Log in

NYSE:CHRACharah Solutions Competitors & Alternatives

$3.26
+0.19 (+6.19 %)
(As of 07/3/2020 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$2.97
Now: $3.26
$3.33
50-Day Range
$1.54
MA: $1.87
$3.26
52-Week Range
$1.28
Now: $3.26
$5.73
Volume117,500 shs
Average Volume167,813 shs
Market Capitalization$97.44 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.43

Competitors

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) Vs. BRY, CEPU, SRLP, GLP, BCEI, and HESM

Should you be buying CHRA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "oils/energy" are considered alternatives and competitors to Charah Solutions, including Berry Petroleum (BRY), CENT PUERTO S A/S (CEPU), Sprague Resources (SRLP), Global Partners (GLP), Bonanza Creek Energy (BCEI), and Hess Midstream Partners (HESM).

Berry Petroleum (NASDAQ:BRY) and Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

96.9% of Berry Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.3% of Charah Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Berry Petroleum shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Berry Petroleum and Charah Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Berry Petroleum-4.58%11.05%6.25%
Charah Solutions-9.62%-57.01%-8.52%

Volatility and Risk

Berry Petroleum has a beta of 3.04, indicating that its stock price is 204% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Berry Petroleum and Charah Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Berry Petroleum07102.13
Charah Solutions11102.00

Berry Petroleum presently has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 67.01%. Charah Solutions has a consensus target price of $2.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Given Berry Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Berry Petroleum is more favorable than Charah Solutions.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Berry Petroleum and Charah Solutions' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Berry Petroleum$559.41 million0.68$43.54 million$1.353.55
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.18$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.47

Berry Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Charah Solutions. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Berry Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Berry Petroleum beats Charah Solutions on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

CENT PUERTO S A/S (NYSE:CEPU) and Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

4.5% of CENT PUERTO S A/S shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.3% of Charah Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares CENT PUERTO S A/S and Charah Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CENT PUERTO S A/S21.16%11.97%6.07%
Charah Solutions-9.62%-57.01%-8.52%

Volatility and Risk

CENT PUERTO S A/S has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for CENT PUERTO S A/S and Charah Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CENT PUERTO S A/S12001.67
Charah Solutions11102.00

CENT PUERTO S A/S presently has a consensus target price of $7.50, suggesting a potential upside of 198.80%. Charah Solutions has a consensus target price of $2.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Given CENT PUERTO S A/S's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe CENT PUERTO S A/S is more favorable than Charah Solutions.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CENT PUERTO S A/S and Charah Solutions' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CENT PUERTO S A/S$606.52 million0.63$182.34 million$0.992.54
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.18$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.47

CENT PUERTO S A/S has higher revenue and earnings than Charah Solutions. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CENT PUERTO S A/S, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

CENT PUERTO S A/S beats Charah Solutions on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) and Sprague Resources (NYSE:SRLP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Charah Solutions and Sprague Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Charah Solutions11102.00
Sprague Resources0000N/A

Charah Solutions presently has a consensus price target of $2.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Given Charah Solutions' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Charah Solutions is more favorable than Sprague Resources.

Risk & Volatility

Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sprague Resources has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Charah Solutions and Sprague Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Charah Solutions-9.62%-57.01%-8.52%
Sprague Resources1.31%39.05%3.79%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

23.3% of Charah Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 18.7% of Sprague Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Charah Solutions and Sprague Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.18$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.47
Sprague Resources$3.50 billion0.10$31.26 million$1.1013.68

Sprague Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Charah Solutions. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sprague Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Sprague Resources beats Charah Solutions on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) and Global Partners (NYSE:GLP) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Charah Solutions and Global Partners, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Charah Solutions11102.00
Global Partners22001.50

Charah Solutions presently has a consensus price target of $2.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Global Partners has a consensus price target of $14.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 47.01%. Given Global Partners' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Partners is more favorable than Charah Solutions.

