S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
pixel
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
pixel
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
pixel
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
pixel
Log in
NYSE:CHRA

Charah Solutions Competitors

$3.65
-0.36 (-8.98 %)
(As of 03/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$3.63
Now: $3.65
$4.04
50-Day Range
$2.68
MA: $3.89
$4.69
52-Week Range
$1.28
Now: $3.65
$5.75
Volume80,154 shs
Average Volume944,718 shs
Market Capitalization$109.47 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta0.26

Competitors

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) Vs. LPI, HESM, BRY, BTU, FLMN, and MTRX

Should you be buying CHRA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "oils/energy" are considered alternatives and competitors to Charah Solutions, including Laredo Petroleum (LPI), Hess Midstream (HESM), Berry Petroleum (BRY), Peabody Energy (BTU), Falcon Minerals (FLMN), and Matrix Service (MTRX).

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) and Laredo Petroleum (NYSE:LPI) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Charah Solutions and Laredo Petroleum, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Charah Solutions10001.00
Laredo Petroleum13402.38

Charah Solutions presently has a consensus price target of $1.25, suggesting a potential downside of 65.75%. Laredo Petroleum has a consensus price target of $22.50, suggesting a potential downside of 34.04%. Given Laredo Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Laredo Petroleum is more favorable than Charah Solutions.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Charah Solutions and Laredo Petroleum's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.20$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.88
Laredo Petroleum$837.28 million0.49$-342,460,000.00$14.802.30

Charah Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Laredo Petroleum. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Laredo Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Charah Solutions and Laredo Petroleum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Charah Solutions-7.05%-59.84%-6.32%
Laredo Petroleum-111.63%23.92%6.68%

Risk & Volatility

Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Laredo Petroleum has a beta of 4.72, meaning that its stock price is 372% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

33.0% of Charah Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.7% of Laredo Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Laredo Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Laredo Petroleum beats Charah Solutions on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hess Midstream (NYSE:HESM) and Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

63.2% of Hess Midstream shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.0% of Charah Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Hess Midstream and Charah Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hess Midstream3.11%1.65%1.56%
Charah Solutions-7.05%-59.84%-6.32%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Hess Midstream and Charah Solutions, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hess Midstream01602.86
Charah Solutions10001.00

Hess Midstream currently has a consensus price target of $21.5714, suggesting a potential downside of 5.06%. Charah Solutions has a consensus price target of $1.25, suggesting a potential downside of 65.75%. Given Hess Midstream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hess Midstream is more favorable than Charah Solutions.

Volatility & Risk

Hess Midstream has a beta of 2.33, meaning that its share price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Hess Midstream and Charah Solutions' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hess Midstream$848.30 million0.48$70.10 million$1.2018.93
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.20$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.88

Hess Midstream has higher revenue and earnings than Charah Solutions. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hess Midstream, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Hess Midstream beats Charah Solutions on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) and Berry Petroleum (NASDAQ:BRY) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Charah Solutions and Berry Petroleum's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.20$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.88
Berry Petroleum$559.41 million0.73$43.54 million$1.353.76

Berry Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Charah Solutions. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Berry Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Charah Solutions and Berry Petroleum's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Charah Solutions-7.05%-59.84%-6.32%
Berry Petroleum-35.49%8.20%4.51%

Risk & Volatility

Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Berry Petroleum has a beta of 2.94, indicating that its stock price is 194% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Charah Solutions and Berry Petroleum, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Charah Solutions10001.00
Berry Petroleum12102.00

Charah Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $1.25, suggesting a potential downside of 65.75%. Berry Petroleum has a consensus target price of $5.1667, suggesting a potential upside of 1.71%. Given Berry Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Berry Petroleum is more favorable than Charah Solutions.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

33.0% of Charah Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Berry Petroleum shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Berry Petroleum shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Berry Petroleum beats Charah Solutions on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) and Peabody Energy (NYSE:BTU) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Charah Solutions and Peabody Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.20$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.88
Peabody Energy$4.62 billion0.08$-211,300,000.00$0.547.35

Charah Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peabody Energy. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peabody Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Charah Solutions and Peabody Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Charah Solutions-7.05%-59.84%-6.32%
Peabody Energy-62.27%-19.80%-6.40%

Volatility & Risk

Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Peabody Energy has a beta of 1.68, indicating that its share price is 68% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Charah Solutions and Peabody Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Charah Solutions10001.00
Peabody Energy04002.00

