NYSE:BSIG

BrightSphere Investment Group Competitors

$22.93
+0.38 (+1.69 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$22.23
Now: $22.93
$23.40
50-Day Range
$18.10
MA: $19.61
$22.55
52-Week Range
$4.93
Now: $22.93
$23.40
Volume1.20 million shs
Average Volume485,504 shs
Market Capitalization$1.82 billion
P/E Ratio12.33
Dividend Yield0.18%
Beta1.86

Competitors

BrightSphere Investment Group (NYSE:BSIG) Vs. AMG, JHG, EVR, HLNE, LAZ, and HLI

Should you be buying BSIG stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investment advice" are considered alternatives and competitors to BrightSphere Investment Group, including Affiliated Managers Group (AMG), Janus Henderson Group (JHG), Evercore (EVR), Hamilton Lane (HLNE), Lazard (LAZ), and Houlihan Lokey (HLI).

Affiliated Managers Group (NYSE:AMG) and BrightSphere Investment Group (NYSE:BSIG) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.8% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.8% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Affiliated Managers Group and BrightSphere Investment Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Affiliated Managers Group5.37%19.15%8.64%
BrightSphere Investment Group20.95%80.30%10.42%

Risk & Volatility

Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BrightSphere Investment Group has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Affiliated Managers Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. BrightSphere Investment Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Affiliated Managers Group pays out 0.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BrightSphere Investment Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Affiliated Managers Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and BrightSphere Investment Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Affiliated Managers Group and BrightSphere Investment Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Affiliated Managers Group12202.20
BrightSphere Investment Group01402.80

Affiliated Managers Group presently has a consensus target price of $133.60, suggesting a potential downside of 14.16%. BrightSphere Investment Group has a consensus target price of $23.80, suggesting a potential upside of 3.79%. Given BrightSphere Investment Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BrightSphere Investment Group is more favorable than Affiliated Managers Group.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Affiliated Managers Group and BrightSphere Investment Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Affiliated Managers Group$2.24 billion2.96$15.70 million$14.2210.94
BrightSphere Investment Group$819.50 million2.22$223.90 million$1.7712.95

BrightSphere Investment Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Affiliated Managers Group. Affiliated Managers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BrightSphere Investment Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

BrightSphere Investment Group beats Affiliated Managers Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Janus Henderson Group (NYSE:JHG) and BrightSphere Investment Group (NYSE:BSIG) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.2% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.8% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Janus Henderson Group and BrightSphere Investment Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Janus Henderson Group3.71%10.41%6.93%
BrightSphere Investment Group20.95%80.30%10.42%

Risk & Volatility

Janus Henderson Group has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BrightSphere Investment Group has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Janus Henderson Group pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. BrightSphere Investment Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Janus Henderson Group pays out 58.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BrightSphere Investment Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Janus Henderson Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and BrightSphere Investment Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Janus Henderson Group and BrightSphere Investment Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Janus Henderson Group26101.89
BrightSphere Investment Group01402.80

Janus Henderson Group presently has a consensus target price of $25.1286, suggesting a potential downside of 22.42%. BrightSphere Investment Group has a consensus target price of $23.80, suggesting a potential upside of 3.79%. Given BrightSphere Investment Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BrightSphere Investment Group is more favorable than Janus Henderson Group.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Janus Henderson Group and BrightSphere Investment Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Janus Henderson Group$2.19 billion2.55$427.60 million$2.4713.11
BrightSphere Investment Group$819.50 million2.22$223.90 million$1.7712.95

Janus Henderson Group has higher revenue and earnings than BrightSphere Investment Group. BrightSphere Investment Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Janus Henderson Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

BrightSphere Investment Group beats Janus Henderson Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Evercore (NYSE:EVR) and BrightSphere Investment Group (NYSE:BSIG) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Evercore and BrightSphere Investment Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Evercore01713.00
BrightSphere Investment Group01402.80

Evercore presently has a consensus target price of $138.7778, suggesting a potential upside of 5.41%. BrightSphere Investment Group has a consensus target price of $23.80, suggesting a potential upside of 3.79%. Given Evercore's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Evercore is more favorable than BrightSphere Investment Group.