Risk & Volatility

Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Partners has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its share price is 53% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Charah Solutions and Global Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Charah Solutions-9.62%-57.01%-8.52%
Global Partners0.25%11.01%1.64%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

23.3% of Charah Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Global Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.5% of Global Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Charah Solutions and Global Partners' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.18$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.47
Global Partners$13.08 billion0.03$34.49 million$1.059.29

Global Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Charah Solutions. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Global Partners beats Charah Solutions on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) and Bonanza Creek Energy (NYSE:BCEI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Charah Solutions and Bonanza Creek Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Charah Solutions-9.62%-57.01%-8.52%
Bonanza Creek Energy50.70%16.10%12.68%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Charah Solutions and Bonanza Creek Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.18$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.47
Bonanza Creek Energy$313.22 million1.05$67.07 million$3.244.88

Bonanza Creek Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Charah Solutions. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bonanza Creek Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bonanza Creek Energy has a beta of 2.15, indicating that its share price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

23.3% of Charah Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Bonanza Creek Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Charah Solutions and Bonanza Creek Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Charah Solutions11102.00
Bonanza Creek Energy01302.75

Charah Solutions presently has a consensus price target of $2.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Bonanza Creek Energy has a consensus price target of $26.50, suggesting a potential upside of 67.62%. Given Bonanza Creek Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bonanza Creek Energy is more favorable than Charah Solutions.

Summary

Bonanza Creek Energy beats Charah Solutions on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) and Hess Midstream Partners (NYSE:HESM) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Charah Solutions and Hess Midstream Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Charah Solutions-9.62%-57.01%-8.52%
Hess Midstream Partners6.41%2.06%1.97%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Charah Solutions and Hess Midstream Partners' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.18$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.47
Hess Midstream Partners$848.30 million0.38$70.10 million$1.2015.08

Hess Midstream Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Charah Solutions. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hess Midstream Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hess Midstream Partners has a beta of 2.75, suggesting that its share price is 175% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

23.3% of Charah Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.7% of Hess Midstream Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Charah Solutions and Hess Midstream Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Charah Solutions11102.00
Hess Midstream Partners01502.83

Charah Solutions currently has a consensus price target of $2.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Hess Midstream Partners has a consensus price target of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.55%. Given Hess Midstream Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hess Midstream Partners is more favorable than Charah Solutions.