Charah Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $1.25, suggesting a potential downside of 65.75%. Peabody Energy has a consensus target price of $3.50, suggesting a potential downside of 11.84%. Given Peabody Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Peabody Energy is more favorable than Charah Solutions.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

33.0% of Charah Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.7% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Peabody Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Peabody Energy beats Charah Solutions on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) and Falcon Minerals (NASDAQ:FLMN) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Charah Solutions and Falcon Minerals' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.20$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.88
Falcon Minerals$68.46 million5.43$14.35 million$0.3113.94

Falcon Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Charah Solutions. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Falcon Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Charah Solutions and Falcon Minerals' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Charah Solutions-7.05%-59.84%-6.32%
Falcon Minerals10.72%1.90%1.60%

Volatility & Risk

Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Falcon Minerals has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its share price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Charah Solutions and Falcon Minerals, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Charah Solutions10001.00
Falcon Minerals03202.40

Charah Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $1.25, suggesting a potential downside of 65.75%. Falcon Minerals has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.41%. Given Falcon Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Falcon Minerals is more favorable than Charah Solutions.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

33.0% of Charah Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Falcon Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Falcon Minerals beats Charah Solutions on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Charah Solutions (NYSE:CHRA) and Matrix Service (NASDAQ:MTRX) are both small-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Charah Solutions and Matrix Service's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Charah Solutions$554.87 million0.20$-42,060,000.00($0.94)-3.88
Matrix Service$1.10 billion0.34$-33,070,000.00$0.4035.03

Matrix Service has higher revenue and earnings than Charah Solutions. Charah Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matrix Service, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Charah Solutions and Matrix Service's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Charah Solutions-7.05%-59.84%-6.32%
Matrix Service-4.47%0.52%0.30%

Volatility & Risk

Charah Solutions has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Matrix Service has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Charah Solutions and Matrix Service, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Charah Solutions10001.00
Matrix Service0000N/A

Charah Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $1.25, suggesting a potential downside of 65.75%. Given Charah Solutions' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Charah Solutions is more favorable than Matrix Service.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