Dividends

Evercore pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. BrightSphere Investment Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Evercore pays out 31.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. BrightSphere Investment Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Evercore has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and BrightSphere Investment Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Evercore is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

Evercore has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BrightSphere Investment Group has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Evercore and BrightSphere Investment Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Evercore11.80%27.11%12.25%
BrightSphere Investment Group20.95%80.30%10.42%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.8% of Evercore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of Evercore shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.8% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Evercore and BrightSphere Investment Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Evercore$2.01 billion2.75$297.44 million$7.7017.10
BrightSphere Investment Group$819.50 million2.22$223.90 million$1.7712.95

Evercore has higher revenue and earnings than BrightSphere Investment Group. BrightSphere Investment Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evercore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Evercore beats BrightSphere Investment Group on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

BrightSphere Investment Group (NYSE:BSIG) and Hamilton Lane (NASDAQ:HLNE) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for BrightSphere Investment Group and Hamilton Lane, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
BrightSphere Investment Group01402.80
Hamilton Lane03202.40

BrightSphere Investment Group presently has a consensus price target of $23.80, suggesting a potential upside of 3.79%. Hamilton Lane has a consensus price target of $80.00, suggesting a potential downside of 13.69%. Given BrightSphere Investment Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe BrightSphere Investment Group is more favorable than Hamilton Lane.

Dividends

BrightSphere Investment Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Hamilton Lane pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. BrightSphere Investment Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hamilton Lane pays out 62.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. BrightSphere Investment Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Hamilton Lane has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Hamilton Lane is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Volatility & Risk

BrightSphere Investment Group has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its share price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hamilton Lane has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares BrightSphere Investment Group and Hamilton Lane's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
BrightSphere Investment Group20.95%80.30%10.42%
Hamilton Lane19.78%44.51%20.35%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

99.2% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.8% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 34.6% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BrightSphere Investment Group and Hamilton Lane's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BrightSphere Investment Group$819.50 million2.22$223.90 million$1.7712.95
Hamilton Lane$274.05 million17.84$60.83 million$2.0146.11

BrightSphere Investment Group has higher revenue and earnings than Hamilton Lane. BrightSphere Investment Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hamilton Lane, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

BrightSphere Investment Group beats Hamilton Lane on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

BrightSphere Investment Group (NYSE:BSIG) and Lazard (NYSE:LAZ) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for BrightSphere Investment Group and Lazard, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
BrightSphere Investment Group01402.80
Lazard14402.33

BrightSphere Investment Group presently has a consensus price target of $23.80, suggesting a potential upside of 3.79%. Lazard has a consensus price target of $40.8889, suggesting a potential downside of 11.93%. Given BrightSphere Investment Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe BrightSphere Investment Group is more favorable than Lazard.

Dividends

BrightSphere Investment Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Lazard pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. BrightSphere Investment Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lazard pays out 57.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. BrightSphere Investment Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Lazard has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

BrightSphere Investment Group has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its share price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lazard has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares BrightSphere Investment Group and Lazard's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
BrightSphere Investment Group20.95%80.30%10.42%
Lazard11.62%47.79%6.01%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

99.2% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.5% of Lazard shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.8% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Lazard shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BrightSphere Investment Group and Lazard's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BrightSphere Investment Group$819.50 million2.22$223.90 million$1.7712.95
Lazard$2.67 billion1.83$286.50 million$3.2814.16

Lazard has higher revenue and earnings than BrightSphere Investment Group. BrightSphere Investment Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lazard, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

BrightSphere Investment Group beats Lazard on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

BrightSphere Investment Group (NYSE:BSIG) and Houlihan Lokey (NYSE:HLI) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for BrightSphere Investment Group and Houlihan Lokey, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
BrightSphere Investment Group01402.80
Houlihan Lokey24001.67

BrightSphere Investment Group presently has a consensus price target of $23.80, suggesting a potential upside of 3.79%. Houlihan Lokey has a consensus price target of $66.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.20%. Given BrightSphere Investment Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe BrightSphere Investment Group is more favorable than Houlihan Lokey.

Dividends

BrightSphere Investment Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Houlihan Lokey pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. BrightSphere Investment Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Houlihan Lokey pays out 41.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. BrightSphere Investment Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Houlihan Lokey has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Houlihan Lokey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Volatility & Risk

BrightSphere Investment Group has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its share price is 86% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Houlihan Lokey has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares BrightSphere Investment Group and Houlihan Lokey's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
BrightSphere Investment Group20.95%80.30%10.42%
Houlihan Lokey18.06%19.18%12.48%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

99.2% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.5% of Houlihan Lokey shares are owned by institutional investors. 25.8% of BrightSphere Investment Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.0% of Houlihan Lokey shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares BrightSphere Investment Group and Houlihan Lokey's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BrightSphere Investment Group$819.50 million2.22$223.90 million$1.7712.95
Houlihan Lokey$1.16 billion3.92$183.79 million$3.2020.58

BrightSphere Investment Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Houlihan Lokey. BrightSphere Investment Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Houlihan Lokey, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

BrightSphere Investment Group beats Houlihan Lokey on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