Summary

Hess Midstream Partners beats Charah Solutions on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Berry Petroleum logo
BRY
Berry Petroleum
1.9$4.79+1.5%$382.04 million$559.41 million-9.58Analyst Upgrade
CENT PUERTO S A/S logo
CEPU
CENT PUERTO S A/S
2.2$2.51+3.6%$380.02 million$606.52 million2.64Analyst Upgrade
Sprague Resources logo
SRLP
Sprague Resources
1.7$15.05+0.7%$344.99 million$3.50 billion9.12Heavy News Reporting
Global Partners logo
GLP
Global Partners
2.4$9.75+0.8%$331.45 million$13.08 billion13.73Insider Buying
Bonanza Creek Energy logo
BCEI
Bonanza Creek Energy
1.9$15.81+4.2%$328.42 million$313.22 million2.14Analyst Upgrade
Heavy News Reporting
Hess Midstream Partners logo
HESM
Hess Midstream Partners
2.0$18.10+0.7%$326.31 million$848.30 million14.48
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure logo
SOI
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure
2.3$7.12+1.0%$322.42 million$241.69 million11.67Heavy News Reporting
W&T Offshore logo
WTI
W&T Offshore
2.2$2.26+0.4%$320.42 million$534.90 million1.73Analyst Upgrade
QEP Resources logo
QEP
QEP Resources
2.0$1.32+1.5%$313.71 million$1.21 billion0.81
Baytex Energy logo
BTE
Baytex Energy
1.4$0.51+1.9%$288.29 million$1.36 billion-0.15
Oasis Midstream Partners logo
OMP
Oasis Midstream Partners
2.3$8.17+8.2%$288.07 million$271.62 million4.49
Tellurian logo
TELL
Tellurian
1.4$1.10+3.2%$283.62 million$28.77 million-1.53
Oil States International logo
OIS
Oil States International
1.5$4.52+2.0%$275.45 million$1.02 billion-0.43
FLMN
Falcon Minerals
2.6$3.18+0.0%$273.46 million$68.46 million13.25
Peabody Energy logo
BTU
Peabody Energy
1.6$2.75+0.4%$268.67 million$4.62 billion-0.58
Seadrill logo
SDRL
Seadrill
0.5$0.51+7.3%$257.15 million$1.39 billion-0.02High Trading Volume
Nabors Industries logo
NBR
Nabors Industries
1.2$34.60+1.9%$252.54 million$3.05 billion-0.24
Nextdecade logo
NEXT
Nextdecade
1.3$2.04+1.5%$246.07 millionN/A0.00
Oasis Petroleum logo
OAS
Oasis Petroleum
1.8$0.75+2.7%$243.42 million$2.32 billion2.89
Centennial Resource Development logo
CDEV
Centennial Resource Development
2.3$0.88+1.1%$242.78 million$944.33 million-0.46
Matrix Service logo
MTRX
Matrix Service
1.6$9.28+0.4%$242.58 million$1.42 billion-16.57Analyst Upgrade
Keane Group logo
FRAC
Keane Group
1.8$2.30+2.6%$241.45 million$2.14 billion2.50
SunCoke Energy logo
SXC
SunCoke Energy
2.3$2.68+9.3%$221.80 million$1.60 billion-1.54
Tidewater logo
TDW
Tidewater
0.8$5.45+2.4%$219.76 million$486.55 million-1.54
RGC Resources logo
RGCO
RGC Resources
1.5$24.79+1.2%$201.75 million$68.03 million17.83
Precision Drilling logo
PDS
Precision Drilling
1.5$0.73+4.4%$200.98 million$1.05 billion-12.14Analyst Report
Earthstone Energy logo
ESTE
Earthstone Energy
2.5$2.94+2.7%$190.30 million$191.26 million2.47Analyst Upgrade
Heavy News Reporting
Gulfport Energy logo
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
2.2$1.17+0.0%$187.19 million$1.35 billion-0.09Analyst Upgrade
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
2.2$2.07+1.9%$186.09 million$820.12 million-6.90
Golar LNG Partners logo
GMLP
Golar LNG Partners
2.0$2.67+1.1%$185.04 million$299.65 million-53.40Analyst Upgrade
Heavy News Reporting
Exterran logo
EXTN
Exterran
1.6$5.28+1.1%$175.04 million$1.32 billion-1.51Heavy News Reporting
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P logo
CLMT
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P
0.9$2.13+1.9%$166.05 million$3.45 billion-2.29
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
1.4$13.55+0.3%$162.19 million$837.28 million-1.61Analyst Upgrade
Natural Resource Partners logo
NRP
Natural Resource Partners
1.7$12.40+1.2%$152.04 million$263.93 million-1.76
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
0.8$3.26+0.0%$151.95 million$20.51 million7.09
Montage Resources logo
MR
Montage Resources
2.0$4.19+11.2%$150.06 million$634.44 million3.08
PNRG
Primeenergy Resources
0.7$75.24+5.2%$150.04 million$104.82 million15.39
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.3$9.60+2.0%$145.52 million$471.22 million0.53
Denbury Resources logo
DNR
Denbury Resources
1.6$0.28+0.0%$141.82 million$1.27 billion0.43
Consol Energy logo
CEIX
Consol Energy
1.7$5.17+3.1%$134.57 million$1.43 billion2.20Analyst Upgrade
Heavy News Reporting
CONSOL Coal Resources logo
CCR
CONSOL Coal Resources
1.6$4.04+1.2%$111.73 million$332.93 million3.70Analyst Upgrade
Heavy News Reporting
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust logo
SJT
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust
0.6$2.27+2.2%$105.81 million$9.93 million16.21
Whiting Petroleum logo
WLL
Whiting Petroleum
1.5$1.15+2.6%$105.12 million$1.57 billion-0.03
Summit Midstream Partners logo
SMLP
Summit Midstream Partners
1.2$1.01+0.0%$95.50 million$443.53 million-0.25Analyst Downgrade
Ramaco Resources logo
METC
Ramaco Resources
2.3$2.20+1.4%$93.97 million$230.21 million4.40Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.4$6.54+4.3%$88.04 million$78.44 million-9.08
EPSN
Epsilon Energy
1.4$3.05+4.3%$80.22 million$26.69 million10.89
Flotek Industries logo
FTK
Flotek Industries
0.8$1.28+3.9%$75.46 million$119.35 million-0.58
Noble logo
NE
Noble
1.3$0.30+0.0%$75.14 million$1.31 billion-0.04
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
1.5$1.27+2.4%$72.97 million$84.52 million-1.31
This page was last updated on 7/4/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for $1.00

Sign up for MarketBeat All Access to gain access to MarketBeat's full suite of research tools:

  • Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

    View the latest news, buy/sell ratings, SEC filings and insider transactions for your stocks. Compare your portfolio performance to leading indices and get personalized stock ideas based on your portfolio.

  • Stock Ideas and Recommendations

    Get daily stock ideas top-performing Wall Street analysts. Get short term trading ideas from the MarketBeat Idea Engine. View which stocks are hot on social media with MarketBeat's trending stocks report.

  • Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

    Identify stocks that meet your criteria using seven unique stock screeners. See what's happening in the market right now with MarketBeat's real-time news feed. Export data to Excel for your own analysis.

Start Your Risk-Free Trial Subscription Here

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.