33.0% of Charah Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Matrix Service shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Charah Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Matrix Service shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Matrix Service beats Charah Solutions on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Charah Solutions Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Laredo Petroleum logo
LPI
Laredo Petroleum
0.9$34.11-2.0%$409.97 million$837.28 million-0.50High Trading Volume
Gap Down
Hess Midstream logo
HESM
Hess Midstream
1.9$22.72-0.8%$409.60 million$848.30 million18.47News Coverage
Berry Petroleum logo
BRY
Berry Petroleum
1.1$5.08-0.6%$406.06 million$559.41 million-1.96
Peabody Energy logo
BTU
Peabody Energy
1.3$3.97-5.0%$390.03 million$4.62 billion-0.19Gap Down
FLMN
Falcon Minerals
1.3$4.32-2.1%$371.93 million$68.46 million43.20Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Matrix Service logo
MTRX
Matrix Service
1.1$14.01-1.3%$371.41 million$1.10 billion-8.81
CONSOL Energy logo
CEIX
CONSOL Energy
1.2$10.71-3.0%$364.47 million$1.43 billion-31.50
NGL Energy Partners logo
NGL
NGL Energy Partners
2.0$2.71-3.7%$350.05 million$7.58 billion-1.09
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
1.3$3.84-2.6%$349.26 million$820.12 million-4.36
TETRA Technologies logo
TTI
TETRA Technologies
0.9$2.63-1.5%$331.32 million$1.04 billion-2.25Increase in Short Interest
Calumet Specialty Products Partners logo
CLMT
Calumet Specialty Products Partners
0.7$4.22-2.8%$329.03 million$3.45 billion-3.22Earnings Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
Central Puerto logo
CEPU
Central Puerto
1.4$2.11-1.9%$319.46 million$606.52 million3.30Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Precision Drilling logo
PDS
Precision Drilling
1.1$23.20-4.1%$310.09 million$1.05 billion-5.27
Torchlight Energy Resources logo
TRCH
Torchlight Energy Resources
0.6$2.12-25.0%$302.33 million$750,000.00-10.60Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
Aemetis logo
AMTX
Aemetis
0.6$13.80-26.0%$301.06 million$202 million-9.86Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Gap Up
Sunworks logo
SUNW
Sunworks
0.7$11.11-21.1%$264.81 million$59.83 million-7.66Gap Up
Mammoth Energy Services logo
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services
0.9$5.72-5.4%$261.80 million$625.01 million-1.65
Penn Virginia logo
PVAC
Penn Virginia
1.2$16.45-4.2%$250.04 million$471.22 million-1.46Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Golar LNG Partners logo
GMLP
Golar LNG Partners
1.7$3.50-0.3%$247.58 million$299.65 million9.46Decrease in Short Interest
Contura Energy logo
CTRA
Contura Energy
1.4$13.34-3.1%$244.24 million$2.29 billion-0.50
VIST
Vista Oil & Gas
0.6$2.70-3.7%$235.72 million$415.98 million-1.76Gap Down
Natural Resource Partners logo
NRP
Natural Resource Partners
1.6$18.00-2.0%$220.70 million$263.93 million-0.89
Orbital Energy Group logo
OEG
Orbital Energy Group
1.6$4.77-17.2%$220.69 million$23.49 million-9.17
NextDecade logo
NEXT
NextDecade
1.4$1.74-14.9%$209.70 millionN/A0.00Decrease in Short Interest
PBT
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
1.1$4.34-0.0%$202.29 million$20.51 million14.00
BATL
Battalion Oil
0.3$12.40-4.0%$200.93 millionN/A-1.14High Trading Volume
RGC Resources logo
RGCO
RGC Resources
1.1$23.15-0.4%$190.18 million$63.08 million17.81
VAALCO Energy logo
EGY
VAALCO Energy
0.6$3.17-0.9%$182.14 million$84.52 million-4.23Upcoming Earnings
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust logo
SJT
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust
0.7$3.80-4.5%$177.12 million$9.93 million34.55
Ramaco Resources logo
METC
Ramaco Resources
2.3$4.10-8.5%$174.81 million$230.21 million82.00Analyst Upgrade
SPI
SPI Energy
0.5$7.42-8.0%$165.77 million$97.88 million0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Up
Exterran logo
EXTN
Exterran
1.8$4.84-3.1%$160.34 million$1.32 billion-1.07Earnings Announcement
Flotek Industries logo
FTK
Flotek Industries
0.6$2.09-10.5%$152.77 million$119.35 million-0.82Upcoming Earnings
SandRidge Energy logo
SD
SandRidge Energy
0.5$4.15-27.5%$149.10 million$266.85 million-0.28High Trading Volume
BORR
Borr Drilling
1.0$1.30-12.3%$143.09 million$334.10 million-0.49High Trading Volume
Gap Up
HTOO
Fusion Fuel Green
0.0$14.76-1.0%$140.52 millionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Natural Gas Services Group logo
NGS
Natural Gas Services Group
1.6$10.09-3.0%$135.90 million$78.44 million72.07Increase in Short Interest
AMPY
Amplify Energy
1.0$3.45-5.5%$129.91 million$275.58 million-0.29Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Smart Sand logo
SND
Smart Sand
1.2$2.78-7.6%$121.26 million$233.07 million2.55Earnings Announcement
Gap Up
Forum Energy Technologies logo
FET
Forum Energy Technologies
0.8$21.40-4.5%$119.33 million$956.50 million-1.57Analyst Upgrade
KLXE
KLX Energy Services
1.3$13.12-6.6%$111.65 million$544 million-0.20Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
U.S. Well Services logo
USWS
U.S. Well Services
1.0$1.48-12.2%$109.62 million$514.76 million-0.34Decrease in Short Interest
VVPR
VivoPower International
0.0$7.99-2.6%$107.89 million$48.70 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
VVPR
VivoPower International
0.0$7.99-2.6%$107.89 million$48.70 million0.00Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
Nine Energy Service logo
NINE
Nine Energy Service
0.6$3.37-0.0%$106.36 million$832.94 million-0.18Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
TransGlobe Energy logo
TGA
TransGlobe Energy
1.0$1.46-0.7%$105.91 million$278.93 million-1.28Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
PNRG
PrimeEnergy Resources
0.8$48.26-2.8%$96.23 million$104.82 million0.00Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
SilverBow Resources logo
SBOW
SilverBow Resources
1.5$8.02-5.5%$95.74 million$288.63 million-0.31Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Blueknight Energy Partners logo
BKEP
Blueknight Energy Partners
0.9$2.22-0.9%$91.46 million$371.07 million-15.86Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
CSI Compressco logo
CCLP
CSI Compressco
0.6$1.92-0.5%$90.92 million$476.58 million-1.78Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/5/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.