+2.51 (+5.59 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$45.06
Now: $47.40
$47.51
50-Day Range
$37.49
MA: $44.18
$50.66
52-Week Range
$8.95
Now: $47.40
$52.88
Volume1.13 million shs
Average Volume701,443 shs
Market Capitalization$4.52 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.11

Competitors

Scientific Games (NASDAQ:SGMS) Vs. LVS, MGM, CZR, PENN, WYNN, and CHDN

Should you be buying SGMS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "casinos & gaming" are considered alternatives and competitors to Scientific Games, including Las Vegas Sands (LVS), MGM Resorts International (MGM), Caesars Entertainment (CZR), Penn National Gaming (PENN), Wynn Resorts (WYNN), and Churchill Downs (CHDN).

Las Vegas Sands (NYSE:LVS) and Scientific Games (NASDAQ:SGMS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Scientific Games' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Las Vegas Sands$13.74 billion3.39$2.70 billion$3.2618.71
Scientific Games$3.40 billion1.33$-130,000,000.00$0.23206.09

Las Vegas Sands has higher revenue and earnings than Scientific Games. Las Vegas Sands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scientific Games, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

37.3% of Las Vegas Sands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Scientific Games shares are held by institutional investors. 10.8% of Las Vegas Sands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 40.6% of Scientific Games shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Las Vegas Sands and Scientific Games, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Las Vegas Sands071102.61
Scientific Games12402.43

Las Vegas Sands presently has a consensus price target of $58.0938, suggesting a potential downside of 4.76%. Scientific Games has a consensus price target of $38.75, suggesting a potential downside of 18.25%. Given Las Vegas Sands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Las Vegas Sands is more favorable than Scientific Games.

Volatility & Risk

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Scientific Games has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Scientific Games' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Las Vegas Sands-12.67%-12.97%-3.03%
Scientific Games-18.48%N/A-3.74%

Summary

Las Vegas Sands beats Scientific Games on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

MGM Resorts International (NYSE:MGM) and Scientific Games (NASDAQ:SGMS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares MGM Resorts International and Scientific Games' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MGM Resorts International$12.90 billion1.54$2.05 billion$0.7752.29
Scientific Games$3.40 billion1.33$-130,000,000.00$0.23206.09

MGM Resorts International has higher revenue and earnings than Scientific Games. MGM Resorts International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scientific Games, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

63.4% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Scientific Games shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of MGM Resorts International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 40.6% of Scientific Games shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for MGM Resorts International and Scientific Games, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MGM Resorts International311502.11
Scientific Games12402.43

MGM Resorts International presently has a consensus price target of $29.5625, suggesting a potential downside of 26.57%. Scientific Games has a consensus price target of $38.75, suggesting a potential downside of 18.25%. Given Scientific Games' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Scientific Games is more favorable than MGM Resorts International.

Volatility & Risk

MGM Resorts International has a beta of 2.42, meaning that its share price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Scientific Games has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares MGM Resorts International and Scientific Games' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MGM Resorts International20.81%-12.08%-4.10%
Scientific Games-18.48%N/A-3.74%

Summary

MGM Resorts International beats Scientific Games on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Caesars Entertainment (NASDAQ:CZR) and Scientific Games (NASDAQ:SGMS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Caesars Entertainment has a beta of 3.15, meaning that its share price is 215% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Scientific Games has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Caesars Entertainment and Scientific Games, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Caesars Entertainment031202.80
Scientific Games12402.43

Caesars Entertainment presently has a consensus price target of $80.4688, suggesting a potential downside of 14.07%. Scientific Games has a consensus price target of $38.75, suggesting a potential downside of 18.25%. Given Caesars Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Caesars Entertainment is more favorable than Scientific Games.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Caesars Entertainment and Scientific Games' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caesars Entertainment$2.53 billion7.71$81 million$1.4763.70
Scientific Games$3.40 billion1.33$-130,000,000.00$0.23206.09

Caesars Entertainment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Scientific Games. Caesars Entertainment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scientific Games, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Caesars Entertainment and Scientific Games' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Caesars Entertainment-47.29%-56.40%-7.39%
Scientific Games-18.48%N/A-3.74%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.7% of Caesars Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Scientific Games shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Caesars Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 40.6% of Scientific Games shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Caesars Entertainment beats Scientific Games on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Scientific Games (NASDAQ:SGMS) and Penn National Gaming (NASDAQ:PENN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

Scientific Games has a beta of 2.11, indicating that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Penn National Gaming has a beta of 2.79, indicating that its stock price is 179% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Scientific Games and Penn National Gaming, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Scientific Games12402.43
Penn National Gaming241202.56

