China Green Agriculture Competitors

Nutrien (NYSE:NTR) and China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nutrien and China Green Agriculture's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than China Green Agriculture.

Profitability

This table compares Nutrien and China Green Agriculture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Nutrien has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Nutrien and China Green Agriculture, as provided by MarketBeat.

Nutrien presently has a consensus target price of $56.4444, indicating a potential upside of 0.76%. Given Nutrien's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

61.9% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nutrien beats China Green Agriculture on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) and China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The Scotts Miracle-Gro and China Green Agriculture's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The Scotts Miracle-Gro has higher revenue and earnings than China Green Agriculture.

Profitability

This table compares The Scotts Miracle-Gro and China Green Agriculture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

The Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for The Scotts Miracle-Gro and China Green Agriculture, as provided by MarketBeat.

The Scotts Miracle-Gro presently has a consensus target price of $250.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.94%. Given The Scotts Miracle-Gro's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe The Scotts Miracle-Gro is more favorable than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

63.1% of The Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. 27.2% of The Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Scotts Miracle-Gro beats China Green Agriculture on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Mosaic (NYSE:MOS) and China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The Mosaic and China Green Agriculture's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

China Green Agriculture has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Mosaic.

Profitability

This table compares The Mosaic and China Green Agriculture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

The Mosaic has a beta of 1.81, meaning that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for The Mosaic and China Green Agriculture, as provided by MarketBeat.

The Mosaic presently has a consensus target price of $27.9722, indicating a potential downside of 16.40%. Given The Mosaic's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe The Mosaic is more favorable than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

69.8% of The Mosaic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of The Mosaic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Mosaic beats China Green Agriculture on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

CF Industries (NYSE:CF) and China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CF Industries and China Green Agriculture's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CF Industries has higher revenue and earnings than China Green Agriculture.

Profitability

This table compares CF Industries and China Green Agriculture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

CF Industries has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for CF Industries and China Green Agriculture, as provided by MarketBeat.

CF Industries presently has a consensus target price of $43.9167, indicating a potential downside of 7.17%. Given CF Industries' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CF Industries is more favorable than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.0% of CF Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of CF Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CF Industries beats China Green Agriculture on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

ICL Group (NYSE:ICL) and China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for ICL Group and China Green Agriculture, as provided by MarketBeat.

ICL Group presently has a consensus target price of $5.75, indicating a potential downside of 10.85%. Given ICL Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe ICL Group is more favorable than China Green Agriculture.

Risk and Volatility

ICL Group has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ICL Group and China Green Agriculture's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

ICL Group has higher revenue and earnings than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

7.4% of ICL Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares ICL Group and China Green Agriculture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

ICL Group beats China Green Agriculture on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) and American Vanguard (NYSE:AVD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for China Green Agriculture and American Vanguard, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Volatility & Risk

China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, American Vanguard has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares China Green Agriculture and American Vanguard's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

American Vanguard has higher revenue and earnings than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of American Vanguard shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of American Vanguard shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares China Green Agriculture and American Vanguard's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

American Vanguard beats China Green Agriculture on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.