NYSE:CGA

China Green Agriculture Competitors

$13.15
+2.30 (+21.20 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$10.97
Now: $13.15
$13.48
50-Day Range
$3.78
MA: $5.62
$10.85
52-Week Range
$1.77
Now: $13.15
$11.50
Volume779,635 shs
Average Volume136,575 shs
Market Capitalization$83.50 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.74

Competitors

China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) Vs. NTR, SMG, MOS, CF, ICL, and AVD

Should you be buying CGA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "agricultural chemicals" are considered alternatives and competitors to China Green Agriculture, including Nutrien (NTR), The Scotts Miracle-Gro (SMG), The Mosaic (MOS), CF Industries (CF), ICL Group (ICL), and American Vanguard (AVD).

Nutrien (NYSE:NTR) and China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nutrien and China Green Agriculture's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nutrien$20.02 billion1.60$992 million$2.1725.82
China Green Agriculture$249.24 million0.34$-136,750,000.00N/AN/A

Nutrien has higher revenue and earnings than China Green Agriculture.

Profitability

This table compares Nutrien and China Green Agriculture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nutrien0.47%4.19%1.98%
China Green Agriculture-66.12%-53.71%-42.41%

Risk and Volatility

Nutrien has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Nutrien and China Green Agriculture, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nutrien15612.54
China Green Agriculture0000N/A

Nutrien presently has a consensus target price of $56.4444, indicating a potential upside of 0.76%. Given Nutrien's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Nutrien is more favorable than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

61.9% of Nutrien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Nutrien shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nutrien beats China Green Agriculture on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Scotts Miracle-Gro (NYSE:SMG) and China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The Scotts Miracle-Gro and China Green Agriculture's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Scotts Miracle-Gro$4.13 billion3.21$387.40 million$7.2432.90
China Green Agriculture$249.24 million0.34$-136,750,000.00N/AN/A

The Scotts Miracle-Gro has higher revenue and earnings than China Green Agriculture.

Profitability

This table compares The Scotts Miracle-Gro and China Green Agriculture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Scotts Miracle-Gro9.38%52.60%11.09%
China Green Agriculture-66.12%-53.71%-42.41%

Risk and Volatility

The Scotts Miracle-Gro has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for The Scotts Miracle-Gro and China Green Agriculture, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Scotts Miracle-Gro00313.25
China Green Agriculture0000N/A

The Scotts Miracle-Gro presently has a consensus target price of $250.00, indicating a potential upside of 4.94%. Given The Scotts Miracle-Gro's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe The Scotts Miracle-Gro is more favorable than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

63.1% of The Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. 27.2% of The Scotts Miracle-Gro shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Scotts Miracle-Gro beats China Green Agriculture on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

The Mosaic (NYSE:MOS) and China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The Mosaic and China Green Agriculture's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Mosaic$8.91 billion1.42$-1,067,400,000.00$0.19176.11
China Green Agriculture$249.24 million0.34$-136,750,000.00N/AN/A

China Green Agriculture has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Mosaic.

Profitability

This table compares The Mosaic and China Green Agriculture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The Mosaic-13.05%N/AN/A
China Green Agriculture-66.12%-53.71%-42.41%

Risk and Volatility

The Mosaic has a beta of 1.81, meaning that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for The Mosaic and China Green Agriculture, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The Mosaic181002.47
China Green Agriculture0000N/A

The Mosaic presently has a consensus target price of $27.9722, indicating a potential downside of 16.40%. Given The Mosaic's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe The Mosaic is more favorable than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

69.8% of The Mosaic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of The Mosaic shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Mosaic beats China Green Agriculture on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

CF Industries (NYSE:CF) and China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CF Industries and China Green Agriculture's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CF Industries$4.59 billion2.21$493 million$1.9324.51
China Green Agriculture$249.24 million0.34$-136,750,000.00N/AN/A

CF Industries has higher revenue and earnings than China Green Agriculture.

Profitability

This table compares CF Industries and China Green Agriculture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CF Industries7.00%5.14%2.34%
China Green Agriculture-66.12%-53.71%-42.41%

Risk and Volatility

CF Industries has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for CF Industries and China Green Agriculture, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CF Industries17602.36
China Green Agriculture0000N/A

CF Industries presently has a consensus target price of $43.9167, indicating a potential downside of 7.17%. Given CF Industries' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe CF Industries is more favorable than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.0% of CF Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of CF Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CF Industries beats China Green Agriculture on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

ICL Group (NYSE:ICL) and China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for ICL Group and China Green Agriculture, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
ICL Group02002.00
China Green Agriculture0000N/A

ICL Group presently has a consensus target price of $5.75, indicating a potential downside of 10.85%. Given ICL Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe ICL Group is more favorable than China Green Agriculture.

Risk and Volatility

ICL Group has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares ICL Group and China Green Agriculture's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ICL Group$5.27 billion1.57$475 million$0.3717.43
China Green Agriculture$249.24 million0.34$-136,750,000.00N/AN/A

ICL Group has higher revenue and earnings than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

7.4% of ICL Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares ICL Group and China Green Agriculture's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
ICL Group-0.12%5.99%2.56%
China Green Agriculture-66.12%-53.71%-42.41%

Summary

ICL Group beats China Green Agriculture on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Green Agriculture (NYSE:CGA) and American Vanguard (NYSE:AVD) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for China Green Agriculture and American Vanguard, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Green Agriculture0000N/A
American Vanguard0000N/A

Volatility & Risk

China Green Agriculture has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, American Vanguard has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares China Green Agriculture and American Vanguard's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Green Agriculture$249.24 million0.34$-136,750,000.00N/AN/A
American Vanguard$468.19 million1.34$13.60 million$0.4644.13

American Vanguard has higher revenue and earnings than China Green Agriculture.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

0.9% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of American Vanguard shares are held by institutional investors. 30.3% of China Green Agriculture shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of American Vanguard shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares China Green Agriculture and American Vanguard's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Green Agriculture-66.12%-53.71%-42.41%
American Vanguard2.40%3.16%1.61%

Summary

American Vanguard beats China Green Agriculture on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.


China Green Agriculture Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Nutrien logo
NTR
Nutrien
1.7$56.02+0.4%$31.94 billion$20.02 billion329.53Analyst Report
The Scotts Miracle-Gro logo
SMG
The Scotts Miracle-Gro
1.7$238.23+1.6%$13.27 billion$4.13 billion34.98Analyst Report
The Mosaic logo
MOS
The Mosaic
1.7$33.46+1.0%$12.68 billion$8.91 billion-11.66Analyst Upgrade
CF Industries logo
CF
CF Industries
2.0$47.31+0.1%$10.15 billion$4.59 billion35.84Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
ICL Group logo
ICL
ICL Group
1.6$6.45+0.0%$8.26 billion$5.27 billion17.43
American Vanguard logo
AVD
American Vanguard
0.9$20.30+0.4%$627.31 million$468.19 million54.87News Coverage
CVR Partners logo
UAN
CVR Partners
0.4$46.20+0.0%$493.97 million$404.18 million-4.91Increase in Short Interest
Marrone Bio Innovations logo
MBII
Marrone Bio Innovations
1.3$1.71+3.5%$296.66 million$29.37 million-9.00Gap Down
Calyxt logo
CLXT
Calyxt
1.3$5.58+0.5%$207.33 million$7.30 million-4.20News Coverage
Evogene logo
EVGN
Evogene
1.3$4.37+2.5%$112.53 million$750,000.00-5.39
SenesTech logo
SNES
SenesTech
1.5$1.47+2.0%$7.50 million$140,000.00-0.19Increase in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 4/17/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.