Scientific Games presently has a consensus target price of $38.75, suggesting a potential downside of 18.25%. Penn National Gaming has a consensus target price of $95.6842, suggesting a potential downside of 4.26%. Given Penn National Gaming's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Penn National Gaming is more favorable than Scientific Games.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Scientific Games and Penn National Gaming's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Scientific Games$3.40 billion1.33$-130,000,000.00$0.23206.09
Penn National Gaming$5.30 billion2.95$43.90 million$0.37270.11

Penn National Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Scientific Games. Scientific Games is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penn National Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Scientific Games and Penn National Gaming's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Scientific Games-18.48%N/A-3.74%
Penn National Gaming-19.86%-8.73%-1.10%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

89.5% of Scientific Games shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 40.6% of Scientific Games shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Penn National Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Penn National Gaming beats Scientific Games on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Scientific Games (NASDAQ:SGMS) and Wynn Resorts (NASDAQ:WYNN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

Risk & Volatility

Scientific Games has a beta of 2.11, indicating that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wynn Resorts has a beta of 2.32, indicating that its stock price is 132% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

89.5% of Scientific Games shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.5% of Wynn Resorts shares are held by institutional investors. 40.6% of Scientific Games shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Wynn Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Scientific Games and Wynn Resorts' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Scientific Games$3.40 billion1.33$-130,000,000.00$0.23206.09
Wynn Resorts$6.61 billion2.23$122.99 million$2.6148.77

Wynn Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than Scientific Games. Wynn Resorts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scientific Games, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Scientific Games and Wynn Resorts, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Scientific Games12402.43
Wynn Resorts29702.28

Scientific Games presently has a consensus target price of $38.75, suggesting a potential downside of 18.25%. Wynn Resorts has a consensus target price of $108.4375, suggesting a potential downside of 14.80%. Given Wynn Resorts' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Wynn Resorts is more favorable than Scientific Games.

Profitability

This table compares Scientific Games and Wynn Resorts' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Scientific Games-18.48%N/A-3.74%
Wynn Resorts-25.71%-96.61%-7.68%

Scientific Games (NASDAQ:SGMS) and Churchill Downs (NASDAQ:CHDN) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

Scientific Games has a beta of 2.11, indicating that its share price is 111% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Churchill Downs has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Scientific Games and Churchill Downs, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Scientific Games12402.43
Churchill Downs01402.80

Scientific Games currently has a consensus target price of $38.75, suggesting a potential downside of 18.25%. Churchill Downs has a consensus target price of $200.80, suggesting a potential downside of 9.00%. Given Churchill Downs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Churchill Downs is more favorable than Scientific Games.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Scientific Games and Churchill Downs' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Scientific Games$3.40 billion1.33$-130,000,000.00$0.23206.09
Churchill Downs$1.33 billion6.39$137.50 million$4.4349.81

Churchill Downs has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Scientific Games. Churchill Downs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Scientific Games, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.5% of Scientific Games shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.0% of Churchill Downs shares are held by institutional investors. 40.6% of Scientific Games shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Churchill Downs shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Scientific Games and Churchill Downs' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Scientific Games-18.48%N/A-3.74%
Churchill Downs-8.99%11.09%1.49%

Summary

Churchill Downs beats Scientific Games on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Scientific Games Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Las Vegas Sands logo
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
1.3$61.00+0.5%$46.60 billion$13.74 billion-61.62Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
MGM Resorts International logo
MGM
MGM Resorts International
1.8$40.26+1.4%$19.93 billion$12.90 billion14.38
Caesars Entertainment logo
CZR
Caesars Entertainment
1.4$93.64+0.5%$19.50 billion$2.53 billion-9.59Analyst Report
Penn National Gaming logo
PENN
Penn National Gaming
1.7$99.94+0.8%$15.64 billion$5.30 billion-14.65Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Wynn Resorts logo
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
1.4$127.28+0.5%$14.72 billion$6.61 billion-12.18Analyst Upgrade
Churchill Downs logo
CHDN
Churchill Downs
1.8$220.66+1.3%$8.50 billion$1.33 billion-91.56Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Advanced Drainage Systems logo
WMS
Advanced Drainage Systems
1.5$117.00+3.2%$8.29 billion$1.67 billion95.90Analyst Downgrade
Boyd Gaming logo
BYD
Boyd Gaming
1.4$65.62+0.7%$7.35 billion$3.33 billion-113.14Analyst Report
News Coverage
International Game Technology logo
IGT
International Game Technology
0.8$17.00+0.2%$3.48 billion$4.79 billion-4.23Decrease in Short Interest
Monarch Casino & Resort logo
MCRI
Monarch Casino & Resort
1.3$67.46+0.3%$1.24 billion$249.17 million87.61Decrease in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/17/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.