BrightSphere Investment Group Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Affiliated Managers Group logo
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group
2.3$155.63+1.0%$6.63 billion$2.24 billion67.37Analyst Report
News Coverage
Janus Henderson Group logo
JHG
Janus Henderson Group
1.9$32.39+0.4%$5.58 billion$2.19 billion73.62Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Evercore logo
EVR
Evercore
2.5$131.66+2.6%$5.53 billion$2.01 billion23.60Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Hamilton Lane logo
HLNE
Hamilton Lane
1.5$92.69+0.4%$4.89 billion$274.05 million48.03
Lazard logo
LAZ
Lazard
2.4$46.43+0.3%$4.88 billion$2.67 billion18.21Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Houlihan Lokey logo
HLI
Houlihan Lokey
2.1$65.87+0.7%$4.54 billion$1.16 billion21.67Analyst Revision
News Coverage
AllianceBernstein logo
AB
AllianceBernstein
2.0$40.29+1.0%$3.96 billion$3.52 billion14.60Analyst Downgrade
Artisan Partners Asset Management logo
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management
2.2$53.36+0.7%$3.66 billion$799 million18.15
Moelis & Company logo
MC
Moelis & Company
1.7$54.19+1.4%$3.47 billion$746.53 million43.01Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
StepStone Group logo
STEP
StepStone Group
1.1$35.82+0.8%$3.40 billionN/A0.00
Cohen & Steers logo
CNS
Cohen & Steers
2.1$66.50+1.7%$3.21 billion$410.83 million27.48
Focus Financial Partners logo
FOCS
Focus Financial Partners
1.8$43.37+2.2%$3.12 billion$1.22 billion180.69Analyst Revision
Federated Hermes logo
FHI
Federated Hermes
1.5$31.35+0.7%$3.11 billion$1.33 billion10.15News Coverage
Noah logo
NOAH
Noah
1.7$42.83+0.6%$2.62 billion$253.09 million19.83
GCM Grosvenor logo
GCMG
GCM Grosvenor
1.4$12.12+0.7%$2.25 billionN/A0.00
Victory Capital logo
VCTR
Victory Capital
1.6$29.04+7.0%$1.97 billion$612.37 million10.96Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
Virtus Investment Partners logo
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
1.7$252.92+2.1%$1.94 billion$563.25 million38.15Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gap Up
AssetMark Financial logo
AMK
AssetMark Financial
1.4$22.35+0.4%$1.62 billion$417.94 million-1,116.94Insider Selling
PJT Partners logo
PJT
PJT Partners
2.0$66.97+0.6%$1.60 billion$717.64 million19.19Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Sculptor Capital Management logo
SCU
Sculptor Capital Management
1.3$22.49+0.2%$1.27 billion$597.35 million-11.30Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Pzena Investment Management logo
PZN
Pzena Investment Management
0.9$10.79+1.9%$767.92 million$150.75 million51.38News Coverage
Diamond Hill Investment Group logo
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
1.4$165.91+0.6%$524.28 million$136.62 million14.36
Barings BDC logo
BBDC
Barings BDC
2.2$10.26+0.4%$492.09 million$75.65 million-256.50Analyst Upgrade
Fidus Investment logo
FDUS
Fidus Investment
1.5$16.95+1.2%$414.21 million$77.11 million18.83
Value Line logo
VALU
Value Line
1.1$31.60+0.0%$302.54 million$40.30 million16.99
Saratoga Investment logo
SAR
Saratoga Investment
1.6$25.20+0.2%$281.48 million$58.45 million8.72News Coverage
PUYI
Puyi
0.5$4.14+3.4%$249.70 million$18.33 million0.00Gap Down
Monroe Capital logo
MRCC
Monroe Capital
1.4$10.69+1.3%$227.74 million$68.19 million-53.45News Coverage
Silvercrest Asset Management Group logo
SAMG
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
2.3$14.47+0.5%$208.80 million$102.15 million12.92
U.S. Global Investors logo
GROW
U.S. Global Investors
0.4$11.84+8.4%$178.38 million$4.48 million0.00High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
WHG
Westwood Holdings Group
1.0$17.46+1.5%$147.21 million$84.08 million75.92
StoneCastle Financial logo
BANX
StoneCastle Financial
1.5$19.89+0.0%$130.52 million$16.35 million64.16
Manning & Napier logo
MN
Manning & Napier
0.5$6.43+0.2%$110.22 million$136 million35.72
Great Elm Capital logo
GECC
Great Elm Capital
1.1$3.29+0.3%$77.34 million$27.04 million-1.35Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
HNNA
Hennessy Advisors
1.4$9.98+9.7%$73.45 million$33.39 million9.42High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
PHCF
Puhui Wealth Investment Management
0.4$5.13+8.0%$59.04 million$2.18 million0.00Gap Down
Medley Management logo
MDLY
Medley Management
0.5$8.34+2.5%$5.59 million$48.84 million-1.04Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/11/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.