China Distance Education Competitors

Hailiang Education Group (NASDAQ:HLG) and China Distance Education (NYSE:DL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

14.9% of China Distance Education shares are held by institutional investors. 41.6% of China Distance Education shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Hailiang Education Group has a beta of -0.12, indicating that its share price is 112% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Distance Education has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Hailiang Education Group and China Distance Education, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hailiang Education Group and China Distance Education's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Hailiang Education Group has higher revenue and earnings than China Distance Education.

Profitability

This table compares Hailiang Education Group and China Distance Education's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

China Distance Education beats Hailiang Education Group on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Stride (NYSE:LRN) and China Distance Education (NYSE:DL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Stride has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Distance Education has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Stride and China Distance Education's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Stride has higher revenue and earnings than China Distance Education. China Distance Education is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stride, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Stride and China Distance Education, as reported by MarketBeat.

Stride currently has a consensus price target of $44.25, suggesting a potential upside of 60.50%. Given Stride's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Stride is more favorable than China Distance Education.

Profitability

This table compares Stride and China Distance Education's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

87.1% of Stride shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.9% of China Distance Education shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Stride shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.6% of China Distance Education shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Stride beats China Distance Education on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Distance Education (NYSE:DL) and Perdoceo Education (NASDAQ:PRDO) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

China Distance Education has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Perdoceo Education has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Distance Education and Perdoceo Education's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Perdoceo Education has higher revenue and earnings than China Distance Education. Perdoceo Education is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Distance Education, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for China Distance Education and Perdoceo Education, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Perdoceo Education has a consensus target price of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 63.93%. Given Perdoceo Education's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Perdoceo Education is more favorable than China Distance Education.

Profitability

This table compares China Distance Education and Perdoceo Education's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.9% of China Distance Education shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of Perdoceo Education shares are held by institutional investors. 41.6% of China Distance Education shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Perdoceo Education shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Perdoceo Education beats China Distance Education on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Distance Education (NYSE:DL) and Arco Platform (NASDAQ:ARCE) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

China Distance Education has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arco Platform has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Distance Education and Arco Platform's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

China Distance Education has higher revenue and earnings than Arco Platform. China Distance Education is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arco Platform, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for China Distance Education and Arco Platform, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Arco Platform has a consensus target price of $48.50, suggesting a potential upside of 99.10%. Given Arco Platform's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Arco Platform is more favorable than China Distance Education.

Profitability

This table compares China Distance Education and Arco Platform's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.9% of China Distance Education shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Arco Platform shares are held by institutional investors. 41.6% of China Distance Education shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Arco Platform beats China Distance Education on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Distance Education (NYSE:DL) and Vasta Platform (NASDAQ:VSTA) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Distance Education and Vasta Platform's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

China Distance Education has higher revenue and earnings than Vasta Platform.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for China Distance Education and Vasta Platform, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Vasta Platform has a consensus target price of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 118.71%. Given Vasta Platform's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vasta Platform is more favorable than China Distance Education.

Profitability

This table compares China Distance Education and Vasta Platform's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.9% of China Distance Education shares are held by institutional investors. 41.6% of China Distance Education shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

China Distance Education beats Vasta Platform on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Distance Education (NYSE:DL) and iHuman (NYSE:IH) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Distance Education and iHuman's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

China Distance Education has higher revenue and earnings than iHuman.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for China Distance Education and iHuman, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

iHuman has a consensus target price of $26.10, suggesting a potential upside of 171.88%. Given iHuman's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe iHuman is more favorable than China Distance Education.

Profitability

This table compares China Distance Education and iHuman's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

14.9% of China Distance Education shares are held by institutional investors. 41.6% of China Distance Education shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

China Distance Education beats iHuman on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.